Nabihah Tayob1, Fasiha Kanwal2, Abeer Alsarraj2, Ruben Hernaez2, Hashem B El-Serag3. 1. Department of Data Science, Dana-Farber Cancer Institute, Boston, Massachusetts. 2. Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Houston VA Health Services Research and Development Service Center of Excellence, Houston, Texas; Section of Health Services Research, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. 3. Section of Gastroenterology and Hepatology, Department of Medicine, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center and Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas; Houston VA Health Services Research and Development Service Center of Excellence, Houston, Texas; Section of Health Services Research, Michael E. DeBakey VA Medical Center, Houston, Texas; Baylor College of Medicine, Houston, Texas. Electronic address: hasheme@bcm.edu.
Abstract
BACKGROUND & AIMS: α-fetoprotein (AFP), AFP Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of AFP (AFP-L3), and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) in combination or in GALAD (Gender, Age, AFP-L3, AFP, and DCP) were tested for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in retrospective cohort and case-control studies. However, there is a paucity of prospective data and no phase III biomarker studies from North American populations. METHODS: We conducted a prospective specimen collection, retrospective blinded evaluation (PRoBE) cohort study in patients with cirrhosis enrolled in a 6-monthly surveillance with liver imaging and AFP. Blood samples were prospectively collected every 6 months and analyzed in a retrospective blinded fashion. True positive rate (TPR) and false positive rate (FPR) for any or early HCC were calculated within 6, 12, and 24 months of HCC diagnosis based on published thresholds for biomarkers individually, in combination and in GALAD and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Early Detection Screening (HES) scores. We calculated the area under the receiver operating curve and estimated TPR based on an optimal threshold at a fixed FPR of 10%. RESULTS: The analysis was conducted in a cohort of 534 patients; 50 developed HCC (68% early) and 484 controls with negative imaging. GALAD had the highest TPR (63.6%, 73.8%, and 71.4% for all HCC, and 53.8%, 63.3%, and 61.8 % for early HCC within 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively) but an FPR of 21.5% to 22.9%. However, there were no differences in the area under the receiver operating curve among GALAD, HES, AFP-L3, or DCP. At a fixed 10% FPR, TPR for GALAD dropped (42.4%, 45.2%, and 46.9%) and was not different from HES (36.4%, 40.5%, and 40.8%) or AFP-L3 alone (39.4%, 45.2%, and 44.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective cohort phase III biomarker study, GALAD was associated with a considerable improvement in sensitivity for HCC detection but an increase in false-positive results. GALAD performance was modest and not different from AFP-L3 alone or HES.
BACKGROUND & AIMS: α-fetoprotein (AFP), AFP Lens culinaris agglutinin-reactive fraction of AFP (AFP-L3), and des-gamma-carboxy prothrombin (DCP) in combination or in GALAD (Gender, Age, AFP-L3, AFP, and DCP) were tested for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) surveillance in retrospective cohort and case-control studies. However, there is a paucity of prospective data and no phase III biomarker studies from North American populations. METHODS: We conducted a prospective specimen collection, retrospective blinded evaluation (PRoBE) cohort study in patients with cirrhosis enrolled in a 6-monthly surveillance with liver imaging and AFP. Blood samples were prospectively collected every 6 months and analyzed in a retrospective blinded fashion. True positive rate (TPR) and false positive rate (FPR) for any or early HCC were calculated within 6, 12, and 24 months of HCC diagnosis based on published thresholds for biomarkers individually, in combination and in GALAD and Hepatocellular Carcinoma Early Detection Screening (HES) scores. We calculated the area under the receiver operating curve and estimated TPR based on an optimal threshold at a fixed FPR of 10%. RESULTS: The analysis was conducted in a cohort of 534 patients; 50 developed HCC (68% early) and 484 controls with negative imaging. GALAD had the highest TPR (63.6%, 73.8%, and 71.4% for all HCC, and 53.8%, 63.3%, and 61.8 % for early HCC within 6, 12, and 24 months, respectively) but an FPR of 21.5% to 22.9%. However, there were no differences in the area under the receiver operating curve among GALAD, HES, AFP-L3, or DCP. At a fixed 10% FPR, TPR for GALAD dropped (42.4%, 45.2%, and 46.9%) and was not different from HES (36.4%, 40.5%, and 40.8%) or AFP-L3 alone (39.4%, 45.2%, and 44.9%). CONCLUSIONS: In a prospective cohort phase III biomarker study, GALAD was associated with a considerable improvement in sensitivity for HCC detection but an increase in false-positive results. GALAD performance was modest and not different from AFP-L3 alone or HES.
Authors: Donna L White; Peter Richardson; Nabiha Tayoub; Jessica A Davila; Fasiha Kanwal; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2015-10-28 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Nabihah Tayob; Israel Christie; Peter Richardson; Ziding Feng; Donna L White; Jessica Davila; Douglas A Corley; Fasiha Kanwal; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2018-12-14 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: J Best; H Bilgi; D Heider; C Schotten; P Manka; S Bedreli; M Gorray; J Ertle; L A van Grunsven; A Dechêne Journal: Z Gastroenterol Date: 2016-12-09 Impact factor: 2.000
Authors: Hashem B El-Serag; Fasiha Kanwal; Jessica A Davila; Jennifer Kramer; Peter Richardson Journal: Gastroenterology Date: 2014-01-23 Impact factor: 22.682
Authors: Sarah Berhane; Hidenori Toyoda; Toshifumi Tada; Takashi Kumada; Chiaki Kagebayashi; Shinji Satomura; Nora Schweitzer; Arndt Vogel; Michael P Manns; Julia Benckert; Thomas Berg; Maria Ebker; Jan Best; Alexander Dechêne; Guido Gerken; Joerg F Schlaak; Arndt Weinmann; Marcus A Wörns; Peter Galle; Winnie Yeo; Frankie Mo; Stephen L Chan; Helen Reeves; Trevor Cox; Philip Johnson Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2016-01-13 Impact factor: 11.382
Authors: Nabihah Tayob; Peter Richardson; Donna L White; Xiaoying Yu; Jessica A Davila; Fasiha Kanwal; Ziding Feng; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: BMC Med Res Methodol Date: 2018-01-04 Impact factor: 4.615
Authors: Amit G Singal; Sruthi Patibandla; Joseph Obi; Hannah Fullington; Neehar D Parikh; Adam C Yopp; Jorge A Marrero Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-09-10 Impact factor: 13.576
Authors: Nabihah Tayob; Douglas A Corley; Israel Christie; Lucy Almers; Ahmed K Rahal; Peter Richardson; Donna L White; Jessica Davila; Fasiha Kanwal; Hashem B El-Serag Journal: Clin Gastroenterol Hepatol Date: 2020-08-05 Impact factor: 13.576