Literature DB >> 35130099

Beyond forced telehealth adoption: A framework to sustain telehealth among allied health services.

Emma E Thomas1,2, Monica L Taylor1,2, Elizabeth C Ward3, Rita Hwang1,4, Renee Cook1,2,3,4, Julie-Anne Ross4, Clare Webb5, Michael Harris6, Carina Hartley7, Phillip Carswell8, Clare L Burns9, Liam J Caffery1,2.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: As COVID-19 restrictions reduce globally, services will determine what components of care will continue via telehealth. We aimed to determine the clinician, service, and system level factors that influence sustained use of telehealth and develop a framework to enhance sustained use where appropriate.
METHODS: This study was conducted across 16 allied health departments over four health service facilities (Brisbane, Australia). It used a multi-method observational study design, involving telehealth service activity data from hospital administrative databases and qualitative interviews with allied health staff (n  =  80). Data were integrated and analysed using Greenhalgh's Non-adoption, Abandonment, Scale-up, Spread, and Sustainability framework.
RESULTS: Increased telehealth use during the peak COVID period reverted to in-person activity as restrictions eased. Telehealth is unlikely to be sustained without a clear strategy including determination of roles and responsibilities across the organisation. Clinician resistance due to forced adoption remains a key issue. The main motivator for clinicians to use telehealth was improved consumer-centred care. Benefits beyond this are needed to sustain telehealth and improvements are required to make the telehealth experience seamless for providers and recipients. Data were synthesised into a comprehensive framework that can be used as a blueprint for system-wide improvements and service enhancement or redesign. DISCUSSION: Sustainability of telehealth activity beyond the peak COVID period is unlikely without implementation strategies to address consumer, clinician, service, and system factors. The framework can inform how these strategies can be enacted. Whilst developed for allied health disciplines, it is likely applicable to other disciplines.

Entities:  

Keywords:  NASSS; Telehealth; allied health; sustainability

Year:  2022        PMID: 35130099     DOI: 10.1177/1357633X221074499

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Telemed Telecare        ISSN: 1357-633X            Impact factor:   6.344


  4 in total

1.  Technology-supported models of nutrition care: Perspectives of health service providers.

Authors:  Amandine Barnett; Jaimon T Kelly; Charlene Wright; Katrina L Campbell
Journal:  Digit Health       Date:  2022-06-03

2.  Telemedicine or In-Person: Referral Letter Content Influencing How a Patient Receives Treatment.

Authors:  Edwin Phillip Greenup; Matthew Page; Daniel Best; Stephanie Ferdinands; Natalie Atkins
Journal:  Telemed Rep       Date:  2022-05-03

Review 3.  Telepractice and Dysphagia Management: The Era of COVID-19 and Beyond.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Ward; Madeline Raatz; Jeanne Marshall; Laurelie R Wishart; Clare L Burns
Journal:  Dysphagia       Date:  2022-04-15       Impact factor: 2.733

4.  "I was Unsure at First": A Qualitative Evaluation of Patient Perceptions of VA Clinical Video Telehealth Visits in the V-IMPACT Program.

Authors:  Ashley C Mog; Megan Moldestad; Rachael Kenney; Lauren Stevenson; Marcie Lee; P Michael Ho; George G Sayre
Journal:  J Patient Exp       Date:  2022-07-03
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.