Francois Mercier1, Nassim Djebli2, Mario González-Sales3, Felix Jaminion2, Georgina Meneses-Lorente4. 1. Roche Innovation Center, Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Basel, Switzerland. francois.mercier@roche.com. 2. Roche Innovation Center, Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Basel, Switzerland. 3. Modeling Great Solutions, Escalades-Engordany, Andorra. 4. Roche Innovation Centre, Roche Pharmaceutical Research and Early Development, Welwyn, United Kingdom.
Abstract
PURPOSE: Entrectinib is an anti-cancer agent that inhibits TRKA/B/C, ROS1, and ALK. Secondary pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure parameters for entrectinib derived from a previously described population PK model were used to characterize exposure-response relationships in patients treated with entrectinib. METHODS: Data were pooled from Phase 1 and 2 studies of entrectinib (600-800 mg/day in adults, 250-750 mg/m2/day in children) in 293 patients with NTRK-, ROS1-, or ALK-positive, locally advanced or metastatic tumors. Efficacy was evaluated by the changes in sum of target lesion diameters and best overall response defined by RECIST1.1. A longitudinal nonlinear mixed-effect model described the relationship between entrectinib exposure and tumor size data in patients with ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. The relationship between exposure and treatment-emergent (TEAEs) or serious (SAEs) adverse events was assessed by logistic regression in all patients for whom secondary PK parameter estimates were derived. RESULTS: Among the 89 patients with evaluable efficacy data included in the exposure-efficacy analysis, 73% (65/89) achieved a complete or partial response. Entrectinib exposure distribution was similar in responders and non-responders. Model-described tumor shrinkage rates were 8-12 times greater than growth rates in both ROS-1-positive NSCLC patients and NTRK fusion-positive solid tumor patients, with no relationship between exposure and these rates. The probability of experiencing a Grade ≥ 3 TEAE or SAE increased with exposure, primarily at doses > 600 mg/day. CONCLUSION: These analyses supported that entrectinib at 600 mg/day provides an acceptable benefit-risk ratio in adults with NTRK-, ROS1-, or ALK-positive tumors, considered as rare disease.
PURPOSE: Entrectinib is an anti-cancer agent that inhibits TRKA/B/C, ROS1, and ALK. Secondary pharmacokinetic (PK) exposure parameters for entrectinib derived from a previously described population PK model were used to characterize exposure-response relationships in patients treated with entrectinib. METHODS: Data were pooled from Phase 1 and 2 studies of entrectinib (600-800 mg/day in adults, 250-750 mg/m2/day in children) in 293 patients with NTRK-, ROS1-, or ALK-positive, locally advanced or metastatic tumors. Efficacy was evaluated by the changes in sum of target lesion diameters and best overall response defined by RECIST1.1. A longitudinal nonlinear mixed-effect model described the relationship between entrectinib exposure and tumor size data in patients with ROS1-positive non-small-cell lung cancer (NSCLC) or NTRK fusion-positive solid tumors. The relationship between exposure and treatment-emergent (TEAEs) or serious (SAEs) adverse events was assessed by logistic regression in all patients for whom secondary PK parameter estimates were derived. RESULTS: Among the 89 patients with evaluable efficacy data included in the exposure-efficacy analysis, 73% (65/89) achieved a complete or partial response. Entrectinib exposure distribution was similar in responders and non-responders. Model-described tumor shrinkage rates were 8-12 times greater than growth rates in both ROS-1-positive NSCLC patients and NTRK fusion-positive solid tumor patients, with no relationship between exposure and these rates. The probability of experiencing a Grade ≥ 3 TEAE or SAE increased with exposure, primarily at doses > 600 mg/day. CONCLUSION: These analyses supported that entrectinib at 600 mg/day provides an acceptable benefit-risk ratio in adults with NTRK-, ROS1-, or ALK-positive tumors, considered as rare disease.
Authors: Kristin Bergethon; Alice T Shaw; Sai-Hong Ignatius Ou; Ryohei Katayama; Christine M Lovly; Nerina T McDonald; Pierre P Massion; Christina Siwak-Tapp; Adriana Gonzalez; Rong Fang; Eugene J Mark; Julie M Batten; Haiquan Chen; Keith D Wilner; Eunice L Kwak; Jeffrey W Clark; David P Carbone; Hongbin Ji; Jeffrey A Engelman; Mari Mino-Kenudson; William Pao; A John Iafrate Journal: J Clin Oncol Date: 2012-01-03 Impact factor: 44.544
Authors: Dara L Aisner; Teresa T Nguyen; Diego D Paskulin; Anh T Le; Jerry Haney; Nathan Schulte; Fiona Chionh; Jenny Hardingham; John Mariadason; Niall Tebbutt; Robert C Doebele; Andrew J Weickhardt; Marileila Varella-Garcia Journal: Mol Cancer Res Date: 2013-12-02 Impact factor: 5.852
Authors: Robert C Doebele; Lara E Davis; Aria Vaishnavi; Anh T Le; Adriana Estrada-Bernal; Stephen Keysar; Antonio Jimeno; Marileila Varella-Garcia; Dara L Aisner; Yali Li; Philip J Stephens; Deborah Morosini; Brian B Tuch; Michele Fernandes; Nisha Nanda; Jennifer A Low Journal: Cancer Discov Date: 2015-07-27 Impact factor: 39.397
Authors: Snjezana Dogan; Lu Wang; Ryan N Ptashkin; Robert R Dawson; Jatin P Shah; Eric J Sherman; R Michael Tuttle; James A Fagin; David S Klimstra; Nora Katabi; Ronald A Ghossein Journal: Mod Pathol Date: 2016-06-10 Impact factor: 7.842
Authors: Garrett M Brodeur; Jane E Minturn; Ruth Ho; Anisha M Simpson; Radhika Iyer; Carly R Varela; Jennifer E Light; Venkatadri Kolla; Audrey E Evans Journal: Clin Cancer Res Date: 2009-05-05 Impact factor: 12.531
Authors: A Vaishnavi; M Capelletti; P A Jänne; R C Doebele; A T Le; S Kako; M Butaney; D Ercan; S Mahale; K D Davies; D L Aisner; A B Pilling; E M Berge; J Kim; H Sasaki; S Park; G Kryukov; L A Garraway; Peter S Hammerman; J Haas; S W Andrews; D Lipson; P J Stephens; V A Miller; M Varella-Garcia Journal: Nat Med Date: 2013-10-27 Impact factor: 53.440