| Literature DB >> 35120505 |
Kolsoum MohammadniaMotlagh1, Mohsen Shamsi2, Nasrin Roozbahani3, Mahmood Karimi4, Rahmatollah Moradzadeh5.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Due to the fact that pre-diabetic people are at higher risk of developing diabetes, it is possible to reduce the risk by taking preventive measures. Therefore, the present study aimed to determine the effect of theory-based education on promoting a healthy lifestyle and fasting blood sugar (FBS) in pre-diabetic women.Entities:
Keywords: Fasting blood sugar; Lifestyle; Planned behavior theory; Pre-diabetes; Women
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35120505 PMCID: PMC8814792 DOI: 10.1186/s12905-022-01608-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: BMC Womens Health ISSN: 1472-6874 Impact factor: 2.809
Fig. 1Diagram to demonstrate participant flow throughout the study. CONSORT flow diagram of the study design. This study will be conducted and reported on the basis of Consolidated Standards of Reporting Trials (CONSORT) 2010 statement. The figure shows the flow diagram of randomized controlled protocol
Comparison of the intervention and control groups, concerning the demographic variables
| Group variable | Control (n = 35) | Intervention (n = 36) | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Mean | SD | Mean | SD | ||
| Age (years) | 47.91 | 7.56 | 46.85 | 7.42 | 0.557 |
| Weight (Kg) | 76.76 | 9.34 | 74.94 | 12.52 | 0.490 |
| Height (Cm) | 158.19 | 4.38 | 158.64 | 5.95 | 0.721 |
| BMI (Weight/height (m2)) | 30.67 | 3.56 | 29.58 | 4.72 | 0.116 |
Comparison of the intervention and control groups, concerning the knowledge and FBS, before and after the intervention
| Variables and time | Intervention (n = 36) | Control (n = 35) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before | 0.59 ± 0.17 | 0.56 ± 0.16 | 0.247 |
| After | 0.73 ± 0.13 | 0.57 ± 0.17 | 0.000 |
| 0.000 | 0.632 | ||
| Before | 106.56 ± 6.09 | 107.09 ± 5.36 | 0.461 |
| After | 99.70 ± 11.06 | 110.94 ± 17.09 | 0.003 |
| 0.002 | 0.132 | ||
*Independent T-test
**Paired T-test
Comparison of the intervention and control groups, concerning the TPB and diet, before and after the intervention
| Variables and time | Intervention (n = 36) | Control (n = 35) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before | 4.53 ± 0.42 | 4.30 ± 0.42 | 0.023 |
| After | 4.64 ± 0.34 | 4.49 ± 0.46 | 0.230 |
| Difference between before and after the intervention*** | 0.10 ± 0.42 | 0.20 ± 0.49 | 0.369 |
| Before | 4.52 ± 0.50 | 4.44 ± 0.52 | 0.6 |
| After | 4.47 ± 0.69 | 4.30 ± 0.68 | 0.226 |
| 0.609 | 0.245 | ||
| Before | 3.95 ± 0.75 | 3.75 ± 0.77 | 0.295 |
| After | 4.07 ± 0.69 | 4.01 ± 0.95 | 0.912 |
| 0.288 | 0.055 | ||
| Before | 4.52 ± 0.77 | 4.37 ± 0.77 | 0.304 |
| After | 4.61 ± 0.68 | 4.65 ± 0.53 | 0.994 |
| 0.614 | 0.090 | ||
| Before | 1.40 ± 0.24 | 1.25 ± 0.29 | 0.027 |
| After | 1.53 ± 0.20 | 1.34 ± 0.27 | 0.003 |
| Difference between before and after the intervention*** | 0.13 ± 0.27 | 0.09 ± 0.26 | 0.456 |
**Paired T-test
*Independent T-test
***There were the significant differences between the scores mean of attitude and behavior in before between the control and intervention groups, therefore, for the attitude and behavior, the differences between the means of before and after the intervention were compared. Finally, no significant differences were found
Comparison of the intervention and control groups, concerning the TPB and physical activity, before and after the intervention
| Variables and time | Intervention (n = 36) | Control (n = 35) | |
|---|---|---|---|
| Before | 4.42 ± 0.64 | 4.42 ± 0.38 | 0.357 |
| After | 4.63 ± 0.39 | 4.53 ± 0.38 | 0.210 |
| 0.047 | 0.157 | ||
| Before | 4.43 ± 0.68 | 4.28 ± 0.71 | 0.298 |
| After | 4.43 ± 0.71 | 4.19 ± 0.70 | 0.089 |
| 0.958 | 0.435 | ||
| Before | 3.31 ± 0.86 | 3.21 ± 0.76 | 0.606 |
| After | 3.34 ± 0.69 | 3.26 ± 0.93 | 0.057 |
| 0.046 | 0.770 | ||
| Before | 4.22 ± 1.24 | 4.00 ± 1.23 | 0.232 |
| After | 4.76 ± 0.60 | 4.45 ± 1.01 | 0.109 |
| 0.056 | 0.22 | ||
| Before | 0.65 ± 0.83 | 0.48 ± 0.81 | 0.3 |
| After | 0.48 ± 0.74 | 0.31 ± 0.63 | 0.286 |
| 0.204 | 0.201 | ||
**Paired T-test
*Independent T-test