Ullas Batra1, Shrinidhi Nathany2, Mansi Sharma1, Sakshi Mattoo2, Anurag Mehta3, Joslia T Jose1. 1. Medical Oncology, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre New Delhi, India. 2. Molecular Diagnostics, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre New Delhi, India. 3. Laboratory Services, Molecular Diagnostics and Research, Rajiv Gandhi Cancer Institute and Research Centre New Delhi, India.
Abstract
INTRODUCTION: Activating mutations in the BRAF gene have been reported in 0.8%-8% cases of NSCLC. Traditionally, diagnostics have mainly focused on detection of V600E and modalities like mutation specific IHC, allele specific real-time PCR have been utilized. This may underestimate true prevalence of the non-V600E variants. Broader panel NGS testing offers a one stop solution and may identify newer potentially targetable variants. This is a retrospective single center experience of patients with BRAF mutated NSCLC characterizing the molecular spectrum and clinicopathologic characteristics. METHODS: 260 patients underwent panel based NGS testing at our center, between 2017-2020. 13 BRAF mutant cases, were detected and were clinically reviewed. RESULTS: Thirteen cases of BRAF alterations were seen in out of 260 (5%) patients. Median age of the cohort was 62 years (range: 39-86 years) with a female predilection). Canonical BRAF V600E mutation was seen in 6 (46.2%) patients and 7 (53.8%) harbored a non-V600E alteration. Spectrum of non V600E alterations included G466E, G469A, N581I, V600_K601delins, D594G, L597Q, G649V and were commonly female (P>0.01) with a higher trend for liver metastases (P=0.09). Median PFS was 4.8 months on chemotherapy (P=0.8). All patients (13/13, 100%) were never smokers with an adenocarcinoma histology. CONCLUSION: This is a single center experience from an Indian NSCLC cohort and shows higher prevalence of non-V600E than V600E mutation reported in literature. This may be attributed to increased use of NGS testing revealing otherwise missed alterations on sequential single gene testing. IJMEG
INTRODUCTION: Activating mutations in the BRAF gene have been reported in 0.8%-8% cases of NSCLC. Traditionally, diagnostics have mainly focused on detection of V600E and modalities like mutation specific IHC, allele specific real-time PCR have been utilized. This may underestimate true prevalence of the non-V600E variants. Broader panel NGS testing offers a one stop solution and may identify newer potentially targetable variants. This is a retrospective single center experience of patients with BRAF mutated NSCLC characterizing the molecular spectrum and clinicopathologic characteristics. METHODS: 260 patients underwent panel based NGS testing at our center, between 2017-2020. 13 BRAF mutant cases, were detected and were clinically reviewed. RESULTS: Thirteen cases of BRAF alterations were seen in out of 260 (5%) patients. Median age of the cohort was 62 years (range: 39-86 years) with a female predilection). Canonical BRAF V600E mutation was seen in 6 (46.2%) patients and 7 (53.8%) harbored a non-V600E alteration. Spectrum of non V600E alterations included G466E, G469A, N581I, V600_K601delins, D594G, L597Q, G649V and were commonly female (P>0.01) with a higher trend for liver metastases (P=0.09). Median PFS was 4.8 months on chemotherapy (P=0.8). All patients (13/13, 100%) were never smokers with an adenocarcinoma histology. CONCLUSION: This is a single center experience from an Indian NSCLC cohort and shows higher prevalence of non-V600E than V600E mutation reported in literature. This may be attributed to increased use of NGS testing revealing otherwise missed alterations on sequential single gene testing. IJMEG
Authors: Anya M Litvak; Paul K Paik; Kaitlin M Woo; Camelia S Sima; Matthew D Hellmann; Maria E Arcila; Marc Ladanyi; Charles M Rudin; Mark G Kris; Gregory J Riely Journal: J Thorac Oncol Date: 2014-11 Impact factor: 15.609
Authors: Lawrence H Schwartz; Saskia Litière; Elisabeth de Vries; Robert Ford; Stephen Gwyther; Sumithra Mandrekar; Lalitha Shankar; Jan Bogaerts; Alice Chen; Janet Dancey; Wendy Hayes; F Stephen Hodi; Otto S Hoekstra; Erich P Huang; Nancy Lin; Yan Liu; Patrick Therasse; Jedd D Wolchok; Lesley Seymour Journal: Eur J Cancer Date: 2016-05-14 Impact factor: 9.162
Authors: J Mazieres; C Cropet; L Montané; F Barlesi; P J Souquet; X Quantin; C Dubos-Arvis; J Otto; L Favier; V Avrillon; J Cadranel; D Moro-Sibilot; I Monnet; V Westeel; J Le Treut; E Brain; J Trédaniel; M Jaffro; S Collot; G R Ferretti; C Tiffon; C Mahier-Ait Oukhatar; J Y Blay Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2020-01-03 Impact factor: 32.976
Authors: Amir Noeparast; Erik Teugels; Philippe Giron; Gil Verschelden; Sylvia De Brakeleer; Lore Decoster; Jacques De Grève Journal: Oncotarget Date: 2016-08-26
Authors: J Mazieres; A Drilon; A Lusque; L Mhanna; A B Cortot; L Mezquita; A A Thai; C Mascaux; S Couraud; R Veillon; M Van den Heuvel; J Neal; N Peled; M Früh; T L Ng; V Gounant; S Popat; J Diebold; J Sabari; V W Zhu; S I Rothschild; P Bironzo; A Martinez-Marti; A Curioni-Fontecedro; R Rosell; M Lattuca-Truc; M Wiesweg; B Besse; B Solomon; F Barlesi; R D Schouten; H Wakelee; D R Camidge; G Zalcman; S Novello; S I Ou; J Milia; O Gautschi Journal: Ann Oncol Date: 2019-08-01 Impact factor: 32.976