Hayden P Baker1, James Dahm2, Kathryn Schultz2, Daniel Portney2, Daryl Dillman2, Jason Strelzow2. 1. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Chicago, 5758 S. Maryland Avenue, Dept 4B, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA. Hayden.Baker@uchospitals.edu. 2. Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, The University of Chicago, 5758 S. Maryland Avenue, Dept 4B, Chicago, IL, 60637, USA.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of ipsilateral femoral neck fractures in ballistic femur fractures and compare this to similar non-ballistic blunt fractures. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective review of an institutional trauma database was completed at a single Level 1 trauma academic medical center. PATIENTS: All patients treated for a ballistic or blunt femur fracture presenting to our institution between May 1, 2018, and February 29, 2020, were included. In all, 270 femur fractures were identified. We excluded 73, including 29 pediatric fractures and 44 geriatric peritrochanteric fractures. The final cohort included 197 femur fractures in 187 patients. Of the 197 femur fractures included, 68 were ballistic and 129 were blunt mechanism. RESULTS: Four ipsilateral femoral neck fractures were identified in the ballistic fracture cohort. There was no significant difference between ipsilateral femoral neck fractures associated with blunt femur fractures when compared with ballistic fractures, 7.7 versus 5.8%, respectively. We identified one occult femoral neck fracture that was associated with a ballistic 32-B3 femoral shaft fracture. The ipsilateral femoral neck fracture associated with the 32-B3 ballistic femoral shaft fracture was not identified on plain films (Fig. 3A, B) and review of CTA during initial trauma workup. Identification of this fracture intra-operatively changed the treatment plan from standard proximal locking to recon proximal locking for this case. Patients included in the blunt fracture cohort were more likely to be poly-trauma patients with a higher rate of associated fractures. CONCLUSIONS: We detected no difference in rate of associated femoral neck fracture between blunt and ballistic femur fractures. These fractures can be missed on initial evaluation, which may lead to a delayed diagnosis and alter treatment plans. The authors conclude that treating surgeons must remain vigilant with a high index of suspicion for occult femoral neck fractures in patients who suffer ballistic femoral shaft fractures. Low-energy ballistic injuries should not rule out the possibility of an occult femoral neck fracture.
OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study is to evaluate the rate of ipsilateral femoral neck fractures in ballistic femur fractures and compare this to similar non-ballistic blunt fractures. DESIGN AND SETTING: A retrospective review of an institutional trauma database was completed at a single Level 1 trauma academic medical center. PATIENTS: All patients treated for a ballistic or blunt femur fracture presenting to our institution between May 1, 2018, and February 29, 2020, were included. In all, 270 femur fractures were identified. We excluded 73, including 29 pediatric fractures and 44 geriatric peritrochanteric fractures. The final cohort included 197 femur fractures in 187 patients. Of the 197 femur fractures included, 68 were ballistic and 129 were blunt mechanism. RESULTS: Four ipsilateral femoral neck fractures were identified in the ballistic fracture cohort. There was no significant difference between ipsilateral femoral neck fractures associated with blunt femur fractures when compared with ballistic fractures, 7.7 versus 5.8%, respectively. We identified one occult femoral neck fracture that was associated with a ballistic 32-B3 femoral shaft fracture. The ipsilateral femoral neck fracture associated with the 32-B3 ballistic femoral shaft fracture was not identified on plain films (Fig. 3A, B) and review of CTA during initial trauma workup. Identification of this fracture intra-operatively changed the treatment plan from standard proximal locking to recon proximal locking for this case. Patients included in the blunt fracture cohort were more likely to be poly-trauma patients with a higher rate of associated fractures. CONCLUSIONS: We detected no difference in rate of associated femoral neck fracture between blunt and ballistic femur fractures. These fractures can be missed on initial evaluation, which may lead to a delayed diagnosis and alter treatment plans. The authors conclude that treating surgeons must remain vigilant with a high index of suspicion for occult femoral neck fractures in patients who suffer ballistic femoral shaft fractures. Low-energy ballistic injuries should not rule out the possibility of an occult femoral neck fracture.