| Literature DB >> 35128096 |
Cecilia Obi Nja1, Richard Ekonesi Orim1, Hope Amba Neji1, John Okpa Ukwetang1, Uduak Edet Uwe1, Mary Anari Ideba1.
Abstract
A quasi non-equivalent, non-randomized factorial design, examined Chemistry students' attitudes towards chemistry and academic achievement in second year Bachelor of Education students taught with the flipped classroom strategy. In the study of 100 students, a pre-attitude test of 30-items questionnaire was apportioned to ascertained students' attitude towards chemistry. Pre-test was also apportioned to the control and experimental group. This was followed by teaching using the flipped classroom strategy for experimental group and the control group was taught using the traditional approach. Thereafter, students in the experimental group wrote a post attitude test. A post-test was administered to both experimental and control group. The result of the post-attitude showed a significantly higher mean when compared to the pre attitude score. The result of the analysis using sample t-test showed students having a positive attitude towards chemistry, when taught using flipped classroom. The study also sought to find out the academic achievement of students taught with and without the flipped classroom strategy. Findings from the investigation of academic achievement revealed that students' academic achievement was significantly higher than those in the conventional group. The implications of these findings are that the flipped classroom strategy could improve attitude of students towards chemistry, thereby enhancing their academic achievement. This is so as students can play the lesson videos again and again at the comfort of their homes for mastery of concept in their lesson. The result of this study is especially relevant to the learning and teaching of chemistry in secondary and tertiary institutions in developing nations, Nigeria inclusive. This is so as the teacher per student ratio is high such that the teacher cannot carry every student along in the class within the short period provided.Entities:
Keywords: Flipped classroom; Students' achievement; Teachers and attitude
Year: 2022 PMID: 35128096 PMCID: PMC8800036 DOI: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2022.e08792
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Heliyon ISSN: 2405-8440
Figure 1Features of 2 × 2 factorial design.
Design of the study.
| Group | I | Pre-test/pre attitude | Treatment (6week) | Post-test/post attitude |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Pre performance test/pre attitude | XFC | Postperformance test/Attitude test in Flipped classroom | |
| Control | I | preperformance test/pre attitude | XCL | post performance test/Attitude test |
Note. I = intact class; XFC = Flipped Classroom; XCL = Conventional Learning.
Descriptive statistics for pre and post attitude.
| Mean | N | Std. Deviation | Std.Error | |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre attitude | 40.88 | 60 | 8.675 | 1.120 |
| Post attitude | 76.73 | 60 | 14.630 | 1.889 |
Descriptive statistics for pre and post-attitude Attitudes.
| Attitudes | Mean | N | Std deviation | Std error | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Group | 1 | Simplicity | pre | 9.97 | 60 | 3.344 | .432 |
| Simplicity | post | 26.25 | 60 | 4.011 | .353 | ||
| Group | 2 | Motivation | pre | 12.37 | 60 | 3.664 | .473 |
| Motivation | post | 30.29 | 60 | 6.068 | .783 | ||
| Group | 3 | Utilization | pre | 5.77 | 60 | 1.329 | .172 |
| Utilization | post | 6.85 | 60 | 3.177 | .410 | ||
| Group | 4 | Relevance | pre | 12.77 | 60 | 3.824 | .494 |
| Relevance | post | 13.34 | 60 | 3.781 | .488 | ||
Paired Samples Test for pre and post-attitude.
| Mean | Paired Differences | Std. Error | 95%Confidence Interval of the Difference | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Std. Deviation | Mean | lower | Upper | t | df | Sig (2- tailed | ||
| Pre-attitude, post -attitude | 35.85 | 12.63 | 1.63 | -39.11 | -32.59 | 21.99 | 59 | 0.000 |
Paired samples t test of CAQ concepts.
| Mean | Std. Deviation | Std. Error Mean | 95% Confidence Interval of the Difference | t | df | Sig. (2-tailed | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Pre-simplicity, Post -simplicity | 7.27 | 4.50 | .58 | 6.10 | 8.43 | 12.50 | 59 | 000 |
| Pre-motivation, post- motivation | 5.917 | 3.19 | .41 | -6.74 | -5.09 | 14.35 | 59 | 000 |
| Pre-utilization, post-utilization | .57 | 3.32 | .43 | -1.42 | .29 | 1.32 | 59 | .191 |
| Pre-relevance, Post- relevance | .38 | 5.86 | .76 | -1.13 | 1.90 | .506 | 59 | .614 |
Mean standard deviation of influence of treatment and attitude on the academic performance of undergraduate chemistry students.
| Treatment | Attitude | Mean | Std. Deviation | N |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Experimental | Negative | 12.96 | 2.549 | 27 |
| Positive | 14.52 | 2.526 | 33 | |
| Total | 13.82 | 2.633 | 60 | |
| Control | Negative | 10.25 | 1.849 | 32 |
| Positive | 13.75 | 1.282 | 8 | |
| Total | 10.95 | 2.241 | 40 | |
| Total | Negative | 11.49 | 2.569 | 59 |
| Positive | 14.37 | 2.343 | 41 | |
| Total | 12.67 | 2.846 | 100 |
Summary of 2 × 2 analysis of covariance of influence of treatment and attitude on the academic performance of undergraduate chemistry students.
| Sources of variation | Type III Sum of Squares | df | Mean Square | F | Sig. | Partial Eta Squared |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Corrected Model | 329.078a | 4 | 82.270 | 16.522 | .000 | .410 |
| Intercept | 2766.319 | 1 | 2766.319 | 555.566 | .000 | .854 |
| Pre test | 17.674 | 1 | 17.674 | 3.549 | .063 | .036 |
| Treatment | 46.781 | 1 | 46.781 | 9.395 | .003 | .090 |
| Attitudes | 119.866 | 1 | 119.866 | 24.073 | .000 | .202 |
| Treatment Attitude | 24.440 | 1 | 24.440 | 4.908 | .029 | .049 |
| Error | 473.032 | 95 | 4.979 | |||
| Total | 16855.000 | 100 |
R Squared = .410 (Adjusted R Squared = .385).