| Literature DB >> 35126166 |
Luca Filippi1, Maurizio Cammalleri2, Rosario Amato2, Massimiliano Ciantelli1, Alessandro Pini3, Paola Bagnoli2, Massimo Dal Monte2.
Abstract
Retinopathy of prematurity (ROP) is an evolutive and potentially blinding eye disease that affects preterm newborns. Unfortunately, until now no conservative therapy of active ROP with proven efficacy is available. Although ROP is a multifactorial disease, premature exposition to oxygen concentrations higher than those intrauterine, represents the initial pathogenetic trigger. The increase of oxygenation in a retina still incompletely vascularized promotes the downregulation of proangiogenic factors and finally the interruption of vascularization (ischemic phase). However, the increasing metabolic requirement of the ischemic retina induces, over the following weeks, a progressive hypoxia that specularly increases the levels of proangiogenic factors finally leading to proliferative retinopathy (proliferative phase). Considering non-modifiable the coupling between oxygen levels and vascularization, so far, neonatologists and ophthalmologists have "played defense", meticulously searching the minimum necessary concentration of oxygen for individual newborns, refining their diagnostic ability, adopting a careful monitoring policy, ready to decisively intervene only in a very advanced stage of disease progression. However, recent advances have demonstrated the possibility to pharmacologically modulate the relationship between oxygen and vascularization, opening thus the perspective for new therapeutic or preventive opportunities. The perspective of a shift from a defensive towards an attack strategy is now at hand.Entities:
Keywords: hyperoxia/hypoxia; hypoxia-inducible factor-1; prolyl hydroxylase domain-containing proteins; propranolol; β-adrenergic system
Year: 2022 PMID: 35126166 PMCID: PMC8814365 DOI: 10.3389/fphar.2022.835771
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Pharmacol ISSN: 1663-9812 Impact factor: 5.810
ROP classification (Chiang et al., 2021).
| Location of vascularization | ||
|---|---|---|
| Zone I | Twice radius from optic disc to the fovea | |
| Zone II | From the outer border of Zone I to the nasal ora serrata | |
| Zone III | Residual peripheral retina extending beyond Zone II | |
| Stage of the disease | ||
| Stage of acute disease | Stage 1 | Demarcation line at the vascular-avascular juncture |
| Stage 2 | Ridge from the demarcation line with small neovascular tufts | |
| Stage 3 | Neovascular proliferation from the ridge into the vitreous or flat neovascularization | |
| Retinal Detachment | Stage 4 | Partial detachment: 4A with fovea attached, 4B with fovea detached |
| Stage 5 | Total detachment | |
| Preplus disease | Abnormal vascular dilation, tortuosity insufficient for plus disease, or both | |
| Plus disease | Appearance of dilation and tortuosity of retinal vessels | |
FIGURE 1Role of oxygen in the physiologic retinal vascularization and in the pathogenesis of ROP. During the intrauterine life, the physiologic low tension of oxygen promotes Hypoxia-Inducible Factor-1α (HIF-1α) and consequently Vascular-Endothelial Growth Factor (VEGF) upregulation, favoring the physiologic vascularization of retina (A) Premature oxygen exposition of preterm newborns induces the stop or even the regression of the immature retinal vascularization, secondary to the downregulation of both HIF-1α and VEGF (ischemic phase of ROP) (B) This progressive ischemia is responsible for the shift towards a retina that progressively becomes again hypoxic. Retinal hypoxia in turn induces HIF-1α and VEGF upregulation that promote a tumultuous and pathologic retinal neovascularization (proliferative phase of ROP) (C).
Role of β-ARs in preclinical studies.
| Preclinical studies | |||
|---|---|---|---|
| References | OIR model | Treatment | Results |
|
| Mouse strain C57BL/6J | Subcutaneous PROP | Reduction of HIF-1α, VEGF, IGF-1, retinal hemorrhage, vascular tufts, capillary leakage |
|
| Mouse strain C57BL/6J | Subcutaneous ICI 118,551 | Reduction of VEGF, IGF-1, retinal hemorrhage, vascular tufts, capillary leakage, prevention dysfunctional ERG |
|
| Mouse strain C57BL/6J | Subcutaneous ISO | Reduction of VEGF, vascular tufts, desensitization of β2-ARs |
|
| Mouse strain 129S6 | Subcutaneous, oral or intraperitoneal PROP | No effects |
|
| Mouse strain C57BL/6J | Topical PROP | Reduction of HIF-1α, VEGF, IGF-1, vascular tufts |
|
| Mouse strain C57BL/6J | Subcutaneous PROP | Reduction of apoptosis and stimulation of autophagy, prevention of dysfunctional ERG |
|
| Rat strain Sprague-Dawley | Topical or oral PROP | Improvement of vascular damage, prevention of astrocyte degeneration |
PROP: propranolol; ISO: isoproterenol; HIF-1α: hypoxia-inducible factor-1α; VEGF: vascular endothelial growth factor; IGF-1: insuline-like growth factor; ERG: electroretinogram
Role of propranolol in clinical studies.
| Clinical studies | ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| References | Phase of ROP | Treatment until complete vascularization | Sample size intervention | Control | Sample size control | Results |
| | Proliferative/Stage 2 | Oral PROP 1–2 mg/kg/day | 25 | Standard treatment | 26 | Progression of ROP stage 61/185 vs 99/198 RR 0.65 (95% CI 0.47–0.88) Plus disease 11/134 vs. 27/147 RR 0.43 (95% CI 0.22–0.82) |
| | Proliferative/Stage 1–2 | Oral PROP 0.5–2 mg/kg/day | 10 | Sucrose | 10 | |
| | Ischemic | Oral PROP 1 mg/kg/day | 51 | Calcium carbonate | 51 | |
| | Proliferative/Stage 2 | Oral PROP 0.5 mg/kg/day | 41 | Saline | 43 | |
| | Proliferative/Stage 0–2 | Oral PROP 2 mg/kg/day | 58 | Saline | 68 | |
| Other non-randomized controlled trials | ||||||
| References | Phase of ROP | Treatment until complete vascularization | Sample size intervention | Control | Sample size control | Results |
| | Proliferative/Stage 2–3 | Oral PROP 1.5 mg/kg/day oral | 20 | Historical control group | 27 | Progression to stage 2 or 3 with plus 2/20 vs. 13/27 |
| | Proliferative/Stage 2 | Topical PROP 0.1% | 23 | Historical control group | 26 | Study discontinued |
| | Proliferative/Stage 1 | Topical PROP 0.2% | 97 | Historical control group | 333 | Progression to stage 2 or 3 with plus 12/97 vs. 79/333 RR 0.521 (95% CI 0.297–0.916) |
PROP: propranolol; RR: Relative Risk (treatment vs. control); CI: confidence intervals
FIGURE 2Current perspective and futuristic scenarios for ROP prevention and treatment. During the ischemic phase of ROP, futuristic are the hypotheses to prevent ROP occurrence through prolyl hydroxylase domain-containing proteins (PHD) inhibitors or β-adrenoceptor (β-AR) agonists aiming at preventing hyperoxia-induced vascular regression thus hindering the proliferative phase of ROP. The shift from hyperoxia to hypoxia is characterized by HIF-1α upregulation, which promotes VEGF production leading to retinal vessel proliferation. Concurrently, noradrenaline (NA) surge activates β2-ARs, expressed by Müller cells and β3-ARs, localized to endothelial cells, both participating to VEGF accumulation. Blockade of β2-ARs with propranolol is the goal of the current perspective to counteract ROP progression, while the futuristic approach of antagonizing β3-ARs deserves further investigations.