Literature DB >> 35126729

Investigation of miRNA expression profiles using cohort samples reveals potential early detectability of colorectal cancers by serum miR-26a-5p before clinical diagnosis.

Asahi Hishida1, Hiroya Yamada2, Yoshitaka Ando3, Yoshinaga Okugawa4,5, Manabu Shiozawa6, Yohei Miyagi7, Yataro Daigo8,9, Yuji Toiyama5, Yumiko Shirai10, Koji Tanaka11, Yoko Kubo1, Rieko Okada1, Mako Nagayoshi1, Takashi Tamura1, Atsuyoshi Mori12, Takaaki Kondo13, Nobuyuki Hamajima14, Kenji Takeuchi1, Kenji Wakai1.   

Abstract

Previous studies have investigated the usefulness of microRNA (miRNA/miR) expression data for the early detection of colorectal cancer (CRC). However, limited data are available regarding miRNAs that detect CRC before clinical diagnoses. Accordingly, the present study investigated the early detectability of CRC by miRNAs using the preserved serum samples of the cohort participants affected with CRC within 2 years of study enrollment. First, the significant miRNAs were revealed using clinical CRC samples for a (seven early CRCs and seven controls) microarray analysis based on significance analysis of microarrays. Next, replicability was verified by reverse transcription-quantitative (RT-q)PCR (eight early CRCs and eight controls, together with 12 CRCs and 12 controls). Finally, early detectability was tested using the cohort samples of Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort Study (17 CRCs and 17 controls) to reveal how a certain number of patients developed CRC within 2 years after participation. In the discovery phase, miRNA expression measurements were conducted using a 3D-Gene Human miRNA Oligo Chip for 2,555 miRNAs, and RT-qPCR analyses were performed to validate the replicability. In the first validation set with eight CRCs with early clinical stage and eight age- and gender-matched controls, miR-26a-5p and miR-223-3p demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy of area under the curve (AUC)=1.000 (sensitivity and specificity 100%). In an examination of the predictability of CRC incidence using pre-clinical cohort samples, miR-26a-5p demonstrated good predictability of advanced CRC incidence with an AUC of 0.840. Overall, the present study revealed serum miR-26a-5p as a potential early detection marker for CRC. Copyright: © Hishida et al.

Entities:  

Keywords:  cohort study; colorectal cancer; early detection of cancer; microRNA

Year:  2022        PMID: 35126729      PMCID: PMC8805182          DOI: 10.3892/ol.2022.13207

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oncol Lett        ISSN: 1792-1074            Impact factor:   2.967


Introduction

Colorectal cancer (CRC) is one of the commonest cancers worldwide, next to the cancers of lung and breast, while it continues to be among the top 3 cancers both in incidence and mortality in Japan (1,2). The incidence of CRC is in an increasing trend with the Westernized lifestyle getting more and more prevalent in Japan, making it one of the most important public health burdens to countermeasure along with other issues such as infectious diseases (3). Accumulated clinical evidence shows that the life expectancy of CRC patients is favorable when their CRCs are found in early stage with 5-year overall survival (OAS) rate of more than 84%, whereas the OAS of advanced CRC patients are much lower, 60.0% for those with clinical stage IIIb and 18.8% for those with clinical stage IV, suggesting the importance of early detection of CRCs (4). MicroRNAs (miRNAs) are small non-coding RNAs 20–25 nucleotides in length that play roles in transcriptional and post-transcriptional gene regulation in normal cells. MiRNAs have also been shown to play essential roles in the development and progression of various types of cancers (5). Recently, medical researchers worldwide made substantial efforts to clarify the roles of miRNAs in and their potential applicability to early detection of cancers, which have led to the accumulation of useful evidence for future development of clinical tests based on blood miRNA measurements in practical medicine (6–8). Although there are a considerable number of studies that investigated the possible usefulness of miRNA expression data for early detection of CRCs (9–11), there is still little evidence that clarified the detectability of CRC onset by the miRNA expression analysis using the samples from cohort study participants who were before clinical diagnoses. Accordingly, we set out to examine the early detectability of CRCs by serum miRNAs using the preserved serum samples of the cohort participants who were affected with CRC within 2 years after study enrollments.

Materials and methods

Study subjects

For the discovery phase, the discovery cohort included seven CRC patients who underwent surgery at Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital between years of 2019 and 2020. In the first validation phase, the case subjects were 8 CRC patients who underwent surgery at Kanagawa Cancer Center Hospital between years of 2019 and 2020. In the second validation phase, the case subjects were 12 CRC patients who visited or were admitted to Iga City General Hospital between years of 2014 and 2016. In the discovery and validation phases, the control subjects were age- and gender-matched cancer-free subjects from Iga City Cohort Study who participated between years of 2013 and 2014 without any history of cancer and without any cancer incidence at least within a year after participation, with one-to-one matching. The test cohort included patients from the Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort Study (J-MICC Study), one of the largest genome cohort studies in Japan with 92,610 participants who were recruited nationwide from 14 areas of Japan between 2005 and 2014 (12). We obtained informed consent from the participants in the J-MICC Study. We collected blood samples using a 7 ml vacuum tube for serum and 7 ml EDTA-2Na containing vacuum tube for plasma and buffy coat. We also conducted a survey using self-administered questionnaires to the participants that included items on drinking, smoking, physical activities, sleep, food consumption, medical history, and reproductive history. For the test phase for early detectability of CRCs before clinical diagnosis, cases were the 17 participants of J-MICC Shizuoka and Daiko Studies and Iga City Cohort Study, all of which are the sub-cohorts of the J-MICC Study, who developed CRCs within 2 years after participation, and the control subjects were age- and gender-matched cancer-free subjects from the corresponding cohorts (Shizuoka, Daiko and Iga City Cohort Studies) without any history of cancer and without any cancer incidence at least within a year after participation, with one-to-one matching. We first discovered the significantly up/down-regulated miRNAs using the clinical CRC samples (7 early CRCs and 7 controls in the 1st stage, discovery phase) by microarray analysis based on SAM (significance analysis of microarrays) (13). We next verified their replicability by real-time PCR (8 early CRCs and 8 controls, together with 12 early and advanced CRCs and 12 controls in the 2nd stage, validation phase). Finally, we tested the early detectability using the cohort samples of J-MICC Shizuoka & Daiko Studies (14,15) who developed CRC within 2 years after participation (3rd stage, test phase) (Fig. 1). Written informed consent was obtained from all participants. The protocol of this study was approved by the Ethics Review Committee of the Nagoya University Graduate School of Medicine (approval no. 2019-0314-8), Aichi Cancer Center, Kanagawa Cancer Center and all the participated institutions.
Figure 1.

Workflow of the present study. CRC, colorectal cancer; SAM, significance analysis of microarrays; Ct, threshold cycles; J-MICC, Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort.

Follow-up

In the J-MICC Study, we followed up the cancer incidence by the survey of regional cancer registries, where cancers were coded based on ICD-O-3T as C00-C80 (and CRCs were coded as C18-C20). For the follow-up of death, we conducted the survey on death certificates and classified the underlying causes of deaths based on ICD-10, where cancers were coded as C00-C97 (and CRCs were coded as C18-C20). Participants who moved out of the catchment areas were considered as dropouts, who were excluded from the follow-up survey after the timepoints of move-outs and treated as truncated.

MiRNA expression analysis with microarray

MiRNAs were extracted from 400 µl of serum samples using the miRNeasy extraction kit (Qiagen). Prior to microarray analyses, the integrity of total RNA samples was checked by detecting the peak from small RNA fragments using the Agilent 2100 Bioanalyzer (Agilent Technologies). In the discovery phase, miRNA expression measurements were conducted using a 3D-Gene miRNA Labeling kit and a 3D-Gene Human miRNA Oligo Chip (Toray Industries Inc.) for the detection of the expressions of microRNA sequences from 271 organisms: 38,589 hairpin precursors and 48,860 mature microRNAs registered in the miRBase release 22 (www.mirbase.org). The raw data of each spot was normalized by substitution with a mean intensity of the background signal determined by all blank spots' signal intensities of 95% confidence intervals. Measurements of spots with the signal intensities greater than 2 standard deviations (SD) of the background signal intensity were considered to be valid. A relative expression level of a given miRNA was calculated by comparing the signal intensities of the valid spots throughout the microarray experiments. The normalized data were normalized per array, such that the 75th percentile of the signal intensity was adjusted to 1.

Quantitative RT-PCR analysis

To validate the replicability of the miRNAs detected by microarray analyses, we conducted the quantitative RT-PCR (qRT-PCR) analyses. miRNAs were extracted from 200 µl of serum samples using the miRNeasy Mini Kit (Qiagen). The miRNAs were then reverse transcribed using the miRCURY LNA RT Kit (Qiagen). The obtained cDNA was quantified by qRT-PCR in the ABI-PRISM 7900 Sequence Detection System and the StepOnePlus System (Applied Biosystems, Foster City, CA) using the miRCURY LNA miRNA PCR Kit (Qiagen) according to manufacturer's instructions (details of the primers used are shown in Table S1). The experiment was performed in duplicate and the average cycle threshold (Cq) value was obtained. Quantification of miRNA expression levels was conducted based on the comparative cycle threshold (ΔΔCq) method, where the expression levels of each miRNA were normalized based on the expression levels of miR-16-5p as an internal control (16). Two-tailed P-values are calculated based on a Student's t-test of the 2−ΔΔCq values for each gene comparing cases and controls. In the test phase for early detectability of CRCs before clinical diagnosis, experiments were conducted with blinding to examiners (whose names are in the Acknowledgements).

Database search

We referred to the databases of miRCancer (www.mircancer.ecu.edu) (17) to search for the previously reported miRNAs whose expressions were associated with the development or progression of CRCs.

Statistical analysis

The comparisons between the miRNA expression data of CRC patients and control subjects based on microarray measurements were conducted using SAM, using the ‘samr’ package of R ver. 3.6.3, where q-value is used as a means to control the positive false discovery rate in multiple hypothesis testing (18), after excluding the miRNAs with percent presence of the signals in either of cases or controls was less than 50%. ROC curve analyses were conducted using the MedCalc ver. 20.011 (MedCalc Software Ltd.). Graphs for miRNA expression levels were drawn using the ‘beeswarm’ package of R. Comparisons of the two miRNA expression levels were conducted using the Student's t-test (unpaired, 2-sided) as well as by Mann-Whitney's U test, and those of more than three miRNA expression levels were conducted by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) with post hoc analysis by Tukey's test by using Stata (StataCorp).

Results

Study characteristics

The characteristics of the study subjects are shown in Table I. Briefly, the discovery set consisted of 7 early CRC cases and 7 age- and gender-matched controls, the first validation set consisted of 8 early CRC cases with 8 age- and gender-matched controls, and the second validation set consisted of 12 CRC cases with mixture of early and advanced stages together with 12 age- and gender-matched controls, whereas the test set of cohort samples for pre-clinical early detection consisted of 17 cohort participants who developed CRC with mixture of early and advanced clinical stages within 2 years after participation, together with 17 age- and gender-matched controls.
Table I.

Characteristics of the study subjects.

DiscoveryValidation-1Validation-2Test (cohort, J-MICC)




VariablesCase (n=7)Control (n=7)Case (n=8)Control (n=8)Case (n=12)Control (n=12)Case (n=17)Control (n=17)
Male (%)5 (71.4%)5 (71.4%)4 (33.3%)4 (33.3%)8 (66.7%)8 (66.7%)12 (70.6%)12 (70.6%)
Age, mean ± SD58.4±6.958.0±5.774.5±4.264.5±1.369.0±7.763.8±4.559.7±8.059.5±7.3
Cancer site
  Colon (C)0 (0.0%)-4 (50.0%)-2 (16.7%)-4 (23.5%)-
  Sigmoid (S)2 (28.6%)-1 (12.5%)-6 (50.0%)-7 (41.2%)-
  Rectum (R)5 (71.4%)-3 (37.5%)-4 (33.3%)-4 (23.5%)-
  S-R0 (0.0%)-0 (0.0%)-0 (0.0%)-2 (11.8%)-
Clinical stage
  I6 (85.7%)-3 (37.5%)-1 (8.3%)-3 (17.6%)-
  II1 (14.3%)-5 (62.5%)-4 (33.3%)-7 (41.2%)-
  III0 (0.0%)-0 (0.0%)-7 (58.3%)-3 (17.6%)-
  IV0 (0.0%)-0 (0.0%)-0 (0.0%)-2 (11.8%)-
  (Unknown)0 (0.0%)-0 (0.0%)-0 (0.0%)-2 (11.8%)-

SD, standard deviation; S-R, sigmoid colon and rectum; J-MICC, Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort; Validation-1, 1st validation set from Kanagawa Cancer Center; Validation-2, 2nd validation set from Iga City General Hospital.

Microarray miRNA expression analysis of CRC patients and controls

We conducted the miRNA expression analyses according to the workflow presented in Fig. 1. We selected the candidate miRNA based on the combined strategy of theoretical selection with best statistical significance and the empirical selection by database search (17) and our previous reports (9,10). The comprehensive expression measurements of miRNAs by microarrays and subsequent SAM analysis revealed miR-6765, miR-5100, miR-572 (up-regulated) and miR-518e-5p (down-regulated) as the miRNAs with best discrimination abilities. In addition, we searched for the miRNAs with smallest q-values which were previously reported in association with CRCs among the miRNAs that fulfilled the criteria of FDR <0.25 (562 up-regulated miRNAs and 255 down-regulated miRNAs), which led us to adopt miR-223-3p, miR-26a-5p and miR-21-5p as the up-regulated, miR-22-5p and miR-15a-5p as the down-regulated candidate miRNAs (Table II and Fig. 2). We also confirmed that there was no statistically significant difference in expression levels of miR-16-5p (the internal control) observed between cases and controls (Fig. S1).
Table II.

Selected miRNAs in the discovery phase.

A, miRNAs upregulated in CRCs

miRNAsFold-changeq-value (%)

Smallest q-value
  miR-6765-3p3.3560
  miR-51003.1140
  miR-5723.1520
CRC associated, smallest
q-value
  miR-223-3p2.8670
  miR-26a-5p2.8624.091
CRC associated, reported by our group (9,10)
  miR-21-5p1.7669.431

B, miRNAs downregulated in CRCs

miRNAs Fold-change q-value (%)

Smallest q-value
  miR-518e-5p0.38115.197
CRC associated, smallest
q-value
  miR-22-5p0.57815.197
  miR-15a-5p0.47415.197

CRC, colorectal cancer; miR, microRNA.

Figure 2.

SAM plot for significant miRNA discovery and selected miRNAs for validation. Upregulated miRNAs are shown in red and downregulated miRNAs are shown in green. Top significant miRNAs are miRNAs with smallest q-values (18) in SAM. miRNAs/miRs, microRNA; SAM, significance analysis of microarrays; CRC, colorectal cancer; SE-miRNAs in CRC, super-enhancer-associated miRNAs in colorectal cancer (23).

Validation with quantitative RT-PCR analysis with independent samples

We next verified the replicability of microarray discovered miRNAs by qRT-PCR using independent samples. In the first validation set with 8 CRC samples with early clinical stage from Kanagawa Cancer Center and 8 age- and gender-matched controls, miR-26a-5p and miR-223-3p demonstrated the highest diagnostic accuracy of AUC=1.000 (sensitivity 100.0% and specificity 100.0%), followed by miR-21-5p with AUC of 0.859 (sensitivity 100.0% and specificity 62.5%) (Fig. 3A). In the second validation set with the independent set with 12 advanced CRCs and 12 controls from Iga City General Hospital, most of the selected miRs demonstrated moderate accuracy with AUCs of 0.6-0.8 (Fig. 3B). The expressions of the top 3 significant up-regulated miRNAs (miR-6765, miR-5100 and miR-572) and the top significant down-regulated miRNA (miR-518e-5p) were not detected in the qRT-PCR of the validation phase. The expression levels of replicated miRNAs (miRNAs with AUC of more than 0.6 and the same directions of correlations as those in the discovery phase) as well as those of the rest of the miRNAs that failed to replicate are shown in Fig. 4.
Figure 3.

ROC curves in the validation data set. (A) 1st validation set from Kanagawa. (B) 2nd validation set from Iga. CRC, colorectal cancer; miRNA/miR, microRNA; AUC, area under the curve; ROC curve, receiver operating characteristic curve.

Figure 4.

Expression levels of replicated miRNAs in the validation data set. (A) 1st validation set from Kanagawa. (B) 2nd validation set from Iga. Two-tailed P-values are calculated based on an unpaired Student's t-test of the 2−ΔΔCq values for each gene comparing cases and controls. CRC, colorectal cancer; miRNA/miR, microRNA; Pt, P-value for t-test; PMW, P-value for Mann-Whitney's U test; N, normal.

Examination of the predictability of CRC incidence using pre-clinical cohort samples

We next examined the predictabilities of CRC incidence by the replicated miRNAs that demonstrated the AUC of more than 0.6 in both of the two validation phases with the same direction of correlations between expression levels of miRNAs and CRC risk as those in the discovery phase 17 samples from patients from the J-MICC Shizuoka and Daiko Studies (14,15) who developed CRCs within 2 years after participation and age- and gender-matched controls. Among the two miRNAs that fulfilled the criteria (miR-26a-5p and miR-223-3p), miR-26a-5p demonstrated the good predictability of advanced CRC incidence (5 incident CRCs and 5 age- and gender-matched controls) with the AUC of 0.840 (sensitivity 100.0% and specificity 60.0%), whereas no other miRs fulfilled the criteria of AUC more than 0.6, and in the same direction of correlations as those in the discovery and validation sets (Figs. 5 and S2). The predictability of early CRC by miR-26a-5p and miR-223-3p did not reach the AUC of 0.6 (Fig. S3). The expression levels of miR-26a-5p and miR-223-3p in the pre-clinical phase are shown in Supplementary Fig. S2. In addition, we compared the expression levels of miR-26a-5p between early CRC, advanced CRC, and non-CRC subjects, which revealed statistically significant difference (P=0.049, one-way ANOVA) (Fig. S4).
Figure 5.

Early detectability of colorectal cancer before clinical diagnosis in cohort participants by ROC curves. ROC curves were generated using the pre-clinical cohort samples (five advanced CRCs and five controls). CRC, colorectal cancer; miRNA/miR, microRNA; AUC, area under the curve; ROC curve, receiver operating characteristic curve; advanced, advanced colorectal cancer.

Discussion

In the present study, on the basis of discovery and validation with clinical CRC samples and testing with pre-clinical cohort samples, we identified serum miR-26a-5p as a possible early detection marker for CRC before clinical diagnosis. With regard to the roles of miR-26a-5p in the colorectal carcinogenesis, considerable amount of experimental evidence has been accumulated. The expressions of miR-26a have been reportedly inversely correlated with PTEN expressions in human CRC tissue samples, where miR-26a was significantly upregulated in tumors in comparison to normal tissues, and there was no difference in miR-26a expression levels by CRC stages (19). MiR-26a is also demonstrated to downregulate retinoblastoma 1 gene expression and also to regulate glucose metabolism by targeting PDHX in CRCs (20). Meanwhile, miR-223-3p is shown to promote the proliferation, growth, migration, invasion and EMT (epithelial-mesenchymal transition) of CRCs through the negative regulation of PRDM1 (21). Although the present study failed to detect the early detectability of CRCs by miR-223-3p, the high accuracy of CRC detectability in the validation phase may indicate its importance in the development of CRCs. MiR-21 is also shown to be a robust diagnostic marker for CRCs, which failed to detect CRC incidence before clinical diagnosis. Considering that the high expression of miR-21 in serum and CRC tissue is associated with larger tumor size, distant metastasis and poor prognosis, as demonstrated in the previous papers (10,22), the role of miR-21 in the early detection of CRCs might be relatively limited. In addition, miR-26a-5p is one of the super-enhancer-associated miRNAs (SE-miRNAs) of CRCs, where super-enhancers (SEs) are newly found regulatory regions on the genome consisted of multiple enhancer-like elements occupied with high densities of master transcription factors and mediator complexes (23). Moreover, both miR-15a and miR-26a-5p are marked with super-enhancers in normal sigmoid colon and other normal tissues (23), thus the roles of these SE-miRNAs in the normal colorectal tissues as well as in the development of CRCs should be clarified experimentally and clinically in the future. Further clarification of the roles of SE-miRNAs in CRC development as well as in the early detection of CRCs should be warranted. In the present study, the detectability of selected miRNAs in the discovery phase was improved in the first validation set with CRC cases of early clinical stages compared to the second validation set with CRC cases of mixture of early and advanced clinical stages, which was in accordance with the findings with the previous report of miRNA diagnostic model in lung cancer, although the difference in diagnostic accuracies between early and advanced stage of lung cancers was only a little (24). It also remains unclear whether the changes in miRNA expression levels reflect the presence of diseases, i.e., the existence of cancers itself, or reflect the alterations of surrounding tissues such as microenvironments, and it is neither clarified whether the miRNA expression changes initiates prior to disease onset or not (25). Further biological and epidemiological studies are warranted. One strength to be mentioned of the present study would be the availability of serum samples of cohort participants who developed CRCs after participation, which enabled us to evaluate the early detectability of CRCs before clinical diagnosis. Further studies that will make use of the preserved samples of large cohort studies for early detection of cancers might be expected. There are several limitations to be mentioned in the present study. Although the present study analyzed the frozen samples preserved for several years for early detectability of CRC, the miRNAs are shown to be highly stable for ~5 years under the storage at −80°C (26). To obtain more reliable results, however, further studies with improved designs, e.g., those with more frequent follow-ups with blood sample collections will be expected. In the present study, miRNA expression levels in the serum were measured. Although the miRNA expression levels in serum and plasma are in good correlations to each other, there are some advantages and disadvantages. For example, whereas the miRNA expression levels in serum tends to be higher due to the RNA release during coagulation (27), the miRNA expression levels in plasma might also be affected by delayed sample processing, especially in cohort studies, due to the possible release of exosomes from the blood cells. In addition, aberrant expressions of miR-26a-5p in blood have been reported also in acute myeloid leukemia (AML) (28), bladder cancer (29,30), non-small cell lung cancer (31) and breast cancer (32). Although non-specificity is recognized as a general problem of cancer detection markers, it is worth reporting the present study results considering miR-26a-5p can be one of the potential markers for future clinical applications. Further investigations should be made to identify more specific early detection methods of CRCs. There were also constraints due to limited research funds; we had to select the limited number of miRNAs with high accuracy carefully, although adopting as numerous miRNAs as possible to improve the diagnostic accuracy of miRNA prediction models would be ideal. In addition, some of the miRNAs detected in the discovery phase indicated poor reproducibility of expressions themselves in the validation phase, which was considered to be attributable to the performance of the microarray platform used. Therefore, studies with improved ways of expression analyses, i.e., by using the next-generation sequencings of miRNAs should be expected. Finally, statistical power considerations are as follows. The statistical power for the 10-fold increase in expression levels with the standard deviation of 5 in 8 cases and 8 controls is more than 90%, whereas it is more than 85% in 7 cases and 7 controls under the same conditions. Although the sample size in the present study can detect the difference in expression levels if the difference is large enough, the limited sample sizes of the present study should be considered as a limitation, which should warrant further investigations with sufficient sample sizes in the near future. In conclusion, the present study found serum miR-26a-5p as a potential early detection marker for CRC before clinical diagnosis. Further investigations with improved designs are warranted.
  31 in total

1.  MicroRNAs as potential liquid biopsy biomarkers in colorectal cancer: A systematic review.

Authors:  Yuji Toiyama; Yoshinaga Okugawa; James Fleshman; C Richard Boland; Ajay Goel
Journal:  Biochim Biophys Acta Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-05-29       Impact factor: 10.680

2.  MiR-26a downregulates retinoblastoma in colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Eduardo López-Urrutia; Jossimar Coronel-Hernández; Verónica García-Castillo; Carlos Contreras-Romero; Antonio Martínez-Gutierrez; Diana Estrada-Galicia; Luis Ignacio Terrazas; César López-Camarillo; Hector Maldonado-Martínez; Nadia Jacobo-Herrera; Carlos Pérez-Plasencia
Journal:  Tumour Biol       Date:  2017-04

3.  Super-Enhancer-Mediated RNA Processing Revealed by Integrative MicroRNA Network Analysis.

Authors:  Hiroshi I Suzuki; Richard A Young; Phillip A Sharp
Journal:  Cell       Date:  2017-03-09       Impact factor: 41.582

4.  Baseline data of Shizuoka area in the Japan Multi-Institutional Collaborative Cohort Study (J-MICC Study).

Authors:  Yatami Asai; Mariko Naito; Masumi Suzuki; Akiko Tomoda; Mayumi Kuwabara; Yuko Fukada; Ayumi Okamoto; Sachie Oishi; Kanako Ikeda; Tsukino Nakamura; Yasuko Misu; Shiroh Katase; Satoshi Tokumasu; Kazuko Nishio; Yoshiko Ishida; Asahi Hishida; Emi Morita; Sayo Kawai; Rieko Okada; Kenji Wakai; Akiko Tamakoshi; Nobuyuki Hamajima
Journal:  Nagoya J Med Sci       Date:  2009-09       Impact factor: 1.131

5.  MicroRNA-26a-5p inhibits breast cancer cell growth by suppressing RNF6 expression.

Authors:  Zi-Ming Huang; Heng-Fa Ge; Chen-Chen Yang; Yong Cai; Zhen Chen; Wen-Ze Tian; Jia-Li Tao
Journal:  Kaohsiung J Med Sci       Date:  2019-05-07       Impact factor: 2.744

Review 6.  Data Normalization Strategies for MicroRNA Quantification.

Authors:  Heidi Schwarzenbach; Andreia Machado da Silva; George Calin; Klaus Pantel
Journal:  Clin Chem       Date:  2015-09-25       Impact factor: 8.327

Review 7.  RNA in cancer.

Authors:  Gregory J Goodall; Vihandha O Wickramasinghe
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2020-10-20       Impact factor: 60.716

8.  Cell migration and proliferation are regulated by miR-26a in colorectal cancer via the PTEN-AKT axis.

Authors:  Jossimar Coronel-Hernández; Eduardo López-Urrutia; Carlos Contreras-Romero; Izamary Delgado-Waldo; Gabriela Figueroa-González; Alma D Campos-Parra; Rebeca Salgado-García; Antonio Martínez-Gutierrez; Miguel Rodríguez-Morales; Nadia Jacobo-Herrera; Luis Ignacio Terrazas; Abraham Silva-Carmona; César López-Camarillo; Carlos Pérez-Plasencia
Journal:  Cancer Cell Int       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 5.722

9.  Japanese Society for Cancer of the Colon and Rectum (JSCCR) guidelines 2019 for the treatment of colorectal cancer.

Authors:  Yojiro Hashiguchi; Kei Muro; Yutaka Saito; Yoshinori Ito; Yoichi Ajioka; Tetsuya Hamaguchi; Kiyoshi Hasegawa; Kinichi Hotta; Hideyuki Ishida; Megumi Ishiguro; Soichiro Ishihara; Yukihide Kanemitsu; Yusuke Kinugasa; Keiko Murofushi; Takako Eguchi Nakajima; Shiro Oka; Toshiaki Tanaka; Hiroya Taniguchi; Akihito Tsuji; Keisuke Uehara; Hideki Ueno; Takeharu Yamanaka; Kentaro Yamazaki; Masahiro Yoshida; Takayuki Yoshino; Michio Itabashi; Kentaro Sakamaki; Keiji Sano; Yasuhiro Shimada; Shinji Tanaka; Hiroyuki Uetake; Shigeki Yamaguchi; Naohiko Yamaguchi; Hirotoshi Kobayashi; Keiji Matsuda; Kenjiro Kotake; Kenichi Sugihara
Journal:  Int J Clin Oncol       Date:  2019-06-15       Impact factor: 3.402

10.  Integrated extracellular microRNA profiling for ovarian cancer screening.

Authors:  Akira Yokoi; Juntaro Matsuzaki; Yusuke Yamamoto; Yutaka Yoneoka; Kenta Takahashi; Hanako Shimizu; Takashi Uehara; Mitsuya Ishikawa; Shun-Ichi Ikeda; Takumi Sonoda; Junpei Kawauchi; Satoko Takizawa; Yoshiaki Aoki; Shumpei Niida; Hiromi Sakamoto; Ken Kato; Tomoyasu Kato; Takahiro Ochiya
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2018-10-17       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.