Literature DB >> 35126775

A computational examination of the two-streams hypothesis: which pathway needs a longer memory?

Abolfazl Alipour1,2, John M Beggs2,3, Joshua W Brown1,2, Thomas W James1,2.   

Abstract

The two visual streams hypothesis is a robust example of neural functional specialization that has inspired countless studies over the past four decades. According to one prominent version of the theory, the fundamental goal of the dorsal visual pathway is the transformation of retinal information for visually-guided motor behavior. To that end, the dorsal stream processes input using absolute (or veridical) metrics only when the movement is initiated, necessitating very little, or no, memory. Conversely, because the ventral visual pathway does not involve motor behavior (its output does not influence the real world), the ventral stream processes input using relative (or illusory) metrics and can accumulate or integrate sensory evidence over long time constants, which provides a substantial capacity for memory. In this study, we tested these relations between functional specialization, processing metrics, and memory by training identical recurrent neural networks to perform either a viewpoint-invariant object classification task or an orientation/size determination task. The former task relies on relative metrics, benefits from accumulating sensory evidence, and is usually attributed to the ventral stream. The latter task relies on absolute metrics, can be computed accurately in the moment, and is usually attributed to the dorsal stream. To quantify the amount of memory required for each task, we chose two types of neural network models. Using a long-short-term memory (LSTM) recurrent network, we found that viewpoint-invariant object categorization (object task) required a longer memory than orientation/size determination (orientation task). Additionally, to dissect this memory effect, we considered factors that contributed to longer memory in object tasks. First, we used two different sets of objects, one with self-occlusion of features and one without. Second, we defined object classes either strictly by visual feature similarity or (more liberally) by semantic label. The models required greater memory when features were self-occluded and when object classes were defined by visual feature similarity, showing that self-occlusion and visual similarity among object task samples are contributing to having a long memory. The same set of tasks modeled using modified leaky-integrator echo state recurrent networks (LiESN), however, did not replicate the results, except under some conditions. This may be because LiESNs cannot perform fine-grained memory adjustments due to their network-wide memory coefficient and fixed recurrent weights. In sum, the LSTM simulations suggest that longer memory is advantageous for performing viewpoint-invariant object classification (a putative ventral stream function) because it allows for interpolation of features across viewpoints. The results further suggest that orientation/size determination (a putative dorsal stream function) does not benefit from longer memory. These findings are consistent with the two visual streams theory of functional specialization. SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11571-021-09703-z.
© The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer Nature B.V. 2021.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Convolutional neural networks; Dorsal and ventral visual pathway; LSTM; Memory span; Two-streams hypothesis; Viewpoint invariant object recognition

Year:  2021        PMID: 35126775      PMCID: PMC8807798          DOI: 10.1007/s11571-021-09703-z

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Cogn Neurodyn        ISSN: 1871-4080            Impact factor:   5.082


  47 in total

Review 1.  The cortical organization of speech processing.

Authors:  Gregory Hickok; David Poeppel
Journal:  Nat Rev Neurosci       Date:  2007-04-13       Impact factor: 34.870

2.  Hand path priming in manual obstacle avoidance: evidence that the dorsal stream does not only control visually guided actions in real time.

Authors:  Steven A Jax; David A Rosenbaum
Journal:  J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 3.332

3.  A theory of the visual system biology underlying development of spatial frequency lateralization.

Authors:  Mary F Howard; James A Reggia
Journal:  Brain Cogn       Date:  2007-03-08       Impact factor: 2.310

Review 4.  Do we have distinct systems for immediate and delayed actions? A selective review on the role of visual memory in action.

Authors:  Thomas Schenk; Constanze Hesse
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2017-05-25       Impact factor: 4.027

5.  Functional specificity in the human brain: a window into the functional architecture of the mind.

Authors:  Nancy Kanwisher
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-05-19       Impact factor: 11.205

Review 6.  Decoding neural representational spaces using multivariate pattern analysis.

Authors:  James V Haxby; Andrew C Connolly; J Swaroop Guntupalli
Journal:  Annu Rev Neurosci       Date:  2014-06-25       Impact factor: 12.449

7.  Delayed action does not always require the ventral stream: a study on a patient with visual form agnosia.

Authors:  Constanze Hesse; Thomas Schenk
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2014-02-22       Impact factor: 4.027

Review 8.  Parallel versus serial processing: new vistas on the distributed organization of the visual system.

Authors:  J Bullier; L G Nowak
Journal:  Curr Opin Neurobiol       Date:  1995-08       Impact factor: 6.627

9.  Brain activation during immediate and delayed reaching in optic ataxia.

Authors:  Marc Himmelbach; Marion Nau; Ida Zündorf; Michael Erb; Marie-Therese Perenin; Hans-Otto Karnath
Journal:  Neuropsychologia       Date:  2009-02-02       Impact factor: 3.139

10.  Human fMRI reveals that delayed action re-recruits visual perception.

Authors:  Anthony Singhal; Simona Monaco; Liam D Kaufman; Jody C Culham
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-09-06       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.