| Literature DB >> 35127009 |
Yongfu Shen1, Yi Gong1,2,3,4, Feng Wu1,2,3,4, Yunkai Li1,2,3,4.
Abstract
There is a common phenomenon in nature whereby some animals have differences in their ontogenetic changes in dietary preferences between sexes, especially apex predators. These reflect changes in the needs of development during their lifetimes. Apex predators potentially have diverse dietary niches and a large impact on the trophic dynamics within ecosystems. However, the difference in life history between males and females often leads to increased difficulty in management and conservation. In this study, 25 oceanic whitetip sharks, Carcharhinus longimanus, were collected from the central and eastern tropical Pacific. Retrospective stable isotope analysis of vertebrae was used to evaluate the potential ontogenetic differences in feeding habits and niche width between sexes. Results showed that C. longimanus had a wide range of δ13C values (-18.1 to -12.3‰) and δ15N values (8.9-14.8‰). However, males and females had similar trophic positions with large niche overlap at similar growth stages. Both sexes had increasing δ13C values but relatively constant δ15N values along the vertebrae. These results indicated that male and female C. longimanus may share similar feeding strategies and movement patterns. The results presented in this study enhance our understanding of sexual ontogenetic patterns and ecological role of C. longimanus and highlighted the applicability of vertebrae for characterizing shark life-history traits.Entities:
Keywords: Carcharhinus longimanus; ontogeny; stable isotopes; vertebra
Year: 2021 PMID: 35127009 PMCID: PMC8796903 DOI: 10.1002/ece3.8452
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ecol Evol ISSN: 2045-7758 Impact factor: 2.912
FIGURE 1Sampling locations in the central and eastern tropical Pacific
Biological data of Carcharhinus longimanus in the central and eastern tropical Pacific
| Sample number | Total length/cm | Age | Sex | Maturity |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| OCS‐1‐1 | 191.8 | 5 | Male | Mature |
| OCS‐1‐9 | 190.0 | 5 | Female | Immature |
| OCS‐4‐2 | 158.9 | 5 | Male | Immature |
| OCS‐4‐4 | 179.5 | 7 | Male | Mature |
| OCS‐4‐7 | 185.0 | 9 | Female | Mature |
| OCS‐4‐9 | 176.7 | 7 | Male | Immature |
| OCS‐5‐1 | 175.4 | 6 | Female | Immature |
| OCS‐5‐4 | 189.1 | 7 | Male | Mature |
| OCS‐6‐1 | 168.0 | 6 | Male | Immature |
| OCS‐6‐4 | 172.6 | 11 | Female | Immature |
| OCS‐6‐5 | 230.2 | 14 | Male | Immature |
| OCS‐6‐8 | 164.4 | 7 | Male | Immature |
| OCS‐6‐10 | 235.0 | 16 | Female | Mature |
| OCS‐6‐11 | 227.4 | 14 | Male | Mature |
| OCS‐9‐1 | 205.5 | 12 | Male | Mature |
| OCS‐9‐3 | 167.1 | 8 | Male | Immature |
| OCS‐9‐4 | 170.0 | 7 | Male | Immature |
| OCS‐10‐1 | 242.0 | 13 | Female | Mature |
| OCS‐2‐10 | 171.3 | 9 | Female | Immature |
| OCS‐8‐1 | 165.6 | 10 | Female | Mature |
| OCS‐8‐2 | 150.0 | 9 | Female | Immature |
| OCS‐8‐3 | 142.8 | 6 | Female | Immature |
| OCS‐8‐10 | 153.6 | 9 | Male | Immature |
| OCS‐9‐10 | 165.0 | 8 | Male | Immature |
| OCS‐34‐8 | 160.3 | 4 | Female | Immature |
FIGURE 2Photograph of a vertebral section of a female Carcharhinus longimanus, estimated to be 16 years old, at 235 cm total length
δ13C and δ15N as a function of age (in years), maturity stage, and trophic level for Carcharhinus longimanus in the central and eastern tropical Pacific
| Maturity stage | Sex | Age | δ13C (‰) | δ15N(‰) | Trophic position | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Range | Mean ± SE | Range | Mean ± SE | Range | Mean ± SE | |||
| Immature | Male | 1 | −17.6 to −12.8 | −14.1 ± 0.3 | 9.8–13.4 | 12.2 ± 0.3 | 3.0–4.1 | 3.8 ± 0.1 |
| Female | −17.0 to −12.8 | −14.6 ± 0.4 | 9.5–14.2 | 11.7 ± 0.5 | 2.9–4.4 | 3.4 ± 0.2 | ||
| Combined | −17.6 to −12.8 | −14.7 ± 0.3 | 9.5–14.2 | 12.2 ± 0.3 | 2.9–4.4 | 3.7 ± 0.1 | ||
| Immature | Male | 2 | −17.1 to −13.1 | −14.3 ± 0.2 | 10.2–14.8 | 12.8 ± 0.3 | 3.1–4.6 | 3.9 ± 0.1 |
| Female | −17.3 to −12.9 | −14.7 ± 0.3 | 9.2–14.2 | 11.7 ± 0.4 | 2.8–4.4 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | ||
| Combined | −17.3 to −12.9 | −14.6 ± 0.2 | 9.2–14.8 | 12.3 ± 0.3 | 2.8–4.6 | 3.7 ± 0.1 | ||
| Immature | Male | 3 | −18.1 to −13.2 | −14.4 ± 0.3 | 9.0–14.0 | 11.9 ± 0.4 | 2.8–4.3 | 3.6 ± 0.1 |
| Female | −17.4 to −13.8 | −15.1 ± 0.4 | 8.9–13.2 | 11.7 ± 0.4 | 2.8–4.0 | 3.6 ± 0.1 | ||
| Combined | −18.1 to −13.2 | −14.9 ± 0.2 | 8.9–14.0 | 11.8 ± 0.3 | 2.8–4.3 | 3.6 ± 0.1 | ||
| Immature | Male | 4 | −17.1 to −12.8 | −14.3 ± 0.3 | 10.1–14.3 | 12.4 ± 0.4 | 3.1–4.4 | 3.7 ± 0.1 |
| Female | −17.6 to −13.2 | −14.9 ± 0.4 | 9.5–13.7 | 11.1 ± 0.4 | 2.9–4.2 | 3.2 ± 0.1 | ||
| Combined | −17.6 to −12.8 | −14.4 ± 0.3 | 9.5–14.3 | 11.7 ± 0.3 | 2.9–4.4 | 3.4 ± 0.1 | ||
| Immature | Male | 5 | −16.3 to −12.5 | −13.9 ± 0.2 | 10.9–14.3 | 12.5 ± 0.3 | 3.3–4.4 | 3.7 ± 0.1 |
| Female | −17.8 to −13.2 | 14.5 ± 0.3 | 9.4–12.9 | 11.3 ± 0.4 | 2.9–3.9 | 3.3 ± 0.1 | ||
| Combined | −17.8 to −12.5 | −14.5 ± 0.4 | 9.4–14.3 | 11.6 ± 0.3 | 2.8–4.4 | 3.6 ± 0.1 | ||
| Immature | Male | 6 | −16.5 to −12.6 | −14.0 ± 0.3 | 10.2–14.4 | 12.2 ± 0.4 | 3.1–4.5 | 3.7 ± 0.1 |
| Female | −16.1 to −13.2 | −14.3 ± 0.3 | 9.4–12.6 | 11.2 ± 0.4 | 2.9–3.8 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | ||
| Combined | −16.5 to −12.6 | −14.0 ± 0.2 | 9.4–14.4 | 11.9 ± 0.3 | 2.9–4.5 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | ||
| Immature | Male | 7 | −15.8 to −12.3 | −13.7 ± 0.4 | 9.9–14.5 | 12.2 ± 0.5 | 3.0–4.5 | 3.7 ± 0.1 |
| Female | −18.1 to−12.7 | −14.4 ± 0.7 | 9.4–13.2 | 12.1 ± 0.5 | 2.9–4.0 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | ||
| Combined | −18.1 to −12.3 | −14.2 ± 0.4 | 9.4–14.5 | 12.2 ± 0.3 | 2.9–4.5 | 3.7 ± 0.1 | ||
| Adults | Male | ≥8 | −16.2 to −12.4 | −12.9 ± 0.2 | 10.5–13.9 | 12.9 ± 0.4 | 3.2–4.3 | 4.0 ± 0.1 |
| Female | −16.2 to −13.0 | −13.7 ± 0.3 | 10.0–13.4 | 11.9 ± 0.3 | 3.0–4.1 | 3.6 ± 0.1 | ||
| Combined | −16.2 to −12.1 | −14.2 ± 0.3 | 10.0–13.9 | 12.2 ± 0.3 | 3.0–4.3 | 3.7 ± 0.1 | ||
| Overall | Male | – | −18.1 to −12.3 | −14.3 ± 0.1 | 9.0–14.8 | 12.3 ± 0.1 | 2.8–4.6 | 3.7 ± 0.1 |
| Female | −18.1 to −12.7 | −14.7 ± 0.2 | 8.9–14.2 | 11.5 ± 0.1 | 2.8–4.4 | 3.5 ± 0.1 | ||
| Combined | −18.1 to −12.3 | −14.5 ± 0.1 | 8.9–14.8 | 12.0 ± 0.1 | 2.8–4.6 | 3.7 ± 0.1 | ||
FIGURE 3δ13C and δ15N values obtained from vertebrae of Carcharhinus longimanus sampled (n = 25). (a) Individual patterns, (b) Mean ± SE
FIGURE 4Isotopic enrichment (mean ± SE) of 13C (gray) and 15N (black) in the Carcharhinus longimanus vs. annulus bands, relative to values between the birth band and the first band sampling location
Niche width and isotopic overlap of Carcharhinus longimanus by maturity stage (separated sexes)
| Maturity stage | Age | Isotopic niche (SEAB [‰2]) | Overlap size (‰2) | Isotopic niche overlap (SEAB [%]) | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male | Female | Male | Female | |||
| Immature | 1 | 3.90 | 5.89 | 3.36 | 86.15 | 57.05 |
| Immature | 2 | 4.88 | 4.42 | 2.77 | 56.76 | 62.67 |
| Immature | 3 | 7.24 | 4.74 | 4.55 | 62.85 | 95.99 |
| Immature | 4 | 6.53 | 6.56 | 5.91 | 90.51 | 90.09 |
| Immature | 5 | 4.90 | 2.65 | 1.95 | 39.80 | 73.58 |
| Immature | 6 | 3.88 | 3.05 | 1.97 | 50.77 | 64.59 |
| Immature | 7 | 5.64 | 4.77 | 2.98 | 52.84 | 62.47 |
| Mature | ≥8 | 7.05 | 4.07 | 3.97 | 56.31 | 97.54 |
FIGURE 5The niche overlap between sexes and among growth stages of Carcharhinus longimanus in the central and eastern tropical Pacific. The ellipses represent the estimated standard ellipse area determined by the SIBER analysis