Literature DB >> 35117348

Level of mesothelin expression can indicate the prognosis of malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Feifei Feng1, Huanan Zhang1, Ying Zhang1, Hui Wang1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is a fatal, treatment-resistant tumor. The median survival of MPM is 9-12 months and its early prognostic markers remains uncertain. The objective of this study was to determine that the level of mesothelin expression can be as a predictor of prognosis in MPM patients.
METHODS: Level of mesothelin expression was detected in 38 MPM tissue specimens by immunohistochemistry analysis. The relationship of MPM prognosis and mesothelin expression was evaluated by univariate and multivariate Cox regression, Kaplan-Meier survival curves.
RESULTS: High level of mesothelin expression was significantly associated with non-epithelioid type of MPM and smoking. Meanwhile, higher level of mesothelin expression indicated a shorter total survival.
CONCLUSIONS: The present study suggested that mesothelin is a dependent prognostic factor in MPM patients and might be a novel potential target for immunotherapy in MPM. 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM); mesothelin; prognosis; survival

Year:  2020        PMID: 35117348      PMCID: PMC8799090          DOI: 10.21037/tcr-19-2027

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-676X            Impact factor:   1.241


Introduction

Malignant pleural mesothelioma (MPM) is an aggressive form of cancer that is caused by exposure to asbestos, which incidence is increasing worldwide (1). The global mesothelioma burden is estimated to be in the range of 36,300 to 38,400 annual deaths, according to the database of The World Health Organization (WHO) (1994 to 2014) (2). MPM has very poor prognosis due to its chemoresistance and radioresistance, with the median survival time (MST) of 9–12 months (3,4). MPM is difficult to early diagnosis resulting in few surgery opportunities for most patients with MPM. Therefore, early detection and diagnosis of MPM may help to increase its surgery opportunity and improve its prognosis. In nowadays, several molecules, including estrogen receptors (5), matrix metalloproteinase 2 and 9 (6,7) have been reported as biomarkers for MPM. However, these factors were not available for early diagnosis due to lack of specificity. Therefore, it is very valuable to find a new prognostic factor for early diagnosis of MPM. Mesothelin is a glycosylphosphatidylinositol (GPI)-anchored cell-surface protein, which level of expression is low in normal tissues and high in a variety of malignant tumors, such as ovarian cancer, pancreatic cancer (8), and mesotheliomas (9). It has been reported that mesothelin can be as a marker of neoplastic progression and immunotherapy target in gastroesophageal cancer (10). However, the prognostic value of soluble mesothelin in malignant pleural mesothelioma remains unclear. In the present study, the mesothelin expression profile in MPM tissues was analyzed using immunohistochemistry (IHC) staining method, and its prognostic value was evaluated using statistic methods.

Methods

Patients and specimens

Thirty-eight patients with diagnosed MPM in the Second Hospital of Shandong University between May 2007 and December 2014 were enrolled, and followed up to August 2015. Tumor grade were determined according to the staging of International Mesothelioma Interest group (IMIG). This study was approved by the Ethics Committee of the Second Hospital of Shandong University (Permit Number: 20140195). The trial was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki (as revised in 2013). Because of the retrospective nature of the research, the requirement for informed consent was waived.

Immunohistochemistry

Paraffin-embedded MPM specimens were cut into 5 mm sections for immunohistochemistry analysis. Sections were deparaffinized in xylene and then rehydrated with ethanol. For antigen retrieval, the specimens were incubated in a microwave oven (95 °C) in ethylene diamine tetraacetic acid (EDTA) (ZLI-9068, Zhongshan Golden Bridge Bio-technology, China) for 15 min. After natural cooling, endogenous peroxidase activity was blocked with 3% hydrogen peroxide for 15 min at room temperature. Then, sections were washed with phosphate buffer saline (PBS) for 5 min. Nonspecific antibody binding was blocked with goat serum (ZLI-9022, Zhongshan Golden Bridge Biotechnology, China) for 10 min. Subsequently, the specimens were incubated with rabbit polyclonal anti-mesothelin antibody (1:200, ab96869, abcam, UK) at 4 °C for overnight. Rewarming at 37 °C and then washed with PBS, the specimens were incubated with goat anti-rabbit secondary antibody conjugated with horseradish peroxidase (HRP) (PV-9000, Zhongshan Golden Bridge Bio-technology, China). Counter-stained with hematoxylin, the sections were rinsed, dehydrated and covered.

Immunohistochemical scoring

The randomly selected slides were evaluated by two independent pathologists who were blinded to the clinical status of patients. The intensity of mesothelin expression was scored from 0 to 3+ according to the percentage of positive cells: 0 (trace or 1–25% positive expression), 1+ (26–50% positive expression), 2+ (51–75% positive expression), 3+ (76–100% positive expression). Scores of 0 and 1+ were classified as low expression and scores of 2+ and 3+ were classified as high expression.

Statistical analysis

SPSS 17.0software (SPSS Inc., Chicago, IL) was used to perform statistical analysis. The correlation between mesothelin expression and pathologic and staging features was analyzed by Fisher’s exact test. Survival information was plotted using the Kaplan-Meier curves and the log rank test. Univariate and multivariate analysis of prognostic factors was performed using Cox’s proportional hazards regression model. P<0.05 was used as the cut-off value and considered statistically significant.

Results

Mesothelin expression and patient characteristics in MPM

A total of 38 patients were enrolled in the present study, including 30 males and 8 females. Median patient age was 66.11±9.45 years. Twenty-six cases (68%) had a smoking history. 29 (76%) patients were epithelioid type and the others were non-epithelioid type, which included sarcomatoid and biphasic. More details were shown in .
Table 1

Clinical characteristics of the MPM patients with expression of mesothelin

Mesothelin expressionLowHighP value
Cases2612
Gender1.000
   Male2010
   Female62
Age0.694
   <6064
   ≥60208
Smoking status0.030*
   Non-smoker121
   Smoker1411
Stage1.000
   Early (I-II)115
   Late (III-IV)157
Pathological type0.002*
   Epithelioid245
   Non-epithelioid27

*indicates statistical significant difference.

*indicates statistical significant difference. The high-level expression of mesothelin were significantly associated with higher in smokers (P=0.030) and non-epithelioid type (P=0.002). There is no significant difference of mesothelin expression in other clinic characteristics. Representative pictures for mesothelin staining are shown in .
Figure 1

Immunohistochemical results of mesothelin expression in MPM patients. Low-level expression of mesothelin are shown in A (magnification, 100×) and B (magnification, 200×), and high-level expression are shown in C (magnification, 100×) and D (magnification, 200×).

Immunohistochemical results of mesothelin expression in MPM patients. Low-level expression of mesothelin are shown in A (magnification, 100×) and B (magnification, 200×), and high-level expression are shown in C (magnification, 100×) and D (magnification, 200×).

Relationship between overall survival of MPM and patient characteristics or mesothelin expression

To determine the prognostic factors of MPM, the overall survival (OS) of MPM patients was analyzed based on IHC between patient characteristics and mesothelin expression respectively ().
Figure 2

Relationship between overall survival of MPM and patient characteristics or mesothelin expression. Kaplan-Meier survival curves by the status of (A) gender, (B) age, (C) smoking status, (D) stage, (E) pathological type, (F) mesothelin expression.

Relationship between overall survival of MPM and patient characteristics or mesothelin expression. Kaplan-Meier survival curves by the status of (A) gender, (B) age, (C) smoking status, (D) stage, (E) pathological type, (F) mesothelin expression. The smokers have shorter OS (9.63±1.11 months) than those who do not smoke (17.02±1.47 months) (P=0.014, ). The other significant difference of OS was between epithelioid type (14.62±1.32 months) and non-epithelioid type (6.17±1.37 months) (P<0.001, ). These results are in accord with the established knowledge. It is worth noting that the patients with high expression (7.47±1.48 months) of mesothelin had shorter OS than those with low expression (14.72±1.30 months) (P=0.005 ). However, no significant difference of OS was observed in subgroup of gender, age and stage (). To determine which factors had the influence on the MPM patients’ overall survival, various possible predictive factors were engaged in univariate analysis (). The results indicated that smoking status (P=0.023), pathological type (P<0.001), and mesothelin expression (P=0.009) had significant effects on OS, which confirmed to the results of Kaplan-Meier overall survival curve. By multivariate Cox analysis, it was confirmed that non-epithelioid type (P=0.037) and high mesothelin expression (P=0.038) were the independent negative prognostic factors of OS for patients with MPM ().
Table 2

Univariate analysis of overall survival in 38 patients with MPM

Patient characteristicsOverall survival hazard radio95% CIP value
Gender: male vs. female2.2840.870–6.0010.094
Age: <60 vs. ≥600.9820.435–2.2160.965
Smoking status: no vs. yes0.4080.189–0.8820.023*
Stage: I-II vs. III-IV1.1040.553–2.2860.790
Pathological type: Epithelioid vs. non- epithelioid0.1920.076–0.4820.000*
Mesothelin: low vs. high0.3480.158–0.7650.009*

*indicates statistical significant difference.

Table 3

Multivariate analysis of overall survival in 38 patients with MPM

Patient characteristicsOverall survival hazard radio95% CIP value
Gender: male vs. female1.9800.631–6.2170.242
Age: <60 vs. ≥600.8210.347–1.9400.653
Smoking status: no vs. yes0.6300.244–1.6260.911
Stage: I-II vs. III-IV1.0670.494–2.3040.869
Pathological type: Epithelioid vs. non- epithelioid0.3300.116–0.9350.037*
Mesothelin: low vs. high0.3770.150–0.9470.038*

*indicates statistical significant difference.

*indicates statistical significant difference. *indicates statistical significant difference.

Discussion and conclusion

High-level expression of mesothelin has been reported in several type of malignant tumors including MPM, lung, ovarian, pancreatic and esophageal cancer (8-10). However, its prognostic value in patients with MPM was still unknown. In the present study, the relationship between mesothelin expression and prognosis of MPM was investigated. Mesothelin is a 40-kDa glycosyl-phosphatidylinositol-linked cell-surface glycoprotein (11). It has been reported that it might play an important role in cell adhesion and metastasis in ovarian cancers (8) and be a potential marker of neoplastic progression (12,13). In human lung cancer and mesothelioma cells, overexpression of mesothelin can promote epithelial-to-mesenchymal transition and tumorigenicity, then leads to tumor growth and metastasis (9). In MPM, it has been known that male gender, age and asbestos exposure are considered as poor prognostic factors (14,15). Perspective from pathology in MPM, non-epithelioid type may have a worse prognosis and a longer history of asbestos exposure of higher intensity (16,17). In the present study, it has been showed that the high-level expression of mesothelin was prevalent in the smokers and non-epithelioid type. Meanwhile, the patients with high mesothelin expression showed a significantly lower OS than those with low expression. Multivariate analysis determined that mesothelin was a independent negative prognostic factor in OS of patients. As the mesothelin expression could be easily detected by immunohistochemistry, it can be served as a promising tumor biomarker for prognosis in MPM patients. Though the previous study presented the survival advantage in female MPM patients compared to male (17). There is no significant difference of OS between different genders in the present results. Moreover, patients in early stage have not showed longer survival duration than those in late stage. The reason might be the small number of enrolled cases. Therefore, a multi-institutional study which should enroll more MPM cases will be performed. Several studies showed that mesothelin might be a novel target for immunotherapy among several cancers (18). The treatment based on mesothelin antibody has been studied in ovarian, pancreatic cancer (8), gastroesophageal cancer (10), glioblastoma (11) and malignant mesothelioma (19). The present study confirmed that high-level expression of mesothelin in MPM predicted the poor prognosis and act as a n independent factor. Therefore, the down-regulation expression of mesothelin in MPM would be considered as a novel target therapy for MPM.
  17 in total

Review 1.  Malignant pleural mesothelioma: an update on diagnosis and treatment options.

Authors:  Sanjana Kondola; David Manners; Anna K Nowak
Journal:  Ther Adv Respir Dis       Date:  2016-02-12       Impact factor: 4.031

2.  Efficacy of Anti-mesothelin Immunotoxin RG7787 plus Nab-Paclitaxel against Mesothelioma Patient-Derived Xenografts and Mesothelin as a Biomarker of Tumor Response.

Authors:  Jingli Zhang; Swati Khanna; Qun Jiang; Christine Alewine; Markku Miettinen; Ira Pastan; Raffit Hassan
Journal:  Clin Cancer Res       Date:  2016-09-15       Impact factor: 12.531

Review 3.  Prognostic factors in malignant pleural mesothelioma.

Authors:  Ben Davidson
Journal:  Hum Pathol       Date:  2015-02-28       Impact factor: 3.466

4.  Adenosine diphosphate regulates MMP2 and MMP9 activity in malignant mesothelioma cells.

Authors:  Antonella Muscella; Luca Giulio Cossa; Carla Vetrugno; Giovanna Antonaci; Santo Marsigliante
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2018-07-08       Impact factor: 5.691

5.  Oestrogen receptors are prognostic factors in malignant peritoneal mesothelioma.

Authors:  Krishna Pillai; Mohammad Hossein Pourgholami; Terence C Chua; David Lawson Morris
Journal:  J Cancer Res Clin Oncol       Date:  2013-03-06       Impact factor: 4.553

6.  Contemporary Analysis of Prognostic Factors in Patients with Unresectable Malignant Pleural Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Andrea Billé; Lee M Krug; Kaitlin M Woo; Valerie W Rusch; Marjorie G Zauderer
Journal:  J Thorac Oncol       Date:  2015-12-10       Impact factor: 15.609

7.  Novel Antibody Therapeutics Targeting Mesothelin In Solid Tumors.

Authors:  Xiao-Yan Zhao; Babu Subramanyam; Nenad Sarapa; Sven Golfier; Harald Dinter
Journal:  Clin Cancer Drugs       Date:  2016-10

8.  Evaluation of Matrix Metalloproteinase 9 Serum Concentration as a Biomarker in Malignant Mesothelioma.

Authors:  Danijela Štrbac; Katja Goričar; Vita Dolžan; Viljem Kovač
Journal:  Dis Markers       Date:  2019-05-02       Impact factor: 3.434

9.  Mesothelin as a novel biomarker and immunotherapeutic target in human glioblastoma.

Authors:  Ernest Dodoo; Markus Maeurer; Zhenjiang Liu; Martin Rao; Thomas Poiret; Silvia Nava; Qingda Meng; Anna von Landenberg; Jiri Bartek; Shanshan Xie; Georges Sinclair; Inti Peredo
Journal:  Oncotarget       Date:  2017-08-16

10.  Estimation of the global burden of mesothelioma deaths from incomplete national mortality data.

Authors:  Chimed-Ochir Odgerel; Ken Takahashi; Tom Sorahan; Tim Driscoll; Christina Fitzmaurice; Makoto Yoko-O; Kittisak Sawanyawisuth; Sugio Furuya; Fumihiro Tanaka; Seichi Horie; Nico van Zandwijk; Jukka Takala
Journal:  Occup Environ Med       Date:  2017-09-02       Impact factor: 4.402

View more
  1 in total

Review 1.  Near-Infrared Photoimmunotherapy for Thoracic Cancers: A Translational Perspective.

Authors:  Kohei Matsuoka; Mizuki Yamada; Mitsuo Sato; Kazuhide Sato
Journal:  Biomedicines       Date:  2022-07-11
  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.