| Literature DB >> 35128275 |
Ingrid Grunert1, Katrin Heinrich1, Juliane Ernst1, Michael Hingar1, Alexandre Briguet2, Michael Leiss1, Manfred Wuhrer3, Dietmar Reusch1, Patrick Bulau2.
Abstract
In recent years, a variety of new antibody formats have been developed. One of these formats allows the binding of one type of antibody to two different epitopes. This can for example be achieved by introduction of the "knob-into-hole" format and a combined CrossMab approach. Due to their complexity, these bispecific antibodies are expected to result in an enhanced variety of different degradation products. Reports on the stability of these molecules are still largely lacking. To address this, a panel of stress conditions, including elevated temperature, pH, oxidizing agents, and forced glycation via glucose incubation, to identify and functionally evaluate critical quality attributes in the complementary-determining and conserved regions of a bispecific antibody was applied in this study. The exertion of various stress conditions combined with an assessment by size exclusion chromatography, ion exchange chromatography, LC-MS/MS peptide mapping, and functional evaluation by cell-based assays was adequate to identify chemical modification sites and assess the stability and integrity, as well as the functionality of a bispecific antibody. Stress conditions induced size variants and post-translational modifications, such as isomerization, deamidation, and oxidation, albeit to a modest extent. Of note, all the observed stress conditions largely maintained functionality. In summary, this study revealed the pronounced stability of IgG1 "knob-into-hole" bispecific CrossMab antibodies compared to already marketed antibody products.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35128275 PMCID: PMC8811765 DOI: 10.1021/acsomega.1c06305
Source DB: PubMed Journal: ACS Omega ISSN: 2470-1343
Figure 1Schematic illustration of the bsAb1 structure, an IgG1 bispecific antibody of the knob-into-hole format combined with the CrossMab (CH1-CL) format. Red lines indicate the disulfide bonds between two cysteines.
Overview of bsAb1 Selected Stress Conditions
| stress study name | applied stress condition |
|---|---|
| negative control | dialysis in formulation buffer |
| thermal stress | 40 °C, 4 weeks |
| physiological stress | PBS, pH 7.4, 37 °C, 14 days |
| low pH stress | pH 4.0, 25 °C, 5 days |
| high pH + thermal stress | pH 9.0, 37 °C, 7 days |
| high pH stress | pH 9.0, 25 °C, 7 days |
| oxidative stress | 0.015% H2O2, 25 °C, 18 h |
| glucose + thermal stress | 1 M glucose, 37 °C, 7 days |
Figure 2(A) Size variant distribution by SEC-UV and (B) deconvoluted intact mass spectra of main peak detected by near-native SEC-UV-MS of stressed bsAb1 CrossMab (for assignment of the stress conditions, see the left side of Panel A)—stacked zoom. The top chromatogram/mass spectra show exemplarily the assignment of the different variants.
Quantitative Assessment of bsAb1 Chemical and Post-Translational Modification Sites under Various Stress Conditions by Tryptic LC–MS/MS Peptide Mappinga
| modification [%] | peptide name | stress
study | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| negative control | thermal stress | physiological stress | low pH stress | high pH + thermal stress | high pH stress | oxidative stress | glucose + thermal stress | ||
| N-terminal | HC1-E1-pyrE | 3.6 | 5.0 | 4.4 | 4.4 | 5.7 | 4.2 | 3.8 | 4.0 |
| HC2-Q1-pyrE | 98.1 | 99.8 | 99.9 | 99.3 | 98.6 | 98.3 | 98.1 | 98.3 | |
| asparagine deamidation/succinimide formation | LC2-N25-deam | 0.4 | 0.9 | 0.6 | 0.5 | 1.6 | 0.8 | 0.5 | 0.7 |
| HC2-N52/N54/N59-deam | 0.3 | 1.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.6 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.4 | |
| HC1-N84-deam | 0.3 | 0.4 | 0.5 | 0.3 | 1.7 | 0.8 | 0.2 | 0.4 | |
| HC1’LC2-N165’152-deam | 2.0 | 3.3 | 2.6 | 2.6 | 4.5 | 3.2 | 2.7 | 2.4 | |
| HC1’HC2-N390/395’N400/405-deam | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.7 | 0.3 | 10.2 | 3.6 | 0.3 | 0.5 | |
| HC1’HC2-N390/395’N400/405-suc | 1.8 | 2.0 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 2.9 | 2.1 | 1.8 | 2.0 | |
| aspartate isomerization/succinimide formation | HC2-D106-iso | 3.2 | 16.1 | 7.7 | 3.7 | 6.0 | 3.9 | 1.1 | 6.0 |
| LC2-D50-iso | 0.2 | 2.3 | 0.4 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.3 | |
| LC2-D50-suc | 1.6 | 4.3 | 1.5 | 1.5 | 0.9 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 1.1 | |
| HC1-D405/407-iso | 0.9 | 0.8 | 0.9 | 0.8 | 3.8 | 1.8 | 0.7 | 1.0 | |
| HC2-D415/417-iso | 0.9 | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 3.4 | 1.8 | 0.8 | 0.9 | |
| methionine oxidation | HC2-M124-ox | 2.2 | 4.1 | 2.9 | 2.8 | 5.4 | 4.9 | 67.3 | 2.8 |
| HC1’HC2-M258’M268-ox | 1.2 | 1.3 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.2 | 1.1 | 22.6 | 1.3 | |
| HC1’HC2-M434’M444-ox | 0.7 | 0.8 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 10.0 | 0.8 | |
| lysine glycation | HC1-K65-gly | 0.7 | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | 4.2 |
| HC1-K98-gly | 2.0 | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | 34.5 | |
| HC1-K252-gly | 0.2 | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | 1.4 | |
| LC1-K107-gly | 0.2 | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | n.q. | 1.4 | |
n.q., not quantified.
Theoretical and Observed Molecular Mass Values of bsAb1 Size Variants Detected by Near-Native SEC-UV-MS Analysis under Various Stress Conditionsa
n.d., not detected; aa, amino acid number.
Figure 3Characterization of bsAb1 charge variants by CEC; stacked UV chromatograms not normalized and expanded zoom. The top CEC chromatogram shows exemplarily the assignment of the different variants. AP, acidic peak; BP, basic peak.
Quantitative Potency Analysis of Stressed bsAb1 by Cell-Based Assays
| stress study | target 1 neutralization [%] | target 2 neutralization [%] |
|---|---|---|
| negative control | 103 | 111 |
| thermal stress | 90 | 76 |
| physiological stress | 97 | 91 |
| low pH stress | 106 | 90 |
| high pH + thermal stress | 101 | 93 |
| high pH stress | 99 | 95 |
| oxidative stress | 95 | 93 |
| glucose + thermal stress | 94 | 100 |
Data normalized to starting material (100%).