We aim to report a patient with vertebral brown tumor in the context of a primary hyperparathyroidism presented by shoulder pain. This is the first report of C5 brown tumor involvement in a primary hyperparathyroid patient and emphasizes the consideration of cervical vertebral evaluation in patients with persistent shoulder pain.
We aim to report a patient with vertebral brown tumor in the context of a primary hyperparathyroidism presented by shoulder pain. This is the first report of C5 brown tumor involvement in a primary hyperparathyroid patient and emphasizes the consideration of cervical vertebral evaluation in patients with persistent shoulder pain.
Brown tumor is a reactive bone lesion and occurs when the bone remodeling is altered due to increased PTH level. The prevalence of brown tumor is up to 5% in primary and 13% in secondary hyperparathyroidism.
,
It rarely involves the spine. However, it may mimic a vertebral tumor and compress the spinal column. As it can be prevented and treated with controlling the level of parathyroid hormone, it should always be considered in the differential diagnosis of any lytic vertebral lesion. In this paper, we describe a 46‐year‐old man with a shoulder pain whose C5 vertebral body was revealed to have brown tumor. We further delineate our management and its clinical and radiographic outcomes. Our description is based on the CARE guideline checklist.
CASE REPORT
A 46‐year‐old man was referred to our clinic complaining of neck pain for 8 months. Early in the course of the disease, his cervical plain X‐ray was normal. At that time, he also had a normal cervical MRI report and rheumatologic workup. Incidentally, a high level of calcium (reported level of 12.5 with a normal range of 8.7–10.7 milligram per deciliter [mg/dl]) and low level of phosphate (1.5, normal range 2.5–5 mg/dl) was detected. Upon further workup, it was determined that he had a high level of parathyroid hormone (PTH; 1285 picogram per milliliter (pg/ml), normal range 14.5–87.1 pg/ml) and serum alkaline phosphatase (ALP; 875 units per liter (U/L), normal range 80–360 U/L). He underwent a neck ultrasound that showed a lesion in favor of parathyroid adenoma (lower pole of left parathyroid lobe). His parathyroid adenoma was resected. He was recommended to undergo neck physiotherapy. Our patient experienced exacerbation of his neck pain and radiation of the pain to his left shoulder after starting physiotherapy. He was visited by a shoulder surgeon. A cervical plain X‐ray and CT scan was performed. The neck X‐ray revealed a collapse in the C5 vertebrae (Figure 1). The CT scan showed a lytic lesion in the C5 vertebrae eroding body, left pedicle, and lamina (Figure 2). As a result, he was referred to our clinic. His family and social history were unremarkable. We noticed a positive Hoffmann test. After reviewing his previous MRI retrospectively, an increased signal was noticed in the C5 vertebral body (on T1‐weighted view; Figure 3). After repeating cervical MRI, a lesion on the C5 vertebrae with a low signal on T1 and high signal on T2 was identified (Figure 4).
FIGURE 1
Preoperative X‐ray of the cervical spine demonstrates a lytic lesion in the C5 vertebral body causing vertebral collapse and local kyphosis
FIGURE 2
Preoperative cervical CT scan reveals a C5 lytic lesion affecting vertebral body, left sided lamina and pedicle
FIGURE 3
First MRI (T1) of our patient 6 months before referring to our clinic. A hyperintense signal change after IV contrast (b) is present in the C5 vertebral body
FIGURE 4
Second cervical MRI performed after exacerbation of our patient's symptoms reveals a heterogeneous lesion in the vertebral body causing vertebral collapse (A), spinal cord, and left C6 root compression (B)
Preoperative X‐ray of the cervical spine demonstrates a lytic lesion in the C5 vertebral body causing vertebral collapse and local kyphosisPreoperative cervical CT scan reveals a C5 lytic lesion affecting vertebral body, left sided lamina and pedicleFirst MRI (T1) of our patient 6 months before referring to our clinic. A hyperintense signal change after IV contrast (b) is present in the C5 vertebral bodySecond cervical MRI performed after exacerbation of our patient's symptoms reveals a heterogeneous lesion in the vertebral body causing vertebral collapse (A), spinal cord, and left C6 root compression (B)The patient was scheduled for C5 corpectomy and cord decompression via anterior approach. During surgery, a brownish soft tissue mass within C5 vertebral body was demonstrated, and a biopsy was obtained and sent for pathology. Spinal fixation by an expandable cervical cage and cervical plate from C4 to C6 level was performed. As the C5 vertebral body involvement was extensive, posterior instrumentation with rod and lateral mass screw was done 2 days later for more rigid fixation. Due to left C5 vertebral body involvement, on its left side, no screw was used (Figure 5). The patient's symptoms were dramatically improved after the surgery, and he was recovered uneventfully. Four months postoperatively, signs of remineralization were detected on C5 vertebral body (Figure 6).
FIGURE 5
Postoperative neck X‐ray of our patient. An anterior spinal cord decompression and spinal fixation with cage and locking plate (first stage) and posterior spinal instrumentation (stage 2) were performed
FIGURE 6
Neck X‐ray view 4 months after the spinal surgery and parathyroid adenoma resection. Evidence of C5 vertebral remineralization is present
Postoperative neck X‐ray of our patient. An anterior spinal cord decompression and spinal fixation with cage and locking plate (first stage) and posterior spinal instrumentation (stage 2) were performedNeck X‐ray view 4 months after the spinal surgery and parathyroid adenoma resection. Evidence of C5 vertebral remineralization is presentScattered giant cell, peritrabecular fibrosis, and hemosiderin deposits were observed in the patient's biopsy in accordance with the diagnosis of brown tumor (Figure 7).
FIGURE 7
Pathology of the lesion demonstrated multinucleated giant cells in a fibrillary stroma
Pathology of the lesion demonstrated multinucleated giant cells in a fibrillary stromaAt the final follow‐up, 16 months after surgery, our patient was symptom‐free without any evidence of recurrence.
DISCUSSION
Brown tumor or osteoclastoma is a reactive bone lesion mainly seen in mandible sternum rib pelvis and long bones as a result of increased PTH level.
Brown tumor rarely affects spinal column. To the best of our knowledge, twenty‐two cases due to primary
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
and 30 cases due to secondary hyperparathyroidism
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
,
were reported in the literature. Among the published reports of spinal brown tumor, it mainly affected thoracic region and rarely involves cervical area.
To the extent of the authors knowledge, in the context of primary hyperparathyroidism, only three cases of cervical brown tumor have been reported in the literature (two cases involving C6 and one case affecting C2; Table 1). As far as we know, this is the first report of C5 brown tumor in a patient with primary hyperparathyroidism.
TABLE 1
Published English papers reporting cervical brown tumor associated with primary hyperparathyroidism
Author (year)
Country
Patient's age (sex)
Follow‐up
Level of involvement
Presenting signs/symptoms
Management
Outcome
Ashebu et.al. (2002)
Kuwait
27 y/o (female)
12 months
C6
Weakness, lethargy, painless bony swelling in both shins
Excision of the parathyroid adenoma
Symptom‐free and bony lesions healed
Alfawareh (2015)
Saudi Arabia
26 y/o (female)
24 months
C2
Axial neck pain radiating to both upper limbs, weakness of the right hand, hyperreflexia
Parathyroidectomy, halo vest
Symptoms relieved, mild atlantoaxial rotatory subluxation remained
Khalatbari (2014)
Iran
52 y/o (female)
72 months
C6
Radicular pain, weakness
Tumor resection, lateral mass screw fixation parathyroidectomy
Symptoms relieved
Published English papers reporting cervical brown tumor associated with primary hyperparathyroidismAccording to the previous papers, the spinal osteoclastoma may be associated with neurologic complaints mainly weakness, pain/paresthesia, sphincter incontinence, or pyramidal findings (upward plantar reflex and spasticity). Regarding previous reports of spinal brown tumor, the most frequent neurologic finding was sensory (pain or paresthesia) in primary hyperparathyroidism and motor weakness in secondary hyperparathyroidism. Similarly, the main complaint of our case having primary hyperparathyroidism was neck and shoulder pain. It merits attention that the lesion may also present itself with signs and symptoms of hypercalcemia due to the underlying hyperparathyroidism including the classis tetrad “kidney stone, painful bones, abdominal groans, psychic moans”, polyuria, and urolithiasis.
,The lesion is associated with increased parathyroid hormone, increased level of calcium and alkaline phosphatase, and decreased level of blood phosphate. However, as previous papers reported, the level of calcium may be normal in known cases of brown tumor due to accompanied vitamin D deficiency.
,
This may further complicate the diagnosis of the lesion.In plain X‐ray and CT scan, brown tumor is found as a lytic lesion. In the magnetic resonance imaging (MRI), it has low signal intensity on T1 and high/low signal intensity on T2‐weighted MRI images.
It is enhanced during MRI modality with IV contrast. Osteoclastoma has a rich vascular supply and thus has a high uptake in bone scan.
In accordance with previous reports, our case had a lytic, well‐defined appearance in the plain radiography and CT scan. In the cervical T1‐weighted MRI of our patient, despite previous reports, however, a hyper signal lesion and a heterogeneous lesion were noted on the first and second T1‐weighted MRI consecutively.Occasional episodes of hemorrhage within the brown tumor and its rich vascularity give the lesion its characteristic brown appearance. Tissue biopsy of the lesion reveals peritrabecular fibrosis, hemosiderin deposits, and multinucleated giant cells. Evidence of atypia or anaplastic cells in the biopsy rules out the diagnosis of osteoclastoma.Besides osteoclastoma, giant cell tumor and aneurismal bone cyst should be considered as a differential diagnosis in single lytic bone lesions and Paget's disease, multiple myeloma/metastasis in multiple lytic bone lesions. The giant cells have a more even distribution in giant cell tumor compared with the osteoclastoma. Also, hemosiderin deposits in the tissue biopsy and increased level of PTH are in favor of osteoclastoma. The aneurysmal bone cyst has a cystic nature with a possible fluid–fluid level in radiography. Aneurysmal bone cyst affects younger individuals (10–20 years of age).
In contrast, the osteoclastoma is seen in older patients (mean age of 45.3 in primary and 39.1 in secondary hyperparathyroidism among the previous case reports) and may appear as a solid lesion in the spinal column.
Regarding Paget's disease, giant cells were clustered on the surface of bone trabeculae. However, the multinucleated cells penetrates deeply through the bone and form bone tunnels in the brown tumor.
,Treatment of hyperparathyroidism causes the brown tumor to regress and remineralize. However, as noted in our patient, spinal brown tumors if associated with vertebral fracture or neurologic symptoms will need an emergent spinal decompression in addition of treating the hyperparathyroidism. After spinal decompression, instrumentation and spinal fusion are performed in cases of large lesions affecting at least two vertebrae or those complicated with vertebral fracture.As brown tumor is rarely reported to involve cervical spine, this report on a complicated missed case of cervical brown tumor highlights the importance of early diagnosis and treatable nature of the lesion. However, higher level of evidence may be still needed to define its best management.
CONCLUSION
Brown tumor rarely affects the spinal column. However, as this clinical entity is preventable and treatable by diagnosing and managing hyperparathyroidism, it merits to be considered whenever a lytic vertebral lesion in encountered. This case report emphasizes the possibility of dangerous neurologic condition when a spinal brown tumor is missed and mismanaged.
CONFLICT OF INTEREST
“The authors declare that they have no known competing financial interests or personal relationships that could have appeared to influence the work reported in this paper.”
AUTHOR CONTRIBUTIONS
B.M conducted the surgery and supervised preparing the manuscript. F.V literature reviewed and wrote the manuscript. S.B edited the manuscript and collected the patient's data. S.H.S edited the manuscript.
ETHICAL APPROVAL
The Ethics Committee Board of Tehran University of Medical. Sciences (TUMS) declared no ethical concern in this study.
CONSENT
The authors are accountable for all aspects of the work in ensuring that questions related to accuracy or integrity of any part of the work are appropriately investigated and resolved. All procedures in studies involving human participants were in accordance of ethical standards of the institutional and/or national research committees and with Helsinki declaration (as revised in 2013). Written informed consent was obtained from the patient for publishing the case report and any accompanying images.
Authors: Mauricio Daniel Sánchez-Calderón; Diego Ochoa-Cacique; Oscar Medina Carrillo; Ulises García González; Rosa María Vicuña González; Carlos Cesar Bravo Reyna; José Raúl Guerra-Mora Journal: Int J Surg Case Rep Date: 2018-09-18