Literature DB >> 35125019

Navigating Diabetes Online Communities in Clinical Practice.

Meghan McLarney1, Michelle L Litchman2, Deborah Greenwood3,4, Andjela Drincic1,5.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: This purpose of this study was to conduct a rapid review and environmental scan of diabetes online communities (DOCs) to highlight the clinical impact of DOC engagement and provide guidance to health care providers for navigating and prescribing DOCs.
METHODS: This two-phase review included a rapid review of clinical outcomes and an assessment of DOC content. We conducted a literature search for studies evaluating DOC use and glucometric (glycated hemoglobin [A1C], time-in-range, hypoglycemia), behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. The environmental scan of current DOC sites established key features, including available platforms, target population, content areas, and reach.
RESULTS: Twelve papers were included-eight reported DOC use within a context of do-it-yourself (DIY) noncommercial, opensource hybrid closed loop systems community and four were non-DYI related. In latter, all studies were cross-sectional, describing patient-reported outcomes. Two studies reported A1C lowering with DOC use, two DOC use was associated with high self-efficacy, one showed association with higher self-care levels, and one showed higher quality of life scores when compared with population norms. All DIY studies showed improvement in glucometrics after initiation of sensor augmented pump technology with DOC support. Of 54 DOC sites reviewed in the environmental scan, 29 were included. Diabetes online community sites were heterogenous in social media platform and type of diabetes targeted.
CONCLUSION: Diabetes online communities have the potential to improve clinical, behavioral, and psychosocial outcomes. Randomized control trials and/or longitudinal prospective studies evaluating outcomes are needed to further examine the potential benefits of DOC use. Diabetes online communities are diverse and span a variety of social media platforms, providing clinicians opportunities to individualize recommendations for DOC use.

Entities:  

Keywords:  PWD and DOC; clinical impact of diabetes online communities; diabetes online community; diabetes peer support; social media and diabetes

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35125019      PMCID: PMC9264440          DOI: 10.1177/19322968211069409

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol        ISSN: 1932-2968


  26 in total

1.  Motivations for Participation in an Online Social Media Community for Diabetes.

Authors:  Katherine White; Achamyeleh Gebremariam; Dana Lewis; Weston Nordgren; James Wedding; Josh Pasek; Ashley Garrity; Emily Hirschfeld; Joyce M Lee
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-01-09

2.  A real-world study of user characteristics, safety and efficacy of open-source closed-loop systems and Medtronic 670G.

Authors:  Roshell Jeyaventhan; Geraldine Gallen; Pratik Choudhary; Sufyan Hussain
Journal:  Diabetes Obes Metab       Date:  2021-06-09       Impact factor: 6.577

3.  Twitter Analysis of #OpenAPS DIY Artificial Pancreas Technology Use Suggests Improved A1C and Quality of Life.

Authors:  Michelle L Litchman; Dana Lewis; Lesly A Kelly; Perry M Gee
Journal:  J Diabetes Sci Technol       Date:  2018-09-10

4.  The diabetes online community: Older adults supporting self-care through peer health.

Authors:  Michelle L Litchman; Erin Rothwell; Linda S Edelman
Journal:  Patient Educ Couns       Date:  2017-09-06

5.  Use of a do-it-yourself artificial pancreas system is associated with better glucose management and higher quality of life among adults with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Zekai Wu; Sihui Luo; Xueying Zheng; Yan Bi; Wen Xu; Jinhua Yan; Daizhi Yang; Jianping Weng
Journal:  Ther Adv Endocrinol Metab       Date:  2020-08-25       Impact factor: 3.565

6.  Daily illness appraisal and collaboration in couples with type 1 diabetes.

Authors:  Cynthia A Berg; Vicki S Helgeson; Eunjin Lee Tracy; Jonathan E Butner; Caitlin S Kelly; Meredith Van Vleet; Michelle L Litchman
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2020-05-07       Impact factor: 4.267

7.  Yours, Mine, and Ours: A Qualitative Analysis of the Impact of Type 1 Diabetes Management in Older Adult Married Couples.

Authors:  Michelle L Litchman; Sarah E Wawrzynski; Nancy A Allen; Eunjin L Tracy; Caitlin S Kelly; Vicki S Helgeson; Cynthia A Berg
Journal:  Diabetes Spectr       Date:  2019-08

8.  Real-World Use of Do-It-Yourself Artificial Pancreas Systems in Children and Adolescents With Type 1 Diabetes: Online Survey and Analysis of Self-Reported Clinical Outcomes.

Authors:  Katarina Braune; Shane O'Donnell; Bryan Cleal; Dana Lewis; Adrian Tappe; Ingrid Willaing; Bastian Hauck; Klemens Raile
Journal:  JMIR Mhealth Uhealth       Date:  2019-07-30       Impact factor: 4.773

9.  Perceptions of the Diabetes Online Community's Credibility, Social Capital, and Help and Harm: Cross-Sectional Comparison Between Baby Boomers and Younger Adults.

Authors:  Michelle L Litchman; Linda S Edelman
Journal:  JMIR Aging       Date:  2019-09-26

10.  The PRISMA 2020 statement: an updated guideline for reporting systematic reviews.

Authors:  Matthew J Page; Joanne E McKenzie; Patrick M Bossuyt; Isabelle Boutron; Tammy C Hoffmann; Cynthia D Mulrow; Larissa Shamseer; Jennifer M Tetzlaff; Elie A Akl; Sue E Brennan; Roger Chou; Julie Glanville; Jeremy M Grimshaw; Asbjørn Hróbjartsson; Manoj M Lalu; Tianjing Li; Elizabeth W Loder; Evan Mayo-Wilson; Steve McDonald; Luke A McGuinness; Lesley A Stewart; James Thomas; Andrea C Tricco; Vivian A Welch; Penny Whiting; David Moher
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2021-03-29
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.