| Literature DB >> 35126908 |
Mingming Ren1, Lei Huang1, Xiaoqiang Ye1, Zhifeng Xv1, Chun Ouyang1, Zhen Han1.
Abstract
Heart space-occupying lesions are a disease that occurs frequently in clinical setting, and therefore, it is important to diagnose and treat this type of pathologies properly. Angiographic echocardiography and transesophageal sonogram are widely used for clinical diagnosis. Their application provides a guarantee for the diagnosis of cardiac space-occupying lesions. In this paper, the application of cardiac contrast echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography in cardiac space-occupying lesions was studied. Prediction of cardiac lesions can accurately determine the nature of cardiac occupancies and provide a basis for clinical diagnosis and management judgments. The results of pathological analysis and experimental comparison showed that myocardial contrast echocardiography can accurately distinguish tumor and thrombus and make contribution to patients taking appropriate medical measures. At the same time, it can compare conventional transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography. The results showed that TEE could clearly show the cardiac lesions. The experimental data of 76.9% confirmed cases showed that the diagnostic accuracy is greatly improved. TEE can also clearly show small thrombus that TTE cannot, in which 2DTEE can clearly show the boundary between the space-occupying and surrounding tissues, and whether there is a clear boundary between the space-occupying and surrounding tissues is an important distinguishing point of benign and malignant tumors. In addition, the TEE probe can also be used for large angle imaging and multiangle rotation, so as to determine the tumor boundary and the spatial position relationship between the tumor and the surrounding tissue. All in all, myocardial contrast echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography have better clinical application effect on cardiac space-occupying lesions.Entities:
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35126908 PMCID: PMC8808222 DOI: 10.1155/2022/2066033
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Healthc Eng ISSN: 2040-2295 Impact factor: 2.682
Comparison of semiquantitative indexes in benign and malignant tumor group of heart.
| Pathological diagnosis | Quantity | Is the far edge smooth after angiography | Whether the enhancement is even | Strengthen | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | Low | High | ||
| Malignant | 20 | 0 | 20 | 0 | 20 | 6 | 14 |
| Benign | 25 | 18 | 7 | 17 | 8 | 20 | 5 |
|
| 19.2 | 19.2 | 11.8 | ||||
|
| 0 | 0 | 0 | ||||
MCE semiquantitative indexes of different pathological types of cardiac tumors.
| Pathological type | Quantity | Is the far edge smooth after angiography | Whether the enhancement is even | Strengthen | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Yes | No | Yes | No | Low | High | ||
| Myxoma | 18 | 10 | 8 | 12 | 6 | 18 | 0 |
| Lipoma | 3 | 3 | 0 | 2 | 1 | 2 | 1 |
Figure 1Comparison of quantitative indexes of benign and malignant tumor group.
Figure 2Transesophageal echocardiography results.
Figure 3Example of transesophageal echocardiography.
Figure 4Comparison of conventional transthoracic echocardiography and transesophageal echocardiography.
Figure 5Comparison of the measured heart footprint with the size of the surgical specimen.