Literature DB >> 35117295

Expression profiling analysis reveals molecular mechanism of Lnc00675 downregulation promoting cell apoptosis in acute myeloid leukemia U937 cells.

Miao Miao1, Mengqi Li1, Zhuogang Liu1, Wei Yang1, Chen Wang1, Rong Hu1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Acute myeloid leukemia (AML), an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis, is the most common in adult leukemia. Long non-coding RNA (lncRNA) could affect the regulation of protein-coding genes, cell proliferation and apoptosis, tumor cell resistance to radio- and chemotherapy and pathological processes. Lnc00675 is a lncRNA also known as transmembrane protein 238 like (TMEM238L), which identified as a marker of tumor promoter and unfavorable prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma, glioma and cervical cancer. However, the association between Lnc00675 and hematological tumors has not been previously reported.
METHODS: Expression profile gene chip technology was used to screen for differentially expressed genes (DEGs) through comparing Lnc00675 overexpression and Lnc00675 downregulation. Gene ontology (GO) analysis was performed to identify the biologic implications of the DEGs. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis was performed to identify biologically important pathways associated with the DEGs. Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay and flow cytometric analysis were utilized to detect the cell proliferation rate and the cell apoptosis rate, respectively.
RESULTS: Comparing Lnc00675 overexpression and Lnc00675 downregulation, a total of 866 and 1,115 DEGs were upregulated and downregulated, respectively. Bioinformatics analysis indicated that Lnc00675 might affect U937 cells proliferation and apoptosis through JAK-STAT signaling pathway and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. The cell proliferation rate in si-Lnc00675 group was significantly lower than those of si-NC group and Lnc00675 group (P<0.05). The cell apoptosis rate of si-Lnc00675 group (22.93%±2.24%) was significantly higher than those of si-NC group (0.37%±0.88%) and Lnc00675 group (0.73%±0.35%) (P<0.01).
CONCLUSIONS: Downregulation of lnc00675 expression inhibited proliferation and promoted apoptosis in human leukemia U937 cells. 2020 Translational Cancer Research. All rights reserved.

Entities:  

Keywords:  JAK-STAT signaling pathway; Lnc00675; PI3K-Akt signaling pathway; U937 cells; acute myeloid leukemia (AML); expression profile analysis

Year:  2020        PMID: 35117295      PMCID: PMC8798533          DOI: 10.21037/tcr-20-1714

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Transl Cancer Res        ISSN: 2218-676X            Impact factor:   1.241


Introduction

Acute myeloid leukemia (AML), an aggressive malignancy with poor prognosis, is the most common in adult leukemia. The therapeutic efficacy of patients with AML remains poor, with only 40% young patients (<60 years old) or 10% patients (>60 years old) achieving long-term survival (1). The pathological mechanism of AML is a series of events including changes in cell proliferation, differentiation, and apoptosis caused by pathogenic factors, such as somatic mutations, cytogenetic abnormalities, epigenetic changes (2,3). Long non-coding RNAs (lncRNAs) are e a class of RNAs longer than 200 nucleotides, which don’t have the function of encoding proteins (4). LncRNA could affect protein-coding gene regulation, cell proliferation and apoptosis, tumor cell resistance to radio- and chemotherapy and pathological processes by participating in transcriptional regulation and post-transcriptional regulation (5-8). Accumulating evidence supports that misregulation of lncRNA-based epigenetic networks contribute to many types of cancer (9,10). Lnc00675 is a lncRNA also known as transmembrane protein 238 like (TMEM238L), and is identified as a marker of tumor promoter and unfavorable prognosis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (11), glioma (12) and cervical cancer (13). In spite of the aforementioned link between Lnc00675 and cancer, very few researches have been carried out to find the molecular mechanism of Lnc00675 in cancer metastasis. Li et al. reported the positively correlation between Lnc00675 expression and TRIP6 protein expression in glioma tissues and cell lines (12). Ma et al. reported that LINC00675 promoted cervical tumorigenesis by modulating the Wnt/β-catenin pathway (13). However, the association between Lnc00675 and hematological tumors has not been previously reported. In the current study, we analyzed the effect of Lnc00675 on proliferation and apoptosis in human leukemia U937 cells, and the other aim of the current study was to investigate molecular mechanism of Lnc00675 using expression profiling analysis. Our results probably identify Lnc00675 as a novel therapeutic target and provide a new perspective for molecular mechanisms of AML.

Methods

Cell culture and transfection

Human leukemia U937 cells (RRID: CVCL_0007) was cultured in 90% RPMI-1640 (Hyclone, USA) + 10% FBS (Gibco, USA) + penicillin (100 U/mL) and streptomycin (100 g/mL). Cells were cultured under 5% CO2 and 95% air in an incubator set at 37 °C. U937 cells in logarithmic growth phase were divided into three groups, such as Lnc00675 group, si-Lnc00675 group and si-NC group. U937 cells were seeded in 25 cm2 cell culture flasks.

Cell transfection

Transfections were performed using LipofectamineTM 2000 (Invitrogen, USA). U937 cells suspended in serum-free RPMI-1640 were inoculated in 25 cm2 cell culture flasks to undergo transfection with Lnc00675 overexpression vector (Lnc00675 group), Lnc00675 siRNA vector (si-Lnc00675 group), and Lnc00675 siRNA negative control vector (si-NC group), respectively. All nucleotide vectors were purchased from Shanghai Genechem Co., Ltd. (China).

Microarray analysis

U937 cells of Lnc00675 group and si-Lnc00675 were isolated, pelleted cells by centrifugation, respectively. Used 1 mL of TRIzol Reagent (Invitrogen, USA) to lyse 1×107 U937 cells by repetitive pipetting. Microarray experiments were conducted by Shanghai KangChen Biotech (China) with Agilent Human 4x44K Gene Expression Microarray chips with 444,000 probes, the Agilent One-Color Microarray-Based Gene Expression Analysis protocol was used, including total RNA Clean-up and RNA QC, purify the labeled/amplified RNA and labeled cRNA QC, hybridization, microarray Wash, Scanning, extract data using Agilent Feature Extraction software. Bioconductor DESeq2 version 1.12.3 (https://www.rdocumentation.org/packages/DESeq2) was used to identify differentially expressed genes (DEGs) using a fold change (FC) >2 for significant upregulation or significant downregulation and a false discovery rate (FDR) <0.05. A scatter plot was drawn according to the analysis of the DEGs. Gene ontology (GO, www.geneontology.org) analysis was performed to identify the biologic implications of the DEGs. Fisher’s exact test was used to identify the significant GO terms with FDR-adjusted P values. Kyoto Encyclopedia of Genes and Genomes (KEGG) pathway analysis was performed to identify biologically important pathways associated with the DEGs. Fisher’s exact test was used to select the significant pathways based on P values (P<0.05) and FDR (FDR <0.27).

Cell apoptosis detection by flow cytometry

The cells of Lnc00675 group, si-Lnc00675 group and si-NC group were seeded in 6-well cell culture plate, respectively. After 48 h of transfection, the U937 cells were washed with PBS. Flow cytometry was used to detect the apoptosis rates of the three groups. The staining was performed by Annexin V-FITC/PI double staining method (GenStar, China). Binding buffer was used to resuspend cells, 5 µL of Annexin V-FITC was added, then incubated at room temperature for 15 minutes in the dark. PI staining (5 µL) was added for 5 minutes before detection. A FACS Calibur cell analyzer (BD Biosciences) was used to analyze cell apoptosis and apoptosis rate. The percentages of apoptotic cells including early apoptotic cells (Annexin V+/PI− cells) and late stage apoptotic cells (Annexin V+/PI+ cells) were calculated.

Cell Counting Kit-8 (CCK-8) assay

The viability of U937 cells was detected using CCK-8 assay (Coffit, China). U937 cells (1×105 cells/mL) in the logarithmic growth phase were prepared as cell suspensions using RPMI-1640 containing 10% FBS. Cell suspension (100 µL) was inoculated into a well of 96-well plates. 96-well plate was incubated at 37 °C and 5% CO2 for 24, 48 or 72 h after transfection. CCK-8 solution (10 µL) was added to each well and incubated for 2 h at 37 °C. The absorbance of each well was measured by microplate reader (Shanghai Flash Spectrum Biotechnology, China) at a wavelength of 450 nm. The proliferation rate was calculated using the equation: proliferation rate (%) = (ODtreatment − ODblank)/(ODcontrol − ODblank) ×100%.

Statistical analysis

GO and KEGG analyses were performed using the online database DAVID 6.8 (https://david.ncifcrf.gov/). The difference between 2 groups was determined by unpaired Student’s t‐test using GraphPad prism 8.0 software. The differences were considered statistically significant at P<0.05. All experimental results are presented as the mean ± SD.

Results

Differential gene expression

By comparing Lnc00675 group with si-Lnc00675 group, the microarray analysis determined a total of 1,981 DEGs (FC ≥2) (): 866 genes were upregulated and the remaining 1,115 genes were downregulated. showed the TOP50 upregulated genes and the TOP50 downregulated genes, respectively.
Figure 1

Scatter plot of upregulated and downregulated differentially expressed genes comparing between Lnc00675 group and si-Lnc00675.

Table 1

The TOP50 upregulated genes (Lnc00675 vs. si-Lnc00675)

NO.Gene symbolDescriptionProbe NameGenBank accessionFold change
1CCINCalicinA_23_P60227NM_0058931,964.76
2LOC100129931Uncharacterized LOC100129931A_33_P3277883NR_0338281,235.66
3CCDC64BCoiled-coil domain containing 64BA_33_P3335590NM_001103175161.49
4CEP104Centrosomal protein 104 kDaA_33_P3405754BC05072159.59
5RAB7AMember RAS oncogene familyA_33_P3226492AF11989151.25
6SFNStratifinA_33_P3389286NM_00614251.13
7UTP18UTP18 small subunit processome componentA_23_P130020NM_01600142.96
8LINC01123Long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1123A_33_P3228609NR_04611042.82
9LINC01061Long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1061A_24_P691775NR_03759642.68
10KRTAP1-4Keratin associated protein 1-4A_33_P3213006NM_00125730542.59
11FAM178BFamily with sequence similarity 178 member BA_33_P3287119NM_00112264634.59
12EFTUD1Elongation factor Tu GTP binding domain containing 1A_24_P754817NM_02458033.30
13MAGIXMAGI family member, X-linkedA_24_P66105NM_02485931.73
14DHRS4L1Dehydrogenase/reductase SDR family member 4 like 1A_33_P3359368NM_00127786429.70
15SHISA5Shisa family member 5A_33_P3270636NM_00127206829.61
16SLC51BSolute carrier family 51, beta subunitA_23_P436284NM_17885928.48
17TBC1D31TBC1 domain family, member 31A_23_P334218NM_14564728.18
18PPP1R14AProtein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 14AA_33_P3401647NM_03325627.34
19JAKMIP2Janus kinase and microtubule interacting protein 2A_33_P3255290NM_01479026.58
20RAP1GAP2RAP1 GTPase activating protein 2A_24_P36890NM_00288526.24
21OR52E8Olfactory receptor, family 52, subfamily E, member 8A_33_P3281990NM_00100516825.55
22SSPOSCO-SpondinA_33_P3277178AK09343125.43
23PPP1R1AProtein phosphatase 1, regulatory (inhibitor) subunit 1AA_33_P3383471AK12396925.30
24MAGEB6Melanoma antigen family B, 6A_33_P3368755NM_17352324.11
25BCRBreakpoint cluster regionA_24_P127235NM_00432724.05
26DCLRE1BDNA cross-link repair 1BA_24_P54131NM_02283623.81
27RNF150Ring finger protein 150A_24_P350589NM_02072423.74
28HERC6HECT and RLD domain containing E3 ubiquitin protein ligase family member 6A_33_P3315779NM_00116513623.19
29CUL4ACullin 4AA_33_P3322909NM_00127851323.00
30SCOC-AS1SCOC antisense RNA 1A_24_P145019NR_03393922.94
31ATXN3LAtaxin 3-likeA_23_P361744NM_00113599522.73
32BTN3A1Butyrophilin, subfamily 3, member A1A_33_P3388466NM_00704822.47
33AKAP12A kinase (PRKA) anchor protein 12A_23_P111311NM_14449721.77
34CDCA7Cell division cycle associated 7A_33_P3296169NM_03194221.75
35ZDHHC3Zinc finger, DHHC-type containing 3A_33_P3327479NM_01659821.66
36STARD13StAR-related lipid transfer (START) domain containing 13A_23_P342727NM_17800621.51
37CTNND1Catenin, delta 1A_33_P3209716NM_00120688521.20
38PPAN-P2RY11PPAN-P2RY11 readthroughA_33_P3239759NM_00119869021.06
39REP15RAB15 effector proteinA_33_P3247624NM_00102987420.87
40MECP2Methyl CpG binding protein 2A_33_P3339036NM_00111079220.70
41PIK3R5Phosphoinositide-3-kinase, regulatory subunit 5A_23_P66543NM_01430820.65
42THOC2THO complex 2A_33_P3235690NM_00108155020.63
43ZCCHC13Zinc finger, CCHC domain containing 13A_32_P11096NM_20330320.20
44EGFREpidermal growth factor receptorA_33_P3351944NM_20128320.01
45FBXO2F-box protein 2A_23_P45999NM_01216819.78
46BICC1Bicc family RNA binding protein 1A_33_P3293913NM_00108051219.61
47PCM1Pericentriolar material 1A_24_P555510NM_00619719.56
48SPECC1LSperm antigen with calponin homology and coiled-coil domains 1-likeA_33_P3214027NM_00125473219.26
49RIMS3Regulating synaptic membrane exocytosis 3A_23_P319583NM_01474719.16
50TRHDE-AS1TRHDE antisense RNA 1A_33_P3311493NR_02683619.03
Table 2

The TOP50 downregulated genes (Lnc00675 vs. si-Lnc00675)

NO.Gene symbolDescriptionProbe nameGenBank accessionFold change
1DBF4BDBF4 zinc finger BA_24_P253780NM_145663910.03
2KAT2BK(lysine) acetyltransferase 2BA_32_P159651NM_003884426.94
3FAM50BFamily with sequence similarity 50, member BA_23_P8240NM_012135214.33
4CPSF4LCleavage and polyadenylation specific factor 4-likeA_33_P3265194135.99
5LOC651337Uncharacterized LOC651337A_33_P3617190AK12411969.68
6NOC3LNucleolar complex associated 3 homologA_23_P202496NM_02245156.46
7MED23Mediator complex subunit 23A_23_P330999NM_01597955.58
8DPH2DPH2 homologA_24_P393844NM_00138447.56
9FOXN2Forkhead box N2A_32_P140898NM_00215828.38
10SLCO3A1Solute carrier organic anion transporter family, member 3A1A_24_P336276NM_01327226.61
11TMEM63ATransmembrane protein 63AA_23_P200489NM_01469825.86
12RBM5RNA binding motif protein 5A_23_P18276NM_00577825.57
13MAP4Microtubule-associated protein 4A_23_P211814NM_00237522.55
14IRF3Interferon regulatory factor 3A_23_P27677NM_00157118.69
15SUGCTSuccinyl-CoA:glutarate-CoA transferaseA_23_P145711NM_02472815.75
16IQSEC2IQ motif and Sec7 domain 2A_23_P330788NM_01507515.01
17ELMOD3ELMO/CED-12 domain containing 3A_33_P3297302NM_00113502114.54
18MEF2BNBMEF2B neighborA_33_P3354771AK05716114.32
19UNC80Unc-80 homologA_33_P3410251AK09081514.23
20LRRC8CLeucine rich repeat containing 8 family, member CA_33_P3406030NM_03227014.13
21ELF4E74-like factor 4A_24_P340066NM_00142113.86
22METTL20Methyltransferase like 20A_33_P3318966NM_17380212.63
23C2CD4CC2 calcium-dependent domain containing 4CA_33_P3215412NM_00113626312.40
24ZBTB7Czinc finger and BTB domain containing 7CA_33_P3402304NM_00103936012.04
25NEUROD2Neuronal differentiation 2A_32_P25295NM_00616011.83
26RASD3RASD family member 3A_33_P3349912NM_00125735710.53
27PCDHGC4Protocadherin gamma subfamily C, 4A_23_P303101NM_03240610.50
28TMEM254Transmembrane protein 254A_23_P97853NM_02512510.23
29ANK2Ankyrin 2A_33_P3287967NM_0011489.69
30LOC101928000Uncharacterized LOC101928000A_33_P3258712XR_2435839.43
31SLC31A1Solute carrier family 31, member 1A_24_P321068NM_0018599.39
32LOC100133985Uncharacterized LOC100133985A_33_P3422654NR_0244449.36
33LINC01349Long intergenic non-protein coding RNA 1349A_33_P3300067NR_0389149.27
34CHERPCalcium homeostasis endoplasmic reticulum proteinA_23_P16139NM_0063879.26
35SPRR2CSmall proline-rich protein 2CA_23_P126089NR_0030629.12
36NDRG1N-myc downstream regulated 1A_23_P20494NM_0060969.11
37SLC9A4Solute carrier family 9, subfamily A, member 4A_33_P3396270NM_0010115529.06
38GSTM2P1Glutathione S-transferase mu 2 pseudogene 1A_23_P58869NR_0029328.68
39OR2A2Olfactory receptor, family 2, subfamily A, member 2A_33_P3394312NM_0010054808.68
40PFKFB36-phosphofructo-2-kinase/fructose-2,6-biphosphatase 3A_24_P206604NM_0045668.47
41TPSAB1Tryptase alpha/beta 1A_23_P37702NM_0032947.97
42KIF2CKinesin family member 2CA_23_P34788NM_0068457.88
43SLC6A8Solute carrier family 6, member 8A_23_P159937NM_0056297.74
44ITGA11Integrin, alpha 11A_33_P3353791NM_1815017.58
45ANXA2RAnnexin A2 receptorA_33_P3299279NM_0010142797.49
46GINS1GINS complex subunit 1A_33_P3340025NM_0210677.49
47LOC283887Uncharacterized LOC283887A_33_P3677061XR_1326077.39
48FAM178AFamily with sequence similarity 178, member AA_23_P356139NM_0181217.24
49CLEC12BC-type lectin domain family 12, member BA_33_P3303519NM_2058527.11
50GCRG224Gastric cancer-related gene GCRG224A_33_P3398867AF4384067.09
Scatter plot of upregulated and downregulated differentially expressed genes comparing between Lnc00675 group and si-Lnc00675.

GO analysis of the DEGs

GO analysis contained three domains that represent gene function based on cellular component, biological process and molecular function. A total of 1,385 DEGs were associated with the cell composition domain, of which 608 were upregulated () and 777 genes were downregulated (). The TOP5 enrichment score biological process terms were “non-membrane-bounded organelle”, “intracellular non-membrane-bounded organelle”, “cytoplasmic vesicle”, “intracellular vesicle” and “cytoplasmic part”. A total of 1,320 DEGs were associated with the biological process domain, of which 581 were upregulated () and 739 were down-regulated (). The TOP5 enrichment score biological process terms were “oxoacid metabolic process”, “oxidation-reduction process”, “organic acid metabolic process”, “carboxylic acid metabolic process” and “small molecule metabolic process”. A total of 1,324 DEGs were associated with the molecular function domain, of which 580 were upregulated () and 744 were down-regulated (). The five most enriched molecular function terms were “oxidoreductase activity”, “protein binding”, “steroid dehydrogenase activity, acting on the CH-OH group of donors, NAD or NADP as acceptor”, “protein binding” and “oxidoreductase activity, acting on paired donors, with incorporation or reduction of molecular oxygen”.
Figure 2

Gene ontology cellular component classification. (A) Cellular component classification of upregulated differentially expressed genes; (B) cellular component classification of downregulated differentially expressed genes.

Figure 3

Gene ontology biological process classification. (A) Biological process classification of upregulated differentially expressed genes; (B) biological process classification of downregulated differentially expressed genes.

Figure 4

Gene ontology molecular function classification. (A) Molecular function classification of upregulated differentially expressed genes; (B) molecular function classification of downregulated differentially expressed genes.

Gene ontology cellular component classification. (A) Cellular component classification of upregulated differentially expressed genes; (B) cellular component classification of downregulated differentially expressed genes. Gene ontology biological process classification. (A) Biological process classification of upregulated differentially expressed genes; (B) biological process classification of downregulated differentially expressed genes. Gene ontology molecular function classification. (A) Molecular function classification of upregulated differentially expressed genes; (B) molecular function classification of downregulated differentially expressed genes.

Pathway analysis of the DEGs

Pathway analysis of the DEGs allows the identification of DEGs related to specific cell pathways. Pathway analysis revealed that DEGs were significantly enriched in 73 pathways (). The upregulated genes were involved in 23 pathways and the downregulated DEGs were involved in 50 pathways. The upregulated DEGs were mainly involved in “JAK-STAT signaling pathway”, “Cell cycle”, “Amoebiasis”, “Necroptosis”, “Nucleotide excision repair”, “Inflammatory bowel disease (IBD)”, “Adrenergic signaling in cardiomyocytes”, “ErbB signaling pathway”, “PI3K-Akt signaling pathway” and “Renal cell carcinoma”. The downregulated DEGs were mainly involved in “Steroid biosynthesis”, “Glycosaminoglycan degradation”, “Adherens junction”, “Lysosome, Ferroptosis”, “HIF-1 signaling pathway”, “Central carbon metabolism in cancer”, “Carbon metabolism”, “Glycolysis/Gluconeogenesis”, “Amino sugar and nucleotide sugar metabolism” and “Fatty acid metabolism”.
Figure 5

Significantly enrichment pathway analysis of differentially expressed (DE) genes. (A) Upregulated DE genes involved in the Top10 pathways; (B) downregulated DE genes involved in the Top10 pathways.

Significantly enrichment pathway analysis of differentially expressed (DE) genes. (A) Upregulated DE genes involved in the Top10 pathways; (B) downregulated DE genes involved in the Top10 pathways.

Effects of Lnc00675 on proliferation and apoptosis in U937 cells

The proliferation rate of si-Lnc00675 group was significantly lower than those of si-NC group and Lnc00675 group at all three time points (P<0.05). There was no significant difference in proliferation rate between si-NC group and Lnc00675 group (P>0.05) (). Flow cytometric analysis indicated that the downregulation of Lnc00675 significantly promoted cell apoptosis. The cell apoptosis rate of si-Lnc00675 group (22.93±2.24) was significantly higher than those of si-NC group (0.37±0.88) and Lnc00675 group (0.73±0.35) (P>0.01) ().
Figure 6

Downregulation of Lnc00675 expression inhibited proliferation and induced cell apoptosis in U937 cells. (A) Cell proliferation was measured by CCK8 assay in U937 cells of Lnc00675 group, si-Lnc00675 group and si-NC group; (B) flow cytometry assay was performed to examine cell apoptosis in U937 of Lnc00675 group, si-Lnc00675 group and si-NC group. *, P<0.05 between si-Lnc00675 group and si-NC group or Lnc00675 group.

Downregulation of Lnc00675 expression inhibited proliferation and induced cell apoptosis in U937 cells. (A) Cell proliferation was measured by CCK8 assay in U937 cells of Lnc00675 group, si-Lnc00675 group and si-NC group; (B) flow cytometry assay was performed to examine cell apoptosis in U937 of Lnc00675 group, si-Lnc00675 group and si-NC group. *, P<0.05 between si-Lnc00675 group and si-NC group or Lnc00675 group.

Discussion

With the increasing understanding of the lncRNA, the association between tumorigenesis and lncRNA has attracted more and more attention. Notably, Multiple AML researches had shown that the high expression of lncRNA could lead to promote cell proliferation, repress apoptosis, worse prognosis and poor treatment outcomes, such as ZEB2-AS1 (14), lnc-SOX6-1 (15), lnc-CRNDE (16), lnc-HOTAIR (17). With regard to glioma, the high expression of Lnc00675 was dramatically associated with large tumor and advanced World Health Organization grade size (12). The high expression of Lnc00675 positively correlated with poor survival, perineural invasion and lymph node metastasis in patients with pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma (11). But there is currently no research results available for correlation between Lnc00675 and AML. In the present study, we first reported that the downregulation of Lnc00675 expression resulted in inhibiting cell proliferation and inducing cell apoptosis in U937 cells, but overexpression of Lnc00675 had no effect on the proliferation and apoptosis in U937 cells. The Wingless (Wnt)/β-catenin signaling pathway has been associated with metabolic reprogramming of cancer cells, cancer stem cells, tumorigenesis and tumor plasticity (18). Ma et al. reported that Lnc00675 inhibited apoptosis and promoted proliferation, migration and invasion though the Wnt/β-catenin pathway in cervical cancer cells, and lithium chloride could attenuate the effects of Lnc00675 knockdown (13). Shan et al. revealed that Lnc00675 downregulated miR-942 expression in colorectal cancer cells, and miR-942 bound to 3’UTR of glycogen synthase kinase-3β (GSK-3β, a kinase mediating β-catenin phosphorylation in Wnt/β-catenin pathway) by dual-luciferase reporter assay (19). At present, there are no studies investigating the molecular mechanism of Lnc00675 in AML cells. In this regard, KEGG pathway analysis were performed using standard enrichment calculation methods to reveal the molecular mechanism. The result of pathway analysis indicated that Lnc00675 involved in JAK-STAT signaling pathway and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. The activation of JAK-STAT signaling pathway was implicated in the pathogenesis of AML (20,21), and targeting of this pathway was an effective therapeutic strategy for AML (22,23). Dos Santos et al. demonstrated that the PI3K-Akt signaling pathway was constitutively activated in approximately 60% of AML patients cells (24). PI3K-Akt signaling pathway inhibitors, which used alone or with other drugs, have been proven effective for suppressing cell proliferation and promoting apoptosis in AML patients, cell lines or animal models (25). Epidermal growth factor receptor (EGFR) and interleukin 2 receptor subunit alpha (IL2RA) are involved in both JAK-STAT signaling pathway and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. Comparing upregulation of Lnc00675 with downregulation of Lnc00675, we found that the expressions of EGFR (FC =20.01) and IL2RA (FC =10.56) were drastically upregulated. EGFR is a cell membrane receptor tyrosine kinase, and mutant EGFR are meaningful serological markers for diagnosis of AML (26). EGFR small molecule inhibitors have been reported to induce complete and durable remission in AML patients (27). Researches indicated a strong association of IL2RA expression with tyrosine kinases pathways. Upregulation of IL2RA expression was correlated with upregulation expressions of fms related receptor tyrosine kinase 3 (FLT3) (28) and inhibitor of DNA binding 1 (ID1) (29), a key target of tyrosine kinases contributing to leukemia transformation. High expression of IL2RA mRNA was an independent and adverse prognostic factor in AML (30). The present study, to best of our knowledge, was the first to reveal that downregulation of Lnc00675 expression inhibited proliferation and promoted apoptosis in human leukemia U937 cells. By comparing upregulation of Lnc00675 and downregulation of Lnc00675. We identified 866 upregulated DEGs and 1,115 downregulated DEGs, and indicated that Lnc00675 probably affected U937 cells proliferation and apoptosis through JAK-STAT signaling pathway and PI3K-Akt signaling pathway. We will elucidate molecular mechanism of Lnc00675 in AML and further validate the Lnc00675-mediated signaling pathways in our following researches. The results obtained in the current study may aid in the elucidation of molecular mechanisms of Lnc00675 in AML and contribute to the development of target therapies to treat AML.
  30 in total

1.  [The PI3K/Akt/mTOR pathway: a new therapeutic target in the treatment of acute myeloid leukemia].

Authors:  Cédric Dos Santos; Christian Récher; Cécile Demur; Bernard Payrastre
Journal:  Bull Cancer       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 1.276

2.  Atiprimod blocks phosphorylation of JAK-STAT and inhibits proliferation of acute myeloid leukemia (AML) cells.

Authors:  Stefan Faderl; Alessandra Ferrajoli; David Harris; Quin Van; Hagop M Kantarjian; Zeev Estrov
Journal:  Leuk Res       Date:  2006-07-07       Impact factor: 3.156

3.  Interaction between 12p chromosomal abnormalities and Lnc-HOTAIR mediated pathway in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Nashwa El-Khazragy; Sherief Ghozy; Safa Matbouly; Walid Zaki; Gehan Safwat; Ghada Hussien; Omar Khalifa
Journal:  J Cell Biochem       Date:  2019-04-30       Impact factor: 4.429

4.  Erlotinib antagonizes ABC transporters in acute myeloid leukemia.

Authors:  Elodie Lainey; Marie Sébert; Sylvain Thépot; Marie Scoazec; Cyrielle Bouteloup; Carole Leroy; Stéphane De Botton; Lorenzo Galluzzi; Pierre Fenaux; Guido Kroemer
Journal:  Cell Cycle       Date:  2012-10-24       Impact factor: 4.534

5.  The lncRNA LINC00675 regulates cell proliferation, migration, and invasion by affecting Wnt/β-catenin signaling in cervical cancer.

Authors:  Shuyun Ma; Xiaohong Deng; Yang Yang; Qingqing Zhang; Ting Zhou; Zi Liu
Journal:  Biomed Pharmacother       Date:  2018-10-12       Impact factor: 6.529

6.  Id1 is a common downstream target of oncogenic tyrosine kinases in leukemic cells.

Authors:  Winnie F Tam; Ting-Lei Gu; Jing Chen; Benjamin H Lee; Lars Bullinger; Stefan Fröhling; Andrew Wang; Stefano Monti; Todd R Golub; D Gary Gilliland
Journal:  Blood       Date:  2008-06-17       Impact factor: 22.113

Review 7.  Transcriptional and Post-transcriptional Gene Regulation by Long Non-coding RNA.

Authors:  Iain M Dykes; Costanza Emanueli
Journal:  Genomics Proteomics Bioinformatics       Date:  2017-05-19       Impact factor: 7.691

Review 8.  Alteration of Epigenetic Regulation by Long Noncoding RNAs in Cancer.

Authors:  Mariangela Morlando; Alessandro Fatica
Journal:  Int J Mol Sci       Date:  2018-02-14       Impact factor: 5.923

Review 9.  Wnt Signaling in Cancer Metabolism and Immunity.

Authors:  Sara El-Sahli; Ying Xie; Lisheng Wang; Sheng Liu
Journal:  Cancers (Basel)       Date:  2019-06-28       Impact factor: 6.639

10.  Association of decreased expression of long non-coding RNA LOC285194 with chemoradiotherapy resistance and poor prognosis in esophageal squamous cell carcinoma.

Authors:  Yu-suo Tong; Xi-lei Zhou; Xiao-wei Wang; Qing-quan Wu; Tong-xin Yang; Jin Lv; Jin-song Yang; Bin Zhu; Xiu-feng Cao
Journal:  J Transl Med       Date:  2014-08-29       Impact factor: 5.531

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.