Literature DB >> 35124769

Evaluation of the Fall Protection of Type I Industrial Helmets.

John Z Wu1, Christopher S Pan2, Clayton Cobb1, Andrew Moorehead1, Tsui-Ying Kau1, Bryan M Wimer1.   

Abstract

The performance of Type I industrial helmets for fall protection is not required to be tested in standardized tests. The current study analyzed the fall protection performance of Type I industrial helmets and evaluated if the use of a chin strap and the suspension system tightness have any effect on protection performance. Head impact tests were performed using an instrumented manikin. There were 12 combinations of test conditions: with or without chin strap usage, three levels of suspension system tightness, and two impact surfaces. Four representative helmet models (two basic and two advanced models) were selected for the study. Impact tests without a helmet under all other applicable test conditions were used as a control group. There were four replicates for each test condition-a total of 192 impact tests with helmets and eight impact tests for the control group. The peak acceleration and the calculated head impact criteria (HIC) were used to evaluate shock absorption performance of the helmets. The results showed that all four helmet models demonstrated excellent performance for fall protection compared to the barehead control group. The fall protection performance of the advanced helmet models was substantially better than the basic helmet models. However, the effects of the use of chin straps and suspension system tightness on the helmets' fall protection performance were statistically not significant.
© 2022. This is a U.S. government work and not under copyright protection in the U.S.; foreign copyright protection may apply.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Abbreviated injury scale (AIS); Fall impact; Head impact criteria (HIC); Industrial helmet; Manikin

Year:  2022        PMID: 35124769     DOI: 10.1007/s10439-022-02922-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng        ISSN: 0090-6964            Impact factor:   3.934


  1 in total

Review 1.  Evaluation of the field relevance of several injury risk functions.

Authors:  Priya Prasad; Harold J Mertz; Danius J Dalmotas; Jeffrey S Augenstein; Kennerly Diggs
Journal:  Stapp Car Crash J       Date:  2010-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.