| Literature DB >> 35121385 |
Caitlin Hitchcock1, Judita Rudokaite2, Christina Haag2, Shivam D Patel2, Alicia J Smith2, Isla Kuhn3, Francoise Jermann4, S Helen Ma2, Willem Kuyken5, J MarkG Williams5, Edward Watkins6, Claudi L H Bockting7, Catherine Crane5, David Fisher8, Tim Dalgleish9.
Abstract
The ability to retrieve specific, single-incident autobiographical memories has been consistently posited as a predictor of recurrent depression. Elucidating the role of autobiographical memory specificity in patient-response to depressive treatments may improve treatment efficacy and facilitate use of science-driven interventions. We used recent methodological advances in individual patient data meta-analysis to determine a) whether memory specificity is improved following mindfulness-based cognitive therapy (MBCT), relative to control interventions, and b) whether pre-treatment memory specificity moderates treatment response. All bar one study evaluated MBCT for relapse prevention for depression. Our initial analysis therefore focussed on MBCT datasets only(n = 708), then were repeated including the additional dataset(n = 880). Memory specificity did not significantly differ from baseline to post-treatment for either MBCT and Control interventions. There was no evidence that baseline memory specificity predicted treatment response in terms of symptom-levels, or risk of relapse. Findings raise important questions regarding the role of memory specificity in depressive treatments.Entities:
Keywords: Autobiographical memory; Cogntive therapy; Individual patient data meta-analysis; Mindfulness; Treatment response
Mesh:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35121385 PMCID: PMC7613018 DOI: 10.1016/j.brat.2022.104048
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Behav Res Ther ISSN: 0005-7967