Parental Separation and Semen Quality in Young Men: A Population-Based Cohort Study.

PURPOSE: Parental separation may be a stressful life event with the potential to influence hormonal regulation of offspring reproductive health and thereby affect semen quality in young men. We aimed to study the association between parental separation in pregnancy or in childhood and semen quality in young men and to study whether the timing of parental separation in childhood was important. PATIENTS AND METHODS: We conducted a follow-up study of 1058 young men born 1998-2000 from the Fetal Programming of Semen Quality (FEPOS) cohort nested within the Danish National Birth Cohort. Data on parental separation were obtained longitudinal by self-report. Parental separation in pregnancy was dichotomized, and parental separation in childhood was both dichotomized and categorized according to the timing of parental separation (from birth, from early childhood (0-5 years), and from late childhood (6-10 years)). Semen volume, concentration, total sperm count, motility, morphology, and testes volume were analysed using multivariable negative binomial regression models.
RESULTS: Parental separation in pregnancy was not associated with semen quality. The association between parental separation in childhood and semen quality differed with the timing of parental separation. Parental separation from birth was associated with higher semen volume of 25%, 95% CI (-5; 64); higher total sperm count of 62%, 95% CI (-6; 179); and higher proportion of morphologically normal spermatozoa of 59%, 95% CI (20; 111). Parental separation in early childhood was associated with lower semen volume of -14%, 95% CI (-24; -3); lower concentration of -15%, 95% CI (-28; 1); lower total sperm count of -17%, 95% CI (-32; 2) and lower testes volume of -11%, 95% CI (-18; -3).
CONCLUSION: The timing of parental separation was important, and parental separation from birth was associated with higher semen quality, and parental separation in early childhood was associated with lower semen quality.

Introduction

Poor male reproductive health is a concern in developed countries,1–3 and a prenatal origin has been suggested.2–4 Prenatal factors can interfere with intrauterine reproductive organ development and development and maturation of the hypothalamic-pituitary-gonadal (HPG) axis, which could possibly affect semen quality in the young men.5,6

Parental separation in pregnancy, or single motherhood, may induce maternal stress.7 Maternal stress has been suggested to introduce epigenetic changes in fetal DNA, to affect the hypothalamic-pituitary-adrenal (HPA) axis8 and to influence the fetal hormonal environment.9 This may potentially disturb reproductive health in male offspring.9,10 Stress due to bereavement11 and other stressful life events in pregnancy12 has been associated with poor male reproductive health; however, parental separation in pregnancy has not been studied yet.

Parental separation in childhood may be a major stressful life event for all family members, including the children.13–15 Research highlights the importance of addressing the timing of parental separation16 and in general, preschool children may be more susceptible towards stress following parental separation.17,18 Long-term consequences may arise due to hormonal changes and elevated cortisol levels following chronic augmentation of the HPA axis.19,20 This increased HPA axis activity may in turn suppress the HPG axis, since these interact,21 and may thereby influence semen quality due to its effect on spermatogenesis.10

The experience of stressful life events in childhood have been suggested to be associated with low semen quality22; however, parental separation has not been studied yet. In Denmark and in other Western countries, parental separation affects up to 50% of all children,23 highlighting the need to investigate potential long-term consequences hereof. We aimed to investigate whether parental separation in pregnancy or in childhood was associated with semen quality in young men from a large population-based cohort, and whether the timing of parental separation in childhood was important. We hypothesized that parental separation is associated with lower semen quality.

Materials and Methods

This cohort study is based on the Fetal Programming of Semen Quality (FEPOS) cohort,24 a sub-cohort within the Danish National Birth Cohort (DNBC).25

In the DNBC, pregnant women were invited to provide information on health behavior and medical history in the first trimester through a computer-assisted telephone interview. A follow-up questionnaire for the child to complete under parental guidance was mailed to the mothers, when the child was 11 years.25 The questionnaires can be found at .

Young men were eligible for invitation to the FEPOS cohort, if their mothers had completed the first and second interviews in the DNBC and had a gestational blood sample available in the Danish national biobank. The men were eligible if they were at least 18 years and 9 months old and lived in the area of Aarhus or Copenhagen. During the recruitment period from March 2017 to December 2019, a total of 21,623 men were eligible for participation. Of those, 5,697 men were randomly and consecutively invited to participate using their personal and secure digital mailbox “e-Boks” (Figure 1). The men were encouraged to decline participation, if they had only one or no testes in the scrotum, or if they had undergone sterilization, orchidectomy, or chemotherapy. After providing informed consent, the men completed an online questionnaire on health behavior and medical history, participated in a clinical examination, and provided a semen sample. In total, 1,058 men participated (19%). A detailed description of the recruitment and inclusion can be found in the cohort profile.24

Figure 1

Flowchart on the inclusion of participants in the fetal programming of semen quality (FEPOS) cohort, nested within the Danish National Birth Cohort, Denmark, 1998–2019.

Parental Separation

Information on parental separation in pregnancy was obtained from the first trimester interview within the DNBC. The pregnant women were asked, if they had a cohabiting spouse or partner. Cohabiting women were assigned to the unexposed group, and non-cohabiting women to the exposure group of parental separation in pregnancy.

Information on parental separation in childhood was obtained from the 11-year follow-up questionnaire completed by a subset (n = 702 (66%)) of the children within the FEPOS cohort. The children were asked to report on parental cohabitation, including current and previous cohabitation status of their parents and their own age at parental separation. We excluded children experiencing death of a parent (n = 6) to avoid pooling of stress due to parental separation with bereavement due to death of a parent.15 Children living with both parents until 11 years of age were assigned to the reference category of no parental separation. For the dichotomous exposure categorization, all other children were assigned to the exposure category of parental separation in childhood.

To address the timing of parental separation in relation to the specific health consequences under investigation,15,16 we further categorized the exposure category of parental separation in childhood according to what was previously seen for parental separation relative to timing of pubertal development.26 If the children stated that their parents never lived together, they were assigned to the exposure category parental separation from birth. If they stated that their parents separated between the ages of 0–5 years, the children were assigned to the exposure category parental separation in early childhood. If they stated that their parents separated between the ages of 6–10 years, the children were assigned to the exposure category parental separation in late childhood.

It was not possible to combine the categorized parental separation in childhood exposure groups with the parental separation in pregnancy exposure group, due to incomplete overlap. Some participants reporting parental separation in pregnancy did not have available data on parental separation in childhood (n = 7 (32%)), and some did not report parental separation from birth (n = 5 (23%)), potentially reflecting that the parents might have moved in with each other between the pregnancy interview and the birth. Therefore, parental separation in pregnancy and in childhood were investigated as two separate exposures (Figure 1).

Semen Quality and Testes Volume

Semen samples were collected at home or at the research facility in a pre-weighed sample container. Prior to sample collection, participants were instructed to be abstinent for at least 48–72 hours. All semen quality measures were analysed according to recommendations from World Health Organization.27 All measures were quality controlled and met given standards for semen quality measures.24

Semen volume was estimated by weighing of the sample. Motility and sperm concentration were assessed manually in duplicates after liquefaction, by one of two experienced biomedical laboratory technicians in Aarhus or Copenhagen. Concentration was calculated after standard sperm dilution and counting. Motility was assessed as proportions of progressive (PR), non-progressive (NP) and immotile (IM) spermatozoa. In the statistical analyses, we modelled NP + IM in percentage to ensure optimal model fit. Total sperm count was calculated by multiplying concentration and volume. Morphology, measured as the proportion of strictly normal spermatozoa, was analysed at the Centre of Reproductive Medicine in Malmö, Sweden. At least 200 spermatozoa were assessed in each ejaculate, and abnormalities were recorded for all four regions of the spermatozoa.24 Testes volume was self-assessed by the young men using a Prader Orchidometer, which previously have been found to be valid.28

Covariates

All covariates were identified a priori by use of existing literature and Directed Acyclic Graphs.29 We included maternal socioeconomic status, first trimester smoking, and age at delivery. In our sub-analyses, we further included information on unplanned pregnancy (yes, no). Due to marked collinearity with the exposure categories, this variable was not included in the main analyses. Age at delivery was obtained from the Danish Medical Birth Registry, a nationwide register that holds information on all births in Denmark.30 Information on unplanned pregnancy and first trimester smoking was obtained from the DNBC first trimester interview, as was socioeconomic status, which was defined according to occupation and level of education derived from the International Standard Class of Occupation and Education codes (ISCO-88 and ISCED).

Variables expected to be strongly associated with semen quality were also included in the multivariable models to improve precision.31 We included place of semen sample collection (at home or the clinic), interval from ejaculation to motility analysis (in minutes), spillage of semen sample (yes, no), and abstinence time (in days). Information on all precision variables were obtained at the clinical examination. As we were interested in the total effect of parental separation on semen quality and testicular volume, we did not include sons’ own health behavior in the analyses, as this was considered potential mediating factors.

Statistical Analysis

Baseline characteristics were reported as numbers and percentages or means and standard deviations (SD) according to parental separation in pregnancy and to parental separation in childhood. Semen quality characteristics were reported as 10th, 50th and 90th pseudo percentiles, also according to categories of parental separation. Pseudo percentiles were calculated as the mean of the five values nearest to the actual percentile to comply with local regulations (GDPR, Regulation (EU), 2016/679 of 25 May 2018), which state that a single value corresponding to a single participant may not be reported.

The negative binomial distribution fitted data well compared to other distributions and transformations. Therefore, the data was analysed using a multivariable negative binomial regression model fitted by maximum likelihood estimation (STATA’s -nbreg- package). Crude and adjusted mean ratios of semen quality measures according to exposure groups were estimated with 95% confidence intervals (CI). Based on these ratios, relative percentage differences were calculated as follows: (ratio – 1) × 100%.

All models were adjusted for the selected maternal characteristics and precision variables. Since information on potential confounding variables was available for all participants, complete case analyses were conducted. Maternal age and abstinence time were modelled as second-order polynomials to allow for non-linearity.32 Participants, who reported spillage during sample collection (n = 186), were excluded from the models examining volume and total sperm count. In the remaining models, spillage (yes, no) was adjusted for. Time from ejaculation to motility analysis was applied only in models examining motility.

Selection weights were applied to account for potential selection bias due to non-participation.33 In short, a logistic regression model was fitted with participation as the dependent variable and parental separation in addition to the selected covariates potentially associated with participation as explanatory variables. The inverse of the model-based predicted probability of participation was used as the selection weight in all models. See for a detailed description. To account for the use of selection weights and clustering of siblings, robust standard errors were applied in all analyses.

The negative binomial regression models were checked by comparing the observed distributions against the model-based distributions using Q-Q plots. Then, standardized deviance residuals were plotted against model-based predictions. The data check did not raise concerns about model fit (data not shown). Data management and statistical analyses were conducted in STATA 16.1 (StataCorp, College Station, TX).

Ethics

This study was conducted in accordance with the Declaration of Helsinki. All participants provided a written informed consent at enrolment. The Committee for Biomedical Research Ethics in Denmark has approved data collection in the DNBC ((KF) 01-471/94). The establishment of the FEPOS cohort was approved by the Scientific Research Ethics Committee for Copenhagen and Frederiksberg (No. H-16015857) and the Danish Data Protection Agency (P-2019-503). The data collection was approved by the Danish Data Protection Agency (2012-41-0379 and 2015-57-0002) and the Steering Committee of the DNBC (Ref. no. 2016-08). This particular study was approved by the Steering Committee of the DNBC (Ref. no. 2019-21).

Results

Of the 1,058 FEPOS participants, 22 men (2%) were exposed to parental separation in pregnancy (Table 1), while 160 men (23%) were exposed to parental separation in childhood (Table 2). Mothers of men exposed to separation in pregnancy or in childhood were more likely to report smoking and to have lower socioeconomic status in the first trimester. The participants had a median age of 19 years and 2 months (range 18 years and 10 months to 21 years and 4 months). Among non-participants, 2% were exposed to parental separation in pregnancy, and 22% were exposed to parental separation in childhood (data not in table).

Table 1

Baseline Characteristics. Maternal and Semen Quality Characteristics According to Parental Separation in Pregnancy Among 1058 Young Men from FEPOS, Denmark, 1998–2019

	Parental Separation				Missing Values
	Yes		No
	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%
	22	2.1	1,036	97.9
Maternal characteristics
Maternal age at delivery; mean years (SD)	31.5 (4.8)		30.5 (4.1)		<5a	0.5
Maternal social class; n(%)					0	0.0
High-/low-grade professional	5	22.7	704	68.0
Skilled/unskilled worker	8	36.4	292	28.2
Student/economically inactive	9	40.9	40	3.8
Smoking 1. trimester; n(%)					0	0.0
0 cigarettes/day	7	31.8	808	78.0
1–10 cigarettes/day	>10	>45.5	194	18.7
>10 cigarettes/day	<5a	<22.7	34	3.28
Unplanned pregnancy; n(%)					6	0.6
No	6	27.3	871	84.1
Yes	16	72.7	159	15.4
Precision variables
Abstinence time; mean days (SD)	2.1 (0.9)		2.3 (1.5)		5	0.5
0–2 days; n(%)	7	31.8	359	34.7
>2 days; n(%)	15	68.2	672	64.9
Place of semen sample collection; n(%)					10	1.0
At home	<5a	<22.7	134	12.9
In the clinic	>17	>77.3	892	86.1
Spillage; n(%)					9	0.9
Yes	<5a	<22.7	181	17.5
No	>17	>77.3	846	81.7
Interval ejaculation - analysis; mean min (SD)	53.0 (17.5)		49.9 (19.5)		12	1.2
0–60 min; n(%)	13	59.1	773	74.6
>60 min; n(%)	9	40.9	251	24.2

Notes: aDue to local data regulations, it is not allowed to report numbers smaller than five, why the numbers in the table have been changed to mask the numbers smaller than five.

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation.

Table 2

Baseline Characteristics. Maternal and Semen Quality Characteristics According to Parental Separation in Childhood Among 696 Young Men from FEPOS, Denmark, 1998–2019

	Parental Separation				Missing Values
	Yes		No
	No.	%	No.	%	No.	%
	160	23.0	536	77.0
Maternal characteristics
Maternal age at delivery; mean years (SD)	30 (4.4)		30.5 (4.0)		<5a	0.7
Maternal social class; n(%)					0	0.0
High-/low-grade professional	94	60.2	371	69.2
Skilled/unskilled worker	55	33.1	139	25.9
Student/economically inactive	11	6.6	26	4.9
Smoking 1. trimester; n(%)					0	0.0
0 cigarettes/day	108	66.9	442	82.5
1–10 cigarettes/day	44	27.7	81	15.1
> 10 cigarettes/day	8	5.4	13	2.4
Unplanned pregnancy; n(%)					<5a	0.7
No	119	74.4	<470	<87.7
Yes	41	25.6	<66	<12.3
Precision variables
Abstinence time; mean days (SD)	2.2 (1.2)		2.4 (1.6)		<5a	0.7
0–2 days; n(%)	59	36.9	186	34.7
>2 days; n(%)	<101	<63.1	<350	<65.3
Place of semen sample collection; n(%)					8	1.2
At home	<28	<17.5	<68	<12.7
In the clinic	132	82.5	468	87.3
Spillage; n(%)					8	1.2
Yes	<26	<16.3	<108	<20.1
No	134	83.8	428	79.9
Interval ejaculation - analysis; mean min (SD)	51.3 (20.7)		50.0 (19.4)		6	0.9
0–60 min; n(%)	109	68.1	407	75.9
>60 min; n(%)	<51	31.9	<129	<24.1

Notes: aDue to local data regulations, it is not allowed to report numbers smaller than five, why the numbers in the table have been changed to mask the numbers smaller than five.

Abbreviations: SD, standard deviation.

Parental Separation in Pregnancy

Parental separation in pregnancy was not associated with semen quality (Table 3, Figure 2 and ). Adjusted associations pointed towards both higher (eg, semen volume of 13%, 95% CI (−6; 36)) and lower (eg, semen concentration of −13%, 95% CI (−42, 30)) semen quality in exposed compared to unexposed men.

Table 3

Descriptive Statisticsa. Semen Quality Characteristics and Testes Volume According to (A) Parental Separation in Pregnancy; (B) Parental Separation in Childhood; and (C) Parental Separation According to Timing of Parental Separation in Childhood in Young Men from FEPOS, Denmark, 2017–2019

A.

Parental Separation in Pregnancy (n = 1058)

Missing Values

Yes

No

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

22

2.1

1,036

97.9

Volume (mL)b

2.9 (1.5–4.8)

2.7 (1.3–4.7)

192

18

Concentration (mill/mL)

34 (6–98)

39 (8–113)

6

0.6

Total sperm count (mill)b

96 (20–336)

102 (18–338)

192

18

Progressive motility (PR %)c

65 (47–77)

63 (41–80)

23

2.2

Morphology (% normal)c

8.4 (1.0–13.4)

6.0 (1.0–13.0)

29

2.7

Average testicular volume (mL)

19 (8–24)

15 (9–24)

<5d

0.5

B.

Parental Separation in Childhood (n = 696)

Yes

No

Missing Values

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

160

23

536

77

Volume (mL)b

2.5 (1.4–4.5)

2.7 (1.3–4.9)

134

19

Concentration (mill/mL)

37 (5–90)

39 (8–112)

<5d

0.7

Total sperm count (mill)b

96 (12–324)

102 (18–349)

134

19

Progressive motility (a %)c

64 (39–81)

62 (38–79)

14

2.0

Morphology (% normal)c

6.0 (1.0–13.0)

6.0 (1.0–13.0)

18

2.6

Average testicular volume (mL)

15 (9–24)

15 (9–25)

<5d

0.5

C.

Parental Separation in Childhood (n = 696)

Yes

Yes

Yes

No

Missing Values

From Birth

In Early Childhood

In Late Childhood

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

No.

%

10

1.4

83

11.9

67

9.6

536

77

Volume (mL)b

3.8 (2.5–4.7)

2.4 (1.3–4.2)

2.6 (1.4–4.6)

2.7 (1.3–4.9)

134

19

Concentration (mill/mL)

40 (26–79)

37 (7–88)

36 (3–110)

39 (8–112)

<5d

0.7

Total sperm count (mill)b

158 (66–300)

92 (13–292)

96 (10–324)

102 (18–349)

134

19

Progressive motility (a %)c

62 (53–68)

64 (37–80)

65 (41–84)

62 (38–79)

14

2.0

Morphology (% normal)c

11.0 (7.2–13.4)

6.0 (1.0–12.5)

5.5 (1.0–13.0)

6.0 (1.0–13.0)

18

2.6

Average testicular volume (mL)

19 (14–23)

14 (8–20)

16 (10–25)

15 (9–25)

<5d

0.5

Notes: aReported as 50th percentile (10th–90th). All percentiles are pseudo percentiles calculated from the average of five values. bExcluding samples from participants reporting spillage. cExcluding samples with azoospermia. dDue to local data regulations, it is not allowed to report numbers smaller than five.

Abbreviations: p10, 10th pseudo percentile; p50, 50th pseudo percentile; p90, 90th pseudo percentile.

Figure 2

Main results for parental separation in pregnancy or in childhood. Relative percentage differences in semen quality and testes volume according to parental separation in pregnancy (square and dark grey (N=1,058)) or in childhood (circle and black (N=696)). Parental separation relatively to no parental separation (vertical line). Adjusted for maternal age at delivery; maternal social class; maternal first trimester smoking; abstinence time; place of semen sample collection (not testes volume); spillage (not testes volume). Motility further adjusted for interval between ejaculation and analysis in minutes. Due to model fit, the figure show results for NP (non-progressive) + IM (immotile) spermatozoa. Therefore, negative estimates represent a higher proportion of progressive motility, and positive estimates represent a lower proportion of progressive motility. Point estimates with 95% confidence intervals are shown to the right.

Parental Separation in Childhood

The dichotomized parental separation in childhood was associated with a tendency towards lower semen quality in exposed men (Table 3), but all confidence intervals included the null (Figure 2 and ). For example, exposed men had lower semen concentration of −12%, 95% CI (−25; 4); and lower total sperm count of −10%, 95% CI (−25; 8) compared to unexposed men.

For the subdivision of parental separation in childhood, parental separation from birth was associated with higher semen quality in exposed compared to unexposed men (Table 3); eg higher semen volume of 25%, 95% CI (−5; 64); higher total sperm count of 62%, 95% CI (−6; 179); and a higher proportion of morphological normal spermatozoa of 59%, 95% CI (20; 111) (Figure 3 and ). In contrast, parental separation in early childhood was associated with lower semen quality (Table 3); eg lower semen volume of −14%, 95% CI (−24; −3); lower semen concentration of −15%, 95% CI (−28; 1); lower total sperm count of −17%, 95% CI (−32; 2); and lower testes volume of −11%, 95% CI (−18; −3) (Figure 3 and ). Parental separation in late childhood was not associated with semen quality (Table 3, Figure 3 and ).

Figure 3

Main results exploring the timing of parental separation in childhood. Relative percentage differences in semen quality and testes volume according to timing of parental separation in childhood (N=696). Parental separation from birth (square and black), in early childhood (circle and dark grey) or in late childhood (triangle and light grey) relatively to no parental separation (vertical line). Adjusted for maternal age at delivery; maternal social class; maternal first trimester smoking; abstinence time; place of semen sample collection (not testes volume); spillage (not testes volume). Motility further adjusted for interval between ejaculation and analysis in minutes. Due to model fit, the figure show results for NP (non-progressive) + IM (immotile) spermatozoa. Therefore, negative estimates represent a higher proportion of progressive motility, and positive estimates represent a lower proportion of progressive motility. Point estimates with 95% confidence intervals are shown to the right.

Sub-Analyses

Overall, the estimates for semen quality did not change essentially with further adjustment for unplanned pregnancy ( and ).

Discussion

Parental separation in pregnancy was not associated with semen quality. Dichotomized parental separation in childhood was associated with a tendency towards lower semen quality, but effect sizes were small and confidence intervals wide and overlapped the null. Parental separation from birth was associated with a tendency towards higher semen quality, whereas parental separation in early childhood was associated with a tendency towards lower semen quality. Though most confidence intervals included the null, the tendencies were evident for all semen quality characteristics and the lack of statistical significance may be a consequence of few exposed participants and hence low-powered analyses, more than suggestive of null-findings.

Strengths and Weaknesses

In this population-based follow-up study, we used information on a large sample of young men from a nation-wide birth cohort.24 The participation rate was relatively low, introducing risk of selection bias. However, the study population was restricted to young men, presumably unaware of their own fertility status. It is therefore unlikely that their participation was associated with semen quality.34 Further, participation was not associated with parental separation, since the proportion of men exposed to parental separation were similar between participants and non-participants. We estimated selection weights to further reduce the risk of selection bias. Hence, the risk of selection bias is considered limited.

Although individual semen samples may vary over time, the within individual variation is not likely to introduce systematic errors, when one semen sample per participant is obtained and analysed.35,36 Though self-assessment of testes volume may be valid, some participants may have underestimated their testes volume.28 This may, however, not introduce systematic bias, as underestimation are likely independent and non-differential with regard to participants’ exposure status. The trained biomedical laboratory technicians were blinded to the participants’ exposure, and therefore potential measurement error on semen quality is non-differential according to the exposure groups, potentially attenuating the observed associations.

Information on parental separation in pregnancy was provided by the mothers in the first trimester interview. This may not apply to the entire pregnancy and in addition may reflect single motherhood and not parental separation. Thus, the parental separation in pregnancy exposure group may include women, who started cohabitation with their partner or spouse later in pregnancy, since only 10 sons reported parental separation from birth, together with women, who chose to establish a family without involving a father. However, less than five men were conceived using a sperm donor, and none of those were exposed to parental separation, either in pregnancy or in childhood.

Information on parental separation in childhood was provided by the children themselves in the 11-year follow-up. Most sons (83%) completed the questions guided by a parent, limiting the risk of misclassifications. However, potential non-differential misclassification may arise in the categorized variable, especially around the introduced cut-offs between exposure groups. This could potentially mix the exposure groups and decrease exposure contrast, but we do not expect it to explain the observed associations.

Overall, information problems when measuring parental separation, semen characteristics and testes volume may give rise to potential information bias, which potentially could lead to bias towards the null.

The potential consequences for reproductive health of parental separation are likely to be modified by the level of family conflicts, shared parenting schedules, future family structures involving a potential stepfamily, potential loss of income, and lower socioeconomic status.16,19 We only measured parental separation and not the individual perceived stress.13 It may be more stressful for some children to live in a conflicted non-separated family environment than going through a parental separation, and therefore the stress levels may not be directly comparable.15 Furthermore, the consequences of parental separation are also likely to be modified by levels of societal support, making our results generalizable to other Western countries with high welfare schemes.23

Interpretation

Parental separation in pregnancy has to our knowledge never been investigated in relation to semen quality in adult sons as the primary focus. One previous study has investigated this as one of several prenatal stressful life events in one combined exposure group.12 The results suggested that maternal stressful life events in early pregnancy was associated with a lower total sperm count and lower progressive motility. In this smaller follow-up study,12 around 5% of the men were exposed due to parental separation or divorce in pregnancy, whereas, eg, death of a relative constituted the exposure for almost 10% of the men. The reported findings may therefore potentially reflect an association with more potent stress-inducing events. First trimester maternal bereavement, assessed as the death of a relative, has previously been suggested to be associated with an increased risk of a composite measure of infertility, congenital malformations of genital organs, or testes cancer. However, when examining infertility in isolation, no associations were observed.11

Further, parental separation in childhood has to our knowledge never been investigated in relation to semen quality. However, in a study examining reproductive development following parental separation, we found that sons exposed to parental separation in childhood entered puberty earlier than their unexposed peers,26 indicating that parental separation may affect reproductive development. Moreover, the current study aligns with other research, suggesting that stressful life events in childhood may impair male reproductive health.10,22

Epigenetic mechanisms may offer a possible explanation for the observed associations. Epigenetic changes, in particular abnormal sperm DNA methylation, have been closely associated with impaired semen quality.37,38 Stress following parental separation in pregnancy might induce such epigenetic alterations.7,8

Telomere length is another potential biomarker of reproductive capability, since telomere shortening has been associated with impaired semen quality.39 Both prenatal stress and parental separation in childhood, father loss due to separation or death and childhood adversities have been associated with shortened telomere length.19,40–42 This offers a possible explanation for the observed associations between parental separation in childhood and semen quality in this study.

Though we had limited power, our results suggested that parental separation from birth might be associated with higher semen quality. Pregnancies in mothers of sons exposed to parental separation from birth were mainly unplanned (80%). An unplanned pregnancy may be a result of a prompt conception likely to follow intercourse with a father with high or at least adequate semen quality, which may be inherited to the son.43,44 However, in the sub-analyses adjusting for unplanned pregnancy, the results did not change essentially, suggesting that our results should be explained by another unknown mechanism. However, the result may also be a chance finding, since only 10 participants were exposed to parental separation from birth.

Conclusion

Our results indicated that parental separation from birth was associated with higher semen quality and parental separation in early childhood was associated with lower semen quality in young men. Due to low statistical power, most confidence intervals included the null. However, the tendencies were evident for all semen quality characteristics, suggesting that the timing of parental separation in childhood was important for the associations with semen quality in this study. Since this is the first study investigating parental separation in relation to adult sons’ semen quality and testes volume, our findings need replication.