| Literature DB >> 35125798 |
Seham S Al Hemaidi1,2, Gorka Sesma1, Khabir Ahmad3, Ruba Saleh Alghofaili4, Raseel A Awad5.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Botulinum toxin (Botox) therapy is a well-known option for strabismus management and is often used in managing esotropia. Exotropia is also a common type of strabismus; however, the effectiveness of Botox in improving exotropia is still ambiguous. In this study, we report our experience in using Botox to manage the various types of exotropia.Entities:
Keywords: Botulinum toxin; exotropia; strabismus
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2021 PMID: 35125798 PMCID: PMC8763105 DOI: 10.4103/meajo.meajo_269_21
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Middle East Afr J Ophthalmol ISSN: 0974-9233
Baseline characteristics of the study population (n=97)
| Characteristics | Frequency, |
|---|---|
| Age (year), median (IQR) | 13.03 (18.01) |
| Sex | |
| Male | 57 (58.8) |
| Female | 40 (41.2) |
| Previous surgery | |
| No | 45 (46.4) |
| Yes | 52 (53.6) |
| Type of exotropia | |
| Sensory | 30 (30.9) |
| Consecutive | 24 (24.7) |
| Basic | 21 (21.6) |
| Intermittent | 15 (15.5) |
| Other | 7 (7.2) |
| Previous Botox treatment | |
| No | 88 (90.7) |
| Yes | 9 (9.3) |
| Systemic disease | |
| None | 84 (86.6) |
| Yes | 13 (13.4) |
IQR: Interquartile range, Botox: Botulinum toxin
Figure 1The sex of patients in our study
Figure 2Distribution of types of exotropia in our study
Frequency of patients achieving an angle of deviation within 10 prism diopters and 20 prism diopters after a single botulinum toxin injection
| Characteristic |
| Achieving angle of deviation within 10 PD, frequency (number of patients), | Achieving angle of deviation within 20 PD, frequency (number of patients), |
|---|---|---|---|
| Sex | |||
| Male | 57 | 15 (26.3) | 25 (43.9) |
| Female | 40 | 13 (32.5) | 24 (60.0) |
| All | 97 | 28 (28.9) | 49 (50.5) |
| Type of exotropia | |||
| Sensory | 30 | 2 (6.7) | 6 (20.0) |
| Consecutive | 24 | 6 (25.0) | 14 (58.3) |
| Basic | 21 | 11 (52.4) | 15 (71.4) |
| Intermittent | 15 | 5 (33.3) | 8 (53.3) |
| Other | 7 | 4 (57.1) | 6 (85.7) |
| Previous surgery | |||
| No | 45 | 17 (37.8) | 28 (62.2) |
| Yes | 52 | 11 (21.2) | 21 (40.4) |
| Previous Botox treatment | |||
| No | 88 | 26 (29.5) | 45 (51.1) |
| Yes | 9 | 2 (22.2) | 4 (44.4) |
| Systemic disease | |||
| None | 84 | 25 (29.8) | 44 (52.4) |
| Yes | 13 | 3 (23.1) | 5 (38.5) |
| Botox dose (units) | |||
| <20 | 54 | 9 (16.7) | 23 (42.6) |
| ≥20 | 43 | 19 (44.2) | 26 (60.5) |
Botox: Botulinum toxin
Log-binomial regression analysis of the relationship between achieving an angle of deviation within 20 prism diopters and Botulinum toxin dose
| Crude analysis | Multivariable analysis | |||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| |||||||
| Incidence ratio | LCI | UCI |
| Incidence ratio | LCI | UCI |
| |
| Age (years) | 0.99 | 0.98 | 1.01 | 0.405 | 1.02 | 1.0001 | 1.03 | 0.049 |
| Sex | ||||||||
| Malea | 0.115 | 0.059 | ||||||
| Female | 1.37 | 0.93 | 2.02 | 1.41 | 0.99 | 2.00 | ||
| Type of exotropia | ||||||||
| Sensorya | ||||||||
| Consecutive | 2.92 | 1.32 | 6.46 | 0.008 | 3.96 | 1.81 | 8.67 | 0.001 |
| Basic | 3.57 | 1.66 | 7.71 | 0.001 | 3.02 | 1.24 | 7.34 | 0.015 |
| Intermittent | 2.67 | 1.13 | 6.32 | 0.026 | 2.87 | 1.09 | 7.53 | 0.032 |
| Other | 4.29 | 1.96 | 9.36 | <0.001 | 3.86 | 1.68 | 8.89 | 0.001 |
| Previous surgery | ||||||||
| No | 1.54 | 1.03 | 2.31 | 0.036 | 1.54 | 0.75 | 3.16 | 0.234 |
| Yesa | ||||||||
| Previous Botox | ||||||||
| No | 1.15 | 0.54 | 2.47 | 0.718 | 1.16 | 0.49 | 2.72 | 0.738 |
| Yesa | ||||||||
| Systemic disease | ||||||||
| None | 1.36 | 0.66 | 2.80 | 0.401 | 1.30 | 0.65 | 2.59 | 0.457 |
| Yesa | ||||||||
| Botox dose (units) | 1.01 | 1.001 | 1.03 | 0.028 | 1.01 | 0.996 | 1.03 | 0.138 |
aThis parameter is not shown. LCI: Lower confidence interval, UCI: Upper confidence interval, Botox: Botulinum toxin
Figure 3Scatterplot of the angle of deviation change as a function of botulinum toxin (Botox) dose assessed at the follow-up visits. The circles denote the degree of correction in the angle of deviation of each patient. Botox dose is cumulative. Locally weighted scatterplot smoothing (Lowess, Blue) and linear fit (Cranberry) to the data are shown