| Literature DB >> 35117884 |
Xinmei Wang1,2,3, Lisha Zhu1,2, Jingxian Wu1,2,3, Yong Zhao1,2,3.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Despite the significant advancements made in the treatment of ovarian cancer (OC), poor prognosis remains a major concern because this disease is frequently diagnosed at an advanced stage. Tumor recurrence and metastasis have been implicated in the poor clinical outcomes of OC. Although Fibulin-3 has been shown to be closely related to the development of various tumors, its relationship with OC has not been widely examined. Hence, this study was conducted to investigate the expression of Fibulin-3 in epithelial ovarian cancer (EOC), determine its relationship with EOC prognosis, and correlate its expression with that of the epithelial-mesenchymal transition markers (Snail, E-cadherin, and N-cadherin).Entities:
Keywords: Epithelial mesenchymal transition (EMT); fibulin-3; ovarian cancer (OC); prognosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 35117884 PMCID: PMC8799201 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-20-984
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Cancer Res ISSN: 2218-676X Impact factor: 1.241
Figure 1Expression of Fibulin-3 in human ovarian tissues of immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. Fibulin-3 expression in (A) ovarian cancer, (B) borderline ovarian tumor, (C) benign ovarian tumor (Magnification ×400).
Figure 2Positive control and negative control of immunohistochemistry (IHC) analysis. Positive control (Fibulin-3 positive) (A) cervical cancer. Negative control (B) ovarian cancer, (C) borderline ovarian tumor, (D) benign ovarian tumor (Magnification ×400).
Tissue levels of Fibulin-3 in patients with ovarian tumors
| Characteristics | N | % | Fibulin-3 | χ2 | P value | ||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | ||||||||
| N | % | N | % | ||||||
| Age (years) | 0.714 | 0.398 | |||||||
| ≤45 | 22 | 26.19 | 14 | 63.64 | 8 | 36.36 | |||
| >45 | 62 | 74.81 | 33 | 53.23 | 29 | 46.77 | |||
| Type of organization | 10.926 | 0.004** | |||||||
| benign | 10 | 9.80 | 8 | 80.00 | 2 | 20.00 | |||
| borderline | 8 | 7.84 | 8 | 100.00 | 0 | 0.00 | |||
| Carcinoma | 84 | 82.35 | 46 | 54.76 | 38 | 45.24 | |||
| Pathology type | 1.313 | 0.726 | |||||||
| clear cell carcinoma | 7 | 8.33 | 5 | 71.43 | 2 | 28.57 | |||
| endometrial carcinoma | 5 | 5.95 | 2 | 40.00 | 3 | 60.00 | |||
| serous carcinoma | 66 | 78.57 | 36 | 54.55 | 30 | 45.45 | |||
| mucinous carcinoma | 6 | 7.14 | 3 | 50.00 | 3 | 50.00 | |||
| Grade type | 0.086 | 0.770 | |||||||
| type I | 23 | 27.38 | 12 | 52.17 | 11 | 47.83 | |||
| type II | 61 | 72.62 | 34 | 55.74 | 27 | 44.26 | |||
| FIGO stage | 4.377 | 0.036** | |||||||
| I + II | 37 | 44.05 | 25 | 67.57 | 12 | 32.43 | |||
| III+ IV | 47 | 55.95 | 21 | 44.68 | 26 | 55.32 | |||
| CA125 | 1.764 | 0.184 | |||||||
| <1,000 U/mL | 55 | 65.48 | 33 | 60.00 | 22 | 40.00 | |||
| >1,000 U/mL | 29 | 34.52 | 13 | 44.83 | 16 | 55.17 | |||
**, P<0.05.
Figure 3The correlation between Fibulin-3 and the studied EMT makers. Fibulin-3 (A), E-cadherin (B), N-caderin (C) and snail (D) expression in OC (IHC, magnification ×400). OC, ovarian cancer.
The relationship between EMT markers and Fibulin-3 expression in OC
| Fibulin-3 | r | P value | ||
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Low | High | |||
| E-cadherin | ||||
| Low | 12 | 22 | 0.252 | 0.021* |
| High | 34 | 16 | ||
| Snail | ||||
| Low | 42 | 14 | 0.644 | <0.001* |
| High | 4 | 24 | ||
| N-cadherin | ||||
| Low | 39 | 17 | 0.451 | <0.001* |
| High | 7 | 21 | ||
*, P<0.005; r relative coefficient. OC, ovarian cancer.
Univariate and Multivariate analysis of patients with ovarian cancer
| Characteristics | Univariate Cox | Multivariate Cox | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P value | Hazard ratio | 95% CI | P value | ||
| Age (years) | 1.849 | 0.765–4.466 | 0.172 | 1.503 | 0.610–3.701 | 0.376 | |
| Pathology type | 0.710 | 0.441–1.142 | 0.158 | 0.871 | 0.495–1.532 | 0.632 | |
| Grade type | 1.107 | 0.516–2.371 | 0.794 | 0.935 | 0.407–2.149 | 0.874 | |
| FIGO stage | 3.913 | 1.702–8.999 | 0.001* | 2.378 | 0.941–6.012 | 0.067 | |
| Fibulin-3 | 11.321 | 4.346–29.491 | <0.001* | 9.225 | 3.484–24.426 | <0.001* | |
*, P<0.005.
Figure 4Fibulin-3 expression survival analysis. Patients with high Fibulin-3 expression (yellow line) had a much worse prognosis than those with low Fibulin-3 expression (blue line).