| Literature DB >> 35119039 |
Dan Weng1,2,3, Tao Han4, Jin Dong2, Ming Zhang2, Yang Mi2, Yiping He5, Xiaojuan Li5, Xiaoming Zhu1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Gestational trophoblastic diseases (GTDs) are characterized by vascular abnormalities of the trophoblast, but their pathogenesis is unknown. Angiogenin (ANG) and matrix metalloproteinase (MMP)-2, which are molecules implicated in the angiogenic process, may play some role in this process.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35119039 PMCID: PMC8812619 DOI: 10.1097/MD.0000000000028768
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Medicine (Baltimore) ISSN: 0025-7974 Impact factor: 1.889
Associations of ANG and MMP-2 expressions with the clinicopathological characteristics of patients with GTD.
| ANG | MMP-2 | ||||||||
| Characteristics | N | – | + | ++ | – | + | ++ | ||
| Age (year) | |||||||||
| <40 | 30 | 3 | 16 | 11 | <.001† | 12 | 7 | 11 | <.001† |
| >-40 | 8 | 2 | 6 | 0 | 5 | 2 | 1 | ||
| Sample type | |||||||||
| NCV | 28 | 11 | 13 | 4 | <.001‡ | 12 | 12 | 4 | <.001‡ |
| BM | 26 | 0 | 19 | 7 | 5 | 11 | 10 | ||
| GTT | 12 | 4 | 7 | 1 | 4 | 6 | 2 | ||
| TNM stage | |||||||||
| I | 4 | 1 | 2 | 1 | .042‡ | 1 | 2 | 1 | .042‡ |
| II | 1 | 0 | 1 | 0 | 0 | 0 | 1 | ||
| III | 2 | 1 | 1 | 0 | 1 | 1 | 0 | ||
| IV | 7 | 0 | 6 | 1 | 0 | 5 | 2 | ||
| FIGO stage | |||||||||
| poor | 6 | 1 | 5 | 0 | .031† | 2 | 2 | 2 | .014† |
| high | 8 | 2 | 4 | 2 | 1 | 4 | 3 | ||
BM = benign mole, GTT = gestational trophoblast tumor, NCV = normal chorionic villi.
P < .05, significant different.
Date are analyzed with Mann–Whitney test.
Date are analyzed with Kruskal–Wallis test.
Figure 1The immunoreactivity of ANG and MMP-2 in normal chorionic villi (A and B, ×100), benign mole (C and D), and gestational trophoblast tumor (E and F, × 200) samples and blank control (G, ×200).
The relationship between the expressions of ANG and MMP-2 in NCV, BM, and GTT samples.
| MMP-2 | ||||||||||||
| NCV | BM | GTT | ||||||||||
| ANG | – | + | ++ | P/rs | – | + | ++ | P/rs | – | + | ++ | P/rs |
| – | 10 | 0 | 1 | 0.000/0.725∗∗ | 0 | 0 | 0 | 0.035/0.401∗ | 2 | 1 | 0 | 0.013/0.606∗ |
| + | 2 | 11 | 0 | 7 | 6 | 3 | 3 | 7 | 1 | |||
| ++ | 0 | 2 | 2 | 2 | 3 | 7 | 0 | 0 | 2 | |||
∗∗Correlation is significant at the 0.01 level. (2-tailed).
∗Correlation is significant at the 0.05 level. (2-tailed)
BM = benign mole, GTT = gestational trophoblast tumor, NCV = normal chorionic villi.
∗P < .05, significant different.
Figure 2The relationship between the levels of ANG and MMP-2 in the serum of GTD and normal controls. (A and B) The levels of ANG and MMP-2 in the serum of GTD and normal controls were detected by ELISA. All results are representative of 3 independent experiments. The data were reported as the mean ± SEM, n = 3. ∗∗∗Significant difference, P < .001, Student t test. (C) The correlation between ANG and MMP-2 levels in the serum from patients with GTD was analyzed using the Pearson correlation and linear regression analysis.
The levels of ANG and MMP-2 in the maternal serum of patients with GTD and healthy pregnant women.
| Group | Age (year) | Angiogenin (ng/mL) | MMP-2 (ng/mL) | ||
| Control (n = 20) | 26.72 ± 0.07 | 372.65 ± 1.42 | <.001 | 260.60 ± 1.73 | |
| GTD (n = 20) | 33.05 ± 0.09 | 457.88 ± 0.64 | 388.98 ± 0.66 |