| Literature DB >> 35116070 |
Richard Komakech1,2,3, Nam-Hui Yim4, Ki-Shuk Shim5, Haiyoung Jung6,7, Jae-Eun Byun6,8, Jun Lee1,2, Denis Okello1,2, Motlalepula Gilbert Matsabisa6, Joseph O Erhabor9,10, Omolola Oyenihi9, Francis Omujal3, Moses Agwaya3, Yong-Goo Kim1, Jeong Hwan Park11, Youngmin Kang1,2.
Abstract
Prostate cancer is one of the major causes of cancer-related deaths among men globally. Medicinal plants have been explored as alternative treatment options. Herein, we assessed the in vitro cytotoxic effects of 70% ethanolic root extracts of six-month-old micropropagated Prunus africana (PIR) on PC-3 prostate cancer cells as an alternative to the traditionally used P. africana stem-bark extract (PWS) treatment. In vitro assays on PC-3 cells included annexin-V and propidium iodide staining, DAPI staining, and caspase-3 activity analysis through western blotting. PC-3 cells were exposed to PWS and PIR at different concentrations, and dose-dependent antiprostate cancer effects were observed. PC-3 cell viability was determined using CCK-8 assay, which yielded IC50 values of 52.30 and 82.40 μg/mL for PWS and PIR, respectively. Annexin-V and PI staining showed dose-dependent apoptosis of PC-3 cells. Significant (p < 0.001) percent of DAPI-stained apoptotic PC-3 cells were observed in PWS, PIR, and doxorubicin treatment compared with the negative control. PWS treatment substantially elevated cleaved caspase-3 levels in PC-3 cells compared with the PIR treatment. These results provide evidence for the antiprostate cancer potential of PIR and sets a basis for further research to enhance future utilization of roots of young micropropagated P. africana for prostate cancer treatment as an alternative to stem bark. Moreover, micropropagation approach may help provide the required raw materials and hence reduce the demand for P. africana from endangered wild population.Entities:
Year: 2022 PMID: 35116070 PMCID: PMC8807049 DOI: 10.1155/2022/8232851
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evid Based Complement Alternat Med ISSN: 1741-427X Impact factor: 2.629
Figure 1Prunus africana samples used in the experiment: (a) wild P. africana stem bark (PWS); (b) juvenile stem bark from cloned P. africana plant (PIS); (c) juvenile roots from cloned P. africana plant (PIR); (d) juvenile leaves from cloned P. africana plant (PIL); (e) in vitro callus from leaf explant (PC); (f) wild stem bark powder; (g) juvenile stem bark powder from cloned P. africana plant; (h) juvenile root powder from cloned P. africana plant; (i) juvenile leaves powder from cloned P. africana plant; (j) callus powder.
Figure 2Finger-printing analysis of the extracts derived from P. africana by the HPLC-DAD method. PWS, mature P. africana stem bark; PIS, stem bark of juvenile cloned P. africana; PIR, root of juvenile cloned P. africana; PIL, leaves of juvenile cloned P. africana; PIC, callus generated from leaf explant of P. africana. Part I: retention part, 15–20 min; Part II: retention part, 40–45 min.
Figure 3GC/MS chromatogram of the methanol extract of sample PWS.
Phytochemical components detected in the methanol extract of P. africana experimental materials by GC/MS analysis. t: retention time (min); %: percent of total.
| No. | Identified compound | PWS | PIS | PIR | PIL | PC | |||||
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
|
| %2 |
| % |
| % |
| % |
| % | ||
| 1 | 3-Furanmethanol | 5.96 | 0.39 | — | — | — | — | 5.97 | 0.16 | 5.97 | 0.79 |
| 2 | Dihydroxyacetone | 7.01 | 2.22 | 6.96 | 0.72 | — | — | 7.01 | 0.62 | 7.10 | 1.31 |
| 3 | Benzoic acid, methyl ester | 12.83 | 0.46 | — | — | — | — | 8.11 | 0.35 | — | — |
| 4 | 4H-Pyran-4-one,2,3-dihydro-3,5-dihydroxy-6-methyl- | 13.95 | 1.13 | 13.95 | 0.63 | 13.94 | 0.66 | 9.19 | 0.06 | 14.00 | 2.87 |
| 5 | Benzoic acid | 14.68 | 14.02 | 14.60 | 3.10 | 14.55 | 1.83 | 12.83 | 0.15 | 14.48 | 0.71 |
| 6 | Catechol | 15.17 | 4.74 | — | — | 15.17 | 0.32 | 13.97 | 0.80 | — | — |
| 7 | 4-Vinylphenol | 15.61 | 0.77 | 15.62 | 0.65 | 15.63 | 0.80 | 14.99 | 6.79 | — | — |
| 8 | 5-Hydroxymethyl-2-furaldhyde | 15.81 | 0.31 | 15.81 | 0.81 | 15.81 | 0.11 | 15.20 | 0.80 | 16.03 | 24.79 |
| 9 | Isosorbide | 17.10 | 0.98 | — | — | — | — | 15.62 | 1.66 | — | — |
| 10 | Phenol, 2,6-dimethoxy- | 18.39 | 0.41 | — | — | 18.39 | 0.04 | 15.83 | 0.32 | — | — |
| 11 | 4-Hydroxy-3-methoxybenzaldehyde | 19.30 | 0.41 | 25.03 | 0.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 12 | 3,4-Altrosan | 20.84 | 3.30 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 13 | Mandelamide | 21.54 | 0.40 | — | — | — | — | 21.64 | 1.41 | — | — |
| 14 | Vanillic acid | 22.13 | 0.93 | — | — | 22.12 | 0.78 | — | — | — | — |
| 15 | Benzenepropanol, 4-hydroxy-3-methoxy- | 23.61 | 2.14 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 16 | Benzaldehyde, 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy- | 23.83 | 0.75 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 17 | 4-(Hydroxymethyl)-2,6-dimethoxyphenol | 24.57 | 0.17 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 18 | (E)-4-(3-Hydroxyprop-1-en-1-yl)-2-methoxyphenol | 25.03 | 0.18 | 25.03 | 0.14 | 25.03 | 0.10 | 25.05 | 0.38 | — | — |
| 19 | 6-Hydroxy-5-trifluoromethylcyclohexa-1,3-diene | 25.98 | 3.65 | — | — | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 20 | Benzoic acid, 4-hydroxy-3,5-dimethoxy- | 26.13 | 0.29 | 26.12 | 0.08 | 26.20 | 0.13 | — | — | — | — |
| 21 | Isopropyl myristate | 26.31 | 0.40 | 26.31 | 0.15 | — | — | — | — | — | — |
| 22 | Sorbitol | 27.95 | 0.05 | 27.00 | 0.09 | 29.62 | 5.75 | 29.82 | 2.88 | — | — |
| 23 | n-Hexadecanoic acid | 28.21 | 4.95 | 28.22 | 2.34 | 28.22 | 3.72 | 28.24 | 1.52 | 28.23 | 3.18 |
| 24 | 9,12-Octadecadienoic acid (Z, Z)- | 30.51 | 0.20 | 30.52 | 0.79 | 30.52 | 0.64 | 30.57 | 0.88 | 30.52 | 0.21 |
| 25 | Oleic acid | 30.58 | 0.76 | 30.60 | 0.99 | — | — | — | — | 30.60 | 1.72 |
| 26 | Octadecanoic acid | 30.87 | 0.47 | 30.87 | 0.66 | — | — | 30.89 | 0.58 | 30.88 | 0.69 |
| 27 | Benzyl, beta-d-glucoside | 31.90 | 0.32 | 31.90 | 0.17 | — | — | 32.05 | 0.28 | 31.97 | 0.16 |
| 28 | 9-Octadecenamide, (Z)- | 33.35 | 1.95 | 33.35 | 0.80 | 33.35 | 1.05 | 33.36 | 0.33 | 33.35 | 0.59 |
| 29 | (R)-alpha-(beta-D-glucopyranosyloxy)benzene-acetonitrile | 35.10 | 6.60 | — | — | 35.10 | 1.91 | — | — | — | — |
| 30 | 13-Docosenamide, (Z)- | 37.88 | 6.49 | 37.88 | 6.76 | 37.88 | 4.53 | 37.88 | 0.93 | 37.87 | 1.07 |
| 31 | Squalene | 38.38 | 1.09 | — | — | — | — | 38.40 | 5.34 | — | — |
| 32 | Beta-sitosterol | 43.55 | 8.37 | 43.57 | 16.77 | 43.56 | 7.75 | 43.56 | 4.76 | 43.55 | 4.02 |
Figure 4Multivariate statistical analysis of different samples obtained from in vitro regenerated and wild Prunus africana plants. (a) TANGO FT-NIR spectroscopy analysis results (wave number frequency range = 12,000–4,000 cm−1). (b). FT-NIR chemical characterization based on Ward's algorithm clustering dendrogram (data preprocessing-first derivative + vector normalization; standard (Euclidean distance); frequency range = 12,000–4,000 cm−1). PIC, P. africana callus sample; PIR, root sample obtained from in vitro regenerated P. africana plant; PIL, leaf sample obtained from in vitro regenerated P. africana plant; PWS, stem sample obtained from mature wild P. africana plant; PIS, stem sample obtained from in vitro regenerated P. africana plant.
Figure 5CCK-8 assay of PC-3 cells viability when exposed for 48 h at different concentrations of PWS and PIR samples. Results were expressed as percentage of cell viability and each point expressed as mean ± SD (N = 3). IC50 values are calculated by using GraphPad Prism software.
Figure 6Apoptosis assay of PC-3 cells after 48 h treatment with PWS and PIR samples. (a) Apoptosis levels after annexin-V and PI staining of treated PC3-cells. (b) Apoptosis levels of treated PC-3 cells by flow cytometry (FACS) after annexin-V and PI staining (the upper left quadrant indicates necrotic cells (annexin V (−)/PI (+)), the upper right quadrant indicates late apoptotic cells (annexin V (+)/PI (+)), lower right quadrant indicates early apoptotic cells (annexin V (+)/PI (−)), and the lower left quadrant indicates healthy cells (annexin V (−)/PI (−)). (c) Dead cells of treated PC-3 cells when stained with trypan blue.
Figure 7Changes in PC-3 cells nuclear condensation observed after DAPI staining when treated with PWS (52.30 μg/ml) or PIR (82.40 μg/ml), vehicle (0.1% DMSO), and doxorubicin (1.13 uM) as a positive control and incubated for 48 h. Representative image and percentage of apoptotic cells were shown. p < 0.001 compared with vehicle-treated controls.
Figure 8Western blot analysis of PC-3 after 48 h treatment with PWS and PIR samples.