Literature DB >> 35117602

The association between genomic variations and histological grade in hepatocellular carcinoma.

Jun Liu1, Guangbing Li1, Yuan Guo2, Ning Fan2, Yunjin Zang2.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Histological grade (HG) is an important prognostic factor for hepatocellular carcinoma. With the development of precision medicine, diagnosis with a sequencing technology has become increasingly accepted. It is vital to discuss their similarities and differences to bridge or improve the traditional HG diagnosis with the novel sequencing technique.
METHODS: A total of 658 tumor samples were collected from 602 Chinese hepatocellular carcinoma patients and sequenced for a panel of pan-cancer genes. Nucleotide usage bias, genomic variation-related scores, driver genes, and biological processes were compared among different HGs. These results were further verified using a cohort dataset from the Western population.
RESULTS: Genomic variation subtypes, such as C>G substitution, maximum somatic allele frequency (MSAF), and TP53, and biological processes including "angiogenesis" and "regulation of homotypic cell-cell adhesion" were found to be significantly associated with HG in both Chinese and Western populations.
CONCLUSIONS: The association identified between genomic variation and HG could aid our understanding of HG as an important clinical measure, and potentially be used to predict HG for hepatocellular carcinoma. 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Histological grade (HG); genomic variation; hepatocellular carcinoma; sequencing

Year:  2020        PMID: 35117602      PMCID: PMC8798104          DOI: 10.21037/tcr.2020.03.32

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-676X            Impact factor:   1.241


Introduction

Histological grade (HG) describes the aggressive potential of solid tumors. The classical and widely adopted grading system for hepatocellular carcinoma is Edmondson-Steiner (ES), which is based on microscopic evaluation of the tubule formation, mitotic count, and nuclear pleomorphism. According to the ES grading system, tumors can be classified into three or four grades. A tumor of a higher grade tends to grow and spread at a faster pace, which needs more urgent and aggressive treatment. Needle biopsies and histopathological evaluation works as a gold standard for HG diagnosis. Collectively, clinical physicians have accumulated a large amount of experience in using this method. However, it has two major problems, diagnostic subjectivity and biopsy inaccessibility (1), which might hinder its full efficacy. A stricter tumor grading requires two or more pathologists with expertise in a specific cancer to reduce diagnostic subjectivity. Much effort has been made with non-invasive methods such as magnetic resonance and contrast computed tomography (CT) to avoid biopsy unavailability (2). In contrast to diverse imaging methods, molecular biomarkers could overcome the two problems mentioned above. For example, miR-1290 could work as a biomarker of high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma (3), and tumor tissue protein signatures could predict the HG of breast cancer (4). Apart from the expression of biomarkers as an indicator of HG, the genomic variation could also be used. Many gene mutations have been recognized to be associated with HG, such as TP53 (5), IDH1/2 (6) and ACVR2 (7). We are interested to know how far genomic variations are associated with HG in HCC because it can help us to understand HG as an important clinical measure. With the development of precision medicine, DNA sequencing provides rich information for disease diagnosis and precision treatment. By using a liquid biopsy, genomic variations could prove to be more useful in predicting HG and could perfectly overcome the two major problems in the traditional ES grading system. Additionally, this method could provide necessary information for precise treatment in one-shot sequencing. However, ctDNA concentration is more easily affected by cancer development and clinical therapy, and the standard to detect ctDNA from liquid biopsy has not been well established. This study sequenced 487 tissue samples from 459 Chinese HCC patients to build a solid connection between genomic variation and HG. Genomic variation, including nucleotide substitution/indel, truncation, gene homozygous deletion and fusion, were called. Association of HG with factors including genomic variation types, substitution types, mutational frequency related scores and biological processes was studied. Among the factors, those found to be significant were compared to those of the Western population.

Methods

Patients and samples

This study was approved by Shandong Provincial Hospital Affiliated to Shandong University and The Affiliated Hospital of Qingdao University. A total of 602 patients were enrolled. Each participant provided written informed consent. Samples were collected from surgery after diagnosis or relapse. HG was scored by a specialist in hepatobiliary pathology according to the Edmondson and Steiner method (8). Grade 1 was defined as well differentiated (WD), grade 2 and 3 as moderate differentiated (MD), grade 4 as poor differentiated (PD). The patients were staged according to the seventh edition of the tumor-node-metastasis (TNM) classification system for lung cancer from the American Joint Committee. We also collected another public dataset to validate our analysis. This dataset, MSKCC, containing 360 samples, was downloaded from cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/, accessed on March 5, 2019).

Library preparation and next-generation sequencing

Tissue samples (40 µm section) were collected for each patient. KAPA Hyper Prep Kit (#07962363001, Roche, Basel, Switzerland) was used to extract DNA. PBS (phosphate-buffered saline) was added to those samples with volumes of less than 5 mL in order to make each sample volume equivalent to 5 mL. They were centrifuged (2 times at 1,600 g for 10 and 15 min, respectively) for extraction of DNA and the supernatant was separated. Invitrogen Qubit® DNA HS Assay Kit (#Q32854) was used to measure the DNA concentration. Single strand DNA and protein contamination were excluded. Library construction was only applied in samples with at least 50 ng of double-stranded DNA extracted. Molecular identifiers (MIDs) were added to the DNA segment ends for DNA libraries to reduce the false discovery rate (FDR). Barcodes were also added to the reads for multiplex sequencing. Sequencing was performed on an Illumina Novaseq 6000 (Illumina, San Diego, CA) for 151 bp read length from both ends. The average sequencing depth was about 3,000×.

Variants calling

A pan-cancer panel (Yuansuo®, Origimed, Shanghai, China) comprising 588 genes was captured with targeted amplification. Adaptors were trimmed from raw DNA reads by cutadapt (version 1.18) (9). MID-labeled reads were de-duplicated with an in-house pipeline. BWA MEM (version 0.7.9a) (10) mapped the high-quality reads to the UCSC hg19 reference sequences. Base quality was recalibrated by the BaseRecalibrator tool from GATK (version 3.8) (11). Mutect2 with a tumor-only mode (12) and Varscan (version 2.3.9) (13) with the default parameters were used to call variants. For each sample, the germline variants having variant allele frequency (VAF) <0.1% were filtered according to the databases of ExAC (14), gnomAD (15), 1000 Genomes (16), and ESP6500 (17). Somatic variants that had not been filtered were further annotated by ANNOVAR (2017/07/17) (18) with RefSeq (version 2017/06/01). Fermi-lite (19) was used to identify gene fusion and rearrangement. The breakpoints were further checked by BLAT (http://genome.ucsc.edu, version 3.50). Those reads uniquely mapping to the reference genome constituted rearrangement supported reads. CNVKit (20) was used to estimate the logR scores. Copy number was assigned 1 for logR values below −0.25, 3 for logR values above 0.25, and 2 for logR values in between −0.25 and 0.25 (21).

Bioinformatics analysis

The mutant allele tumor heterogeneity (MATH) score for a tumor was calculated as the median absolute deviation divided by the median MAF of all somatic mutations detected in the tumor sample. As suggested by Jiang et al. (22), the calculation of MATH used somatic mutation calls with MAF of 0.075 or greater. Clonal mutation burden (CMB) (22) was defined as the number of mutations per clone, and divided into low (low TMB, high MATH), high (high TMB, low MATH), or intermediate (others).

Statistical analysis

The Mann-Whitney U test was used to compare TMB, MSAF, MATH, and CMB between different HGs. Fisher’s exact test was performed to compare the count number of nucleotide mutations for different HGs. Survival analysis was conducted with R software. Samples were classified by a cutoff at the median mutational frequency. The survival time was plotted against overall survival probability by the Kaplan-Meier method. The log-rank test was applied to calculate the P value between the two groups.

Results

Patients and genomic variation detection

The analysis workflow of this study is illustrated in . Initially, a total of 602 patients were enrolled in this study. Of these, only 459 patients had histological grading information available. The other patients’ samples were thus filtered out from the following study. Their clinicopathologic characteristics are summarized in . The median age of patients was 55 years old (range, 16 to 82 years old). Most of the patients were male (87.6%). According to the TNM classification system (23), the number of patients in the early stage (I/II/III) and late-stage (IV) were 418 and 41, respectively. Patients who consumed alcohol more than 200 days per year were classified as “drinking”, and those who had an immediate family member with any type of cancer were labeled as “family history”. HGs were divided into three categories: poorly differentiated (PD), moderately differentiated (MD) and well differentiated (WD).
Figure S1

Workflow for this study.

Table S1

Clinical characteristics in each histological grade

CharacteristicsHistological grade
Poor/moderateWell
Age (mean ± SD)54.9±15.060.7±12.5
Gender
   Male35844
   Female543
Stage
   I/II/III37543
   IV374
Drink
   Yes507
   No36240
Family
   Yes925
   No32042
Tissue samples were prepared by surgery and enriched with a pan-cancer panel of genes (Yuansuo®, Origimed Co., Ltd, Shanghai, China) (). For the 459 patients, 487 samples were collected. Somatic genomic variations (SGVs) were called by Mutec2 (12) and Varscan (13) for each sample. Gene amplifications were called by CNVKit (20). Fermi-lite (19) was used to identify gene fusion and rearrangement. The genomic variations at top high frequency are depicted in . Genomic variations from multiple samples of each patient were merged under the same patient.
Figure S2

The gene list of the targeted sequencing.

Figure 1

The landscape of genomic variations. From top to bottom, the bar plot indicates the tumor mutation burdens (TMBs) and the below heat map indicated the clinicopathological characteristics. HG (histological grades) includes WD (well-differentiated), MD (moderately differentiated), and PD (poorly differentiated). The bottom left bar plot indicates the percentage of genomic variation for each gene in the patients. The bottom right heatmap shows genomic variation types.

The landscape of genomic variations. From top to bottom, the bar plot indicates the tumor mutation burdens (TMBs) and the below heat map indicated the clinicopathological characteristics. HG (histological grades) includes WD (well-differentiated), MD (moderately differentiated), and PD (poorly differentiated). The bottom left bar plot indicates the percentage of genomic variation for each gene in the patients. The bottom right heatmap shows genomic variation types.

The bias of SGV types in different HGs

There are multiple types of SGVs deriving from different mechanisms. Those SGVs were classified into five types (fusion/rearrangement, gene amplification, gene homozygous deletion, substitution/indel, and truncation). The percentage of those groups was summarized according to the HG groups (). From poorly to moderately to well-differentiated HG, the percentage of the truncation and substitution/indel group increased but that of the gene amplification group dropped. The poorly differentiated group had the lowest percentage of fusion/rearrangement but the highest percentage of gene amplification variations.
Figure 2

Variation distribution for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). (A) The upper plot shows the distribution of five types of genomic variation for three groups of HGs (histological grades). The lower plot is the distribution of 12 substitution types, which are grouped into transition and transversion. The x-axis indicates the patient percentage and the y-axis indicated the HGs. (B) The upper and the lower plots show MSAF (maximum somatic allele frequency) and MATH (mutant allele tumor heterogeneity) distributions for the three HG groups, respectively.

Variation distribution for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC). (A) The upper plot shows the distribution of five types of genomic variation for three groups of HGs (histological grades). The lower plot is the distribution of 12 substitution types, which are grouped into transition and transversion. The x-axis indicates the patient percentage and the y-axis indicated the HGs. (B) The upper and the lower plots show MSAF (maximum somatic allele frequency) and MATH (mutant allele tumor heterogeneity) distributions for the three HG groups, respectively. Single nucleotide variants (SNVs) can be classified into transversion substitution and transition substitution. Transition SNVs regularly had a higher frequency and caused no functional change because of codon “wobble”. To study the association between amino acid changes and HGs, the percentages of transversion and transition were compared (). In total, the percentage range of transversion and transition for different HGs was 65–72% and 28–34%, respectively. WD had higher transition than PD with percentages of 52% and 47%, respectively (P value =2.537e-11), but had lower transversion than PD with percentages of 48% and 53%, respectively (P value =2.2e-16). For specific substitutions, WD had less C>G transversion (P value =0.0058) and more G>A transition (P value =0.026) than non-WD. PD had higher C>T transition (P value =0.01) than non-PD. Except for mutational occurrence, we also studied the association between HGs and mutational frequency related scores including maximum somatic allele frequency (MSAF) (24), MATH and CMB (22). MSAF was regularly used as a measure of cellular tumor prevalence. Higher MSAF denoted higher tumor content. The MATH score denoted allele heterogeneity among each sample, which reflected the diversity of mutational clones. CMB score combined the tumor mutation burden (TMB) and MATH score (22). High CMB was defined as high TMB and low MATH. These scores were compared among different HGs. WD had significantly lower MSAF than MD and PD with P values equal to 0.031 and 0.038, respectively (). As for the MATH score, MD was highest among HGs, but only MD transversion. PD had a P value of less than 0.05. We also tested the CMB score, but no significant difference was found among HGs (result not shown).

The functional bias of genomic variations for different HGs

Driver genes play a big part in cancer. Their specific effect on HG was also studied. The driver genes of HCC were collected from the literature (25,26). The top 10 variable genes are displayed in . Genes TP53, TERT, CTNNB1, RB1, AXIN1, and ARID1A were prone to substitution/indel/truncation variation, while CCND1, FGF19, FGF4, and FGF3 preferred gene amplification. Among those driver genes, there were three genes showing significantly different HGs after mutation (). Of these three genes, mutational TP53 (TP53) had a higher average HG than non-mutational TP53 (TP53). A non-parameter Wilcoxon’s rank-sum test showed significance at P value =3.8e-2. In contrast, mutational CTNNB1 (CTNNB1) and FGF3 (FGF3) showed significantly lower HG with P value =7.8e-4 and P value =0.04, respectively. We also tested the association between gene amplification variation and HG for those driver genes, but no significant difference was found ().
Figure 3

Frequency of genomic variation in driver genes. (A) The percentage of patients with five types of genomic variations for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) driver genes. (B) The average grade of tumors with/without substitution/indel/truncation mutations in driver genes. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001. (C) The average grade of tumors with/without amplification in driver genes. SNV, single-nucleotide variant; CNV, copy number variation.

Frequency of genomic variation in driver genes. (A) The percentage of patients with five types of genomic variations for hepatocellular carcinoma (HCC) driver genes. (B) The average grade of tumors with/without substitution/indel/truncation mutations in driver genes. *, P<0.05; **, P<0.01; ***, P<0.001. (C) The average grade of tumors with/without amplification in driver genes. SNV, single-nucleotide variant; CNV, copy number variation. Mutations, such as substitution, indel, and truncation, can modify the targeted gene functions, and amplification can modify their expression. To study their functional bias, three HG groups were intersected with each other as displayed by a Venn plot in . WD, MD, and PD had 14, 57 and 62 unique mutated genes, respectively. WD had fewer unique mutated genes than other HGs. The unique genes for WD and PD were enriched with the biological processes of gene ontology. A hypergeometric test was performed for each biological process. The Bonferroni-Hochberg (BH) method was applied to correct for multiple testing errors. The top 10 enriched biological processes are listed in . WD was enriched in the regulation of the developmental process, cell differentiation, and membrane invagination. There were 1,168 biological processes enriched for PD specific mutations with multiple testing corrected P values less than 0.05, such as cell proliferation, protein phosphorylation, and cellular response to a stimulus.
Figure 4

The substitution/indel/truncation overlaps between different histological grades. (A) The substitution/indel/truncation overlaps between three HGs including WD, MD, and PD; (B) the enriched biological processes for well-differentiated tumors; (C) the enriched biological processes for moderately differentiated tumors; (D) the enriched biological processes for poorly differentiated tumors. The length of the blue bar indicates the negative log-transformed false discovery rate (FDR). HGs, histological grades; WD, well-differentiated; MD, moderately differentiated; PD, poorly differentiated.

The substitution/indel/truncation overlaps between different histological grades. (A) The substitution/indel/truncation overlaps between three HGs including WD, MD, and PD; (B) the enriched biological processes for well-differentiated tumors; (C) the enriched biological processes for moderately differentiated tumors; (D) the enriched biological processes for poorly differentiated tumors. The length of the blue bar indicates the negative log-transformed false discovery rate (FDR). HGs, histological grades; WD, well-differentiated; MD, moderately differentiated; PD, poorly differentiated. Apart from substitution/indel/truncation mutations, copy number variation can also disrupt cellular function by modifying gene regulation. The amplified genes were intersected with each other (Figure S3A) to obtain the HG-specific genes. The specific genes had similar distribution as substitution/indel/truncation for gene amplification. WD had less specific gene amplification than other HGs, while PD had the highest number of specific genes. WD was enriched in the regulation of fibroblast migration and the negative regulation of transport (Figure S3B); MD was enriched in the positive regulation of cellular processes and the regulation of cell proliferation (Figure S3C); and PD was enriched in the positive regulation of metabolic processes (Figure S3D).

Comparison to the Western population

The findings above were compared against the Western population. An MSKCC dataset from the Western population was downloaded from cBioportal (https://www.cbioportal.org/, accessed on March 5, 2019). With this dataset, nucleotide usage, TMB, driver genes, and biological processes were analyzed using the same procedures as in our dataset. Results showed that WD possessed a higher percentage of transition mutation than PD in the Western population. Meanwhile, PD held a higher percentage of transversion than WD. Such results were in line with those from our dataset. As for the nucleotide usage, only C>G transversion showed higher frequency in PD than in WD (P value =0.017), matching the result from our dataset. Specifically to the Western population, WD had higher A>G mutation than non-WD with P value =0.031. PD had higher A>C and lower A>G substitution than non-PD with P values =0.036 and 7.5e-4, respectively. Among the driver genes, only TP53 mutation was consistently associated with higher HG (P value =1.3e-3, Mann-Whitney U test). Additionally in the Western population, the RB1 mutation tended to be enriched in the high-grade samples. Further investigation of the similarity between the functional biases for WD- and PD-specific genes revealed an extraordinary consistency. The top significantly enriched biological processes in our dataset showed similar significance in the MSKCC dataset (). For example, for both our dataset and the MSKCC dataset, PD-specific genes took part in cell proliferation, protein phosphorylation, and regulation of cell proliferation; MD-specific genes took part in the cellular protein modification process and cellular response to stimulus; and WD-specific genes taking part in the regulation of developmental processes and cell differentiation.
Figure 5

Biological processes could predict survival accurately. (A) The top enriched biological process in WD-specific genes from the Chinese population was validated in the Western population; (B) the top enriched biological process in MD-specific genes from the Chinese population was validated in the Western population; (C) the top enriched biological process in PD-specific genes from the Chinese population was validated in the Western population; (D) the intersection of enriched biological processed in the Chinese population and the Western population. WD, well-differentiated; MD, moderately differentiated; PD, poorly differentiated.

Biological processes could predict survival accurately. (A) The top enriched biological process in WD-specific genes from the Chinese population was validated in the Western population; (B) the top enriched biological process in MD-specific genes from the Chinese population was validated in the Western population; (C) the top enriched biological process in PD-specific genes from the Chinese population was validated in the Western population; (D) the intersection of enriched biological processed in the Chinese population and the Western population. WD, well-differentiated; MD, moderately differentiated; PD, poorly differentiated. It was noteworthy that HG-specific genes may share common enriched biological processes (). To extract the consistent HG-specific biological processes between the two datasets, we first extracted the HG-specific biological processes taken by HG-specific genes for both datasets. Then an intersection was conducted between HG-specific biological processes for both datasets. Through these means, we identified the HG-specific biological processes commonly taken by both datasets. There were 3 WD-specific, 150 MD-specific and 64 PD-specific common biological processes (). These gene lists were applied for gene ontology enrichment analysis. The PD-specific common biological processes included angiogenesis, phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate biosynthetic process, glycerophospholipid metabolic process and development of primary male sexual characteristics; the MD-specific common biological processes included response to hydrogen peroxide, response to peptide hormone and protein localization to the nucleus; and the three WD-specific common biological processes were regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition involved in endocardial cushion formations, epithelial to mesenchymal transition involved in endocardial cushion formations and regulation of homotypic cell-cell adhesion.
Table S2

The HG-specific biological processes

GOIDP values_adjustedgo_termsDatasetHG-specific
GO:00015251.264E-06AngiogenesisZBPD
GO:00360921.584E-05Phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate biosynthetic processMSKCCPD
GO:00066619.918E-05Phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic processMSKCCPD
GO:00066500.0002442Glycerophospholipid metabolic processZBPD
GO:00360920.000248Phosphatidylinositol-3-phosphate biosynthetic processZBPD
GO:19027510.0002485Positive regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionZBPD
GO:00066500.0003463Glycerophospholipid metabolic processMSKCCPD
GO:00066610.0007599Phosphatidylinositol biosynthetic processZBPD
GO:00066440.000767Phospholipid metabolic processZBPD
GO:00085840.0008151Male gonad developmentMSKCCPD
GO:00465460.0008151Development of primary male sexual characteristicsMSKCCPD
GO:00066440.0010525Phospholipid metabolic processMSKCCPD
GO:00464740.0010952Glycerophospholipid biosynthetic processMSKCCPD
GO:00902180.0015026Positive regulation of lipid kinase activityMSKCCPD
GO:00450170.0018219Glycerolipid biosynthetic processMSKCCPD
GO:00196370.0019276Organophosphate metabolic processZBPD
GO:00071260.002289Meiotic nuclear divisionZBPD
GO:00086540.0023611Phospholipid biosynthetic processMSKCCPD
GO:00435510.0026075Regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activityMSKCCPD
GO:19030460.0027839Meiotic cell cycle processZBPD
GO:19037270.0027864Positive regulation of phospholipid metabolic processMSKCCPD
GO:00015250.0030352AngiogenesisMSKCCPD
GO:00105180.0032304Positive regulation of phospholipase activityZBPD
GO:00308550.0040562Epithelial cell differentiationMSKCCPD
GO:00352720.0042767Exocrine system developmentMSKCCPD
GO:00435500.0042767Regulation of lipid kinase activityMSKCCPD
GO:19027490.0046541Regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionMSKCCPD
GO:00481460.0049414Positive regulation of fibroblast proliferationMSKCCPD
GO:00330080.0050369Positive regulation of mast cell activation involved in immune responseZBPD
GO:00433060.0050369Positive regulation of mast cell degranulationZBPD
GO:00464740.0050474Glycerophospholipid biosynthetic processZBPD
GO:00513210.0051928Meiotic cell cycleZBPD
GO:00432690.0052714Regulation of ion transportMSKCCPD
GO:00140680.0059387Positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signalingZBPD
GO:00330080.0062257Positive regulation of mast cell activation involved in immune responseMSKCCPD
GO:00433060.0062257Positive regulation of mast cell degranulationMSKCCPD
GO:00330050.0066599Positive regulation of mast cell activationZBPD
GO:00450170.0071944Glycerolipid biosynthetic processZBPD
GO:00448390.0072853Cell cycle G2/M phase transitionMSKCCPD
GO:00140680.0073914Positive regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase signalingMSKCCPD
GO:00028880.0080025Positive regulation of myeloid leukocyte mediated immunityZBPD
GO:00433020.0080025Positive regulation of leukocyte degranulationZBPD
GO:00330050.0082744Positive regulation of mast cell activationMSKCCPD
GO:00086540.0087335Phospholipid biosynthetic processZBPD
GO:00341090.0088759Homotypic cell-cell adhesionZBPD
GO:00308550.0089828Epithelial cell differentiationZBPD
GO:19027510.0091779Positive regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionMSKCCPD
GO:00066290.0093471Lipid metabolic processMSKCCPD
GO:00086100.0100358Lipid biosynthetic processMSKCCPD
GO:00028880.0100358Positive regulation of myeloid leukocyte mediated immunityMSKCCPD
GO:00433020.0100358Positive regulation of leukocyte degranulationMSKCCPD
GO:00341090.0114927Homotypic cell-cell adhesionMSKCCPD
GO:00516560.0119185Establishment of organelle localizationZBPD
GO:00432690.0125078Regulation of ion transportZBPD
GO:00607350.0129404Regulation of eif2 alpha phosphorylation by dsRNAZBPD
GO:00421020.0130323Positive regulation of T cell proliferationZBPD
GO:00301780.0141809Negative regulation of Wnt signaling pathwayZBPD
GO:00066290.0150464Lipid metabolic processZBPD
GO:00516560.0165508Establishment of organelle localizationMSKCCPD
GO:00607350.0165508Regulation of eif2 alpha phosphorylation by dsRNAMSKCCPD
GO:00071260.0170219Meiotic nuclear divisionMSKCCPD
GO:00421020.0174305Positive regulation of T cell proliferationMSKCCPD
GO:00902180.0181076Positive regulation of lipid kinase activityZBPD
GO:00328850.0187746Regulation of polysaccharide biosynthetic processZBPD
GO:00301780.0195602Negative regulation of Wnt signaling pathwayMSKCCPD
GO:19030460.0198476Meiotic cell cycle processMSKCCPD
GO:00086100.020913Lipid biosynthetic processZBPD
GO:00327520.0213557Positive regulation of interleukin-3 productionZBPD
GO:00422230.0213557Interleukin-3 biosynthetic processZBPD
GO:00433660.0213557Beta selectionZBPD
GO:00453990.0213557Regulation of interleukin-3 biosynthetic processZBPD
GO:00454010.0213557Positive regulation of interleukin-3 biosynthetic processZBPD
GO:00072570.0216117Activation of JUN kinase activityZBPD
GO:00328810.0216117Regulation of polysaccharide metabolic processZBPD
GO:19027490.0218429Regulation of cell cycle G2/M phase transitionZBPD
GO:00448390.0237717Cell cycle G2/M phase transitionZBPD
GO:00330030.0243556Regulation of mast cell activationZBPD
GO:00435510.0243556Regulation of phosphatidylinositol 3-kinase activityZBPD
GO:19037270.0252945Positive regulation of phospholipid metabolic processZBPD
GO:00328850.0253146Regulation of polysaccharide biosynthetic processMSKCCPD
GO:00094090.0262411Response to coldZBPD
GO:19033070.0262411Positive regulation of regulated secretory pathwayZBPD
GO:00327520.0274151Positive regulation of interleukin-3 productionMSKCCPD
GO:00422230.0274151Interleukin-3 biosynthetic processMSKCCPD
GO:00433660.0274151Beta selectionMSKCCPD
GO:00453990.0274151Regulation of interleukin-3 biosynthetic processMSKCCPD
GO:00454010.0274151Positive regulation of interleukin-3 biosynthetic processMSKCCPD
GO:00085840.0282742Male gonad developmentZBPD
GO:00465460.0282742Development of primary male sexual characteristicsZBPD
GO:00023510.0282742Serotonin production involved in inflammatory responseZBPD
GO:00024420.0282742Serotonin secretion involved in inflammatory responseZBPD
GO:00025540.0282742Serotonin secretion by plateletZBPD
GO:00322520.0282742Secretory granule localizationZBPD
GO:00326720.0282742Regulation of interleukin-3 productionZBPD
GO:00454250.0282742Positive regulation of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor biosynthetic processZBPD
GO:00455880.0282742Positive regulation of gamma-delta T cell differentiationZBPD
GO:19018430.0282742Positive regulation of high voltage-gated calcium channel activityZBPD
GO:00072570.0285333Activation of JUN kinase activityMSKCCPD
GO:00328810.0285333Regulation of polysaccharide metabolic processMSKCCPD
GO:00421290.0307477Regulation of T cell proliferationZBPD
GO:00513210.0309104Meiotic cell cycleMSKCCPD
GO:00352720.0318221Exocrine system developmentZBPD
GO:00435500.0318221Regulation of lipid kinase activityZBPD
GO:00330030.0322116Regulation of mast cell activationMSKCCPD
GO:00481460.0343113Positive regulation of fibroblast proliferationZBPD
GO:00108970.0343113Negative regulation of triglyceride catabolic processZBPD
GO:00326320.0343113Interleukin-3 productionZBPD
GO:00454230.0343113Regulation of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor biosynthetic processZBPD
GO:00606990.0343113Regulation of endoribonuclease activityZBPD
GO:00074050.0343407Neuroblast proliferationZBPD
GO:00094090.0344727Response to coldMSKCCPD
GO:19033070.0344727Positive regulation of regulated secretory pathwayMSKCCPD
GO:00023510.0359801Serotonin production involved in inflammatory responseMSKCCPD
GO:00024420.0359801Serotonin secretion involved in inflammatory responseMSKCCPD
GO:00025540.0359801Serotonin secretion by plateletMSKCCPD
GO:00322520.0359801Secretory granule localizationMSKCCPD
GO:00326720.0359801Regulation of interleukin-3 productionMSKCCPD
GO:00454250.0359801Positive regulation of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor biosynthetic processMSKCCPD
GO:00455880.0359801Positive regulation of gamma-delta T cell differentiationMSKCCPD
GO:19018430.0359801Positive regulation of high voltage-gated calcium channel activityMSKCCPD
GO:00105180.040339Positive regulation of phospholipase activityMSKCCPD
GO:00421290.0411271Regulation of T cell proliferationMSKCCPD
GO:00108970.0437818Negative regulation of triglyceride catabolic processMSKCCPD
GO:00326320.0437818Interleukin-3 productionMSKCCPD
GO:00454230.0437818Regulation of granulocyte macrophage colony-stimulating factor biosynthetic processMSKCCPD
GO:00606990.0437818Regulation of endoribonuclease activityMSKCCPD
GO:00074050.0450633Neuroblast proliferationMSKCCPD
GO:00196370.045281Organophosphate metabolic processMSKCCPD
GO:00425421.365E-07Response to hydrogen peroxideMSKCCMD
GO:00148121.111E-06Muscle cell migrationMSKCCMD
GO:00424931.147E-06Response to drugMSKCCMD
GO:19016521.569E-06Response to peptideZBMD
GO:00440921.981E-06Negative regulation of molecular functionZBMD
GO:00434345.246E-06Response to peptide hormoneZBMD
GO:00003021.172E-05Response to reactive oxygen speciesMSKCCMD
GO:00345041.315E-05Protein localization to nucleusMSKCCMD
GO:00333651.481E-05Protein localization to organelleMSKCCMD
GO:00703012.532E-05Cellular response to hydrogen peroxideMSKCCMD
GO:00096073.12E-05Response to biotic stimulusMSKCCMD
GO:00346144.066E-05Cellular response to reactive oxygen speciesMSKCCMD
GO:19047054.887E-05Regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferationMSKCCMD
GO:19908744.887E-05Vascular smooth muscle cell proliferationMSKCCMD
GO:00032796.629E-05Cardiac septum developmentMSKCCMD
GO:00517076.996E-05Response to other organismMSKCCMD
GO:00432077.068E-05Response to external biotic stimulusMSKCCMD
GO:19016527.61E-05Response to peptideMSKCCMD
GO:00512239.568E-05Regulation of protein transportMSKCCMD
GO:00604110.0001143Cardiac septum morphogenesisMSKCCMD
GO:00149090.0001298Smooth muscle cell migrationMSKCCMD
GO:00324960.0001321Response to lipopolysaccharideMSKCCMD
GO:00456820.0001383Regulation of epidermis developmentMSKCCMD
GO:00062730.0001448Lagging strand elongationMSKCCMD
GO:00434340.0001755Response to peptide hormoneMSKCCMD
GO:00022370.0001807Response to molecule of bacterial originMSKCCMD
GO:00031790.000188Heart valve morphogenesisMSKCCMD
GO:00508640.0002231Regulation of B cell activationMSKCCMD
GO:00031700.0002759Heart valve developmentMSKCCMD
GO:00515700.0003745Regulation of histone H3-K9 methylationZBMD
GO:00440920.0004357Negative regulation of molecular functionMSKCCMD
GO:00421000.0004756B cell proliferationMSKCCMD
GO:00003020.0005009Response to reactive oxygen speciesZBMD
GO:19040190.0005234Epithelial cell apoptotic processMSKCCMD
GO:00062660.0005342DNA ligationZBMD
GO:00346140.00056Cellular response to reactive oxygen speciesZBMD
GO:20012420.0005685Regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayMSKCCMD
GO:00468790.0006353Hormone secretionMSKCCMD
GO:00062710.0006777DNA strand elongation involved in DNA replicationMSKCCMD
GO:00032050.0007089Cardiac chamber developmentMSKCCMD
GO:00030070.0007878Heart morphogenesisMSKCCMD
GO:00099140.0008096Hormone transportMSKCCMD
GO:00345040.0008947Protein localization to nucleusZBMD
GO:00515670.000944Histone H3-K9 methylationZBMD
GO:00308880.001Regulation of B cell proliferationMSKCCMD
GO:00326110.001Interleukin-1 beta productionMSKCCMD
GO:00331570.001093Regulation of intracellular protein transportZBMD
GO:19020420.001286Negative regulation of extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway via death domain receptorsZBMD
GO:00508520.0012901T cell receptor signaling pathwayMSKCCMD
GO:00062660.0012907DNA ligationMSKCCMD
GO:00328450.0013576Negative regulation of homeostatic processMSKCCMD
GO:00032810.0014821Ventricular septum developmentMSKCCMD
GO:00331430.0014821Regulation of intracellular steroid hormone receptor signaling pathwayMSKCCMD
GO:00226160.001571DNA strand elongationMSKCCMD
GO:00718870.0016635Leukocyte apoptotic processZBMD
GO:19040350.0017433Regulation of epithelial cell apoptotic processMSKCCMD
GO:00326120.0019145Interleukin-1 productionMSKCCMD
GO:00973060.0019363Cellular response to alcoholZBMD
GO:00349680.0021658Histone lysine methylationZBMD
GO:00616470.002279Histone H3-K9 modificationZBMD
GO:00331460.002285Regulation of intracellular estrogen receptor signaling pathwayMSKCCMD
GO:00224080.0023527Negative regulation of cell-cell adhesionMSKCCMD
GO:00331570.0023985Regulation of intracellular protein transportMSKCCMD
GO:00512230.0024086Regulation of protein transportZBMD
GO:00324460.0024086Protein modification by small protein conjugationZBMD
GO:00515730.0028681Negative regulation of histone H3-K9 methylationZBMD
GO:00180220.0028725Peptidyl-lysine methylationZBMD
GO:00468240.0028725Positive regulation of nucleocytoplasmic transportZBMD
GO:00316480.0030756Protein destabilizationMSKCCMD
GO:00096360.0032692Response to toxic substanceZBMD
GO:00062610.0033055DNA-dependent DNA replicationMSKCCMD
GO:00062730.0033374Lagging strand elongationZBMD
GO:00022230.0035118Stimulatory C-type lectin receptor signaling pathwayZBMD
GO:00022200.0036986Innate immune response activating cell surface receptor signaling pathwayZBMD
GO:00511030.0038896DNA ligation involved in DNA repairZBMD
GO:00030070.0040602Heart morphogenesisZBMD
GO:00165710.0042866Histone methylationZBMD
GO:00973060.0044943Cellular response to alcoholMSKCCMD
GO:00310600.0045733Regulation of histone methylationZBMD
GO:00230610.0047426Signal releaseMSKCCMD
GO:00515730.0047426Negative regulation of histone H3-K9 methylationMSKCCMD
GO:00016660.0047462Response to hypoxiaMSKCCMD
GO:00062840.0050431Base-excision repairMSKCCMD
GO:00182050.0051017Peptidyl-lysine modificationZBMD
GO:00362930.0053204Response to decreased oxygen levelsMSKCCMD
GO:00616470.0053204Histone H3-K9 modificationMSKCCMD
GO:00062610.0055276DNA-dependent DNA replicationZBMD
GO:20010200.0055567Regulation of response to DNA damage stimulusMSKCCMD
GO:00324460.0057176Protein modification by small protein conjugationMSKCCMD
GO:00149090.0058867Smooth muscle cell migrationZBMD
GO:00706640.0058867Negative regulation of leukocyte proliferationZBMD
GO:00903160.0059508Positive regulation of intracellular protein transportMSKCCMD
GO:00326510.0061433Regulation of interleukin-1 beta productionMSKCCMD
GO:00063040.0062479DNA modificationMSKCCMD
GO:00511030.0062941DNA ligation involved in DNA repairMSKCCMD
GO:00305200.0064205Intracellular estrogen receptor signaling pathwayMSKCCMD
GO:00420930.0064205T-helper cell differentiationMSKCCMD
GO:00459360.0065605Negative regulation of phosphate metabolic processZBMD
GO:00105630.0066057Negative regulation of phosphorus metabolic processZBMD
GO:00456040.0067768Regulation of epidermal cell differentiationMSKCCMD
GO:00310610.0067822Negative regulation of histone methylationZBMD
GO:00349680.0067993Histone lysine methylationMSKCCMD
GO:00022940.0071277CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell differentiation involved in immune responseMSKCCMD
GO:00022870.0074349alpha-beta T cell activation involved in immune responseMSKCCMD
GO:00022930.0074349alpha-beta T cell differentiation involved in immune responseMSKCCMD
GO:00316630.0074349Lipopolysaccharide-mediated signaling pathwayMSKCCMD
GO:00380340.0077505Signal transduction in absence of ligandZBMD
GO:00971920.0077505Extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in absence of ligandZBMD
GO:00342840.0078981Response to monosaccharideMSKCCMD
GO:00062710.0081662DNA strand elongation involved in DNA replicationZBMD
GO:00466600.0082366Female sex differentiationMSKCCMD
GO:00148120.008241Muscle cell migrationZBMD
GO:00032830.0088126Atrial septum developmentZBMD
GO:00230190.0088126Signal transduction involved in regulation of gene expressionZBMD
GO:00072590.0089793JAK-STAT cascadeZBMD
GO:00976960.0089793STAT cascadeZBMD
GO:00180220.0091089Peptidyl-lysine methylationMSKCCMD
GO:00468240.0091089Positive regulation of nucleocytoplasmic transportMSKCCMD
GO:00015410.0092698Ovarian follicle developmentMSKCCMD
GO:00703010.0095041Cellular response to hydrogen peroxideZBMD
GO:00022920.0096977T cell differentiation involved in immune responseMSKCCMD
GO:19035330.0097929Regulation of protein targetingZBMD
GO:00064790.0099192Protein methylationZBMD
GO:00082130.0099192Protein alkylationZBMD
GO:00508520.0099192T cell receptor signaling pathwayZBMD
GO:00328450.0101971Negative regulation of homeostatic processZBMD
GO:00310600.0104978Regulation of histone methylationMSKCCMD
GO:00326520.0104978Regulation of interleukin-1 productionMSKCCMD
GO:00086250.0108141Extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway via death domain receptorsZBMD
GO:00324960.0108141Response to lipopolysaccharideZBMD
GO:00097430.0108748Response to carbohydrateMSKCCMD
GO:00019470.0108748Heart loopingMSKCCMD
GO:00486780.0108748Response to axon injuryMSKCCMD
GO:00720910.0108748Regulation of stem cell proliferationMSKCCMD
GO:19035330.0110206Regulation of protein targetingMSKCCMD
GO:00022230.0110206Stimulatory C-type lectin receptor signaling pathwayMSKCCMD
GO:00310610.0110206Negative regulation of histone methylationMSKCCMD
GO:00433670.0112179CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell differentiationMSKCCMD
GO:00022200.0115502Innate immune response activating cell surface receptor signaling pathwayMSKCCMD
GO:19047050.0117161Regulation of vascular smooth muscle cell proliferationZBMD
GO:19908740.0117161Vascular smooth muscle cell proliferationZBMD
GO:00421000.0117593B cell proliferationZBMD
GO:19040190.0124536Epithelial cell apoptotic processZBMD
GO:00064710.0125445Protein ADP-ribosylationZBMD
GO:00022370.0127762Response to molecule of bacterial originZBMD
GO:00613710.0130477Determination of heart left/right asymmetryMSKCCMD
GO:00165710.0132027Histone methylationMSKCCMD
GO:00226160.0132769DNA strand elongationZBMD
GO:00085850.0132769Female gonad developmentZBMD
GO:00031430.0134719Embryonic heart tube morphogenesisMSKCCMD
GO:00085890.0134719Regulation of smoothened signaling pathwayMSKCCMD
GO:00357100.0134719CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell activationMSKCCMD
GO:00706640.0134719Negative regulation of leukocyte proliferationMSKCCMD
GO:00713010.0136096Cellular response to vitamin B1ZBMD
GO:00903470.0136096Regulation of cellular organohalogen metabolic processZBMD
GO:00903480.0136096Regulation of cellular organofluorine metabolic processZBMD
GO:00903490.0136096Negative regulation of cellular organohalogen metabolic processZBMD
GO:00903500.0136096Negative regulation of cellular organofluorine metabolic processZBMD
GO:19044040.0136096Response to formaldehydeZBMD
GO:00032790.0136766Cardiac septum developmentZBMD
GO:00465450.0139992Development of primary female sexual characteristicsZBMD
GO:00097430.0140538Response to carbohydrateZBMD
GO:00430860.0143878Negative regulation of catalytic activityZBMD
GO:00032830.0143938Atrial septum developmentMSKCCMD
GO:00230190.0143938Signal transduction involved in regulation of gene expressionMSKCCMD
GO:00073890.015078Pattern specification processMSKCCMD
GO:00063040.0153019DNA modificationZBMD
GO:00511000.0154442Negative regulation of bindingMSKCCMD
GO:00459360.0155204Negative regulation of phosphate metabolic processMSKCCMD
GO:00515700.015525Regulation of histone H3-K9 methylationMSKCCMD
GO:00105630.01554Negative regulation of phosphorus metabolic processMSKCCMD
GO:00466340.0155981Regulation of alpha-beta T cell activationMSKCCMD
GO:00713010.0155981Cellular response to vitamin B1MSKCCMD
GO:00903470.0155981Regulation of cellular organohalogen metabolic processMSKCCMD
GO:00903480.0155981Regulation of cellular organofluorine metabolic processMSKCCMD
GO:00903490.0155981Negative regulation of cellular organohalogen metabolic processMSKCCMD
GO:00903500.0155981Negative regulation of cellular organofluorine metabolic processMSKCCMD
GO:19044040.0155981Response to formaldehydeMSKCCMD
GO:00331460.0159353Regulation of intracellular estrogen receptor signaling pathwayZBMD
GO:00510510.0167241Negative regulation of transportMSKCCMD
GO:00380340.0167508Signal transduction in absence of ligandMSKCCMD
GO:00971920.0167508Extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway in absence of ligandMSKCCMD
GO:00466600.0191336Female sex differentiationZBMD
GO:00316480.01952Protein destabilizationZBMD
GO:00064710.0196997Protein ADP-ribosylationMSKCCMD
GO:00430860.0202833Negative regulation of catalytic activityMSKCCMD
GO:00031790.0203264Heart valve morphogenesisZBMD
GO:00032300.0203264Cardiac atrium developmentZBMD
GO:00333650.0219486Protein localization to organelleZBMD
GO:00425420.0231473Response to hydrogen peroxideZBMD
GO:00108680.0231473Negative regulation of triglyceride biosynthetic processZBMD
GO:00714600.0231473Cellular response to cell-matrix adhesionZBMD
GO:00903450.0231473Cellular organohalogen metabolic processZBMD
GO:00903460.0231473Cellular organofluorine metabolic processZBMD
GO:00508640.0232449Regulation of B cell activationZBMD
GO:00442620.0234314Cellular carbohydrate metabolic processMSKCCMD
GO:00031700.0234325Heart valve developmentZBMD
GO:00086250.0238195Extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway via death domain receptorsMSKCCMD
GO:00430290.0244019T cell homeostasisZBMD
GO:00468250.0252439Regulation of protein export from nucleusZBMD
GO:00182050.0254654Peptidyl-lysine modificationMSKCCMD
GO:00903160.0255328Positive regulation of intracellular protein transportZBMD
GO:00224080.0260472Negative regulation of cell-cell adhesionZBMD
GO:00062840.0260472Base-excision repairZBMD
GO:00108830.0260472Regulation of lipid storageZBMD
GO:00072590.0262577JAK-STAT cascadeMSKCCMD
GO:00976960.0262577STAT cascadeMSKCCMD
GO:00515670.0262577Histone H3-K9 methylationMSKCCMD
GO:00108680.0262577Negative regulation of triglyceride biosynthetic processMSKCCMD
GO:00714600.0262577Cellular response to cell-matrix adhesionMSKCCMD
GO:00903450.0262577Cellular organohalogen metabolic processMSKCCMD
GO:00903460.0262577Cellular organofluorine metabolic processMSKCCMD
GO:00442620.0265122Cellular carbohydrate metabolic processZBMD
GO:00424930.0271005Response to drugZBMD
GO:00064790.0275738Protein methylationMSKCCMD
GO:00082130.0275738Protein alkylationMSKCCMD
GO:00085850.0277022Female gonad developmentMSKCCMD
GO:00511000.029382Negative regulation of bindingZBMD
GO:00326510.0295013Regulation of interleukin-1 beta productionZBMD
GO:00435250.0295013Positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processZBMD
GO:00510550.0295013Negative regulation of lipid biosynthetic processZBMD
GO:00073890.0295013Pattern specification processZBMD
GO:00230610.0295013Signal releaseZBMD
GO:00305200.0295013Intracellular estrogen receptor signaling pathwayZBMD
GO:00420930.0295013T-helper cell differentiationZBMD
GO:00098220.0295013Alkaloid catabolic processZBMD
GO:00102660.0295013Response to vitamin B1ZBMD
GO:00330760.0295013Isoquinoline alkaloid metabolic processZBMD
GO:00714940.0295013Cellular response to UV-CZBMD
GO:00987600.0295013Response to interleukin-7ZBMD
GO:00987610.0295013Cellular response to interleukin-7ZBMD
GO:19907850.0295013Response to water-immersion restraint stressZBMD
GO:00718870.029714Leukocyte apoptotic processMSKCCMD
GO:00456040.0298719Regulation of epidermal cell differentiationZBMD
GO:00465450.0305378Development of primary female sexual characteristicsMSKCCMD
GO:19020420.0306947Negative regulation of extrinsic apoptotic signaling pathway via death domain receptorsMSKCCMD
GO:00022940.0309829CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell differentiation involved in immune responseZBMD
GO:00022870.0320739alpha-beta T cell activation involved in immune responseZBMD
GO:00022930.0320739alpha-beta T cell differentiation involved in immune responseZBMD
GO:00316630.0320739Lipopolysaccharide-mediated signaling pathwayZBMD
GO:00032300.0321242Cardiac atrium developmentMSKCCMD
GO:20012420.0323501Regulation of intrinsic apoptotic signaling pathwayZBMD
GO:00510510.0324454Negative regulation of transportZBMD
GO:00517070.0338559Response to other organismZBMD
GO:00432070.033997Response to external biotic stimulusZBMD
GO:00098220.0354738Alkaloid catabolic processMSKCCMD
GO:00102660.0354738Response to vitamin B1MSKCCMD
GO:00330760.0354738Isoquinoline alkaloid metabolic processMSKCCMD
GO:00714940.0354738Cellular response to UV-CMSKCCMD
GO:00987600.0354738Response to interleukin-7MSKCCMD
GO:00987610.0354738Cellular response to interleukin-7MSKCCMD
GO:19907850.0354738Response to water-immersion restraint stressMSKCCMD
GO:00032050.0358613Cardiac chamber developmentZBMD
GO:00015410.0363016Ovarian follicle developmentZBMD
GO:00070890.0363016Traversing start control point of mitotic cell cycleZBMD
GO:00109890.0363016Negative regulation of low-density lipoprotein particle clearanceZBMD
GO:00140420.0363016Positive regulation of neuron maturationZBMD
GO:00357990.0363016Ureter maturationZBMD
GO:00429970.0363016Negative regulation of Golgi to plasma membrane protein transportZBMD
GO:00704270.0363016Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing 1 signaling pathwayZBMD
GO:20000480.0363016Negative regulation of cell-cell adhesion mediated by cadherinZBMD
GO:00468790.0364954Hormone secretionZBMD
GO:00022920.0371894T cell differentiation involved in immune responseZBMD
GO:00308880.0371894Regulation of B cell proliferationZBMD
GO:00326110.0371894Interleukin-1 beta productionZBMD
GO:00430290.0386747T cell homeostasisMSKCCMD
GO:00326520.0392552Regulation of interleukin-1 productionZBMD
GO:20010200.039929Regulation of response to DNA damage stimulusZBMD
GO:00468250.0400926Regulation of protein export from nucleusMSKCCMD
GO:00019470.040316Heart loopingZBMD
GO:00486780.040316Response to axon injuryZBMD
GO:00720910.040316Regulation of stem cell proliferationZBMD
GO:00099140.0407189Hormone transportZBMD
GO:00096070.0410816Response to biotic stimulusZBMD
GO:00433670.0414048CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell differentiationZBMD
GO:00108830.0416577Regulation of lipid storageMSKCCMD
GO:00070890.0432135Traversing start control point of mitotic cell cycleMSKCCMD
GO:00109890.0432135Negative regulation of low-density lipoprotein particle clearanceMSKCCMD
GO:00140420.0432135Positive regulation of neuron maturationMSKCCMD
GO:00357990.0432135Ureter maturationMSKCCMD
GO:00429970.0432135Negative regulation of Golgi to plasma membrane protein transportMSKCCMD
GO:00704270.0432135Nucleotide-binding oligomerization domain containing 1 signaling pathwayMSKCCMD
GO:20000480.0432135Negative regulation of cell-cell adhesion mediated by cadherinMSKCCMD
GO:00032810.0437357Ventricular septum developmentZBMD
GO:00331430.0437357Regulation of intracellular steroid hormone receptor signaling pathwayZBMD
GO:00604110.0437357Cardiac septum morphogenesisZBMD
GO:00613710.0447239Determination of heart left/right asymmetryZBMD
GO:00096360.0455879Response to toxic substanceMSKCCMD
GO:00031430.0456721Embryonic heart tube morphogenesisZBMD
GO:00085890.0456721Regulation of smoothened signaling pathwayZBMD
GO:00357100.0456721CD4-positive, alpha-beta T cell activationZBMD
GO:00016660.0462698Response to hypoxiaZBMD
GO:00435250.0463606Positive regulation of neuron apoptotic processMSKCCMD
GO:00510550.0463606Negative regulation of lipid biosynthetic processMSKCCMD
GO:00456820.0465784Regulation of epidermis developmentZBMD
GO:19040350.0465784Regulation of epithelial cell apoptotic processZBMD
GO:00342840.0473956Response to monosaccharideZBMD
GO:00326120.0473956Interleukin-1 productionZBMD
GO:00362930.047653Response to decreased oxygen levelsZBMD
GO:00466340.0493719Regulation of alpha-beta T cell activationZBMD
GO:19050050.0303648Regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition involved in endocardial cushion formationZBWD
GO:00031980.0462411Epithelial to mesenchymal transition involved in endocardial cushion formationZBWD
GO:00341100.0498585Regulation of homotypic cell-cell adhesionZBWD
GO:19050050.027475Regulation of epithelial to mesenchymal transition involved in endocardial cushion formationMSKCCWD
GO:00031980.0414965Epithelial to mesenchymal transition involved in endocardial cushion formationMSKCCWD
GO:00341100.0441837Regulation of homotypic cell-cell adhesionMSKCCWD

Note: dataset, our dataset was named ZB. PD, poor differentiated; MD, moderate differentiated; WD, well differentiated.

Discussion

Although there have been many studies on the association between gene expression and HG, information on the association between genomic variation and HG is still scarce. The intention of this study was to understand the association between genomic variation and HG and explore the potential of genomic variation as an indicator of HG. A stable genomic variation pattern should be associated with a hidden molecular mechanism. For example, C>T and C>G substitution could come from DNA editing catalyzed by apolipoprotein B mRNA catalytic subunit-like (APOBEC) and activation-induced deaminase (AID) family, which can bind to both RNA and single-stranded (ss) DNA. DNA deamination by these proteins results in the C>U conversion in single-stranded DNA. Such mutations could result in C>T transition and C>G transversion by different DNA repair polymerases (27). In lung cancer, different cancer subtypes also showed a large difference in C>T transition and C>G transversion (28). Due to the existence of such molecular mechanisms, those stable genomic variation patterns could be stable predictors of HG. In this study, we have analyzed the association of HGs with genomic variation and mutational frequency in the Chinese population and the Western population, and have found a higher C>G transversion mutated in patients with PD HCC for both populations. This association was meaningful in the treatment of such a subset of HCC patients. As reported, APOBEC-related mutagenesis was found to be highly correlated with immunotherapy response (29). Thus, detected C>G transversion could be a good indicator of immunotherapy efficacy. In spite of high C>G transversion being found in HCC and believed as an etiology of HCC by Morishita et al. (30), they did not associate it with any biological significance. Our results revealed that patients with high C>G transversion were strongly associated with poorly differentiated HCC, involving in APOBEC-related mutagenesis. Taking into account the important mutational scores in relation to survival, we also studied TMB, MSAF, MATH and CMB score, among which only MSAF is significantly associated with HG. As a measure of cellular tumor prevalence, MSAF has been used in many studies (24,31,32). Studies have shown that MSAF is also correlated with tumor burden (31) and several other research studies have revealed that tumor burden is strongly associated with HG (32). Therefore, it is reasonable that MSAF was significantly associated with HG. Among the driver genes of HCC, TP53 mutation was a consistent biomarker of high HG in both populations, which agreed with the previous studies in ovarian cancer (5) and HCC (33). However, we also noticed difference between the Chinese and Western populations. In the Chinese population, mutations in CTNNB1, ARID2, and ACVR2A were associated with a lower HG, and in the western population, RB1 was associated with a high HG. During the analysis of biological processes of substitution/indel/truncation and amplification for WD- and PD-specific genes, we found that the biological processes were highly matched for mutation and amplification. For example, WD tumors showed higher substitution/indel/truncation and amplification in the cell differentiation, and PD tumor showed higher substitution/indel/truncation and amplification in the protein phosphorylation. These results demonstrated that a tumor could become WD or PD either through mutations or by amplification, or both. Comparisons between the Chinese and the Western populations also proved that the WD was most enriched in cell differentiation, and the PD was most enriched in phosphorylation. Furthermore, there were also genes for WD or PD involved in phosphorylation or cell differentiation, respectively. A further intersection of their biological processes disclosed the unique biological processes for different HGs. Although these biological processes have been well recognized in basic cancer research, they have not been systematically associated with genomic variations and HG in HCC before. It should be noted that, instead of ctDNA (circulating tumor DNA) from blood, DNA from the solid tumor was extracted to detect gene mutations. Considering the instability of ctDNA detection, this should be a very important step for applying genomic variations as a predictor of HG. For example, ctDNA is easier to be detected in late-stage cancer and its concentration can be changed by many factors including clinical therapy and tumor development. How the instability of ctDNA detection affects its prediction is another issue to be discussed. The other limitation of this study is that the comparison with the Western population did not include CNV due to the missing information in the MSKCC dataset. In summary, this pilot study has revealed multiple factors associated with HG. These findings improved our understanding of the molecular mechanism in different HGs of HCC. Further research using ctDNA to detect the genomic variation should be performed to verify this study.
  30 in total

1.  The Genome Analysis Toolkit: a MapReduce framework for analyzing next-generation DNA sequencing data.

Authors:  Aaron McKenna; Matthew Hanna; Eric Banks; Andrey Sivachenko; Kristian Cibulskis; Andrew Kernytsky; Kiran Garimella; David Altshuler; Stacey Gabriel; Mark Daly; Mark A DePristo
Journal:  Genome Res       Date:  2010-07-19       Impact factor: 9.043

2.  FermiKit: assembly-based variant calling for Illumina resequencing data.

Authors:  Heng Li
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2015-07-27       Impact factor: 6.937

3.  Pooled Analysis of Long-Term Survival Data From Phase II and Phase III Trials of Ipilimumab in Unresectable or Metastatic Melanoma.

Authors:  Dirk Schadendorf; F Stephen Hodi; Caroline Robert; Jeffrey S Weber; Kim Margolin; Omid Hamid; Debra Patt; Tai-Tsang Chen; David M Berman; Jedd D Wolchok
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2015-02-09       Impact factor: 44.544

4.  Association between IDH1/2 mutations and brain glioma grade.

Authors:  Lei Deng; Pengju Xiong; Yunhui Luo; Xiao Bu; Suokai Qian; Wuzhao Zhong; Shunqing Lv
Journal:  Oncol Lett       Date:  2018-08-17       Impact factor: 2.967

5.  Analysis of protein-coding genetic variation in 60,706 humans.

Authors:  Monkol Lek; Konrad J Karczewski; Eric V Minikel; Kaitlin E Samocha; Eric Banks; Timothy Fennell; Anne H O'Donnell-Luria; James S Ware; Andrew J Hill; Beryl B Cummings; Taru Tukiainen; Daniel P Birnbaum; Jack A Kosmicki; Laramie E Duncan; Karol Estrada; Fengmei Zhao; James Zou; Emma Pierce-Hoffman; Joanne Berghout; David N Cooper; Nicole Deflaux; Mark DePristo; Ron Do; Jason Flannick; Menachem Fromer; Laura Gauthier; Jackie Goldstein; Namrata Gupta; Daniel Howrigan; Adam Kiezun; Mitja I Kurki; Ami Levy Moonshine; Pradeep Natarajan; Lorena Orozco; Gina M Peloso; Ryan Poplin; Manuel A Rivas; Valentin Ruano-Rubio; Samuel A Rose; Douglas M Ruderfer; Khalid Shakir; Peter D Stenson; Christine Stevens; Brett P Thomas; Grace Tiao; Maria T Tusie-Luna; Ben Weisburd; Hong-Hee Won; Dongmei Yu; David M Altshuler; Diego Ardissino; Michael Boehnke; John Danesh; Stacey Donnelly; Roberto Elosua; Jose C Florez; Stacey B Gabriel; Gad Getz; Stephen J Glatt; Christina M Hultman; Sekar Kathiresan; Markku Laakso; Steven McCarroll; Mark I McCarthy; Dermot McGovern; Ruth McPherson; Benjamin M Neale; Aarno Palotie; Shaun M Purcell; Danish Saleheen; Jeremiah M Scharf; Pamela Sklar; Patrick F Sullivan; Jaakko Tuomilehto; Ming T Tsuang; Hugh C Watkins; James G Wilson; Mark J Daly; Daniel G MacArthur
Journal:  Nature       Date:  2016-08-18       Impact factor: 49.962

6.  The ExAC browser: displaying reference data information from over 60 000 exomes.

Authors:  Konrad J Karczewski; Ben Weisburd; Brett Thomas; Matthew Solomonson; Douglas M Ruderfer; David Kavanagh; Tymor Hamamsy; Monkol Lek; Kaitlin E Samocha; Beryl B Cummings; Daniel Birnbaum; Mark J Daly; Daniel G MacArthur
Journal:  Nucleic Acids Res       Date:  2016-11-28       Impact factor: 16.971

7.  Clinical utility of tumor genomic profiling in patients with high plasma circulating tumor DNA burden or metabolically active tumors.

Authors:  Cathy Zhou; Zilong Yuan; Weijie Ma; Lihong Qi; Angelique Mahavongtrakul; Ying Li; Hong Li; Jay Gong; Reggie R Fan; Jin Li; Michael Molmen; Travis A Clark; Dean Pavlick; Garrett M Frampton; Brady Forcier; Elizabeth H Moore; David K Shelton; Matthew Cooke; Siraj M Ali; Vincent A Miller; Jeffrey P Gregg; Philip J Stephens; Tianhong Li
Journal:  J Hematol Oncol       Date:  2018-11-06       Impact factor: 17.388

8.  Fast and accurate short read alignment with Burrows-Wheeler transform.

Authors:  Heng Li; Richard Durbin
Journal:  Bioinformatics       Date:  2009-05-18       Impact factor: 6.937

9.  Sensitive detection of somatic point mutations in impure and heterogeneous cancer samples.

Authors:  Kristian Cibulskis; Michael S Lawrence; Scott L Carter; Andrey Sivachenko; David Jaffe; Carrie Sougnez; Stacey Gabriel; Matthew Meyerson; Eric S Lander; Gad Getz
Journal:  Nat Biotechnol       Date:  2013-02-10       Impact factor: 54.908

Review 10.  The mutational landscape of hepatocellular carcinoma.

Authors:  Ju-Seog Lee
Journal:  Clin Mol Hepatol       Date:  2015-09-30
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.