Literature DB >> 35123113

An evaluation of seasonal maternal-neonatal morbidity related to trainee cycles.

Ayamo Oben1, Paula McGee2, William A Grobman3, Jennifer L Bailit4, Ronald J Wapner5, Michael W Varner6, John M Thorp7, Steve N Caritis8, Mona Prasad9, George R Saade10, Dwight J Rouse11, Sean C Blackwell12.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The existence of the "July phenomenon" (worse outcomes related to the presence of new physician trainees in teaching hospitals) has been debated in the literature and media. Previous studies of the phenomenon in obstetrics are limited by the quality and detail of data.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate whether the months of June to August, when transitions in trainees occur, are associated with increased maternal and neonatal morbidity. STUDY
DESIGN: Secondary analysis of an observational cohort of 115,502 mother-infant pairs that delivered at 25 hospitals from March 2008 to February 2011. Inclusion criteria were an individual who had a singleton, nonanomalous live fetus at the onset of labor, and delivered at a hospital with trainees. The primary outcomes were composites of maternal and neonatal morbidity. We evaluated the outcomes by academic quarter during which the delivery occurred, beginning July 1, and by duration of the academic year as a continuous variable. To account for clustering in outcomes at a given delivery location, we applied hierarchical logistic regression with adjustment for hospital as a random effect.
RESULTS: Of 115,502 deliveries, 99,929 met the inclusion criteria. Race and ethnicity, insurance, body mass index, drug use, and the availability of 24/7 maternal-fetal medicine, anesthesia, and neonatology varied by quarter. In adjusted analysis, the frequency of the composite maternal and neonatal morbidity did not differ by quarter. No differences in composite morbidity were observed when using day of the year as a continuous variable (maternal morbidity adjusted odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 0.99-1.00 and neonatal morbidity adjusted odds ratio, 1.00; 95% confidence interval, 1.00-1.01) and after adjustment for hospital as a random effect. Odds of major surgical complications in quarter 2 were twice those in quarter 1. Neonatal injury and intensive care unit were less frequent in later quarters.
CONCLUSION: Maternal and neonatal morbidity in teaching hospitals was not associated with the academic quarter during which delivery occurred, and there was no evidence of a "July phenomenon".
Copyright © 2022 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  July phenomenon; maternal morbidity; neonatal morbidity

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35123113      PMCID: PMC9081218          DOI: 10.1016/j.ajogmf.2022.100583

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol MFM        ISSN: 2589-9333


  15 in total

1.  Spine infections: variations in incidence during the academic year.

Authors:  Stephen P Banco; Alexander R Vaccaro; Oren Blam; Jason C Eck; Jerome M Cotler; Alan S Hilibrand; Todd J Albert; Sheila Murphey
Journal:  Spine (Phila Pa 1976)       Date:  2002-05-01       Impact factor: 3.468

2.  Is there a "July phenomenon" in pediatric neurosurgery at teaching hospitals?

Authors:  Edward R Smith; William E Butler; Fred G Barker
Journal:  J Neurosurg       Date:  2006-09       Impact factor: 5.115

Review 3.  "July effect": impact of the academic year-end changeover on patient outcomes: a systematic review.

Authors:  John Q Young; Sumant R Ranji; Robert M Wachter; Connie M Lee; Brian Niehaus; Andrew D Auerbach
Journal:  Ann Intern Med       Date:  2011-07-11       Impact factor: 25.391

4.  Can differences in obstetric outcomes be explained by differences in the care provided? The MFMU Network APEX study.

Authors:  William A Grobman; Jennifer L Bailit; Madeline Murguia Rice; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Jay D Iams; Alan T Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Jorge E Tolosa; J Peter Van Dorsten
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2014-03-12       Impact factor: 8.661

5.  Examining the July Effect: A National Survey of Academic Leaders in Medicine.

Authors:  Kathryn Levy; Jessica Voit; Amit Gupta; Christopher M Petrilli; Vineet Chopra
Journal:  Am J Med       Date:  2016-05-12       Impact factor: 4.965

6.  Examining the myth of the "July Phenomenon" in surgical patients.

Authors:  Bryan A Ehlert; John T Nelson; Claudia E Goettler; Frank M Parker; William M Bogey; Charles S Powell; Michael C Stoner
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2011-06-30       Impact factor: 3.982

7.  Is there an obstetric July phenomenon?

Authors:  Thomas D Myles
Journal:  Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2003-11       Impact factor: 7.661

8.  The relationship of house staff experience to the cost and quality of inpatient care.

Authors:  E C Rich; G Gifford; M Luxenberg; B Dowd
Journal:  JAMA       Date:  1990-02-16       Impact factor: 56.272

9.  Risk-adjusted models for adverse obstetric outcomes and variation in risk-adjusted outcomes across hospitals.

Authors:  Jennifer L Bailit; William A Grobman; Madeline Murguia Rice; Catherine Y Spong; Ronald J Wapner; Michael W Varner; John M Thorp; Kenneth J Leveno; Steve N Caritis; Phillip J Shubert; Alan T Tita; George Saade; Yoram Sorokin; Dwight J Rouse; Sean C Blackwell; Jorge E Tolosa; J Peter Van Dorsten
Journal:  Am J Obstet Gynecol       Date:  2013-07-24       Impact factor: 8.661

10.  Is the "July Effect" Real? Pediatric Trainee Reported Medical Errors and Adverse Events.

Authors:  Ankoor Y Shah; Andrew Abreo; Nicole Akar-Ghibril; Rebecca F Cady; Rahul K Shah
Journal:  Pediatr Qual Saf       Date:  2017-03-14
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.