| Literature DB >> 35117255 |
Yang Luo1, Yicheng Shen1, Zhong Ju2, Zhi Zhang1.
Abstract
BACKGROUND: Colorectal cancer (CRC) is a common gastrointestinal malignant tumor that occurs in the colon site and accounts for 9% of the total malignant tumors. Among malignant tumors, its morbidity and mortality respectively rank third and fourth, seriously threatening human health and causing a heavy economic burden on society. ZIP7 (SLC39A7), a kind of zinc transporter, plays a crucial role in the self-renewal of intestinal epithelial cells; however, its role in CRC has not been extensively examined. Therefore, our study aimed to analyze the biological function and expression of this zinc transporter in CRC, along with its correlation with disease activity.Entities:
Keywords: ZIP7; colorectal neoplasms; gene expression; prognosis
Year: 2020 PMID: 35117255 PMCID: PMC8798949 DOI: 10.21037/tcr-20-2640
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Transl Cancer Res ISSN: 2218-676X Impact factor: 1.241
Figure 1Expression of ZIP7 in CRC tissues/adjacent tissues/and normal intestinal mucosa tissues: (A) CRC tissue, (B) adjacent tissues, (C) normal intestinal mucosa tissues. Scale bars =50 µm. CRC, colorectal cancer.
ZIP7 protein expression n (%)
| Variables | Total | ZIP7 | χ2 value | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | − | ||||
| Colorectal carcinoma tissue | 118 | 80 (67.8) | 38 (32.2) | – | – |
| Adjacent cancer tissues | 30 | 7 (23.3) | 23 (76.7) | 19.513 | 0.000 |
| Normal intestinal mucosa tissue | 30 | 3 (10) | 27 (90) | 32.440 | 0.000 |
Relationship between ZIP7 protein expression and clinicopathological characteristics of patients with colorectal cancer n (%)
| Variables | Total | ZIP7 | χ2 value | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + (n=80) | (n=38) | ||||
| Age | 0.662 | 0.416 | |||
| <60 | 81 | 53 (65.4) | 28 (34.6) | ||
| ≥60 | 37 | 27 (73.0) | 10 (27.0) | ||
| Gender | 0.128 | 0.720 | |||
| Male | 68 | 47 (69.1) | 21 (30.9) | ||
| Female | 50 | 33 (66.0) | 17 (34.0) | ||
| Size of tumor (cm) | 0.028 | 0.866 | |||
| <5 | 67 | 45 (67.2) | 22 (32.8) | ||
| ≥5 | 51 | 35 (68.6) | 16 (31.4) | ||
| Dukes | 8.350 | 0.039 | |||
| A | 14 | 7 (50.0) | 7 (50.0) | ||
| B | 42 | 24 (57.1) | 18 (42.9) | ||
| C | 34 | 28 (82.4) | 6 (17.6) | ||
| D | 28 | 21 (75.0) | 7 (25.0) | ||
| Lymph node metastasis | 7.554 | 0.006 | |||
| Yes | 62 | 49 (79.0) | 13 (21.0) | ||
| No | 56 | 31 (55.4) | 25 (44.6) | ||
| Invasion depth | 9.408 | 0.002 | |||
| T1 + T2 | 34 | 16 (47.1) | 18 (52.9) | ||
| T3 + T4 | 84 | 64 (76.2) | 20 (23.8) | ||
Figure 2Relationship between ZIP7 and the prognosis of color cancer.
Multifactor analysis of prognostic factors of colorectal cancer (CRC) patients (Cox proportional hazards model)
| Variables | B | SE | P | RR value | 95%CI |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dukes | 1.105 | 0.196 | 0.026 | 3.019 | 2.056–4.433 |
| Lymph node metastasis | 2.283 | 0.480 | 0.031 | 9.806 | 3.831–25.098 |
| Invasion depth | 1.016 | 0.412 | 0.014 | 2.761 | 1.232–6.189 |
| ZIP7 | 1.360 | 0.478 | 0.004 | 3.896 | 1.526–9.951 |
Relationship between postoperative recurrence of colorectal cancer and expression level of ZIP7 n (%)
| Recurrence | Total | ZIP7 | χ2 value | P value | |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| + | − | ||||
| Yes | 45 | 40 (88.9) | 5 (11.1) | 15.021 | 0.000 |
| No | 70 | 38 (54.3) | 32 (45.7) | ||