Literature DB >> 35127267

Biomechanical Comparison of Dart-Throw Motions after Partial Wrist Fusions.

Dami O Oluyede1, Frederick W Werner1, Garrett Esper1, Michael Schreck1.   

Abstract

Background  Multiple partial wrist fusions exist for the management of arthritic disease. Limited information is available on their effect on wrist range of motion in the dart-throwing direction of wrist motion, even though it is used in most activities of daily living. Purpose  The purpose of this study was to measure the retained motion for different orientations of dart-throwing motion for seven different partial wrist fusions and proximal row carpectomy (PRC). Methods  Eight fresh frozen right cadavers were tested with the wrist intact and followed simulated fusions. Fusions were performed using an external fixation technique and included scaphocapitate, scapholunate (SL), capitolunate, radiolunate, radioscapholunate, scaphotrapeziotrapezoid, 4 corner fusion, and PRC. Results  In the intact wrist, the average arc of wrist motion with the wrist oriented at 20 degrees away from the flexion-extension axis was significantly larger than at any other orientation of motion. All partial wrist fusions and the PRC had significantly smaller average dart-throw arc of motion compared with intact at an orientation 20 and 25 degrees away from flexion-extension. The SL fusion provided a significantly larger arc of motion than most of the other fusions at most orientations. Conclusion/Clinical Relevance  This study provides a comprehensive compilation of the range of motion in a functional plane, "the dart-throw motion," for limited wrist fusions and PRC. These data provide the clinician with important information that can be used to educate patients regarding expectations after surgery. Thieme. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  carpal arthrodesis; dart-throwing motion

Year:  2021        PMID: 35127267      PMCID: PMC8807096          DOI: 10.1055/s-0041-1732412

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Wrist Surg        ISSN: 2163-3916


  17 in total

1.  The effects of partial carpal fusions on wrist range of motion.

Authors:  C Got; B G Vopat; P K Mansuripur; P M Kane; A P C Weiss; J J Crisco
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2015-10-09

2.  Proximal row carpectomy: study with a minimum of ten years of follow-up.

Authors:  Michael L DiDonna; Thomas R Kiefhaber; Peter J Stern
Journal:  J Bone Joint Surg Am       Date:  2004-11       Impact factor: 5.284

Review 3.  2007 IFSSH committee report of wrist biomechanics committee: biomechanics of the so-called dart-throwing motion of the wrist.

Authors:  Hisao Moritomo; Emmanuel P Apergis; Guillaume Herzberg; Frederick W Werner; Scott W Wolfe; Marc Garcia-Elias
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2007-11       Impact factor: 2.230

4.  A method of defining palpable landmarks for the ligament-splitting dorsal wrist capsulotomy.

Authors:  Richard A Berger
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 2.230

5.  In-vivo confirmation of the use of the dart thrower's motion during activities of daily living.

Authors:  G H O Brigstocke; A Hearnden; C Holt; G Whatling
Journal:  J Hand Surg Eur Vol       Date:  2012-09-12

6.  An in vitro analysis of wrist motion: the effect of limited intercarpal arthrodesis and the contributions of the radiocarpal and midcarpal joints.

Authors:  H Gellman; D Kauffman; M Lenihan; M J Botte; A Sarmiento
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1988-05       Impact factor: 2.230

7.  Degenerative arthritis of the wrist: proximal row carpectomy versus scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis.

Authors:  M S Cohen; S H Kozin
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 2.230

8.  Wrist kinematic coupling and performance during functional tasks: effects of constrained motion.

Authors:  Rohit Garg; Andrew P Kraszewski; Holbrook H Stoecklein; Grisha Syrkin; Howard J Hillstrom; Sherry Backus; Mark L Lenhoff; Aviva L Wolff; Joseph J Crisco; Scott W Wolfe
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2014-02-28       Impact factor: 2.230

9.  Motion-preserving procedures in the treatment of scapholunate advanced collapse wrist: proximal row carpectomy versus four-corner arthrodesis.

Authors:  J D Wyrick; P J Stern; T R Kiefhaber
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  1995-11       Impact factor: 2.230

10.  Clinical outcomes of scaphoid and triquetral excision with capitolunate arthrodesis versus scaphoid excision and four-corner arthrodesis.

Authors:  R Glenn Gaston; Jeffrey A Greenberg; Robert M Baltera; Alex Mih; Hill Hastings
Journal:  J Hand Surg Am       Date:  2009-09-06       Impact factor: 2.230

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.