Alisha Lussiez1, Ryan Eton, Maia Anderson, Valeria Valbuena, Darrell Campbell, Michael Englesbe, Ryan Howard. 1. Department of Surgery, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI Center for Healthcare Outcomes and Policy, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI National Clinician Scholars Program, University of Michigan, Ann Arbor, MI Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative, Ann Arbor, MI.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in 30-day postoperative outcomes and individual hospital variation in outcomes from 2012-2019 in a collaborative quality improvement network. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Collaborative quality improvement efforts have been shown to improve postoperative outcomes overall, however, heterogeneity in improvement between participating hospitals remains unclear. Understanding the distribution of individual hospital-level changes is necessary to inform resource allocation and policy design. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 51 hospitals in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) from 2012-2019. Risk- and reliability-adjusted hospital rates of 30-day mortality, complications, serious complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and reoperations were calculated for each year and compared between the last two years and the first two years of the study period. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the rates of all 5 adverse outcomes across MSQC hospitals from 2012-2019. Of the 51 individual hospitals, 31 (61%) hospitals achieved a decrease in mortality (range -1.3 percentage points to +0.6 percentage points), 40 (78%) achieved a decrease in complications (range -8.5 percentage points to +2.9 percentage points), 26 (51%) achieved a decrease in serious complications (range -3.2 percentage points to +3.0 percentage points), 29 (57%) achieved a decrease in ED visits (range 5.0 percentage points to +2.2 percentage points), 46 (90%) achieved a decrease in readmissions (range -3.1 percentage points to +0.4 percentage points) and 39 (76%) achieved a decrease in reoperations (range 3.3 percentage points to +1.0 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS: Despite overall improvement in surgical outcomes across hospitals participating in a quality improvement collaborative, there was substantial variation in improvement between hospitals, highlighting opportunities to better understand hospital-level barriers and facilitators to surgical quality improvement.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate changes in 30-day postoperative outcomes and individual hospital variation in outcomes from 2012-2019 in a collaborative quality improvement network. SUMMARY BACKGROUND DATA: Collaborative quality improvement efforts have been shown to improve postoperative outcomes overall, however, heterogeneity in improvement between participating hospitals remains unclear. Understanding the distribution of individual hospital-level changes is necessary to inform resource allocation and policy design. METHODS: We performed a retrospective cohort study of 51 hospitals in the Michigan Surgical Quality Collaborative (MSQC) from 2012-2019. Risk- and reliability-adjusted hospital rates of 30-day mortality, complications, serious complications, emergency department (ED) visits, readmissions, and reoperations were calculated for each year and compared between the last two years and the first two years of the study period. RESULTS: There was a significant decrease in the rates of all 5 adverse outcomes across MSQC hospitals from 2012-2019. Of the 51 individual hospitals, 31 (61%) hospitals achieved a decrease in mortality (range -1.3 percentage points to +0.6 percentage points), 40 (78%) achieved a decrease in complications (range -8.5 percentage points to +2.9 percentage points), 26 (51%) achieved a decrease in serious complications (range -3.2 percentage points to +3.0 percentage points), 29 (57%) achieved a decrease in ED visits (range 5.0 percentage points to +2.2 percentage points), 46 (90%) achieved a decrease in readmissions (range -3.1 percentage points to +0.4 percentage points) and 39 (76%) achieved a decrease in reoperations (range 3.3 percentage points to +1.0 percentage points). CONCLUSIONS: Despite overall improvement in surgical outcomes across hospitals participating in a quality improvement collaborative, there was substantial variation in improvement between hospitals, highlighting opportunities to better understand hospital-level barriers and facilitators to surgical quality improvement.
Authors: Ryan Howard; Anne Ehlers; Lia Delaney; Quintin Solano; Mary Shen; Michael Englesbe; Justin Dimick; Dana Telem Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-07-18 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Ryan Howard; Anne Ehlers; Lia Delaney; Quintin Solano; Brian Fry; Michael Englesbe; Justin Dimick; Dana Telem Journal: Surg Endosc Date: 2022-07-25 Impact factor: 3.453
Authors: Ellen Coeckelberghs; Kris Vanhaecht; Deborah Seys; Bianca Cox; Gabriele Bislenghi; Albert M Wolthuis; André D'Hoore Journal: Ann Surg Date: 2022-08-02 Impact factor: 13.787