Literature DB >> 35117742

Primary pleural synovial sarcoma in an adolescent: a case report.

Yanyan Xu1,2, Jie Lin3, Hongliang Sun2, Sheng Xie1,2.   

Abstract

Primary pleural synovial sarcoma (SS) is an extremely rare entity, especially in the group of children and adolescents. Due to its rarity in this location and variable histogenesis, the diagnosis of SS is a clinical challenge. We report a new case of primary pleural SS in an adolescent. A 14-year-old boy initially referred to another facility for spontaneous right-sided chest pain and dyspnea, and was transferred to our hospital five days later for recurrent hemorrhagic pleural effusion in the right chest cavity. The items in routine haematological investigations were within normal limits, except for the lower level of eosinophil. CT scan revealed a heterogeneously enhancing solid mass occupied the upper two-thirds of the right hemithorax and massive pleural effusion in the lower half of the hemithorax. There was no evidence of hilar or mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Subsequently, an open thoracotomy was performed and the tumour was diagnosed as biphasic SS based on morphological and immunohistochemical analysis. The patient was discharged after surgical resection without complications and adjuvant chemotherapy was arranged. Currently, the patient is clinically well 6 months after surgery, with no evidence of recurrent disease. Though pleural SS is a rare anatomic subset of SS, it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of intrathoracic mass without hilar or mediastinal lymphadenopathy in adolescents, especially the cases with recurrent hemorrhagic pleural effusion. 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Synovial sarcoma (SS); adolescent; case report; hemorrhagic pleural effusion; pleural diseases

Year:  2020        PMID: 35117742      PMCID: PMC8798174          DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2020.03.56

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-676X            Impact factor:   1.241


Introduction

Synovial sarcoma (SS) is a spindle cell tumour with uncertain histogenesis showing variable mesenchymal and epithelial differentiation, accounting for 2.5–10% of all soft tissue sarcoma (1,2). SS is reported as the most common non-rhabdomyosarcomatous soft tissue sarcoma in children and adolescents with a pathognomonic chromosomal translocation t(x;18)(p11;q11) (1). Although a wide anatomic distribution has been documented, primary SS in the pleural cavity is extremely rare, often involving the underlying parenchyma. Due to its rarity in this location and variable histogenesis, the diagnosis of SS is a clinical challenge. As far as we are aware, 12 cases of primary pleural SSs in children and adolescents under the age of 18 have been previously reported in the English-language literature () (3-11), albeit the cases in one series study without individual information was not included (12). We report herein an additional case of primary pleural SS in a 14-year-old boy and review the literature on the subject. And the following case was presented in accordance with the CARE Guideline (13).
Table S1

Summary of the previously published literature about primary pleural synovial sarcoma in children and adolescents

No.YearAuthorCaseSymptomsRadiologic findingsGross findingsMicroscopy subtypeChromosomeTherapyFollow-up
11996Gaertner E, et al. (3).17FDysphagia, chest painXR: left pleural effusion, consolidation, mediastinal shift; CT: mass with focal contrast enhancement occupied lower 2/3 s of hemithorax21 cm, pseudocapsule, necrosis, haemorrhage, pleural thickeningBiphasic patternNASurgeryRapid recurrence, and DOD within 12 months
217FChest painXR: left pleural thickening with a central mass9 cm, necrosis, haemorrhage, pleural thickening, focal calcification, pleural thickeningBiphasic patternNASurgery, chemotherapy, radiationLocal recurrence, DOD at 18 months
39MDyspnea, chest pain, feverXR: right pleural-based mass5 cm, pseudocapsule, necrosis, focal calcification,Biphasic patternNASurgery, chemotherapy, radiationAWD at 8 years with regional and metastatic disease
41997Jawahar DA, et al. (4).18FDyspnea, dry cough, chest painXR: a homogenous density in lower two-thirds of the right hemithorax; CT: heterogeneous mass in right inferior hemithorax17 cm, partial pseudocapsuleBiphasic patternTranslocation (X; 18)Surgery, radiationLocal recurrence at 5 months; AWD 16 months
52003Yildirim E, et al. (5).9MNACT: septated effusion with solid components occupied 3/4 of the left hemithoraxCystic massNANASurgery, chemotherapy (ifosfamide, etoposide)Alive without disease at 30 months
62003Ng SB, et al. (6).15MChest pain, cough, feverXR: a right-sided hydropneumothorax and an area of ill-defined soft tissue density in the lower half of the right lung. CT: mass in the right posterior mediastinum20 cm, solid and cystic areas, haemorrhage, myxoid changeMonophasic patternTranslocation t(X; 18) (p11.2; q11.2)Biopsy, surgery, chemotherapy, radiation; resectionRecurrence at 20 months; AWD 21 months
72005Nishio J, et al. (7).18MChest painXR/CT: right pleural effusion, 8cm diaphragmatic pleural-based massNAMonophasicTranslocation t(X; 18) (p11.2; q11.2); SYT-SSX1 fusion; a ring chromosomeSurgery, radiation; resectionRecurrence at 11 months; AWD 2 years
82005Bégueret H, et al. (8).16MNANANASurgery, radiation; resectionRecurrence at 32 months; AWD 36 months
92006Frazier AA, et al. (9).17FChest painXR: Left-sided pleural-based mass, multilobular and sharply marginatedMottled red soft-tissue mass, partly friable, with cystic and hemorrhagic zones; no capsuleNANAPleural decorticationNA
1017FDyspnea, back painXR: Mass fills 75% of the lower hemithorax; CT: located in left pleura, 15 cm × 20 cm, heterogeneous enhancement, nodularity mixed with areas of low attenuation, no record of lung nodules, pleural effusion presentGray soft-tissue mass, zones of haemorrhage and necrosis; capsule presentNANASurgeryNA
112008Tailor J, et al. (10).16MShortness of breath, chest pain, dry cough, haemoptysisXR: left pleural effusion (lower 2/3 of the hemithorax), mediastinal shift; CT: multiloculated pleural cyst with thickened enhancing septae within it. Visceral and parietal pleural thickened and enhanced without no identifiable mass lesionThe pleural cavity filled with bloodstained fluid containing thick septaeMonophasic patternTranslocation (X; 18) (SYT-SSX)SurgeryAWD 6 months
122016Won JH, et al. (11).17FChest painXR: a round mass in the left upper hemithorax; CT: a well-defined heterogeneous enhancing mass abutting the pleura, no calcification, hemothorax; PET/CT: SUVmax =31.78.0 cm × 6.5 cm × 5.5 cm well-circumscribed but unencapsulated tumor. Whiting-yellow, soft, and fleshy with cystic degenerative changes and hemorrhage, no calcificationMonophasic patternNABiopsy Surgery, radiation, chemotherapy; resectionRecurrence at 28 months; died from sepsis at 37 months
132019Our case14MChest pain; dyspneaCT: a heterogeneously enhancing solid mass occupied the upper two-thirds of the right hemithorax; massive pleural effusionThe tumour was partially encapsulated and received in two fragments, the larger one is 9 cm × 6 cm × 4 cm, and the smaller one is 5.5 cm × 4.5 cm × 3 cm. Cut sections mainly showed a soft, grey red and solid appearanceBiphasic pattern(-)Surgery, chemotherapyAlive without disease 6 months

DOD, death of disease; NA, not available; ADW, alive with disease.

Case presentation

A 14-year-old Asian-Chinese boy initially presented another facility with spontaneous right-sided chest pain and dyspnea on July 1, 2019. There was no history of exposure to asbestos or underlying disease. A total of 700 mL bloodstained fluid was aspirated after a massive effusion in the right chest cavity revealed on the images of computed tomography (CT). The patient was then transferred to the emergency department of our hospital on July 6, 2019, and the bloodstained exudate was 1,000 mL on that day. The items in routine haematological investigations were within normal limits, except for the lower level of eosinophil. Blood and sputum cultures revealed no bacterial growth. Contrast-enhanced CT () showed a heterogeneously enhancing solid mass occupied the upper two-thirds of the right hemithorax, compressing the right lung tissue. The wall of the mass was enhanced, especially at the mural nodule and thickened areas. In addition, there was massive pleural effusion surrounding the pulmonary atelectasis in the lower half of the hemithorax. There is no evidence of hilar or mediastinal lymphadenopathy. Although negative results of preoperative serum tumour markers [human chorionic gonadotropin (HCG), carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA), alpha fetal protein (AFP), carbohydrate antigen (CA) 72-4, CA125, CA199, CA153] were observed, the embryonal tumour was suspected. Subsequently, open thoracotomy was performed on July 10, 2019. The mass was mainly located in the dorsal part of the hemithorax with direct infiltration of the lower lobe. The mass was easily peeled off the chest wall and dissected from the upper and middle lobe, which were re-expanded completely following removal of the mass and the lower lobe. The lymph nodes in paratracheal (upper and lower) and subcarinal regions were also dissected.
Figure 1

Contrast-enhanced CT (A,B: axial image; C: coronal reconstructed image) showed a heterogeneously enhancing solid mass (white star) occupied the upper two-thirds of the right hemithorax, compressing the right lung tissue (yellow star). The wall of the mass was enhanced, especially at the mural nodule (white arrow) and thickened areas. In addition, there was massive pleural effusion (blue star) surrounding the pulmonary atelectasis (yellow star) in the lower half of the hemithorax.

Contrast-enhanced CT (A,B: axial image; C: coronal reconstructed image) showed a heterogeneously enhancing solid mass (white star) occupied the upper two-thirds of the right hemithorax, compressing the right lung tissue (yellow star). The wall of the mass was enhanced, especially at the mural nodule (white arrow) and thickened areas. In addition, there was massive pleural effusion (blue star) surrounding the pulmonary atelectasis (yellow star) in the lower half of the hemithorax. Grossly, the tumour was partially encapsulated and received in two fragments, the larger one is 9 cm × 6 cm × 4 cm, and the smaller one is 5.5 cm × 4.5 cm × 3 cm. Cut sections mainly showed a soft, grey red and solid appearance. Focally greyish yellow and white area measuring 3 cm × 2.5 cm × 2 cm was under the margin of the larger fragment. Histologic examination showed that tumour had hemorrhagic suffusion and necrosis without invading lymph nodes, and was classified as FNCLCC 3. Microscopic examination [hematoxylin-eosin (H&E) staining) of the tumor demonstrates a high degree of cellularity and mitotic figures. Glandular structures and a hemangiopericytoma-like vascular pattern are present (). Immunohistochemical analysis revealed positive reaction for B-cell lymphoma 2 (Bcl-2) (), CD99 (), cytokeratin (CK) and vimentin, and focally positive reaction for epithelial membrane antigen (EMA), transducing-like enhancer of split 1 (TLE1). There was evidence of a high proliferation index [Ki-67(MIB-1)] in around 40% of cells. No immunoreactivity with CD34, S100 protein, desmin, a-SMA, chromogranin A, ALK, and WT-1 was observed. The tumour was negative for t(X;18) translocation using Fluorescence in situ hybridization (FISH) analysis.
Figure 2

Biphasic synovial sarcoma. (A) microscopic examination showed characteristic glandular spaces in hypercellular area (H&E, ×40). A high degree of cellularity and mitotic figures were present (H&E, ×200; an inset); (B) microscopic examination demonstrated a hemangiopericytoma-like vascular pattern (H&E, ×100). (C,D) The immunohistochemical staining was diffusely immunoreactivity for Bcl-2 (×100; C), CD99 (×100; D).

Biphasic synovial sarcoma. (A) microscopic examination showed characteristic glandular spaces in hypercellular area (H&E, ×40). A high degree of cellularity and mitotic figures were present (H&E, ×200; an inset); (B) microscopic examination demonstrated a hemangiopericytoma-like vascular pattern (H&E, ×100). (C,D) The immunohistochemical staining was diffusely immunoreactivity for Bcl-2 (×100; C), CD99 (×100; D). According to the morphological and immunohistochemical analysis, the tumour was diagnosed as biphasic SS. The patient was discharged 1 week after surgical resection without complications, and adjuvant chemotherapy has been arranged in another tumor hospital. Currently, the patient is clinically well 6 months after surgery, with no evidence of recurrent disease. The whole course of interventions and follow-up has been drawn into a timeline figure, and the interested reader can find it in .
Figure S1

Timeline of interventions and follow-up.

Discussion

Primary pleural SS is a quite rare anatomical subset of SS, which is believed to arise from pluripotential mesenchymal tissue rather than synovial cell because they occur in places such as the pleura where synovial structures do not exist and can show epithelial differentiation (2,3), therefore the terminology of SS is actually a bit of a misnomer. In addition, an absence of extrathoracic tumor should be confirmed prior to the diagnosis of primary pleural SS, since SS tends to intrathoracic metastasis, especially to the lung (3,6,8,9). Due to the lack of detailed individual information, the cases in Baheti et al.’s study were not included in the current analysis (12). Thus, primary pleural SSs in children and adolescents under the age of 18 documented in the English literature were 12 cases with no sexual bias (3-11). Typical symptoms include a short term of chest pain and/or dyspnea. Ipsilateral pleural effusion, especially bloodstained exude, is also well observed. It was the most commonly presented as a well-defined mass with patchy low density and heterogeneous enhancement without regional lymphadenopathy or calcification (3,4,6-9,11) on CT images. Only two cases presented as a multiloculated cyst (5,10), which have been mistaken as hydatid cyst before the operation. The radiologic manifestations of pleural SS overlapped with many other neoplasms in the lung and pleura (9), including primary and metastatic lung cancer, malignant mesothelioma, and other rare parenchymal sarcomas (e.g., leiomyosarcoma, sarcomatoid carcinoma, and malignant fibrous histiocytoma). The absence of regional lymphadenopathy tends to against a diagnosis of lung cancer. A history of asbestos exposure or the presence of contralateral pleural plaques favors that of mesothelioma (9). However, no reliable radiologic or clinical features can help to differentiate pleural SS from the other rare parenchymal sarcomas. In the present case, the initial symptoms were as typical as the description in previous reports, including chest pain, dyspnea and hemothorax. On CT images, majority of the tumor appeared to be pleural-based and extended into the right hemithorax without infiltration of the chest wall or cortical bone destruction. The absence of extrathoracic tumor and mediastinal lymphadenopathy only lead to the diagnosis of regional primary parenchymal neoplasm without definite localization. Interestingly, the term intrathoracic or pleuropulmonary SS was frequently used to describe the lesions occurring either pleura or pulmonary for avoiding the dilemma of precise localization in previous studies (8,9,12,14). In addition, although the utility of fluorodeoxyglucose positron emission tomography-CT (FDG PET-CT) in SS has been emphasized in previous studies (11,12,14,15), limited patients received this examination with a variable degree of FDG uptake, and only one adolescent received FDG PET-CT with a high maximum standardized uptake up to 31.7 (11). Currently, it is hard to get a conclusive result, and this examination was also not performed in our case Pleural SSs share the same histologic, histochemistry, immunohistochemistry with SSs in other locations (1,8), appearing as monophasic, biphasic and poorly differentiated tumors (3-7,10,11). The chromosomal translocation t(x;18) (p11: q11) that has been detected in more than 90% of SS, currently represents the most specific clue for definitive diagnosis (16). However, in the present case, the convincing gene rearrangement was failed to be detected by FISH analysis. The final diagnosis was made by morphological and immunohistochemical results. Initially, the characteristic glandular structure and a hemangiopericytoma-like appearance depicted on hematoxylin-eosin staining section favoured the diagnosis of SS, Immunohistochemical findings including a positive reaction for Bcl-2, CD99, CK and vimentin, and a focally positive reaction for EMA and TLE1 (2,17), also confirmed the diagnosis. On the other side, primary pleural SS appears to be more aggressive than its soft tissue counterpart with most patients dying within 1–3 years (3,12,17), albeit one patient was alive 8 years after the initial diagnosis with regional and metastatic disease (3). The treatment for primary pleural SS remains unclear. Whenever feasible, radical resection is still the preferred choice followed by chemotherapy and/or radiotherapy. Sometimes, repeat resections were performed for recurrence or the case that were difficult to completely resect at once (18). In addition, radiofrequency thermal ablation (19), phototherapy and hyperthermia therapy as alternatives may also be considered (3,20). Currently, this 14-year boy is alive without recurrence for the initial six months with multimodality therapy (radical resection and postoperative chemotherapy), however, the long-term outcome is still uncertain and longer follow-up is essential.

Conclusions

Primary pleural SS in adolescents is a very rare, aggressive neoplasm that is difficult to confirm based on imaging, but it should be considered in the differential diagnosis of intrathoracic mass without regional lymphadenopathy in adolescents, especially the cases with recurrent hemorrhagic pleural effusion. Even though it was failed to detect convincing gene rearrangement, characteristic morphological structures and immunohistochemical analysis were aided to make the final diagnosis in the current case. However, six-month follow-up is not enough and the long-term outcome remains to be seen, since a worse prognosis of SS in pleura than that in other locations (1,3,12,17).
  20 in total

1.  A case report of a pleural synovial sarcoma misdiagnosed as cyst hydatidosis.

Authors:  E Yildirim; K Dural; S Han; K Koç; N Gulay Ulaşan; U Sakinci
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Surg (Torino)       Date:  2003-04       Impact factor: 1.888

2.  CARE guidelines for case reports: explanation and elaboration document.

Authors:  David S Riley; Melissa S Barber; Gunver S Kienle; Jeffrey K Aronson; Tido von Schoen-Angerer; Peter Tugwell; Helmut Kiene; Mark Helfand; Douglas G Altman; Harold Sox; Paul G Werthmann; David Moher; Richard A Rison; Larissa Shamseer; Christian A Koch; Gordon H Sun; Patrick Hanaway; Nancy L Sudak; Marietta Kaszkin-Bettag; James E Carpenter; Joel J Gagnier
Journal:  J Clin Epidemiol       Date:  2017-05-18       Impact factor: 6.437

3.  Imaging features of primary and recurrent intrathoracic synovial sarcoma: a single-institute experience.

Authors:  Akshay D Baheti; Rani Sewatkar; Jason L Hornick; Sachin S Saboo; Jyothi P Jagannathan; Nikhil H Ramaiya; Sree Harsha Tirumani
Journal:  Clin Imaging       Date:  2015-04-19       Impact factor: 1.605

4.  Pleural malignant mesothelioma versus pleuropulmonary synovial sarcoma: a clinicopathological study of 22 cases with molecular analysis and survival data.

Authors:  Sonja Klebe; Sarita Prabhakaran; Ashleigh Hocking; Emily Pulford; Sarah Moore; Mario Nicola; Philip W Allen; Douglas W Henderson
Journal:  Pathology       Date:  2018-08-28       Impact factor: 5.306

Review 5.  From the archives of the AFIP: Pleuropulmonary synovial sarcoma.

Authors:  Aletta Ann Frazier; Teri J Franks; Robert D Pugatch; Jeffrey R Galvin
Journal:  Radiographics       Date:  2006 May-Jun       Impact factor: 5.333

Review 6.  The Diagnosis of Pleural Tumors Other Than Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Richard Luther Attanoos; Matthew Richard Pugh
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2018-08       Impact factor: 5.534

Review 7.  Primary pleural synovial sarcoma. A case report and review of the literature.

Authors:  Siok Bian Ng; Qasim Ahmed; Sim Leng Tien; Christina Sivaswaren; Lai Ching Lau
Journal:  Arch Pathol Lab Med       Date:  2003-01       Impact factor: 5.534

8.  SYT-SSX fusion is absent in sarcomatoid mesothelioma allowing its distinction from synovial sarcoma of the pleura.

Authors:  Nicolas Weinbreck; Jean Michel Vignaud; Hugues Begueret; Louise Burke; Jean Benhattar; Louis Guillou; Frédérique Capron; Françoise Galateau-Salle
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2007-06       Impact factor: 7.842

9.  Primary Pleural Synovial Sarcoma with Metastatic Cardiac Involvement: A Case Report.

Authors:  Ji-Hye Won; Susie Chin; Jai Soung Park; Sang Hyun Paik; Heon Lee; Jang Gyu Cha; Hwa Kyoon Shin; Eun Suk Koh
Journal:  Iran J Radiol       Date:  2016-09-07       Impact factor: 0.212

10.  Primary Pulmonary Synovial Sarcoma in a Tertiary Referral Center: Clinical Characteristics, CT, and 18F-FDG PET Findings, With Pathologic Correlations.

Authors:  Gun Ha Kim; Mi Young Kim; Hyun Jung Koo; Joon Seon Song; Chang-Min Choi
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.817

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.