Literature DB >> 35119553

The atrophic edentulous alveolus. A preliminary study on a new generation of subperiosteal implants.

George Dimitroulis1, Benjamin Gupta2, Ian Wilson2, Christopher Hart3.   

Abstract

The aim of this cohort case series is to present a new subperiosteal implant device that uses CAD-CAM technologies together with 3D metal printing capabilities to produce direct bone-anchored dental prosthetic solutions for the management of atrophic edentulous alveolus and jaws. The clinical experience of 21 subperiosteal devices implanted over a 4-year period is presented. The results of this study showed 14 of the 21 cases were successful (66.7%), while 7 cases had complications including exposure of the metal frame (5 cases), mobility of the device (1 case) and 1 case failed for reasons unrelated to the device. Four of the 7 cases were successfully salvaged resulting in an overall success rate of 85.7% (18 /21 cases). This study supports the use of fully customized subperiosteal jaw implants as a simple and reliable alternative for dental rehabilitation of atrophic edentulous cases which would otherwise require bone grafts for conventional fixed dental implant solutions. With more research, the clinical potential for this device is significant as it not only avoids the need for complex and lengthy reconstructive jaw surgery but also allows for the placement of immediate prosthetic teeth at the time of implantation.
© 2022. The Author(s), under exclusive licence to Springer-Verlag GmbH Germany, part of Springer Nature.

Entities:  

Keywords:  3D printing; Atrophic edentulous maxilla; Mandible; Subperiosteal dental implant

Year:  2022        PMID: 35119553     DOI: 10.1007/s10006-022-01044-3

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Oral Maxillofac Surg        ISSN: 1865-1550


  5 in total

Review 1.  The efficacy of horizontal and vertical bone augmentation procedures for dental implants - a Cochrane systematic review.

Authors:  Marco Esposito; Maria Gabriella Grusovin; Pietro Felice; Georgios Karatzopoulos; Helen V Worthington; Paul Coulthard
Journal:  Eur J Oral Implantol       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 3.123

Review 2.  Bone augmentation procedures in implant dentistry.

Authors:  Matteo Chiapasco; Paolo Casentini; Marco Zaniboni
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2009       Impact factor: 2.804

Review 3.  Which hard tissue augmentation techniques are the most successful in furnishing bony support for implant placement?

Authors:  Tara L Aghaloo; Peter K Moy
Journal:  Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants       Date:  2007       Impact factor: 2.804

4.  Custom-made 3D printed subperiosteal titanium implants for the prosthetic restoration of the atrophic posterior mandible of elderly patients: a case series.

Authors:  Carlo Mangano; Andrea Bianchi; Francesco Guido Mangano; Jessica Dana; Marco Colombo; Ivan Solop; Oleg Admakin
Journal:  3D Print Med       Date:  2020-01-08

5.  Improvement of an additively manufactured subperiosteal implant structure design by finite elements based topological optimization.

Authors:  Alberto Carnicero; Andrés Peláez; Andrés Restoy-Lozano; Isaías Jacquott; Ricardo Perera
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-28       Impact factor: 4.379

  5 in total
  1 in total

1.  Dental Implant Therapeutic Trends Among Dentists in Palestine: A Cross-Sectional Questionnaire Study.

Authors:  Mohammad Assaf
Journal:  Cureus       Date:  2022-04-20
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.