| Literature DB >> 35127389 |
Hongyu Sun1,2, Siyu He2,3, Li Wu2, Zeying Cao2,3, Xian Sun2,3,4, Mingwei Xu5, Shan Lu2,6, Mingdi Xu7, Baoming Ning7, Huimin Sun8,7, Tiqiao Xiao5, Peter York2, Xu Xu1, Xianzhen Yin2,4, Jiwen Zhang1,2,8.
Abstract
Changes in structure of oral solid dosage forms (OSDF) elementally determine the drug release and its therapeutic effects. In this research, synchrotron radiation X-ray micro-computed tomography was utilized to visualize the 3D structure of enteric coated pellets recovered from the gastrointestinal tract of rats. The structures of pellets in solid state and in vitro compendium media were measured. Pellets in vivo underwent morphological and structural changes which differed significantly from those in vitro compendium media. Thus, optimizations of the dissolution media were performed to mimic the appropriate in vivo conditions by introducing pepsin and glass microspheres in media. The sphericity, pellet volume, pore volume and porosity of the in vivo esomeprazole magnesium pellets in stomach for 2 h were recorded 0.47, 1.55 × 108 μm3, 0.44 × 108 μm3 and 27.6%, respectively. After adding pepsin and glass microspheres, the above parameters in vitro reached to 0.44, 1.64 × 108 μm3, 0.38 × 108 μm3 and 23.0%, respectively. Omeprazole magnesium pellets behaved similarly. The structural features of pellets between in vitro media and in vivo condition were bridged successfully in terms of 3D structures to ensure better design, characterization and quality control of advanced OSDF.Entities:
Keywords: 3D reconstruction; Enteric coated pellets; Esomeprazole magnesium; Internal 3D structure; In vivo and in vitro structure correlation; Omeprazole magnesium; Structural parameter; Synchrotron radiation X-ray micro computed tomography
Year: 2021 PMID: 35127389 PMCID: PMC8799995 DOI: 10.1016/j.apsb.2021.05.010
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Acta Pharm Sin B ISSN: 2211-3835 Impact factor: 11.413
Figure 1Schematic showing SR-μCT beam line composition.
The gastric retention ESO pellets (%) after oral administration of enteric coated pellets in rats.
| Pellet recovered in stomach (%) | Surface color of pellets | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 94.64 ± 1.40 | White |
| 1.0 | 77.20 ± 4.88 | Pink |
| 1.5 | 57.67 ± 1.70 | Lilac |
| 2.0 | 38.97 ± 9.60 | Purple |
Data were presented as means ± SD, n = 3.
The gastric retention of OME pellets (%) after oral administration of enteric coated pellets in rats (n = 3).
| Pellet recovered in stomach (%) | Surface color of pellets | |
|---|---|---|
| 0.5 | 96.37 ± 0.92 | White |
| 1.0 | 80.03 ± 3.69 | Pink |
| 1.5 | 64.72 ± 1.90 | Lilac |
| 2.0 | 40.36 ± 7.09 | Purple |
Data were presented as means ± SD, n = 3.
Figure 2The 2D structure of ESO and OME pellets at different dissolution time in vitro and in vivo via SEM. (A) ESO pellets in vitro compendium media. (B) OME pellets in vitro compendium media. (C) ESO pellets in vivo. (D) OME pellets in vivo.
Figure 3SR-μCT reconstructed 3D structure of ESO pellets with different dissolution times. (A) Structure of ESO pellets at different time points under dissolution condition in vitro. Each time point contains two types of images: the transparent outer surface of the pellets (orange color) and the internal cross section of the pellets (multiple colors). (B) Structure of ESO pellets at different time points under dissolution condition in vivo. Each time point contains two types of images: the transparent outer surface of the pellets and the internal cross section of the pellets.
Figure 4SR-μCT reconstructed 3D structure of OME pellets with different dissolution times. (A) Structure of OME pellets at different time points under dissolution condition in vitro. Each time point has two types of images: the transparent outer surface of the pellets (orange color) and the internal cross section of the pellets (multiple colors). (B) Structure of OME pellets at different time points under dissolution condition in vivo. Each time point has two types of images: the transparent outer surface of the pellets and the internal cross section of the pellets.
Figure 5The 2D structure of ESO and OME pellets at different time points after optimization of dissolution conditions via SEM. (A) ESO pellets. (B) OME pellets.
Figure 6SR-μCT reconstructed 3D structure of ESO pellets with different dissolution conditions. Each time point contains two types of images: the transparent outer surface of the pellets (orange color) and the internal cross section of the pellets (multiple colors). (A) Structure of ESO pellets with pepsin added into the compendium media. (B) Structure of ESO pellets with GM added into the compendium media. (C) Structure of ESO pellets with pepsin-GM added into the compendium media.
Figure 7SR-μCT reconstructed 3D structure of OME pellets with different dissolution conditions. Each time point contains two types of images: the transparent outer surface of the pellets (orange color) and the internal cross section of the pellets (multiple colors). (A) Structure of OME pellets with pepsin added into the compendium media. (B) Structure of OME pellets with GM added into the compendium media. (C) Structure of OME pellets with pepsin-GM added into the compendium media.
Figure 8Comparison of 3D structure parameters of ESO pellets in five dissolution medias. (A) Sphericity within 2 h. (B) Pellet volume within 2 h. (C) Pore volume within 2 h. (D) Porosity within 2 h. (E) Statistical analysis of the sphericity of 2 h. (F) Statistical analysis of the pellet volume of 2 h. (G) Statistical analysis of the pore volume of 2 h. (H) Statistical analysis of the porosity of 2 h. Herein, in vitro means in vitro compendium media. Pepsin, GM and pepsin-GM represent the dissolution conditions for introducing pepsin, GM and pepsin-GM into the in vitro compendium media. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 20). ∗P < 0.05. ∗∗P < 0.01. ∗∗∗P < 0.001. ns, not significant.
Figure 9Comparison of 3D structure parameters of OME pellets in five dissolution medias. (A) Sphericity within 2 h. (B) Pellet volume within 2 h. (C) Pore volume within 2 h. (D) Porosity within 2 h. (E) Statistical analysis of the sphericity of 2 h. (F) Statistical analysis of the pellet volume of 2 h. (G) Statistical analysis of the pore volume of 2 h. (H) Statistical analysis of the porosity of 2 h. Data are presented as mean ± SD (n = 20). ∗P < 0.05. ∗∗P < 0.01. ∗∗∗P < 0.001. ns, not significant.