Literature DB >> 35125434

Usage Patterns of an mHealth Symptom Monitoring App Among Adolescents With Acute Mild Traumatic Brain Injuries.

Matthew Schmidt1, Lynn Babcock, Brad G Kurowski, Amy Cassedy, Craig Sidol, Shari L Wade.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To understand usage patterns of SMART (Self-Monitoring Activity Regulation and Relaxation Treatment) mHealth app among adolescents with acute mild traumatic brain injuries (mTBIs) and to identify individual characteristics that influenced app usage.
SETTING: Emergency departments of tertiary care children's medical center. PARTICIPANTS: Children aged 11 to 18 years with mTBI in the past 2 weeks, English-speaking, no evidence of severe TBI, and no preexisting neurological impairment.
DESIGN: Nested cohort of the intervention arm of a randomized clinical trial (n = 34). MHEALTH APP INTERVENTION: SMART was a month-long educational program on mTBI designed to promote self-monitoring and management of recovery. SMART included digital symptom and activity self-monitoring surveys, feedback on symptom changes, and 8 modules providing psychoeducation, strategies for symptom management, and training in active problem solving. MAIN MEASURES: App usage time, navigation, and interaction data were automatically collected. Usage involved inputting symptom ratings/activities and reviewing modules. Patterns of symptom/activity reporting and completion of learning modules data were analyzed. Predictors of app utilization, including individual characteristics, resilience (Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale), and coping (Coping Strategies Inventory-Short Form), were analyzed using Spearman correlations.
RESULTS: Participants completed symptom monitoring an average of 9 days over the month. Participants completed an average of 1.87 learning modules out of 7. Parent income and education, comorbid attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder (ADHD), and emotional engagement coping style predicted symptom monitoring. Parental income, comorbid ADHD, and greater reliance on emotional engagement coping predicted module completion. SIGNIFICANT ADVERSE EVENTS: None.
CONCLUSION: Adolescents of higher socioeconomic status and those who manage their emotions using active engagement spent more time on both components of the SMART program.
Copyright © 2022 Wolters Kluwer Health, Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35125434      PMCID: PMC9203862          DOI: 10.1097/HTR.0000000000000768

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Head Trauma Rehabil        ISSN: 0885-9701            Impact factor:   3.117


  26 in total

Review 1.  Postconcussion syndrome occurs in children.

Authors:  W Mittenberg; M S Wittner; L J Miller
Journal:  Neuropsychology       Date:  1997-07       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 2.  Psychological approaches to treatment of postconcussion syndrome: a systematic review.

Authors:  Amal Al Sayegh; David Sandford; Alan J Carson
Journal:  J Neurol Neurosurg Psychiatry       Date:  2010-08-27       Impact factor: 10.154

3.  Psychometric analysis and refinement of the Connor-davidson Resilience Scale (CD-RISC): Validation of a 10-item measure of resilience.

Authors:  Laura Campbell-Sills; Murray B Stein
Journal:  J Trauma Stress       Date:  2007-12

4.  Acute concussion symptom severity and delayed symptom resolution.

Authors:  Joseph A Grubenhoff; Sara J Deakyne; Lina Brou; Lalit Bajaj; R Dawn Comstock; Michael W Kirkwood
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2014-07       Impact factor: 7.124

5.  Convergent and divergent validity of the Connor-Davidson Resilience Scale in children with concussion and orthopaedic injury.

Authors:  Christianne Laliberté Durish; Keith Owen Yeates; Brian L Brooks
Journal:  Brain Inj       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 2.311

6.  Online problem-solving therapy after traumatic brain injury: a randomized controlled trial.

Authors:  Shari L Wade; Brad G Kurowski; Michael W Kirkwood; Nanhua Zhang; Amy Cassedy; Tanya M Brown; Britt Nielsen; Terry Stancin; H Gerry Taylor
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2015-01-12       Impact factor: 7.124

Review 7.  Systematic review of the clinical course, natural history, and prognosis for pediatric mild traumatic brain injury: results of the International Collaboration on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury Prognosis.

Authors:  Ryan Hung; Linda J Carroll; Carol Cancelliere; Pierre Côté; Peter Rumney; Michelle Keightley; James Donovan; Britt-Marie Stålnacke; J David Cassidy
Journal:  Arch Phys Med Rehabil       Date:  2014-03       Impact factor: 3.966

Review 8.  Non-surgical intervention and cost for mild traumatic brain injury: results of the WHO Collaborating Centre Task Force on Mild Traumatic Brain Injury.

Authors:  Jörgen Borg; Lena Holm; Paul M Peloso; J David Cassidy; Linda J Carroll; Hans von Holst; Chris Paniak; David Yates
Journal:  J Rehabil Med       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 2.912

9.  Online problem-solving therapy for executive dysfunction after child traumatic brain injury.

Authors:  Brad G Kurowski; Shari L Wade; Michael W Kirkwood; Tanya M Brown; Terry Stancin; H Gerry Taylor
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2013-06-10       Impact factor: 7.124

10.  Longitudinal trajectories of postconcussive symptoms in children with mild traumatic brain injuries and their relationship to acute clinical status.

Authors:  Keith Owen Yeates; H Gerry Taylor; Jerome Rusin; Barbara Bangert; Ann Dietrich; Kathryn Nuss; Martha Wright; Daniel S Nagin; Bobby L Jones
Journal:  Pediatrics       Date:  2009-03       Impact factor: 7.124

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.