| Literature DB >> 35117890 |
Zhuo Wang1,2,3, Xin Jiang3,4, Qing Li1,3, Yufen Jin3,4, Xingxiang Liu1,3, Fang Wang4, Yong Mao1,3, Dong Hua1,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: miRNA expression data on colorectal cancer (CRC) are constantly updated. Therefore, integrated analysis of these datasets prior to experiments is necessary in translational medicine and oncology research. Abnormal low expression of hsa-miRNA-215-5p (miR-215) is detected in several cancer types, but the role of miR-215 in CRC remains unclear. Therefore, the aim of this work was to identify the expression and role of miR-215 involved in CRC.Entities:
Keywords: TRAF5; biomarker; colorectal cancer (CRC); hsa-miRNA-215-5p (miR-215); prognosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 35117890 PMCID: PMC8798538 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-19-2424
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Cancer Res ISSN: 2218-676X Impact factor: 1.241
Baseline characteristics of patients
| Clinical parameters | miR-215 expression | OR (95%CI) | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High, n (%) | Low, n (%) | ||||
| Gender | 0.493 | ||||
| Female (n=103) | 65 (51.4) | 38 (51.4) | 1.22 (0.69–2.14) | ||
| Male (n=111) | 75 (53.6) | 36 (48.6) | 1.00 | ||
| Age (years) | 0.507 | ||||
| <63 (n=105) | 71 (50.7) | 34 (45.9) | 0.83 (0.47–1.45) | ||
| ≥63 (n=109) | 69 (49.3) | 40 (54.1) | 1.00 | ||
| Tumor location | 0.303 | ||||
| Colon (n=98) | 121 (86.4) | 60 (81.1) | 0.86 (0.63–1.18) | ||
| Rectum (n=116) | 19 (13.6) | 14 (18.9) | 1.00 | ||
| TNM stage | 0.013* | ||||
| III stage (n=108) | 73 (52.1) | 25 (33.8) | 2.04 (1.03–4.04) | ||
| III–IV stage (n=77) | 67 (47.9) | 49 (66.2) | 1.00 | ||
| Tumor (T) status | 0.105 | ||||
| T1+T2 (n=42) | 23 (16.4) | 19 (25.7) | 1.75 (0.88–3.49) | ||
| T3+T4 (n=172) | 117 (83.6) | 55 (74.3) | 1.00 | ||
| Nodal (N) metastasis | 0.771 | ||||
| N0 (n=128) | 85 (60.7) | 43 (28.1) | 0.90 (0.51–1.59) | ||
| N1+N2 (n=86) | 55 (39.3) | 31 (41.9) | 1.00 | ||
| Number of dissected lymph nodes | 0.466 | ||||
| <12 (n=140) | 94 (67.1) | 46 (62.2) | 0.80 (0.45–1.45) | ||
| ≥12 (n=74) | 46 (32.9) | 28 (37.8) | 1.00 | ||
*, significantly different by the Pearson chi-squared test, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Figure 1miRNA expression in GSE48267 (A), GSE38389 (B), GSE41655 (C), GSE49246 (D) related to four pairs of CRC tissue samples and adjacent normal tissue. miRNAs that are generally underexpressed in 4 microRNA microarray (E). *, P<0.05.
Figure 2The expression of miR-215 in the TCGA database. Survival analysis of patients associated with a significant low expression of six miRNAs in tumor tissues in the TCGA-COAD cohort: miR-215 (A); miR-378 (B); miR-1 (C); miR-29 (D); miR-479 (E); miR-145 (F). The ROC curve predicted the 5-year survival in patients with low miR-215 and low miR-145 expression in the TCGA-COAD cohort (G). The survival curve of miR-215 in the tissue validation cohort collected in this study (H). In the TCGA-COAD data set, KEGG predictive enrichment analysis of transcriptome differential genes was performed after grouping according to miR-215 expression (I).
Figure 3The expression of miR-215 in the TCGA database. Scatter plot of the correlation between miR-215 and TRAF5 expression in TCGA-COAD data set (A). TRAF5 expression in CRC tumor specimens by immunohistochemical analysis using tissue microarray and TAK1 expression in CRC tumor specimens (B); Western blot analysis of TRAF, TAK1 and IKβ-α expression after miR-215-mimic and miR-215-inhibitor transfection into HCT116 and SW480 cells (C); Western blotting grayscale analysis of TRAF, TAK1 and IKβ-α expression after miR-215-mimic and miR-215-inhibitor transfection into HCT116 and SW480 cells (D). Western blot analysis of MMP7, vimentin and N-cadherin expression after miR-215-mimic and miR-215-inhibitor transfection into HCT116 and SW480 cells (E,F). Kaplan-Meier curves showing the impact of miR-215 and TRAF5 expression subgroup for overall survival of 214 CRC patients (G). ROC curve determining the performance of the multivariate regression prediction model on the prognosis of the 214 patients with CRC (H). *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01.
Co-expression of miR-215, TRAF5 and IKβ-α in CRC tissue
| Related protein expression | miR-215 expression, n (%) | Chi-square | P value | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| High | Low | |||||
| TRAF expression | ||||||
| High | 50 (35.7) | 43 (58.1) | 9.880 | 0.020* | ||
| Low | 90 (64.3) | 31 (41.9) | ||||
| IKβ-α expression | ||||||
| High | 71 (50.7) | 34 (45.9) | 62.004 | <0.001* | ||
| Low | 69 (49.3) | 40 (54.1) | ||||
*, significantly different by the Pearson chi-squared test, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.
Univariate and multivariate Cox regression
| Clinical parameters | Univariate analysis | Multivariate analysis | |||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| HR (95%CI) | P | HR (95%CI) | P | ||
| Gender (female | 1.08 (0.65–1.81) | 0.770 | |||
| Age (≥63 | 0.71 (0.42–1.19) | 0.187 | |||
| Tumor location (rectum | 1.50 (0.88–2.55) | 0.134 | |||
| TNM stage (III, IV | 2.74 (1.05–7.60) | 0.048* | 1.45 (0.85–2.49) | 0.176 | |
| Tumor (T) status(T3+T4 | 0.32 (0.18–0.56) | 0.099 | |||
| Nodal (N) metastasis (N1+N2 | 1.69 (0.86–3.33) | <0.01* | 3.72 (1.52–9.14) | 0.004* | |
| Lymph nodes (≥12 | 2.05 (1.22–3.42) | 0.007* | 0.67 (0.28–1.62) | 0.373 | |
| miR-215 (high | 0.59 (0.35–0.91) | 0.046* | 0.61 (0.36–1.03) | 0.064 | |
| TRAF5 (high | 1.35 (0.81–2.26) | 0.255 | |||
| IKβ-α (high | 1.00 (0.59–1.71) | 0.999 | |||
*, P<0.05 was considered statistically significant.