| Literature DB >> 35126251 |
Eun-Young Park1, Jung-Hee Kim2.
Abstract
The study aimed to examine the influence of personal characteristics on activity preferences using decision tree analysis and examine the effects of the variables using conventional approaches (logistic regression analysis). A descriptive study was conducted with 251 nursing home residents with dementia in Korea (76.9% female) to examine the relationship between their personal characteristics and activity preferences. Decision tree analysis was used to classify participants' activity preferences, and preference levels were examined using logistic regression analysis. Activities were classified as either physical and social activities or cognitive and affective activities. This model showed an accuracy rate of 85.7% for positively predicting physical and social activity preference and 30.3% for positively predicting cognitive and affective activity preference. Gender was the strongest determinant of activity preference. The odds of preferring physical and social activities were 3.179 times higher among women, while the odds for preferring cognitive and affective activities were 0.412 times higher among men. Notably, cognitive and affective activity preference increased to 58.8% for married male participants. This study's findings can contribute to the development of programs to decrease behavioral and psychological symptoms among older people with dementia residing in nursing homes and provide scientific evidence for integrating these activities into long-term services for this population.Entities:
Keywords: activity preferences; decision tree; dementia; nursing homes; older people
Year: 2022 PMID: 35126251 PMCID: PMC8811220 DOI: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.799810
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Psychol ISSN: 1664-1078
Characteristics of patients with dementia (n = 251).
| Characteristics | n | % |
|
| ||
| Male | 57 | 22.7 |
| Female | 193 | 76.9 |
| Missing | 1 | 0.4 |
|
| ||
| Below 84 | 122 | 48.6 |
| Above 85 | 124 | 49.4 |
| Missing | 5 | 2.0 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 69 | 27.5 |
| No | 182 | 72.5 |
|
| ||
| Yes | 66 | 26.3 |
| No | 185 | 73.7 |
|
| ||
| Below middle school | 148 | 59.0 |
| Above middle school | 90 | 35.9 |
| Missing data | 13 | 5.2 |
|
| ||
| No | 184 | 73.3 |
| Yes | 57 | 22.7 |
| Missing data | 10 | 4.0 |
|
| ||
| High | 160 | 63.7 |
| Low | 79 | 31.5 |
| Missing data | 12 | 4.8 |
FIGURE 1Decision tree for predicting physical and social preference.
Classification matrix of CHAID for physical and social activities.
| Classification matrix | Prediction | Forecasting | ||||
| Not preferred | Preferred | Total | Accuracy measures | % | ||
| Training data | Not preferred | 18 | 27 | 45 | Specificity | 40.0 |
| Preferred | 11 | 66 | 77 | Sensitivity | 85.7 | |
| Total | 29 | 93 | 122 | Overall accuracy | 68.9 | |
CHAID, Chi-squared automatic interaction detection.
Summary of logistic regression analysis for the preference of physical and social activities.
| Variable | B | S.E. | df | Exp (β) | –95% CI | +95% CI |
|
| Gender | 1.16 | 0.39 | 1 | 3.18 | 1.49 | 6.80 | 0.003 |
| Age | –0.06 | 0.31 | 1 | 0.94 | 0.51 | 1.73 | 0.834 |
| Education level | –0.11 | 0.32 | 1 | 0.90 | 0.48 | 1.69 | 0.735 |
| Presence of spouse | –0.32 | 0.36 | 1 | 0.73 | 0.36 | 1.46 | 0.372 |
| Degree of self-expression | 0.37 | 0.33 | 1 | 1.45 | 0.76 | 2.76 | 0.261 |
| Use of assistive device | –0.65 | 0.34 | 1 | 0.52 | 0.27 | 1.02 | 0.056 |
| Religion | –0.17 | 0.34 | 1 | 0.84 | 0.43 | 1.64 | 0.614 |
| Children | 1.51 | 0.83 | 1 | 4.54 | 0.90 | 22.99 | 0.068 |
FIGURE 2Decision tree for predicting preference in cognitive and affective activities.
Classification matrix of CHAID for cognitive and affective activities.
| Classification matrix | Prediction | Forecasting | ||||
| Not preferred | Preferred | Total | Accuracy measures | % | ||
| Training data | Not preferred | 90 | 7 | 97 | Specificity | 92.8 |
| Preferred | 23 | 10 | 33 | Sensitivity | 30.3 | |
| Total | 113 | 17 | 120 | Overall accuracy | 76.9 | |
CHAID, Chi-squared automatic interaction detection.
Summary of logistic regression analysis for preference of cognitive and affective activities.
| Variable | B | S.E. | df | Exp (β) | –95% CI | +95% CI |
|
| Gender | –0.87 | 0.41 | 1 | 0.41 | 0.19 | 0.91 | 0.029 |
| Age | 0.51 | 0.36 | 1 | 1.66 | 0.82 | 3.36 | 0.160 |
| Education level | 0.80 | 0.35 | 1 | 2.22 | 1.11 | 4.44 | 0.024 |
| Presence of spouse | –0.30 | 0.38 | 1 | 0.74 | 0.36 | 1.55 | 0.425 |
| Degree of self-expression | 0.01 | 0.36 | 1 | 1.01 | 0.50 | 2.05 | 0.982 |
| Use of assistive device | –0.11 | 0.38 | 1 | 0.90 | 0.43 | 1.89 | 0.771 |
| Religion | 0.49 | 0.40 | 1 | 1.63 | 0.75 | 3.53 | 0.220 |
| Children | –0.16 | 0.76 | 1 | 0.86 | 0.19 | 3.76 | 0.835 |