| Literature DB >> 35118110 |
Jun Wang1,2, Jordane Ossemond1,2, Yann Le Gouar1,2, Françoise Boissel1,2, Didier Dupont1,2, Frédérique Pédrono1,2.
Abstract
Docosahexaenoic acid (DHA) is a major n-3 polyunsaturated fatty acid (PUFA) particularly involved in cognitive and cardiovascular functions. Due to the high unsaturation index, its dietary intake form has been considered to improve oxidation status and to favor bioaccessibility and bioavailability as well. This study aimed at investigating the effect of DHA encapsulated with natural whey protein. DHA was dietary provided as triacylglycerols to achieve 2.3% over total fatty acids. It was daily supplied to weanling rats for four weeks in omelet as food matrix, consecutively to a 6-hour fasting. First, when DHA oil was encapsulated, consumption of chow diet was enhanced leading to promote animal growth. Second, the brain exhibited a high accretion of 22.8% DHA, which was not improved by dietary supplementation of DHA. Encapsulation of DHA oil did not greatly affect the fatty acid proportions in tissues, but remarkably modified the profile of oxidized metabolites of fatty acids in plasma, heart, and even brain. Specific oxylipins derived from DHA were upgraded, such as Protectin Dx in heart and 14-HDoHE in brain, whereas those generated from n-6 PUFAs were mainly mitigated. This effect did not result from oxylipins measured in DHA oil since DHA and EPA derivatives were undetected after food processing. Collectively, these data suggested that dietary encapsulation of DHA oil triggered a more efficient absorption of DHA, the metabolism of which was enhanced more than its own accretion in our experimental conditions. Incorporating DHA oil in functional food may finally improve the global health status by generating precursors of protectins and maresins.Entities:
Keywords: DHA; brain; encapsulation; heart; oxylipin; rat
Year: 2022 PMID: 35118110 PMCID: PMC8805515 DOI: 10.3389/fnut.2021.812119
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Front Nutr ISSN: 2296-861X
Figure 1The experimental design. Rats were acclimated with the habituation diet for one week. They were then fed with the treatment diet (T-diet) for four weeks. During this period, the rats were daily fasted for 6 hours before receiving 3g of omelet containing DHA as oil (UN-DHA-O) or as encapsulated oil (EN-DHA-O).
The composition of diets (A) and oil mix (B).
|
|
|
|
|---|---|---|
|
| ||
| Starch | 54.6 | 54.9 |
| Sucrose | 10.2 | 10.2 |
| Cellulose | 5.1 | 5.1 |
| Casein | 20.6 | 20.8 |
| Oil mix | 5.0 | 4.5 |
| Mineral mix | 3.5 | 3.5 |
| Vitamin mix | 1.0 | 1.0 |
|
| ||
| Linseed | 1.4 | 2.9 |
| Sunflower | 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Olive | 13.5 | 12.6 |
| Rapeseed | 25.0 | 25.2 |
| Palm | 51.5 | 50.5 |
The composition of dry diets based on the AIN-93-G is presented for the habituation and the treatment diets. Both diets contained a mixture of vegetable oils formulated according to the daily consumption of eggs.
The fatty acid composition of the diets and the omelets.
|
|
|
| |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| 12:0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 14:0 | 0.6 | 0.6 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 16:0 | 26.2 | 25.7 | 25.3 | 22.5 | 22.1 |
| 18:0 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 8.0 | 7.1 | 7.2 |
| 20:0 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 22:0 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 24:0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 14:1n-5 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.0 | 0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16:1n-7 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 2.9 | 2.6 | 2.6 |
| 18:1n-7 | 1.4 | 1.4 | 2.0 | 1.8 | 1.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 16:1n-9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.7 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
| 18:1n-9 | 46.2 | 45.7 | 42.2 | 37.9 | 37.2 |
| 20:1n-9 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.3 |
| 22:1n-9 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 |
| 24:1n-9 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18:2n-6 | 17.0 | 17.2 | 14.8 | 13.0 | 12.9 |
| 20:4n-6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 2.0 | 1.9 | 1.9 |
| 22:4n-6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 22:5n-6 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.3 | 0.6 | 0.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| 18:3n-3 | 3.4 | 4.3 | 0.5 | 0.4 | 0.5 |
| 20:5n-3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 22:5n-3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 22:6n-3 | 0.0 | 0.0 | 0.8 | 9.8 | 10.6 |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Lipids from croquettes and omelets were extracted according to the Folch's method. The fatty acid profile performed by GC-MS was determined for the habituation and the treatment diets, and the different omelets prepared with unencapsulated-DHA oil or encapsulated-DHA oil.
Bold values correspond to the sum of fatty acids per family.
Colored values correspond to the type of omelets: black for control, red for UN-DHA-O and blue for EN-DHA-O.
Figure 2The food intake (A), the growth (B), the food efficiency ratio (C), and the tissue weights (D) of rats. Food consumption of T-diet and animal growth were followed during the four-week experiment. Food efficiency ratio averaged over the four-week experiment was calculated with the daily consumption of T-diet and omelets over the weight gain of growing animals. The effect of diets was determined as well on the tissue weight prior to lipid analysis. a, b, c and ab indicate significant differences between the three groups when p < 0.05; ab means no difference with a and no difference with b. *indicates significant differences between EN-DHA-O and both Control and UN-DHA-O when p < 0.05.
The fatty acid composition of the daily intake of T-diet and omelets.
|
|
| ||
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
| |
| 12:0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 14:0 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.5 |
| 16:0 | 25.6 | 25.4 | 25.4 |
| 18:0 | 4.5 | 4.4 | 4.4 |
| 20:0 | 0.3 | 0.3 | 0.3 |
| 22:0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 24:0 | 0.1 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 16:1n-7 | 0.8 | 0.8 | 0.8 |
| 18:1n-7 | 1.6 | 1.5 | 1.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 16:1n-9 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 18:1n-9 | 44.8 | 44.8 | 44.8 |
| 20:1n-9 | 0.4 | 0.4 | 0.4 |
| 22:1n-9 | 0.2 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
| 24:1n-9 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 18:2n-6 | 16.6 | 16.6 | 16.6 |
| 20:4n-6 | 0.5 | 0.5 | 0.4 |
| 22:5n-6 | 0.1 | 0.2 | 0.2 |
|
|
|
|
|
| 18:3n-3 | 3.4 | 3.4 | 3.5 |
| 20:5n-3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 22:5n-3 | 0.0 | 0.1 | 0.1 |
| 22:6n-3 | 0.2 | 2.5 | 2.5 |
|
|
|
|
|
| n-6/n-3 | 4.9 | 4.9 | 4.8 |
|
|
|
|
|
| TAG-DHA + 2.3% | |||
The fatty acid profile was calculated per group of omelets on the base of the treatment diet consumption, and was averaged per day on the four-week experimental period. This profile corresponds to the combination between FA consumed from the T-diet and FA supplied by the 3g omelet.
Bold values correspond to the sum of fatty acids per family.
Colored values correspond to the type of omelets: black for control, red for UN-DHA-O and blue for EN-DHA-O.
Figure 3The effect of form of the DHA intake on the FA profile of rat tissues after 4 weeks of treatment. Lipids from rat tissues were extracted according to the Folch's method and the fatty acid profile was then determined by gas chromatography-mass spectrometry (GC-MS). The main results on n-3 PUFA and arachidonic acid are presented. a, b, c and ab indicate significant differences between the three groups when p < 0.05; ab means no difference with a and no difference with b.
The dimethylacetal profile of RBC, heart, brain, and eyes.
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
| 29.2 ± 0.3 | 33.2 ± 0.3 | 31.6 ± 0.3 | 6.0 ± 0.1 | 0.12 ± 0.00 |
|
| 30.3 ± 0.3 | 32.6 ± 0.4 | 31.8 ± 0.5 | 5.3 ± 0.2 | 0.12 ± 0.00 | |
|
| 30.0 ± 0.5 | 33.0 ± 0.4 | 31.6 ± 0.7 | 5.4 ± 0.3 | 0.13 ± 0.00 | |
|
|
| 63.2 ± 1.0 | 13.4 ± 1.0 | 23.4 ± 1.2 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.38 ± 0.01 |
|
| 64.2 ± 1.8 | 13.6 ± 1.5 | 22.2 ± 1.4 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.36 ± 0.02 | |
|
| 62.2 ± 1.3 | 15.1 ± 0.7 | 22.7 ± 1.5 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.42 ± 0.02 | |
|
|
| 22.2 ± 0.9 | 52.6 ± 0.7 | 14.9 ± 0.4 | 10.3 ± 0.3 | 2.17 ± 0.07 |
|
| 21.5 ± 0.7 | 51.7 ± 0.6 | 16.3 ± 0.7 | 10.5 ± 0.4 | 2.49 ± 0.13 | |
|
| 21.6 ± 0.5 | 52.7 ± 0.6 | 15.4 ± 0.6 | 10.3 ± 0.4 | 2.30 ± 0.11 | |
|
|
| 26.8 ± 0.3 | 34.3 ± 0.4 | 20.0 ± 0.4 | 18.9 ± 0.2 | 0.12 ± 0.00 |
|
| 40.7 ± 2.1 | 34.8 ± 3.0 | 11.1 ± 2.4 | 13.4 ± 2.2 | 0.06 ± 0.00 | |
|
| 35.1 ± 1.3 | 34.8 ± 0.6 | 15.9 ± 0.8 | 14.2 ± 1.0 | 0.07 ± 0.01 |
Lipids of tissues were extracted by the Folch's method and the dimethylacetal profile was determined by GC-MS.
indicate significant differences between the three groups when p < 0.05; ab means no difference with a and no difference with b.
Colored values correspond to the type of omelets: black for control, red for UN-DHA-O and blue for EN-DHA-O.
The oxidized derivatives of fatty acids from DHA oil and omelets.
|
| ||||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| |
| LA | 13-HODE | 36.61 | 6.61 | 4.03 | 6.15 | 1.81 |
| 9-HODE | 31.27 | 6.20 | 2.92 | 4.78 | 1.55 | |
| ARA | 15-dPGJ2 | 0.52 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.03 |
| 15-HETE | Trace | Trace | Trace | Trace | Trace | |
| 5-HETE | 0.94 | 2.16 | 1.19 | 1.53 | 0.05 | |
| EPA | 18-HEPE | 2.21 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.1 |
| DHA | 17-HDoHE | 17.57 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.87 |
| 14-HDoHE | 13.07 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.00 | 0.65 | |
The oxidized metabolites of fatty acids were quantified by LC-QQQ as mentioned in methods on DHA oil used to prepare omelets.
A column named “expected” results from calculations on oxylipin concentrations expected after supplementation of egg with DHA oil, considering the oxylipin pattern from DHA oil.
Colored values correspond to the type of omelets: black for control, red for UN-DHA-O and blue for EN-DHA-O.
The oxidized derivatives of fatty acids from plasma.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA | 13-HODE | 13.47 ± 1.90 | 8.04 ± 1.01 | 7.29 ± 1.21 |
| 9-HODE | 2.56 ± 0.30 | 1.71 ± 0.13 | 1.72 ± 0.25 | |
| ARA | PGF2α | 0.39 ± 0.09 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 |
| PGE2 | 0.78 ± 0.16 | 0.19 ± 0.02 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | |
| PGD2 | 0.59 ± 0.21 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | |
| TXB2 | 7.88 ± 2.76 | 1.59 ± 0.41 | 0.77 ± 0.08 | |
| 15-HETE | 2.98 ± 0.51 | 1.15 ± 0.12 | 0.64 ± 0.08 | |
| 8-HETE | 2.03 ± 0.33 | 0.54 ± 0.13 | 0.00 ± 0.00 | |
| 12-HETE | 384.28 ± 76.32 | 90.73 ± 22.97 | 25.05 ± 3.25 | |
| 5-HETE | 4.48 ± 0.28 | 2.30 ± 0.14 | 1.53 ± 0.13 | |
| DHA | 14-HDoHE | 42.30 ± 7.53 | 20.41 ± 4.20 | 6.82 ± 0.87 |
| 17-HDoHE | 3.70 ± 0.73 | 2.91 ± 0.36 | 2.06 ± 0.26 | |
The oxidized metabolites of fatty acids were quantified in plasma by LC-QQQ as mentioned in methods.
indicate significant differences between the three groups when p < 0.05.
Colored values correspond to the type of omelets: black for control, red for UN-DHA-O and blue for EN-DHA-O.
The oxidized derivatives of fatty acids from heart.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA | 13-HODE | 772.1 ± 93.6 | 709.4 ± 64.9 | 765.3 ± 58.5 |
| 9-HODE | 220.4 ± 28.9 | 223.6 ± 17.7 | 248.3 ± 20.0 | |
| DGLA | 6kPGF1α | 437.7 ± 96.6 | 194.6 ± 28.1 | 88.1 ± 6.7 |
| ARA | PGF2α | 118.1 ± 20.8 | 51.8 ± 8.8 | 23.6 ± 3.9 |
| PGE2 | 82.2 ± 11.6 | 39.1 ± 7.2 | 24.0 ± 2.3 | |
| PGD2 | 42.8 ± 6.4 | 20.0 ± 3.1 | 22.5 ± 3.4 | |
| TXB2 | 94.8 ± 18.5 | 55.3 ± 7.4 | 44.5 ± 6.1 | |
| 15-HETE | 494.2 ± 50.6 | 270.8 ± 22.0 | 313.6 ± 30.9 | |
| 8-HETE | 109.4 ± 14.8 | 88.6 ± 7.9 | 95.9 ± 10.7 | |
| 12-HETE | 3,562.0 ± 441.1 | 3,213.5 ± 926.4 | 4,335.8 ± 536.1 | |
| 5-HETE | 532.0 ± 66.0 | 325.7 ± 19.1 | 274.6 ± 18.2 | |
| 14,15-EET | 55.6 ± 11.4 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | |
| 5-oxo-ETE | 514.4 ± 60.7 | 306.5 ± 18.9 | 222.5 ± 14.8 | |
| 11,12-EET | 102.2 ± 14.8 | 68.9 ± 5.2 | 48.0 ± 6.3 | |
| 8,9-EET | 179.3 ± 37.2 | 110.9 ± 10.9 | 78.0 ± 9.4 | |
| 5,6-EET | 248.3 ± 59.7 | 121.1 ± 18.4 | 70.9 ± 16.6 | |
| EPA | 18-HEPE | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 20.7 ± 3.6 |
| DHA | PDx | 0.0 ± 0.0 | 2.1 ± 2.1 | 17.4 ± 3.1 |
| 14-HDoHE | 1,754.9 ± 383.6 | 1,743.4 ± 323.6 | 2,961.9 ± 354.3 | |
| 17-HDoHE | 2486.1 ± 646.4 | 2178.8 ± 429.8 | 3218.1 ± 395.3 | |
The oxidized metabolites of fatty acids were quantified in heart by LC-QQQ as mentioned in methods.
indicate significant differences between the three groups when p < 0.05; ab means no difference with a and no difference with b.
Colored values correspond to the type of omelets: black for control, red for UN-DHA-O and blue for EN-DHA-O.
The oxidized derivatives of fatty acids from brain.
|
|
|
|
| |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| LA | 13-HODE | 103.2 ± 14.2 | 108.6 ± 12.0 | 154.0 ± 19.6 |
| DGLA | 6kPGF1α | 272.3 ± 39.7 | 324.4 ± 57.6 | 428.7 ± 64.2 |
| ARA | PGF2α | 3,641.1 ± 367.7 | 4,062.1 ± 266.9 | 4,184.5 ± 187.4 |
| PGE2 | 401.0 ± 39.8 | 499.0 ± 40.3 | 540.3 ± 71.4 | |
| PGD2 | 3,040.4 ± 249.4 | 3,679.7 ± 307.1 | 3,644.2 ± 254.5 | |
| TXB2 | 577.0 ± 53.4 | 637.4 ± 53.3 | 715.8 ± 109.6 | |
| 15-HETE | 716.0 ± 69.6 | 782.2 ± 65.2 | 861.5 ± 52.1 | |
| 8-HETE | 147.3 ± 15.0 | 151.8 ± 8.3 | 218.9 ± 25.5 | |
| 12-HETE | 3557.6 ± 438.4 | 4908.4 ± 679.7 | 5055.1 ± 472.0 | |
| 5-HETE | 840.3 ± 85.9 | 834.8 ± 72.2 | 1046.5 ± 206.8 | |
| 14,15-EET | 223.4 ± 20.5 | 217.3 ± 22.3 | 272.9 ± 37.8 | |
| 5-oxo-ETE | 588.5 ± 75.7 | 569.6 ± 66.6 | 705.5 ± 55.3 | |
| 11,12-EET | 279.2 ± 36.6 | 267.3 ± 26.1 | 297.5 ± 47.1 | |
| 8,9-EET | 380.9 ± 44.4 | 370.4 ± 33.9 | 554.7 ± 95.2 | |
| 5,6-EET | 566.1 ± 90.9 | 446.0 ± 54.2 | 730.1 ± 73.0 | |
| DHA | 14-HDoHE | 382.6 ± 47.1 | 385.5 ± 63.2 | 597.1 ± 61.1 |
| 17-HDoHE | 375.8 ± 49.1 | 581.6 ± 113.7 | 645.8 ± 55.4 | |
The oxidized metabolites of fatty acids were quantified in brain by LC-QQQ as mentioned in methods.
indicate significant differences between the three groups when p < 0.05; ab means no difference with a and no difference with b.
Colored values correspond to the type of omelets: black for control, red for UN-DHA-O and blue for EN-DHA-O.