| Literature DB >> 35126360 |
Nicholas Henry1, Jacqueline Frank1,2, Christopher McLouth3, Amanda L Trout2,4, Andrew Morris5, Jianzhong Chen6, Ann M Stowe1,2,7, Justin F Fraser1,2,4,7,8, Keith Pennypacker1,2,7.
Abstract
Introduction: Short chain fatty acids (SCFA) are gut microbiota-derived metabolites that contribute to the gut-brain axis and may impact stroke outcomes following gut dysbiosis. We evaluated plasma SCFA concentrations against stroke severity parameters and identified SCFA-associated protein networks.Entities:
Keywords: brain ischemia; cytokine - immunological terms; inflammation; microbiome & dysbiosis; neuroimmunology of the gut
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35126360 PMCID: PMC8807638 DOI: 10.3389/fimmu.2021.797302
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Immunol ISSN: 1664-3224 Impact factor: 7.561
Demographics and troke sparameters of thrombectomy patients (n=53).
| Value (%) | Value (%) | ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
| 68 (25-96) |
| |
|
| Mild Stroke (1-4) | 1 (2) | |
| Female | 32 (60) | Moderate Stroke (5-14) | 17 (32.5) |
| Male | 21 (40) | Severe Stroke (15-24) | 27 (52) |
|
| Very Severe Stroke (>24) | 7 (13.5) | |
| <18.5 | 1 (2) |
| |
| 18.5-24.9 | 16 (31) | Mild Stroke (1-4) | 15 (37.5) |
| 25-29.9 | 22 (42) | Moderate Stroke (5-14) | 16 (40) |
| 30-34.9 | 8 (15) | Severe Stroke (15-24) | 9 (22.5) |
| 35+ | 5 (10) |
| |
|
| 0 | 8 (22) | |
| Hypertension | 41 (77) | 1 | 24 (67) |
| Diabetes Mellitus II | 17 (32) | 2 | 4 (11) |
| Hyperlipidemia | 12 (23) |
| |
| Previous Stroke | 10 (19) | 0 | 18 (45) |
|
| 1 | 12 (30) | |
| Current | 12 (27) | 2 | 6 (15) |
| Previous (>6 mon) | 6 (13) | 3 | 2 (7.5) |
| Never | 27 (60) | 4 | 1 (2.5) |
|
|
| ||
| 1 = Perfusion Limited | 1 (2) | 0 | 3 (11.5) |
| 2A <= 50% Perfusion | 2 (4) | 1 | 4 (15) |
| 2B >= 50% Perfusion | 22 (41) | 2 | 2 (8) |
| 3 = Full Perfusion | 28 (53) | 3 | 1 (4) |
| 4 | 9 (35) | ||
| 5 | 4 (15) | ||
| 6 | 3 (11.5) |
Values are median with range, mean ± SD, or (%).
N=53 Patients.
1 patient’s data missing (n=52).
8 patient’s data missing (n=45).
13 patient’s data missing (n=40).
17 patient’s data missing (n=36).
27 patient’s data missing (n=26).
Differences in plasma SCFA concentrations between nominal patient demographics and comorbidities (top) and Pearson Correlations between quantitative patient demographics and SCFA concentrations (bottom).
| Nominal Data | Acetate (μM) | Propionate (μM) | Isobutyrate (μM) | Butyrate (μM) | 2-Methylbutyrate (μM) | ||||||||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| N | Mean | SD | p value | Mean | SD | p value | Mean | SD | p value | Mean | SD | p value | Mean | SD | p value | ||
|
| Female | 32 | 68.40 | 56.59 | 0.466 | 1.64 | 1.17 | 0.251 | 0.32 | 0.28 | 0.914 | 0.45 | 0.47 | 0.726 | 0.42 | 0.27 | 0.908 |
| Male | 21 | 80.32 | 59.58 | 2.08 | 1.52 | 0.33 | 0.39 | 0.40 | 0.65 | 0.41 | 0.26 | ||||||
|
| Yes | 41 | 79.79 | 63.43 | 0.01 | 2.00 | 1.34 | 0.068 | 0.37 | 0.36 | 0.005 | 0.44 | 0.60 | 0.867 | 0.45 | 0.28 | 0.059 |
| No | 12 | 50.34 | 16.84 | 1.20 | 1.11 | 0.19 | 0.09 | 0.41 | 0.31 | 0.29 | 0.12 | ||||||
|
| Yes | 17 | 86.28 | 61.17 | 0.257 | 2.20 | 1.54 | 0.145 | 0.36 | 0.42 | 0.653 | 0.34 | 0.56 | 0.394 | 0.49 | 0.36 | 0.222 |
| No | 36 | 66.91 | 55.52 | 1.63 | 1.19 | 0.31 | 0.28 | 0.48 | 0.54 | 0.38 | 0.20 | ||||||
|
| Yes | 12 | 93.91 | 86.17 | 0.318 | 1.76 | 1.00 | 0.877 | 0.31 | 0.23 | 0.796 | 0.48 | 0.64 | 0.74 | 0.46 | 0.28 | 0.501 |
| No | 41 | 67.04 | 45.75 | 1.83 | 1.42 | 0.33 | 0.35 | 0.42 | 0.52 | 0.40 | 0.26 | ||||||
|
| Yes | 10 | 67.42 | 47.52 | 0.731 | 2.10 | 1.32 | 0.453 | 0.45 | 0.42 | 0.198 | 0.53 | 0.70 | 0.528 | 0.53 | 0.29 | 0.115 |
| No | 43 | 74.45 | 60.03 | 1.75 | 1.33 | 0.30 | 0.30 | 0.41 | 0.51 | 0.39 | 0.25 | ||||||
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| ||||||
|
| 53 | 0.197 | 0.158 | .285* | 0.038 | .328* | 0.016 | 0.223 | 0.108 | .312* | 0.023 | ||||||
|
| 52 | -0.104 | 0.461 | -0.061 | 0.67 | -0.104 | 0.462 | -0.097 | 0.496 | -0.158 | 0.264 | ||||||
|
| 50 | .316* | 0.026 | 0.067 | 0.645 | 0.239 | 0.094 | 0.081 | 0.576 | 0.235 | 0.1 | ||||||
*p values ≤ 0.05.
Figure 1Box and Whisker Plots of Stroke (n=53) vs CVD Control (n=12). (A) Acetate was significantly lower (p=0.02) in stroke (M=73.1, SD=57.5) compared to control (M=120.6, SD=80.0). (B–E) Propionate (MS= 1.8, SDS=1.3; MC=1.44, SDC=1.35), Isobutyrate (MS=0.33, SDS=0.33; MC=0.38, SDC=0.39), Butyrate (MS=0.43, SDS=0.54; MC=0.63, SDC=0.72), and 2-Methylbutyrate (MS=0.41, SDS=0.26; MC=0.41, SDC=0.26) were comparable between groups. )MS= Stroke Mean, SDS= Stroke Std. Dev.; MC= Control Mean, SDC=Control Std. Dev.).
Figure 2Inter-individual SCFA linear regressions of Propionate and Isobutyrate (A) Propionate and Butyrate (B) Propionate and 2-Methylbutyrate (C) Isobutyrate and Butyrate (D) Isobutyrate and 2-Methylbutyrate (E) and Butyrate and 2-Methylbutyrate (F) (p=0.00).
SCFA pearson correlations with stroke parameters.
| Acetate | Propionate | Isobutyrate | Butyrate | 2-Methylbutyrate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| R value | -0.01 | 0.122 | 0.04 | -0.071 | -0.127 |
| p value | 0.943 | 0.386 | 0.777 | 0.615 | 0.365 | |
| N | 53 | 53 | 53 | 53 | 53 | |
|
| R value | 0.086 | 0.095 | 0.036 | -0.06 | -0.007 |
| p value | 0.545 | 0.501 | 0.801 | 0.672 | 0.959 | |
| N | 52 | 52 | 52 | 52 | 52 | |
|
| R value | 0.157 | 0.099 | 0.144 | 0.034 | 0.146 |
| p value | 0.267 | 0.486 | 0.308 | 0.811 | 0.303 | |
| N | 52 | 52 | 52 | 52 | 52 | |
|
| R value | 0.11 | 0.31 | .371* | 0.259 | 0.265 |
| p value | 0.498 | 0.051 | 0.018 | 0.107 | 0.098 | |
| N | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | 40 | |
|
| R value | 0.043 | -.337* | -0.296 | -0.313 | -0.205 |
| p value | 0.794 | 0.036 | 0.067 | 0.053 | 0.21 | |
| N | 39 | 39 | 39 | 39 | 39 |
No SCFAs were correlated with Infarct Volume, Edema Volume, or NIHSS Admission Score (p>0.05). Isobutyrate (p=0.018) was significantly correlated with NIHSS Discharge Scores. Propionate (p=0.036) was significantly correlated with %ΔNIHSS Scores. *p values ≤ 0.05.
Figure 3%ΔNIHSS correlations with Propionate (0.036) (A), Isobutyrate (p=0.067) (B) and Butyrate (p=0.053) (C). Propionate (p=0.051) (D) and Isobutyrate (p=0.018) (E) correlations with NIHSS Discharge scores.
Figure 4STRING protein networks for all intracranial proteins with >3 SCFA correlations (A), intracranial proteins correlated with Propionate, Isobutyrate, Butyrate, and 2-Methylbutyrate (B) and all systemic proteins with >3 SCFA correlations (C).
Biological processes associated with STRING networks for all intracranial proteins with >3 SCFA correlations (a), intracranial proteins correlated with propionate, isobutyrate, butyrate, and 2-methylbutyrate (b) and all systemic proteins with >3 SCFA correlations (c).
| A. All Intracranial Proteins Correlated with >3 SCFAs | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Biological Process | Strength | FDR | Matching Proteins in Network |
| Cytokine-mediated signaling pathway | 1.46 | 1.09E-06 | CSF-1, CXC10, IL-12B, IL-17A, IL-6, TNF, VCAM1 |
| Positive regulation of osteoclast differentiation | 2.62 | 1.57E-06 | CSF-1, IL-12B, IL-17A, TNF |
| Defense response to other organism | 1.34 | 2.62E-06 | CSF-1, CXC10, IL-12B, IL-17A, IL-6, TNF, VCAM1 |
| Positive regulation of immune system process | 1.31 | 2.84E-06 | CSF-1, CXC10, IL-12B, IL-17A, IL-6, TNF, VCAM1 |
| Cell activation | 1.26 | 4.52E-06 | CSF-1, CXC10, IL-12B, IL-17A, IL-6, TNF, VCAM1 |
| Positive regulation of response to external stimulus | 1.52 | 4.94E-06 | CSF-1, CXC10, IL-12B, IL-17A, IL-6, TNF |
| Leukocyte migration | 1.65 | 2.57E-05 | CXC:10, IL-17A, IL-6, TNF, VCAM1 |
| Immune response | 1.09 | 2.57E-05 | CSF-1, CXC:10, IL-12B, IL-17A, IL-6, TNF, VCAM1 |
| Leukocyte differentiation | 1.62 | 3.02E-05 | CSF1, IL6, IL17A, TNF, VCAM1 |
| Positive regulation of cytokine production involved in inflammatory response | 2.6 | 4.79E-05 | IL-17A. IL-6, TNF |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| Positive regulation of leukocyte migration | 2.04 | 0.00027 | CSF-1, CXCL10, IL-6, TNF |
| Cytokine-mediated signaling pathway | 1.46 | 0.00045 | CSF-1, CXCL10, IL-6, TNF, VCAM1 |
| Regulation of mononuclear cell migration | 2.35 | 0.00092 | CSF-1, CXCL10, TNF |
| Positive regulation of gliogenesis | 2.21 | 0.00092 | CSF-1, IL-6, TNF |
| Leukocyte migration | 1.69 | 0.00092 | CXCL10, IL-6, TNF, VCAM1 |
| Leukocyte differentiation | 1.67 | 0.00092 | CSF-1, IL-6, TNF, VCAM1 |
| Defense response to other organism | 1.34 | 0.00092 | CSF-1, CXCL10, IL-6, TNF, VCAM1 |
| Positive regulation of cell population proliferation | 1.33 | 0.00092 | CSF-1, CXCL10, IL-6, TNF, VCAM1 |
| Positive regulation of immune system cells | 1.31 | 0.00092 | CSF-1, CXCL10, IL-6, TNF, VCAM1 |
| Cell activation | 1.26 | 0.00092 | CSF-1, CXCL10, IL-6, TNF, VCAM1 |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| Granulocyte migration | 1.96 | 0.0177 | IL-17A, CXCL9, CXCL10 |
| Leukocyte migration | 1.55 | 0.0177 | IL-17A, CXCL9, CXCL10, VCAM1 |
| Cytokine-mediated signaling pathway | 1.31 | 0.0177 | IL-17A, IL-2, CXCL9, CXCL10, VCAM1 |
| Immune response | 1.02 | 0.0177 | CD8A. IL-17A, IL-2, CXCL9, CXCL10, VCAM1 |
| Cell activation | 1.11 | 0.0261 | CD8A. IL-17A, IL-2, CXCL10, VCAM1 |
| Cell surface receptor signaling pathway | 0.86 | 0.0347 | CD8A. IL-17A, IL-2, CXCL9, CXCL10, VCAM1 |
| Regulation of myoblast fusion | 2.41 | 0.048 | CXCL9, CXCL10 |
FDR, False Discovery Rate.
Figure 5Linear Regressions of IL-6 with SCFAs and NIHSS admission score. Intracranial IL-6 was correlated with Propionate (A), Isobutyrate (B), Butyrate (C), 2-Methylbutyrate (D), and NIHSS Admission (F). Systemic IL-6 was correlated with Isobutyrate (B), Butyrate (C), 2-Methylbutyrate (D), and NIHSS Admission (E).
Systemic proteins correlated with both SCFAs and stroke presentation parameters.
| Acetate | Propionate | Isobutyrate | Butyrate | 2-Methylbutyrate | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| NIHSS Admission | (p=0.035) R=.293*) |
|
| |||
| (p=<.001) R=.469**) |
|
|
| |||
| (p=0.042) R=.284*) |
|
|
| |||
| (p=0.05) R=0.273) |
| |||||
| (p=0.053) (R=0.27) |
|
| ||||
| (p=0.033) R=.296*) |
|
|
| |||
| (p=0.048) R=.276*) |
|
| ||||
| (p=0.051) R=0.272) |
|
| ||||
| (p=0.036) R=.291*) |
| |||||
| (p=0.044) R=.280*) |
|
|
| |||
| (p=0.041) R=.285*) |
| |||||
| Edema Volume | (p=0.013) R=.343*) |
|
|
| ||
| (p=0.039) (R=-.288*) |
|
| ||||
| Infarct Volume | (p=0.055) (R=-0.265) |
|
|
|
The p and R values listed in the second column are those for the stroke parameter-protein correlations. The p and R values listed under each SCFA column beside each protein are those for the SCFA-protein correlations.
*p values, 0.01-0.05. **p values ≤ 0.01.
Intracranial proteins correlated with both SCFAs and NIHSS admission scores.
| Acetate | Propionate | Isobutyrate | Butyrate | 2-Methylbutyrate | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| CCL20 | (p=0.05) R=0.27) | (p=0.012) R=.344*) | (p=0.002) R=.412**) | ||
| (p=0.001) R=.431**) | (p=0.001) R=.431**) | (p=0.001) R=.431**) | |||
| IL-6 | (p=0.026) R=.305*) | (p=0.01) R=.353**) | (p=0.002) R=.407**) | (p=0.004) R=.385**) | |
| (p=0.047) R=.276*) | (p=0.047) R=.276*) | (p=0.047) R=.276*) | (p=0.047) R=.276*) | ||
| TIMP1 | (p=<.001) R=.445**) | (p=0.022) R=.315*) | (p=0.001) R=.435**) | ||
| (p=0.057) R=0.266) | (p=0.057) R=0.266) | (p=0.057) R=0.266) |
SCFA-Protein p and R values are listed on the top of cell. Protein-NIHSS admission score p and R values are listed on the bottom of each cell. *p values = 0.01-0.05. **p values ≤ 0.01.
Figure 6STRING protein networks for systemic proteins correlated with both Isobutyrate and NIHSS admission scores (A), systemic proteins correlated with both 2-Methybutyrate and NIHSS admission scores (B) and intracranial proteins correlated with Isobutyrate, 2-Metlybutyrate and NIHSS Admission Scores (C). *OPG, TNFRSF11B; MCP-1, CCL2; LAP-TGFB1 was not found in STRING.
Biological processes associated with STRING networks for systemic proteins correlated with both Isobutyrate and NIHSS admission scores (a), systemic proteins correlated with both 2-methylbutyrate and NIHSS admission scores (b) and intracranial proteins correlated with Isobutyrate, 2-methylbutyrate and NIHSS admission scores (c).
| A. Systemic Proteins Correlated with Isobutyrate and NIHSS Admission Score | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| Biological Process | Strength | FDR | Matching Proteins in Network |
| Monocyte chemotaxis | 2.44 | 0.0021 | CCL20, CCL4, IL-6 |
| Positive regulation of leukocyte migration | 1.91 | 0.0172 | CCL20, CCL4, IL-6 |
| Negative regulation of bone resorption | 2.75 | 0.0183 | IL-6, TNFRSF11B |
| Cytokine-mediated signaling pathway | 1.36 | 0.0183 | CCL20, CCL4, IL-6, TNFRSF11B |
| Cellular response to tumor necrosis factor | 1.68 | 0.0288 | CCL20, CCL4, TNFRSF11B |
| Positive regulation of lymphocyte migration | 2.31 | 0.0474 | CCL20, CCL4 |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| Monocyte chemotaxis | 2.31 | 3.70E-05 | CCL2, CCL20, CCL4, IL-6 |
| Leukocyte chemotaxis | 1.88 | 3.70E-05 | CCL2, CCL20, CCL4, IL-10, IL-6 |
| Cytokine-mediated signaling pathway | 1.35 | 3.70E-05 | CCL2, CCL20, CCL4, IL-10, IL-6, SOD1, TNFRSF11B |
| Cell surface receptor signaling pathway | 0.87 | 0.00057 | CCL2, CCL20, CCL4, IL-10, IL-6, NID1, SOD1, TNFRSF11B |
| Lymphocyte chemotaxis | 2.12 | 0.0025 | CCL2, CCL20, CCL4 |
| Regulation of leukocyte migration | 1.62 | 0.0025 | CCL2, CCL20, CCL4, IL-6 |
| Positive regulation of MAPK cascade | 1.3 | 0.0026 | CCL2, CCL20, CCL4, IL-6, SOD1 |
| Response to organic substance | 0.76 | 0.0027 | CA3, CCL2, CCL20, CCL4, IL-10, IL-6, SOD1, TNFRSF11B |
| Response to carbon monoxide | 3.04 | 0.0029 | IL-10, SOD1 |
| Cellular response to tumor necrosis factor | 1.55 | 0.003 | CCL2, CCL20, CCL4, TNFRSF11B |
|
| |||
|
|
|
|
|
| Cytokine activity | 1.92 | 0.009 | CCL20, IL-6, TIMP1 |
FDR, False Discovery Rate.