Bohring-Opitz syndrome caused by a novel ASXL1 mutation (c.3762delT) in an IVF baby: A case report.

RATIONALE: Bohring-Opitz syndrome is a severe congenital disorder associated with a de novo mutation in the additional sex combs-like 1 (ASXL1) gene, and it is characterized by symptoms that include developmental delay and musculoskeletal and neurological features. PATIENT CONCERNS: The patient was a girl, an in vitro fertilization (IVF) baby, with delayed motor development, drooling, short stature, slow growth, low muscle tone, image diagnosis of hypoplasia of the corpus callosum, delayed tooth eruption, high palatal arch, adduction of the thumb, drooling, not chewing, excessive joint activity, and ligament relaxation. DIAGNOSIS: Whole-exome sequencing analysis detected 1 novel disruptive frameshift mutation in ASXL1 in the proband but wild-type ASXL1 in both parents.
INTERVENTIONS: Approximately 1 year of rehabilitation training, which included exercise therapy, toy imitation operation, cognition of daily objects, daily living skills training, gesture language training, oral muscle training, and hand movement training. OUTCOMES: After approximately 1 year of training, the patient was 3 years old and able to eat normally without drooling. She was able to grasp objects and pick them up after they fell. She was able to grasp small objects and actively played with toys. In addition, she was able to crawl on the floor (at slow speed, with poor initiative), stand with assistance, and walk with assistance; she was unstable when standing unassisted (standing unassisted for 8 seconds at most during training). LESSON: ASXL1 c.3762delT is a novel mutation that may be caused by IVF. This finding suggests that appropriate gene mutation detection approaches may be necessary for IVF technology.

Introduction

Bohring-Opitz syndrome (BOS) was first described by Bohring et al in 1999.[ The patients they described had several features in common, including a prominent metopic suture, hypertelorism, exophthalmos, cleft lip and palate, limb anomalies, difficulty feeding, and severe developmental delays.[ In almost 50% of cases that meet the clinical criteria for BOS, de novo frameshift and nonsense mutations in the additional sex combs-like 1 (ASXL1) gene have been detected,[ suggesting that loss of function of this gene is the major cause. We report the clinical characterization of a small baby who had total growth retardation, agenesis of the corpus callosum, and hypotonia and was clinically diagnosed with BOS. Whole-exome sequencing analysis revealed 1 novel disruptive frameshift deletion in the ASXL1 gene. The child was conceived through in vitro fertilization (IVF), and both parents are wild-type for ASXL1. Genetic risks and pre-implantation genetic testing in IVF have been the focus of many studies.[ In our study, a novel disruptive frameshift of ASXL1 was found in an IVF baby, which may have been caused by IVF and suggests that appropriate pre-implantation genetic testing is necessary before embryo transfer.

Case report

The proband was an 11-month-old girl, born 33 weeks premature and conceived through IVF. She exhibited the following features: delayed motor development, drooling, short stature, slow growth, low muscle tone, hypoplasia of the corpus callosum as determined by image diagnosis, delayed tooth eruption, high palatal arch, adduction of the thumb, excessive joint activity, and ligament relaxation.

Whole-exome sequencing and whole-genome copy number variation detection were performed. Written informed consent was obtained from the patient's family. A de novo frameshift deletion of ASXL1, c.3762delT (p. N1254fs), was identified (Fig. 1). According to the American Academy of Medical Genetics and Genomics guidelines,[ the c.3762delT mutation of the ASXL1 gene is suggested as a pathogenic site related to the autosomal dominant genetic disease BOS. The clinical features consistent with the phenotype of this case are overall developmental delay, corpus callosum hypoplasia, and hypotonia. We did not detect chromosomal aneuploidy or genome copy number variants of 100 kb or more that are known to cause disease. The first-generation sequencing results showed that the proband had c.3762delT heterozygosity in the ASXL1 gene, and neither the father nor the mother was a carrier (Fig. 1).

Figure 1

First-generation sequencing verifies a disease-causing mutation in the proband and family members: c.3762delT (p.N1254fs).

Copy number variant results

The 0.32 Mb region at q11.2 on chromosome 14 was missing. Querying of the DGV, DECIPHER, OMIM, UCSC, and PubMed public database resources revealed that this fragment does not contain any known genes (Fig. 2).

Figure 2

CNV-seq results of the proband: CNV-seq results showed that the proband had a chromosomal deletion SEQ [HG19] Del (14) (Q11.2) CHR14: G.22620001_22940000Del, but there is no known gene in this region. CNV = copy number variant.

When she was 2 years old, her wrists and knuckles were mostly in flexion, her initiative was very low, her hand movement was poor, she could not grasp items, her holding time was not long, her percussion strength was weak, and she could not crawl or walk. Regarding oral features, she exhibited a high, narrow jaw arch, low sensory sensitivity, and no chewing.

Interventions: At the age of 2 years, rehabilitation training was conducted in the children's rehabilitation department and included exercise therapy, toy imitation operation, cognition of daily objects, daily living skills training, gesture language training, oral muscle training, and hand movement training.

Outcomes: After approximately 1 year of training, at the age of 3 years old, she was able to eat normally without drooling. She was able to grasp objects and pick them up after they fell. She was able to grasp small objects and actively played with toys. In addition, she was able to crawl on the floor (at slow speed, with poor initiative), stand with assistance, and walk with assistance; she was unstable when standing unassisted (standing unassisted for 8 seconds at most during training).

Materials and methods

IVF procedures

The protocol for a modified natural cycle IVF was approved by the institutional review board of the Reproductive and Genetic Hospital of CITIC-Xiangya. Modified natural IVF cycles were conducted as follows: natural ovulatory cycles were monitored with serial transvaginal ultrasound examinations and serum E2 determinations. When the lead follicle reached pre-ovulatory status according to the cycle day, ultrasound, and E2 levels,[ 0.25 mg of the GnRH antagonist ganirelix acetate was administered along with 200 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin. Both medications were self-administered subcutaneously by the prospective. The prospective parents were asked to return daily for continued serial monitoring with ultrasound and serum E2. Both medications were administered daily until follicle maturity criteria were reached. These criteria were previously established by our program as a guideline for the timing of ovulation triggering and comprised combinations of follicle size and E2 level (>20 mm and >200 pg/mL, >18 mm and >250 pg/mL, or >15 mm and >300 pg/mL for mean follicle diameter and serum E2 level, respectively). When these maturity criteria were reached, a trigger dose of 10,000 IU of human chorionic gonadotropin was administered. Follicle aspiration, fertilization in vitro, and embryo transfer were subsequently performed as previously described.[

Ethical review

The Ethics Committee of Changsha Maternal and Child Health Hospital approved this study.

Discussion

Is IVF completely safe? This is a controversial issue. Some studies have shown that IVF is safe,[ whereas others have indicated that various assisted reproductive technologies (ARTs) can induce local and functional epigenetic abnormalities, especially DNA methylation and H3K4me3, providing an epigenetic basis for potential long-term health risks in ART-conceived offspring.[ We found a novel mutated gene in an IVF baby, which indicated that ARTs may cause mutations; however, a larger sample is needed to draw conclusions.

Some of the clinical features of our proband were consistent with previous BOS findings, including full-scale developmental delay and agenesis of the corpus callosum.[ Furthermore, exon sequencing of the whole gene showed that the ASXL1 gene had a c.3762delT frameshift mutation. However, the head sizes of our proband were normal, which is contrary to the microcephaly reported in every other case with ASXL1 disease-causing variants.[

ASXL1 encodes a chromatin-binding protein required for normal determination of segment identity in the developing embryo.[ The protein is a member of the polycomb group of proteins, which are involved in embryogenesis and carcinogenesis through transcriptional regulation of target genes.[ The ASXL1 protein is thought to disrupt chromatin in localized areas, enhancing the transcription of certain genes while repressing the transcription of others.[ The protein encoded by ASXL1 functions as a ligand-dependent coactivator for retinoic acid receptors in cooperation with nuclear receptor coactivators.[

The mutation of ASXL1 in our case (c.3762delT) was identified as a new mutation in the public human exon database. The deletion occurred in exon 12 and caused changes in the reading frame, leading to changes in protein function. Similar to all known frame-coding mutations, most frame-coding mutations in ASXL1 alter protein function, and most such mutations cause BOS. The frameshift mutations c.3754_3758del (p.gln1251_asp1252inster) and c.3769del (p.aLA1257fs) occur in the last exon of ASXL1, and both lead to BOS as revealed by ClinVar. These phenotypes are similar to the mutation we have found. This observation suggests that mutations in the latter part of the gene can lead to BOS.

We conclude that the c.3762delT mutation is a disease-causing mutation responsible for the patient's BOS clinical presentation. The molecular diagnostic methods currently available have not only paved the way for accurate diagnoses and genotype–phenotype correlations but also helped delineate locus heterogeneity among highly similar phenotypes. Hence, accurate phenotypic characterization is essential for choosing the appropriate molecular diagnostic method.

Acknowledgments

We thank all of the patients and healthy volunteers who agreed to participate in the present study and all those who helped us successfully complete the research.

Author contributions

Conceptualization: Xin Yuan, Tuanmei Wang, Dongbo Wang.

Data curation: Jun He, Dongbo Wang, Shuyuan Yan, Guohong Wang.

Formal analysis: Xin Yuan, Tuanmei Wang, Dongbo Wang.

Funding acquisition: Tuanmei Wang.

Investigation: Dongbo Wang, Haichun Guo.

Methodology: Yanling Wang.

Writing – review & editing: Xiangwen Peng.