| Literature DB >> 35127933 |
Patcharaporn Tinchan1, Arpassorn Sirijariyawat2, Arunya Prommakool2, Kriangkrai Phattayakorn2, Soukbandith Pheungsomphane2, Chintana Tayuan2.
Abstract
Antidesma thwaitesianum Müll. Arg. or Mao is well-known in Thailand for its use in soft drinks and wine. This study investigated the potential of its fruit juice as a food preservative based on its antimicrobial activity against food-borne pathogens and spoilage. The fruit juice had antibacterial activity against Bacillus cereus TISTR1527, Staphylococcus aureus TISTR2329, Listeria monocytogenes DMST17303, Pseudomonas aeruginosa TISTR357, Salmonella Typhimurium DMST562, and Escherichia coli TISTR074. The minimum inhibitory concentration ranged from 25 to 100 mg/ml. Of significance was that the juice had excellent antifungal activities against Aspergillus flavus TISTR3135 and Penicillium digitatum ATCC10030. Furthermore, the fruit juice increased the lag time of spore germination of P. digitatum. Analysis of the phytochemical contents of the juice showed that the total phenolic and flavonoid contents were 20.07 mg GAE/g and 3.57 mg QE/g, respectively. In antioxidant activity assay, the juice exhibited moderate DPPH and ABTS+ radical scavenging and ferric-reducing activities. The addition of 5% fruit juice extended the microbial shelf life of chiffon cake. The treated chiffon cake had a shelf-life of 7 days, compared to 3 days for the untreated control. These results support the possible use of Mao fruit juice as an antimicrobial agent and a natural food preservative.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35127933 PMCID: PMC8816606 DOI: 10.1155/2022/5183562
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Int J Food Sci ISSN: 2314-5765
Extraction yield, total phenolic content (TPC), and flavonoid content (TFC) of Mao fruit juice.
| Extraction yield (%) | TPC (mg GAE/g) | TFC (mg QE/g) |
|---|---|---|
| 15.23 ± 0.81 | 20.07 ± 3.43 | 3.57 ± 0.96 |
Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). GAE: gallic acid equivalent; QE: quercetin equivalent.
Antioxidant activity of Mao fruit juice determined using DPPH, ABTS+, and FRAP testing.
| Sample | DPPH scavenging activity | ABTS+ scavenging activity | Ferric-reducing antioxidant power | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| EC50 | TEAC value | EC50 | TEAC value | FRAP value | TEAC value | |
| Juice | 72.18 ± 1.90 | 475.11 ± 12.52 | 76.95 ± 3.66 | 569.90 ± 26.57 | 184.59 ± 3.44 | 90.59 ± 1.69 |
| Trolox | 34.26 ± 0.55 | — | 43.76 ± 0.82 | — | 203.76 ± 5.44 | — |
Values are shown as mean ± standard deviation (n = 3). DPPH: 2, 2-diphenyl-2-picrylhydrazyl; ABTS: 2,2′-azino-bis (3-ethylbenzothiazoline-6-sulfonic acid) diammonium salt; FRAP: ferric-reducing antioxidant power; EC50: half maximal effective concentration; TEAC: trolox equivalent antioxidant capacity; TE: trolox equivalent.
Inhibition zones related to MIC using different Mao fruit juice concentrations.
| Juice (mg/ml) | Inhibition zone (mm) | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 25 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 9.55 ± 0.48 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| 50 | 6.29 ± 0.26 | 6.03 ± 0.02 | 21.55 ± 0.48 | 11.65 ± 1.02 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 11.42 ± 1.02 | 10.31 ± 1.36 | 16.58 ± 0.59 |
| 100 | 8.73 ± 0.64 | 7.03 ± 0.43 | 24.83 ± 0.45 | 17.61 ± 1.19 | 9.36 ± 1.28 | 18.61 ± 0.67 | 12.01 ± 1.07 | 20.43 ± 0.70 |
| 200 | 9.90 ± 0.99 | 9.48 ± 0.60 | 26.97 ± 1.52 | 20.08 ± 1.15 | 11.41 ± 1.86 | 21.06 ± 0.80 | 13.65 ± 0.49 | 24.24 ± 2.60 |
| Gentamycin | 17.52 ± 0.76 | 16.43 ± 1.59 | 18.83 ± 1.11 | 26.05 ± 0.38 | 11.75 ± 0.93 | 22.99 ± 0.23 | — | — |
| Amphotericin B | — | — | — | — | — | — | 7.99 ± 1.25 | 10.08 ± 2.31 |
| Juice (mg/ml) | MIC (mg/ml) | |||||||
| 50 | 50 | 25 | 50 | 100 | 50 | 50 | 50 | |
Effect of Mao fruit juice on spore germination of A. flavus and P. digitatum.
| Incubation time (h) | Spore germination | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Control | 50 mg/ml | 100 mg/ml | 200 mg/ml | |||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 0 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 8 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | + | — | + | — | + | — | + | — |
| 24 | + | — | + | — | + | — | + | — |
| 32 | + | + | + | — | + | — | + | — |
| 48 | + | + | + | — | + | — | + | — |
| 72 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
| 80 | + | + | + | + | + | + | + | + |
+: at least 10% of mold spores had germinated.
Microbial count of chiffon cake during storage at 4°C for 9 days.
| Samples | Period (days) | Total plate count (log CFU/g) | Yeast and mold count (log CFU/g) |
|---|---|---|---|
| Untreated chiffon cake | 1 | 1.74 | 1.74 |
| 3 | 1.30 | 1.32 | |
| 5 | 2.23 | 2.40 | |
| 7 | 2.34 | 2.59 | |
| 9 | 2.60 | 2.57 | |
| Chiffon cake with 5% Mao fruit juice | 1 | 1.58 | 1.60 |
| 3 | 2.08 | 1.00 | |
| 5 | 2.60 | 1.85 | |
| 7 | 2.81 | 1.48 | |
| 9 | 3.04 | 2.23 |