Literature DB >> 35122828

Implementing a Clinical Immunogenicity Strategy using Preclinical Risk Assessment Outputs.

Vibha Jawa1, Jad Maamary2, Michael Swanson3, Shuli Zhang4, Diana Montgomery5.   

Abstract

Immunogenicity to biologics is often observed following dosing in human subjects during clinical trials. Both product and host specific factors may be implicated in contributing to a potential immune response. However, even if such risk factors are identified and eliminated as part of the rational quality by design approaches, the outcome in clinic can be uncertain and challenging to predict. Several tools have been employed to identify these risk factors and consequent mitigation approaches implemented prior to dosing in humans. However, the complexity of the immune system with an interplay of network of immune cells involved in driving a long- term immune response as well as patient characteristics, can make it challenging to predict the outcome in clinic. This perspective will provide an insight into recent advances in the risk assessment approaches that are utilized during preclinical stage of development of a biologic. The outputs from such tools can help to rank order and select the most optimal candidate with the least likelihood of an immune response and can further drive the development of a clinical bioanalytical and immunogenicity monitoring strategy. Such a strategy can be proactively shared with the regulators along with the proposal to streamline clinical immunogenicity and personalizing the outcome based on pharmacogenomics and other patient-related factors. This paper provides a roadmap on performing risk assessments through a systematic identification of risks and their mitigations wherever possible. Recommendations on incorporating the key components of such risk assessments as part of the new regulatory submissions are also provided. Shorter abstract Immunogenicity to biologics is common during clinical trials. Both product and host specific factors have been implicated. Several risk assessment tools can be used to identify and mitigate the risk factors responsible for immunogenicity. An insight into recent advances in the risk assessment approaches will be presented. The outputs can define a risk score and guide the clinical bioanalytical and immunogenicity monitoring strategy. A roadmap on performing risk assessments through a systematic identification of risks and their mitigations wherever possible is provided. Best practices for a risk assessment strategy and recommendations on the content for IND and the Integrated summary of Immunogenicity are also provided.
Copyright © 2022 American Pharmacists Association. Published by Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Bioinformatics; Biologics; Immune monitoring; Immunogenicity Risk assessment strategy; Prediction; Quality attributes; Regulatory guidance

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35122828     DOI: 10.1016/j.xphs.2022.01.032

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pharm Sci        ISSN: 0022-3549            Impact factor:   3.534


  1 in total

1.  Biological Matrix Supply Chain Shortages: More Matrices Are Now Rare-the Case for Surrogate Matrices.

Authors:  Evan A Dubiel; Heather Myler; Mark E Arnold; Patrick Bennett; Jeff Gatz; Elizabeth Groeber; Seema Gupta; Cheikh Kane; Fumin Li; William Mylott; Courtney Noah; Mark O'Dell; Eric Tewalt; Dominic Warrino; Andrew Vick
Journal:  AAPS J       Date:  2022-03-14       Impact factor: 3.603

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.