Literature DB >> 35124748

Billroth II anastomosis maintains SMI and BMI better than Roux-en-Y anastomosis following totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy: a propensity score-matched study.

Linhua Jiang1, Jiawen Zhang1, Xinguo Zhu2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Gastric cancer is a major public health problem around the globe. With the standardization of tumor treatment, surgery continues to be the most important treatment method for gastric cancer. However, changes in body composition and nutrition index parameters in patients with Billroth II and Roux-en-Y anastomosis following totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy (TLDG) remain unclear.
METHODS: This was a single-center retrospective study. A total of 369 patients who underwent TLDG at the First Affiliated Hospital of Soochow University (Suzhou, China) between January 2016 and February 2019 were included and assigned to the Billroth II group or Roux-en-Y group according to the anastomosis method. After propensity score matching, body composition and relevant clinical data were compared between the two groups.
RESULTS: The operation time for the Billroth II group was significantly shorter than for the Roux-en-Y group (174.12 ± 39.33 min vs. 229.19 ± 28.12 min, P < 0.001). In addition, the Billroth II group showed lower skeletal muscle loss. Specifically, the Billroth II group showed a - 4.77 ± 4.88% change in the skeletal muscle index (SMI), whereas the Roux-en-Y group showed a - 11.89 ± 8.68% change (P = 0.001). The Billroth II group also showed a smaller decrease in BMI than the Roux-en-Y group (- 6.67 ± 7.76% vs. - 13.12 ± 10.79%, P = 0.018).
CONCLUSIONS: These results suggest that Billroth II anastomosis after TLDG has advantages over Roux-en-Y for maintaining patient body composition, especially in terms of SMI, and may serve as a useful reference when choosing an anastomosis method.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Billroth II; Gastric cancer; Propensity score match; Roux-en-Y; Sarcopenia

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35124748     DOI: 10.1007/s00423-022-02459-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg        ISSN: 1435-2443            Impact factor:   2.895


  44 in total

1.  What is the best reconstruction method after distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer?

Authors:  Moon-Soo Lee; Sang-Hoon Ahn; Ju-Hee Lee; Do Joong Park; Hyuk-Joon Lee; Hyung-Ho Kim; Han-Kwang Yang; Nayoung Kim; Won Woo Lee
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2011-12-17       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 2.  Gut microbiota role in irritable bowel syndrome: New therapeutic strategies.

Authors:  Eleonora Distrutti; Lorenzo Monaldi; Patrizia Ricci; Stefano Fiorucci
Journal:  World J Gastroenterol       Date:  2016-02-21       Impact factor: 5.742

3.  Nutritional effects of postgastrectomy reconstruction: a clinical evaluation.

Authors:  R Zelnick; L J Auguste; L Wise
Journal:  J Surg Oncol       Date:  1989-04       Impact factor: 3.454

4.  Marked Loss of Muscle, Visceral Fat, or Subcutaneous Fat After Gastrectomy Predicts Poor Survival in Advanced Gastric Cancer: Single-Center Study from the CLASSIC Trial.

Authors:  Hyung Soon Park; Hyo Song Kim; Seung Hoon Beom; Sun Young Rha; Hyun Cheol Chung; Jee Hung Kim; You Jin Chun; Si Won Lee; Eun-Ah Choe; Su Jin Heo; Sung Hoon Noh; Woo Jin Hyung; Jae-Ho Cheong; Hyoung-Il Kim; Taeil Son; Joon Seok Lim; Song-Ee Baek; Minkyu Jung
Journal:  Ann Surg Oncol       Date:  2018-07-26       Impact factor: 5.344

5.  Global cancer statistics, 2012.

Authors:  Lindsey A Torre; Freddie Bray; Rebecca L Siegel; Jacques Ferlay; Joannie Lortet-Tieulent; Ahmedin Jemal
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2015-02-04       Impact factor: 508.702

6.  Postoperative changes in body composition after gastrectomy.

Authors:  Teruo Kiyama; Takashi Mizutani; Takeshi Okuda; Itsuro Fujita; Akira Tokunaga; Takashi Tajiri; Adrian Barbul
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2005-03       Impact factor: 3.452

7.  Body composition assessment and sarcopenia in patients with gastric cancer: a systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Sivesh K Kamarajah; James Bundred; Benjamin H L Tan
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2018-10-01       Impact factor: 7.370

8.  Impact of remnant stomach volume and anastomosis on nutrition and body composition in gastric cancer patients.

Authors:  Koeun Lee; Kyung Won Kim; Jung-Bok Lee; Yongbin Shin; Jin Kyoo Jang; Jeong-Hwan Yook; Byung-Sik Kim; In-Seob Lee
Journal:  Surg Oncol       Date:  2019-09-13       Impact factor: 3.279

9.  Advantages of totally laparoscopic distal gastrectomy over laparoscopically assisted distal gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Osamu Ikeda; Yoshihisa Sakaguchi; Yoshiro Aoki; Norifumi Harimoto; Jyunya Taomoto; Takaaki Masuda; Takefumi Ohga; Eisuke Adachi; Yasushi Toh; Takeshi Okamura; Hideo Baba
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2009-03-05       Impact factor: 4.584

10.  To Roux or not to Roux: a comparison between Roux-en-Y and Billroth II reconstruction following partial gastrectomy for gastric cancer.

Authors:  Thuy B Tran; David J Worhunsky; Malcolm H Squires; Linda X Jin; Gaya Spolverato; Konstantinos I Votanopoulos; Clifford S Cho; Sharon M Weber; Carl Schmidt; Edward A Levine; Mark Bloomston; Ryan C Fields; Timothy M Pawlik; Shishir K Maithel; Jeffrey A Norton; George A Poultsides
Journal:  Gastric Cancer       Date:  2015-09-23       Impact factor: 7.370

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.