Literature DB >> 35122109

A new remnant preservation technique reduces bone tunnel enlargement after anatomic double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Suguru Koyama1, Keiji Tensho2, Hiroki Shimodaira1, Tomoya Iwaasa1, Daiki Kumaki1, Hiroshi Horiuchi3, Naoto Saito4, Jun Takahashi1.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: To investigate the effect of a new remnant preservation technique with a focus on remnant continuity on postoperative femoral and tibial tunnel enlargement after anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction (ACLR).
METHODS: A total of 150 knees were divided into three groups: Preservation Group (Group P: 49 knees), wherein the remnant continuity remained after tunnel creation; Resection Group (Group R: 47 knees), wherein the remaining remnant was resected, and Absent Group (Group A: 54 knees), wherein the remnant had no femoral attachment before tunnel creation. In Group P, the remnant maintained continuity, and the anteromedial (AM) and posterolateral (PL) bundles were positioned anterior and posterior to the remnant, respectively. Computed tomographic scans were performed at 1 week and 1 year after surgery, and the cross-sectional area of each tunnel aperture was measured. Tunnel enlargement was compared among the three groups by one-way analysis of variance (ANOVA) and the Bonferroni test. Univariate and multivariate logistic analyses were performed to identify the risk factors for tunnel enlargement in demographic and radiographic data. RESULT: For femoral AM tunnels, the tunnel enlargement of Group P was significantly smaller than Groups R and A (p < 0.001), femoral PL (p < 0.001 vs. R and A), tibial AM (p < 0.001 vs. R, 0.002 vs. A), and tibial PL (p < 0.001 vs. R, 0.002 vs. A). There was no significant difference between Groups R and A. Multivariate logistic analysis showed that remnant preservation was a significant factor in reducing tunnel enlargement in the femoral AM, femoral PL, tibial AM, and tibial PL.
CONCLUSION: The new remnant-preserving anatomical double-bundle ACLR, which preserves the continuity of the remnant, prevented all bone tunnel enlargement at 1 year postoperatively. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: Level III.
© 2022. The Author(s) under exclusive licence to European Society of Sports Traumatology, Knee Surgery, Arthroscopy (ESSKA).

Entities:  

Keywords:  Anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction; Remnant continuity; Remnant preservation; Tunnel enlargement

Mesh:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35122109     DOI: 10.1007/s00167-022-06882-y

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc        ISSN: 0942-2056            Impact factor:   4.342


  7 in total

1.  The importance of continuous remnant preservation in anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction.

Authors:  L Z van Keulen; R A G Hoogeslag; R W Brouwer; R Huis In 't Veld; N Verdonschot
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-10-01       Impact factor: 4.342

2.  Remnant preserving ACL reconstruction with a functional remnant is related to improved laxity but not to improved clinical outcomes in comparison to a nonfunctional remnant.

Authors:  Carlos Eduardo Franciozi; Flávio Kazuo Minami; Luiz Felipe Ambra; Pedro Henrique Schmidt Alves Ferreira Galvão; Felipe Conrado Schumacher; Marcelo Seiji Kubota
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-04-24       Impact factor: 4.342

3.  Clinical and radiographic results after ACL reconstruction using an adjustable-loop device.

Authors:  Youngji Kim; Mitsuaki Kubota; Keisuke Muramoto; Takuya Kunii; Taisuke Sato; Tetsuya Inui; Ryuichi Ohno; Muneaki Ishijima
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2021-09-09

4.  Tibial slope, remnant preservation, and graft size are the most important factors affecting graft healing after ACL reconstruction.

Authors:  Ahmet Emin Okutan; Muhammet Kalkışım; Enes Gürün; Muhammet Salih Ayas; Osman Aynacı
Journal:  Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc       Date:  2021-07-10       Impact factor: 4.342

5.  Clinical outcome of a new remnant augmentation technique with anatomical double-bundle anterior cruciate ligament reconstruction: Comparison among remnant preservation, resection, and absent groups.

Authors:  Tomoya Iwaasa; Keiji Tensho; Suguru Koyama; Hiroki Shimodaira; Hiroshi Horiuchi; Naoto Saito; Jun Takahashi
Journal:  Asia Pac J Sports Med Arthrosc Rehabil Technol       Date:  2021-05-26

Review 6.  Is Remnant Preservation in Anterior Cruciate Ligament Reconstruction Superior to the Standard Technique? A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Han Wang; Ziming Liu; Yuwan Li; Yihang Peng; Wei Xu; Ning Hu; Wei Huang
Journal:  Biomed Res Int       Date:  2019-12-11       Impact factor: 3.411

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.