| Literature DB >> 35124626 |
Ruo-Yun Lyu1,2, Zong-Lin Wen1,3, Wen-Chao Tang1, Xu-Ming Yang1, Jun-Ling Wen1, Bo Wang3, Ming Gao1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Neck pain is the most common symptom of cervical spondylosis.Entities:
Keywords: Chronic neck pain; SF-36; acupuncture; motion style acupuncture therapy; pain pressure threshold
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35124626 PMCID: PMC9028636 DOI: 10.3233/THC-228048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Technol Health Care ISSN: 0928-7329 Impact factor: 1.205
Figure 1.Flowchart of the study.
Time to visit and data collection
| Study period | |||||
| Visit 1 | Visit 2 | Visit 3 | Visit 4 | Visit 5 | |
| Time node | One-time treatment | One-course treatment | Two-course treatment | One-month follow-up | |
| Informed consent |
| ||||
| Randomization |
| ||||
| General information |
| ||||
| Medical history |
| ||||
| Imaging examination |
| ||||
| Assessment |
| ||||
| PE |
|
|
|
|
|
| PPT |
|
|
|
|
|
| SF-36 |
|
|
| ||
| Safety observation |
|
|
|
| |
| Adverse event record |
|
|
|
| |
| Obedience evaluation |
|
|
|
| |
| Combined treatment records |
|
|
|
| |
If the subjects are directly enrolled at the first visit, i.e., visit 1 and visit 2 events coincide, visit 2 index will be taken as the baseline. PE, physical examination; PPT, pain pressure threshold; SF-36, the MOS item short from health survey.
Acupoint locations and standards used for locating acupoints used in this trial
| Acupoints | Locations | For treatment | For measurement |
|---|---|---|---|
| GB20s | In the anterior region of the neck, inferior to the occipital bone, in the depression between the origins of sternocleidomastoid and the trapezius muscles. |
| |
| BL10s | In the posterior region of the neck, at the same level of the superior border of the spinous process of the second cervical vertebra (C2), in the depression lateral to the trapezius muscles. |
| |
| EX-B2s | In the posterior region of the neck, 0.5 B-cun bilateral to the posterior median line, under the spinous process, between the first cervical vertebrae and the seventh cervical vertebrae. | The second, fourth and sixth cervical vertebrae level of both sides. | The fourth and sixth cervical vertebrae level of both sides. |
| SI11s | In the scapular region, in the depression between the upper one third and the lower two thirds of the line connecting the midpoint of the spine of the scapula with the inferior angle of the scapula. |
| |
| GB21s | In the posterior region of the neck, at the midpoint of the line connecting the spinous process of the seventh cervical vertebra (C7) with the lateral end of the acromion. |
| |
| SI3s | On the dorsum of the hand, in the depression proximal to the ulnar side of the fifth metacarpophalangeal joint, at the border between the red and white flesh. |
|
Reference: WHO standard acupuncture point locations in the Western Pacific Region 2008. B-cun, proportional bone (skeletal) cun.
Figure 2.Location of acupoints.
Figure 3.Location of measurement points.
Baseline before treatment
| Intervention group ( | Control group ( |
| ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Male, | 7 | 8 | 0.77 | |
| Age | 27.00 (25.00, 34.00) | 26.00 (24.25, 41.50) | 0.88 | |
| PPT |
| 30.54 | 26.46 | 0.25 |
|
| 30.17 | 27.30 | 0.36 | |
|
| 34.69 | 31.75 | 0.32 | |
|
| 36.23 | 33.39 | 0.12 | |
| SF-36 | PF | 90.00 (75.00, 100.00) | 85.00 (75.00, 98.75) | 0.83 |
| RP | 75.00 (25.00, 100.00) | 75.00 (25.00, 100.00) | 0.71 | |
| BP | 62.00 (41.00, 74.00) | 62.00 (62.00, 74.00) | 0.15 | |
| GH | 58.70 | 58.76 | 0.84 | |
| VT | 70.00 (60.00, 80.00) | 65.00 (50.00, 73.75) | 0.24 | |
| SF | 80.00 (70.00, 90.00) | 80.00 (70.00, 90.00) | 0.92 | |
| RE | 75.00 (50.00, 100.00) | 87.50 (50.00, 100.00) | 0.76 | |
| MH | 68.00 (56.00, 76.00) | 68.00 (60.00, 76.00) | 0.69 | |
(x S) was used to represent the result of data in normal distribution; M (; ) was used to represent the result of data in non-normal distribution.
Correlation analysis between clinical effect and time nodes on four acupints in both group
| One-time treatment | One-course treatment | Two-course treatment | One-month follow-up | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| Control group | 0.48 | 0.55 | 0.46 | 0.26 |
| Interventional group | 0.68 | 0.10 | 0.14 | 0.17 | |
|
| Control group | 0.60 | 0.40 | 0.24 | 0.20 |
| Interventional group | 0.61 | 0.40 | 0.43 | 0.40 | |
|
| Control group | 0.57 | 0.28 | 0.17 | 0.40 |
| Interventional group | 0.67 | 0.71 | 0.34 | 0.55 | |
|
| Control group | 0.76 | 0.40 | 0.45 | 0.21 |
| Interventional group | 0.76 | 0.12 | 0.10 | 0.40 |
Figure 4.Correlation of PPT at C4.
Figure 5.Correlation of PPT at C6.
Correlation analysis of Shannon entropy between SF-36 and PPT before treatment
| PF | RP | BP | GH | VT | SF | RE | MH | ||
| Rank of correlation | Intervention group | 0.03 | 0.02 | 0.01 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.02 | 0.03 | 0.00 |
| 2 | 4 | 6 | 7 | 5 | 3 | 1 | 8 | ||
| Control group | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 | 0.00 | 0.01 | 0.01 | 0.00 | |
| 6 | 8 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 3 | 2 | 5 |