| Literature DB >> 3511871 |
Abstract
Invasive diagnostic procedures for mediastinal assessment, such as mediastinoscopy, are necessitated by the importance of staging lung cancers, both to plan the treatment and to estimate the prognosis. Other noninvasive techniques may complement or be substituted for mediastinoscopy under certain specific clinical settings. Thus with the introduction of newer diagnostic technologies, such as computed axial tomography, the strategy for mediastinal assessment should be continually reevaluated. In this review, the diagnostic sensitivity, specificity, and overall accuracy of various techniques reported in the literature are examined to elucidate their current roles in assessing the mediastinal involvement in patients with lung cancer.Entities:
Mesh:
Substances:
Year: 1986 PMID: 3511871 DOI: 10.1016/s0003-4975(10)62678-1
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Ann Thorac Surg ISSN: 0003-4975 Impact factor: 4.330