| Literature DB >> 35123519 |
Xiaoran Zhang1, Li Wang1, Xuelin Ma1, Fengyu Wang1, Wenxu Duan1, Xinzhong Shao2.
Abstract
PURPOSE: This study aims to introduce the "tripod" technique using cannulated compression screw and two anti-rotational K-wires for treatment of unstable scaphoid waist fracture nonunion, and to compare it with the single cannulated screw fixation technique in term of scaphoid union and surgical outcomes.Entities:
Keywords: Anti-rotation K-wires; Comparative study; Scaphoid fracture nonunion; Tripod fixation
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35123519 PMCID: PMC8818197 DOI: 10.1186/s13018-022-02975-z
Source DB: PubMed Journal: J Orthop Surg Res ISSN: 1749-799X Impact factor: 2.359
Patient demographics and injury characteristics between two groups
| Variable | Tripod fixation group ( | Single cannulated screw fixation group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Age (year) | 35.9 ± 6.8 | 33.4 ± 6.1 | 0.357 |
| Gender (%) | 0.870 | ||
| Male | 34 (75.6) | 43 (74.1%) | |
| Female | 11 (24.4) | 15 (25.9) | |
| Injured side (%) | 0.732 | ||
| Left | 13 (28.9) | 15 (25.9) | |
| Right | 32 (71.1) | 43 (74.1) | |
| Dominance side | |||
| Dominant | 35 (77.8) | 47 (81.0) | 0.684 |
| Non-dominant | 10 (22.2) | 11 (19.0) | |
| Smoking status | 0.863 | ||
| Current | 17 (37.8) | 22 (37.9) | |
| Past | 4 (8.9) | 7 (12.1) | |
| Never | 24 (53.3) | 29 (50.0) | |
| Mechanism of injury (%) | 0.813 | ||
| Fall | 37 (82.2) | 48 (82.8) | |
| Twisting | 4 (8.9) | 7 (12.1) | |
| Punch | 2 (4.4) | 2 (3.4) | |
| Others or unknown | 2 (4.4) | 1 (1.7) | |
| Herbert classification | 0.859 | ||
| D1 (fibrous nonunion) | 31 (68.9) | 39 (67.2) | |
| D2 (sclerotic nonunion) | 14 (31.1) | 19 (32.8) | |
| Initial treatment | 0.931 | ||
| No treatment | 9 (20.0) | 12 (20.7) | |
| Splint or cast immobilization | 36 (80.0) | 46 (79.3) | |
| Time from initial injury to surgery (months) | 13.2 ± 7.5 | 13.8 ± 8.1 | 0.682 |
Comparisons of clinical and radiographic outcomes at the last visit between both groups
| Variable | Tripod fixation group ( | Single cannulated screw fixation group ( | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Union rate | 45/45 (100%) | 55/58 (94.8%) | 0.122 |
| Time to union | 14.8 ± 3.8 | 17.6 ± 3.6 | 0.027* |
| Pain assessment on VAS (0–10) | 1.4 ± 1.7 | 1.6 ± 2.0 | 0.203 |
| ROM % of healthy side | 92.3 ± 7.6 | 93.7 ± 7.4 | 0.483 |
| Grip strength % of healthy side | 94.7 ± 4.5 | 94.1 ± 5.2 | 0.923 |
| Quick DASH score (0–100) | 19.3 ± 4.1 | 17.9 ± 5.2 | 0.317 |
| Mayo score (0–100) | 87.6 ± 10.6 | 86.4 ± 11.3 | 0.722 |
| LISA | 34.5° ± 12.1° | 33.7 ± 14.2° | 0.790 |
| HLR | 0.67 ± 0.08 | 0.63 ± 0.08 | 0.917 |
VAS, visual analogue scale score; LISA, lateral intrascaphoid angle; HLR, height length ration; DASH, Disabilities of the Arm, Shoulder, and Hand
Statistically signiant
Fig. 1A 32-year young man sustained right scaphoid waist fracture nonunion 11 months after the initial fracture treated by conservative method. The a showed the nonunion at the scaphoid waist site. The b to e showed the operative process of tripod fixation using Herbert screw and two adjunctive K-wires. The f, g were the postoperative radiograph and the CT scan. h to j showed the excellent functional outcome at 12 months postoperatively
Fig. 2A 34-year young man sustained right scaphoid waist fracture nonunion 13 months after the initial fracture treated conservatively. The a, b sowed the nonunion at the waist. The c to e showed it was treated by single Herbert screw fixation. The f to j showed the satisfactory functional outcomes at the last visit at 14 months postoperatively