| Literature DB >> 35127251 |
Azaz Ahmed1,2, Sophia Köhler1, Rosa Klotz3, Nathalia Giese3, Thilo Hackert3, Christoph Springfeld1, Inka Zörnig1, Dirk Jäger1,4, Niels Halama1,2.
Abstract
Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (PDA) is usually unresponsive to immunotherapeutic approaches. However, tertiary lymphoid structures (TLS) are associated with favorable patient outcomes in PDA. A better understanding of the B cell infiltrate and biological features of TLS formation is needed to further explore their potential and improve patient management. We analyzed tumor tissues (n = 55) and corresponding blood samples (n = 51) from PDA patients by systematical immunohistochemistry and multiplex cytokine measurements. The tissue was compartmentalized in "tumor" and "stroma" and separately examined. Clinical patient information was used to perform survival analyses. We found that the mere number of B cells is not associated with patient survival, but formation of TLS in the peritumoral stroma is a prognostic favorable marker in PDA patients. TLS-positive tissues show a higher density of CD8+ T cells and CD20+ B cells and a higher IL2 level in the peritumoral stroma than tissues without TLS. Compartmental assessment shows that gradients of IL2 expression differ with regard to TLS formation: TLS presence is associated with higher IL2 levels in the stromal than in the tumoral compartment, while no difference is seen in patients without TLS. Focusing on the stroma-to-serum gradient, only patients without TLS show significantly higher IL2 levels in the serum than in stroma. Finally, low circulatory IL2 levels are associated with local TLS formation. Our findings highlight that TLS are prognostic favorable and associated with antitumoral features in the microenvironment of PDA. Also, we propose easily accessible serum IL2 levels as a potential marker for TLS prediction.Entities:
Keywords: Interleukin-2; Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma; Tertiary lymphoid structures
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35127251 PMCID: PMC8812743 DOI: 10.1080/2162402X.2022.2027148
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Oncoimmunology ISSN: 2162-4011 Impact factor: 7.723
Patient characteristics
| Subgroup | P-Value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| TLS | No TLS | |||
| Characteristic | (n = 17) | (n = 38) | ||
| Female/Male (n/n) | 9/8 | 19/19 | > 0.99 | |
| Age (years) | 68.21 ± 2.24 | 65.19 ± 1.73 | ||
| >/≤ Average age (n/n) | 12/5 | 20/18 | 0.25 | |
| BMIa | 24.12 ± 0.75 | 24.81 ± 0.67 | ||
| >/≤ Average BMI (n/n) | 8/7 | 13/15 | 0.75 | |
| Diabetes mellitus (n) | 7 | 12 | 0.55 | |
| Glucocorticoid or immunosuppressive drug intake (n) | 0 | 2 | > 0.99 | |
| Cardiovascular comorbidities (n) | 10 | 19 | 0.57 | |
| Pulmonary comorbidities (n) | 1 | 4 | > 0.99 | |
| Renal comorbidities (n) | 2 | 2 | 0.58 | |
| Hepatic comorbidities (n) | 1 | 0 | 0.31 | |
| Autoimmune comorbidities (n) | 0 | 2 | > 0.99 | |
| T | T3 (n) | 17 | 37 | > 0.99 |
| T4 (n) | 0 | 1 | ||
| N | N0 (n) | 4 | 6 | 0.48 |
| N1 (n) | 11 | 32 | 0.15 | |
| N2 (n) | 2 | 0 | 0.09 | |
| M | M0 (n) | 16 | 36 | > 0.99 |
| M1 (n) | 1 | 2 | ||
| Grade | G2 (n) | 13 | 23 | 0.36 |
| G3 (n) | 4 | 15 | ||
| Rb | R0 (n) | 6 | 3 | 0.02 |
| R1 (n) | 11 | 34 | ||
Data are shown as mean ± SEM. Fisher’s exact test was used to compare patients of the different groups. BMI = body mass index (calculated as weight in kilograms divided by height in meters squared), T = stage of primary tumor, N = regional lymph node status, M = distant metastasis status, R = resection margin status.
aInformation available on BMI status from 43 patients.
bInformation available on resection margin status from 54 patients.
Figure 1.B cell infiltrate in PDA. (a) Scatter dot plots comparing the density of immune cells (as indicated) in PDA tissue of patients with stratification in “Tumor” and “Stroma”. Information on immune cell density was available as follows: CD3+(n=49), CD4+(n=51), CD8+(n=51), FoxP3+(n=50), CD20+(n=50), CD163+(n=48). (b) Kaplan-Meier survival plot of PDA patients with high versus low stromal B cell density (n=25/n=25). The median cutpoints were determined to stratify patients into high and low. *p≤.05, ***p≤.0001. PDA=Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Figure 2.Formation of TLS and their association with immune phenotypes and patient outcome. (a) Exemplary detail of TLS in the peritumoral stroma of PDA. Immune cell stainings (as indicated) were all counterstained with H/E. All images: 20x magnification. Scale bar: 250μm. (b) Kaplan-Meier survival plot of PDA patients with “TLS” versus “No TLS” (n=38/n=17). (c) Scatter dot plots comparing the denstiy of CD8+ T cells and CD20+ B cells in peritumoral stroma of PDA patients with ”TLS” (n = 13) versus ”No TLS” (n = 38). (d) Scatter dot plots comparing cytokine concentrations in peritumoral stroma of PDA patients with ”TLS” (n = 13) versus ”No TLS” (n = 38). Cytokines were categorized in Th1- and Th2-type cytokines (as indicated). *p ≤ .05, ***p ≤ .005. TLS = Tertiary lymphoid structures, PDA= Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.
Figure 3.Compartmental IL2 levels and their association with presence of TLS. (a) Comparison of PDA patients with “TLS” (n = 13) versus “No TLS” (n = 36) regarding the stromato-tumor (left) and stroma-to-serum IL2 gradient (right). (b) Scatter dot plots comparing Serum IL2, Serum CRP, Serum WBC and CA 19–9 concentrations of PDA patients with “TLS” (IL2: n = 13; CRP, WBC, CA 19–9: n = 17) versus “No TLS” (n = 38). *p ≤ .05, ***p ≤ .005. TLS = Tertiary lymphoid structures, IL2 = Interleukin-2, CRP = C-reactive protein, WBC = White blood cells, CA 19-9 = Carbohydrate antigen 19–9, PDA = Pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma.