Literature DB >> 35126540

Monitoring udder health status using somatic cell counts in Holstein dairy herds located in north-east of Iran and effectiveness of 10-point mastitis control program.

M R Rahimi1, B Khoramian2, M Drillich3, M Azizzadeh2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The somatic cell count (SCC) of individual cow samples is a useful proxy for monitoring udder health status. AIMS: The present study aimed to provide updated information about udder health in Iranian Holstein dairy cattle, and to quantify the effectiveness of the mastitis control program.
METHODS: A total of 17,990 monthly test-day records from 1,663 Holstein dairy cattle in 10 "regular" herds and 2,389 test-day records from 386 Holstein dairy cattle in 2 herds that were assigned to the 10-point mastitis control program ("controlled" herds) were included. Each test-day record comprised the date of recording, daily milk production (kg), fat and protein (%), days in milk, parity, and SCC.
RESULTS: Median (Q1-Q3) SCC × 103 for "regular" and "controlled" herds were 136 (52-391) and 64 (24-204) cells/ml, respectively. Also, the percentage of records containing SCC >200,000 cells/ml (elevated SCC) for these groups were 40.3% and 25.5%, respectively. Mixed effects logistic analysis revealed that milk records from cows in the first lactation, early lactation, and with >40 kg daily milk yield had lower odds of elevated SCC. The odds of elevated SCC were lower in summer and autumn than in winter.
CONCLUSION: Host and environmental characteristics influence SCC. This should be considered for the interpretation of SCC results. Mastitis control programs can support dairy producers to reach a standard level of udder health.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Dairy cow; Iran; Mastitis control program; Somatic cell count; Udder health

Year:  2021        PMID: 35126540      PMCID: PMC8806178          DOI: 10.22099/IJVR.2021.40046.5805

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Iran J Vet Res        ISSN: 2252-0589            Impact factor:   1.376


  9 in total

1.  Costs of mastitis: facts and perception.

Authors:  Kirsten Huijps; Theo Jgm Lam; Henk Hogeveen
Journal:  J Dairy Res       Date:  2008-01-29       Impact factor: 1.904

2.  Milk production and somatic cell counts: a cow-level analysis.

Authors:  K J Hand; A Godkin; D F Kelton
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2012-03       Impact factor: 4.034

3.  Use of different somatic cell count cut-points to define intramammary infection at drying off in dairy cows from a herd with a high somatic cell count.

Authors:  D Hawkins
Journal:  N Z Vet J       Date:  2019-07       Impact factor: 1.628

Review 4.  Physiology of mastitis and factors affecting somatic cell counts.

Authors:  R J Harmon
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1994-07       Impact factor: 4.034

5.  On distinguishing cause and consequence: do high somatic cell counts lead to lower milk yield or does high milk yield lead to lower somatic cell count?

Authors:  L E Green; Y H Schukken; M J Green
Journal:  Prev Vet Med       Date:  2006-06-14       Impact factor: 2.670

6.  Influence of parity and stage of lactation on the somatic cell count in bacteriologically negative dairy cows.

Authors:  H Laevens; H Deluyker; Y H Schukken; L De Meulemeester; R Vandermeersch; E De Muêlenaere; A De Kruif
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  1997-12       Impact factor: 4.034

7.  Effects of season, milking routine and cow cleanliness on bacterial and somatic cell counts of bulk tank milk.

Authors:  Maddalena Zucali; Luciana Bava; Alberto Tamburini; Milena Brasca; Laura Vanoni; Anna Sandrucci
Journal:  J Dairy Res       Date:  2011-08-16       Impact factor: 1.904

8.  Milk losses associated with somatic cell counts by parity and stage of lactation.

Authors:  Juliano L Gonçalves; Roger I Cue; Bruno G Botaro; José A Horst; Altair A Valloto; Marcos V Santos
Journal:  J Dairy Sci       Date:  2018-02-15       Impact factor: 4.034

9.  Prevalence of subclinical mastitis in Finnish dairy cows: changes during recent decades and impact of cow and herd factors.

Authors:  Heidi Hiitiö; Johanna Vakkamäki; Heli Simojoki; Tiina Autio; Jouni Junnila; Sinikka Pelkonen; Satu Pyörälä
Journal:  Acta Vet Scand       Date:  2017-04-20       Impact factor: 1.695

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.