Literature DB >> 35121544

Towards electrochemical surface plasmon resonance sensor based on the molecularly imprinted polypyrrole for glyphosate sensing.

Domas Balciunas1, Deivis Plausinaitis1, Vilma Ratautaite2, Almira Ramanaviciene3, Arunas Ramanavicius4.   

Abstract

In this research the molecular imprinting technology was applied for the formation of glyphosate-sensitive layer. The glyphosate imprinted conducting polymer polypyrrole (MIPpy) was deposited on a gold chip/electrode and used as an electrochemical surface plasmon resonance (ESPR) sensor. The results described in this study disclose some restrictions and challenges, which arise during the development of glyphosate ESPR sensor based on the molecularly imprinted polymer development stage. It was demonstrated, that glyphosate could significantly affect the electrochemical deposition process of molecularly imprinted polymer on the electrode. The results of cyclic voltammetry (CV), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), and surface plasmon resonance (SPR) have demonstrated that glyphosate molecules tend to interact with bare gold electrode and thus hinder the polypyrrole deposition. As a possible solution, the formation of a self-assembled monolayer (SAM) of 11-(1H-Pyrrol-1-yl)undecane-1-thiol (PUT) before electrochemical deposition of MIPpy and NIPpy was applied. Dissociation constant (KD) and free energy of Gibbs (ΔG0) values of glyphosate on MIPpy and Ppy without glyphosate imprints (NIPpy) were calculated. For the interaction of glyphosate with MIPpy the KD was determined as 38.18 ± 2.33⋅10-5 and ΔG0 as -19.51 ± 0.15 kJ/mol.
Copyright © 2022. Published by Elsevier B.V.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Glyphosate; Herbicide; Molecularly imprinted polymer (MIP); Polypyrrole (Ppy); Self-assembled monolayer (SAM); Surface plasmon resonance (SPR)

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2022        PMID: 35121544     DOI: 10.1016/j.talanta.2022.123252

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Talanta        ISSN: 0039-9140            Impact factor:   6.057


  5 in total

1.  An Efficient Enzyme-Less Uric Acid Sensor Development Based on PbO-Doped NiO Nanocomposites.

Authors:  Md Mahmud Alam; Abdullah M Asiri; Mohammed M Rahman
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-05-31

2.  Electrochemical Determination of Interaction between SARS-CoV-2 Spike Protein and Specific Antibodies.

Authors:  Maryia Drobysh; Viktorija Liustrovaite; Ausra Baradoke; Alma Rucinskiene; Almira Ramanaviciene; Vilma Ratautaite; Roman Viter; Chien-Fu Chen; Ieva Plikusiene; Urte Samukaite-Bubniene; Rimantas Slibinskas; Evaldas Ciplys; Martynas Simanavicius; Aurelija Zvirbliene; Indre Kucinskaite-Kodze; Arunas Ramanavicius
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2022-06-17       Impact factor: 6.208

3.  Nanoplasmonic biosensor for rapid detection of multiple viral variants in human serum.

Authors:  Nikhil Bhalla; Amir Farokh Payam; Alessio Morelli; Preetam Kumar Sharma; Rhiannon Johnson; Alan Thomson; Pawan Jolly; Francesco Canfarotta
Journal:  Sens Actuators B Chem       Date:  2022-04-18       Impact factor: 9.221

4.  Performance Enhancement of SPR Biosensor Using Graphene-MoS2 Hybrid Structure.

Authors:  Haoyuan Cai; Mengwei Wang; Zhuohui Wu; Jing Liu; Xiaoping Wang
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-06-28       Impact factor: 5.719

5.  Room-Temperature, Ionic-Liquid-Enhanced, Beta-Cyclodextrin-Based, Molecularly Imprinted Polymers for the Selective Extraction of Abamectin.

Authors:  Saqib Farooq; Bochang Chen; Shakeel Ahmad; Ihsan Muhammad; Quaid Hussain; Haiyan Wu
Journal:  Nanomaterials (Basel)       Date:  2022-03-20       Impact factor: 5.076

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.