| Literature DB >> 35127507 |
Dan-Qi Wang1,2, Juan Shuai3, Hang Zheng1, Zhong-Qiang Guo1,2, Qiao Huang2, Xiao-Feng Xu4, Xiao-Dong Li5,6, Hao Zi1,2,5,6, Dao-Jing Ming2,5,6, Xuan-Yi Ren7, Xian-Tao Zeng1,2.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Limited attention has been paid to abnormal blood and urine test results for patients with bladder cancer. The present study aimed to identify whether blood and urine parameters are associated with bladder cancer.Entities:
Keywords: bladder cancer; blood test; diagnosis; urinary biomarkers; urine test
Year: 2022 PMID: 35127507 PMCID: PMC8813745 DOI: 10.3389/fonc.2021.796975
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Oncol ISSN: 2234-943X Impact factor: 6.244
Figure 1Flowchart of the selection of participants.
Demographic characteristics and routine blood parameters of the study participants.
| Characteristics | Case group(N = 360) | Control group(N = 1,050) | Chi-squared/t |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | – | Matched | ||
| Male | 289 (80.28%) | 841 (80.10%) | ||
| Female | 71 (19.72%) | 209 (19.90%) | ||
| Age (years) | 65.38 ± 13.11 | 65.18 ± 13.18 | – | Matched |
| BMI (kg/m2) | 23.84 ± 3.24 | 24.60 ± 3.34 | 3.751 | <0.001 |
| FBG (mmol/L) | 5.59 ± 1.29 | 5.94 ± 1.74 | 4.002 | <0.001 |
| Hypertension | 131 (36.39%) | 503 (47.90%) | 14.367 | <0.001 |
| RBCs (109/L) | 4.41 ± 0.53 | 4.43 ± 0.44 | 0.665 | 0.507 |
| WBCs (109/L) | 6.13 ± 1.79 | 6.32 ± 1.64 | 1.750 | 0.081 |
| Lymphocytes (109/L) | 1.61 ± 0.56 | 2.11 ± 0.62 | 14.188 | <0.001 |
| Neutrophils (109/L) | 4.03 ± 3.09 | 3.78 ± 1.37 | −1.514 | 0.131 |
| Platelets (109/L) | 193.57 ± 57.73 | 191.80 ± 52.45 | −0.514 | 0.608 |
| Serum total bilirubin (μmol/L) | 14.32 ± 6.56 | 12.65 ± 6.24 | −4.323 | <0.001 |
| Blood urea nitrogen (mmol/L) | 6.06 ± 2.20 | 5.19 ± 1.60 | −6.861 | <0.001 |
| Uric acid (μmol/L) | 352.43 ± 100.08 | 304.58 ± 79.05 | −8.233 | <0.001 |
| Creatinine (μmol/L) | 86.64 ± 32.03 | 77.70 ± 20.17 | −4.967 | <0.001 |
BMI, body mass index; FBG, fasting blood glucose; RBCs, red blood cells; WBCs, white blood cells.
Univariate conditional logistic regression for urine parameters.
| Exposures | Case group (N = 360) | Control group (N = 1,050) | OR (95% CI)* |
|
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Urine pH | 5.92 ± 0.64 | 6.17 ± 0.84 | 0.67 (0.57, 0.78) | <0.001 |
| Urine protein (g/L) | 0.47 ± 0.71 | 0.09 ± 0.36 | 4.55 (3.36, 6.15) | <0.001 |
| Urine glucose (mmol/L) | 0.13 ± 0.61 | 0.05 ± 0.30 | 1.56 (1.18, 2.05) | 0.002 |
| Urine occult blood | 1.30 ± 1.22 | 0.18 ± 0.50 | 4.27 (3.44, 5.29) | <0.001 |
OR, odds ratio.
Multivariate conditional logistic regression analysis with confounders adjustment.
| Exposures | Model 1 | Model 2 | Model 3 | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| OR (95% CI) |
| |
| Urine pH | 0.66 (0.53, 0.83) | <0.001 | 0.68 (0.53, 0.88) | 0.003 | 0.79 (0.60, 1.04) | 0.092 |
| Urine protein (g/L) | 2.11 (1.39, 3.19) | <0.001 | 1.97 (1.21, 3.19) | 0.006 | 1.83 (1.06, 3.16) | 0.031 |
| Urine glucose(mmol/L) | 2.43 (1.46, 4.07) | <0.001 | 2.61 (1.39, 4.89) | 0.003 | 2.86 (1.31, 6.26) | 0.008 |
| Urine occult blood | 3.47 (2.75, 4.38) | <0.001 | 3.54 (2.73, 4.58) | <0.001 | 3.67 (2.78, 4.86) | <0.001 |
Model 1: Adjusted for BMI, FBG, and hypertension. Model 2: Further adjusted for RBCs, WBCs, lymphocytes, neutrophils, and platelets based on model 1. Model 3: Further adjusted for serum total bilirubin, blood urea nitrogen, uric acid, and creatinine based on model 2.
BMI, body mass index; FBG, fasting blood glucose; RBCs, red blood cells; WBCs, white blood cells.
Spearman’s correlation coefficients between T stage and urine parameters.
| Variable | Urine pH ( | Urine protein ( | Urine glucose ( | Urine occult blood ( |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| T stage | 0.06 (0.26) | 0.17 (<0.01) | −0.03 (0.60) | 0.16 (<0.01) |