Stuart R Stock1, Paul E Morse2,3, Michala K Stock4, Kelsey C James5, Lisa J Natanson6, Haiyan Chen7, Pavel D Shevchenko8, Evan R Maxey8, Olga A Antipova8, Jun-Sang Park8. 1. Northwestern University, Simpson Querrey Institute, Feinberg School of Medicine, Chicago Department of Cell and Developmental Biology, Illinois, United States. 2. Duke University, Department of Evolutionary Anthropology, Durham, North Carolina, United States. 3. University of Florida, Florida Museum of Natural History, Gainesville, Florida, United States. 4. Metropolitan State University of Denver, Department of Sociology and Anthropology, Denver, Colorado, United States. 5. Southwest Fisheries Science Center, National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, La Jolla, California, United States. 6. National Marine Fisheries Service, NOAA, (retired) Northeast Fisheries Science Center, Narragansett, Rhode Island, United States. 7. Stony Brook University, Mineral Physics Institute, Stony Brook, New York, United States. 8. Argonne National Laboratory, Advanced Photon Source, Lemont, Illinois, United States.
Abstract
Purpose: Tomography using diffracted x-rays produces reconstructions mapping quantities such as crystal lattice parameter(s), crystallite size, and crystallographic texture, information quite different from that obtained with absorption or phase contrast. Diffraction tomography is used to map an entire blue shark centrum with its double cone structure (corpora calcerea) and intermedialia (four wedges). Approach: Energy dispersive diffraction (EDD) and polychromatic synchrotron x-radiation at 6-BM-B, the Advanced Photon Source, were used. Different, properly oriented Bragg planes diffract different x-ray energies; these intensities are measured by one of ten energy-sensitive detectors. A pencil beam defines the irradiated volume, and a collimator before each energy-sensitive detector selects which portion of the irradiated column is sampled at any one time. Translating the specimen along X , Y , and Z axes produces a 3D map. Results: We report 3D maps of the integrated intensity of several bioapatite reflections from the mineralized cartilage centrum of a blue shark. The c axis reflection's integrated intensities and those of a reflection with no c axis component reveal that the cone wall's bioapatite is oriented with its c axes lateral, i.e., perpendicular to the backbone's axis, and that the wedges' bioapatite is oriented with its c axes axial. Absorption microcomputed tomography (laboratory and synchrotron) and x-ray excited x-ray fluorescence maps provide higher resolution views. Conclusion: The bioapatite in the cone walls and wedges is oriented to resist lateral and axial deflections, respectively. Mineralized tissue samples can be mapped in 3D with EDD tomography and subsequently studied by destructive methods.
Purpose: Tomography using diffracted x-rays produces reconstructions mapping quantities such as crystal lattice parameter(s), crystallite size, and crystallographic texture, information quite different from that obtained with absorption or phase contrast. Diffraction tomography is used to map an entire blue shark centrum with its double cone structure (corpora calcerea) and intermedialia (four wedges). Approach: Energy dispersive diffraction (EDD) and polychromatic synchrotron x-radiation at 6-BM-B, the Advanced Photon Source, were used. Different, properly oriented Bragg planes diffract different x-ray energies; these intensities are measured by one of ten energy-sensitive detectors. A pencil beam defines the irradiated volume, and a collimator before each energy-sensitive detector selects which portion of the irradiated column is sampled at any one time. Translating the specimen along X , Y , and Z axes produces a 3D map. Results: We report 3D maps of the integrated intensity of several bioapatite reflections from the mineralized cartilage centrum of a blue shark. The c axis reflection's integrated intensities and those of a reflection with no c axis component reveal that the cone wall's bioapatite is oriented with its c axes lateral, i.e., perpendicular to the backbone's axis, and that the wedges' bioapatite is oriented with its c axes axial. Absorption microcomputed tomography (laboratory and synchrotron) and x-ray excited x-ray fluorescence maps provide higher resolution views. Conclusion: The bioapatite in the cone walls and wedges is oriented to resist lateral and axial deflections, respectively. Mineralized tissue samples can be mapped in 3D with EDD tomography and subsequently studied by destructive methods.
Authors: Donald J Weidner; Michael T Vaughan; Liping Wang; Hongbo Long; Li Li; Nathaniel A Dixon; William B Durham Journal: Rev Sci Instrum Date: 2010-01 Impact factor: 1.523
Authors: Holly D Barth; Elizabeth A Zimmermann; Eric Schaible; Simon Y Tang; Tamara Alliston; Robert O Ritchie Journal: Biomaterials Date: 2011-08-31 Impact factor: 12.479
Authors: Eileen Y Brister; Zahra Vasi; Olga Antipova; Alan Robinson; Xiaodong Tan; Aditi Agarwal; Stuart R Stock; Alessandra Carriero; Claus-Peter Richter Journal: Hear Res Date: 2020-03-18 Impact factor: 3.208
Authors: Vincent Raoult; Nicholas Howell; David Zahra; Victor M Peddemors; Daryl L Howard; Martin D de Jonge; Benjamin L Buchan; Jane E Williamson Journal: PLoS One Date: 2018-01-11 Impact factor: 3.240